Skip to main content

Officials debated White House push to declassify documents amid Trump campaign to sow election mistrust, sources say

(CNN) — Trump administration officials have intensely debated the White House’s push to declassify certain documents related to alleged foreign interference in US elections, a move many see as part of a push by President Donald Trump to sow mistrust in the system and undercut his 2020 loss, according to three sources familiar with the matter.

The declassification process is being run in part by the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, led by former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, sources said. Nunes is working with Kurt Olsen, the White House official who is spearheading broader efforts to try to re-investigate election results in 2020 and examine possible interference by foreign adversaries. John Solomon, a political commentator and journalist, also joined the White House last month to help review and declassify documents.

Agencies involved in the process insisted they are working closely together. An ODNI official told CNN that Bill Pulte, the former housing official recently named as the acting director of national intelligence, has been closely coordinating with CIA Director John Ratcliffe on declassifying material ahead of Trump’s speech. A CIA spokesperson said Ratcliffe “has been forward leaning in support of the President’s transparency effort with Acting Director Pulte.”

CNN has reached out to the White House for comment.

Trump is scheduled to deliver a primetime address Thursday night on foreign efforts to influence elections. The substance of Trump’s speech has been closely held, and advisers have intensely debated what should be included, according to people familiar with the plans.

Olsen had been given access to information from National Security Agency and CIA systems related to the 2020 election, CNN has previously reported. He has been heavily involved behind the scenes in the declassification discussions and planning leading up to Trump’s address.

CIA and NSA officials have been wary of Olsen’s intentions since he was first brought into the Trump administration. Both agencies have provided information about 2020 to Olsen, sources have told CNN, but so far his scope has been limited to that election.

Alongside Trump’s speech, the White House has been weighing whether to release a cache of documents related to, among other topics, China and its role in US elections, people familiar with the matter said. The prospect of declassifying certain information related to Venezuela and China’s alleged election interference efforts was among the topics that officials debated.

During his short tenure as acting DNI, Pulte has “had his head down, focused on declassifications,” one US official said. Trump gave Pulte the mandate to declassify intelligence that Trump claims would validate his longtime and baseless claims that foreign adversaries interfered in the 2020 election, tipping the scale in favor of Joe Biden.

The White House has granted Pulte authority to unilaterally declassify information without approval from or consulting with other US intelligence agencies — including CIA, multiple sources told CNN.

Intelligence agencies and the FBI have spent weeks working to prepare documents related to the US election systems and possible vulnerabilities that have long been known.

Many of the documents are based on intelligence gathered by the National Security Agency, including intercepts that show that China, Russia and other adversaries have sought to collect information on US voters and voting systems.

Not all administration officials are on board with the effort. Some worry declassifying wide swaths of information could provide a muddled picture of American voting security and undermine confidence in elections. And others fear the information could risk jeopardizing intelligence collection methods.

None of the documents gathered are expected to show any indication that breaches compromised results of elections. To carry out any actual impact on voting results, adversaries would need an army of operatives to physically access machines and make changes, according to people familiar with the intelligence. That hasn’t happened.

In 2021, an intelligence report released by the ODNI, at the time led by Ratcliffe, concluded that “we have no indication that any foreign actor attempted to alter any technical aspect of the voting process in the 2020 election, including voter registrations, casting ballots, vote tabulation or reporting results.”

Intelligence agencies have said China obtained US voter records. Some of the same records are available publicly for sale to candidates running campaigns. But the same ODNI report said that “China did not deploy interference efforts and considered but did not deploy influence efforts intended to change the outcome of the U.S. presidential election.”

Ahead of Trump’s Thursday night speech, drafts prepared for the president focused on vulnerabilities in the voting systems, not that any election was hacked, sources said. Ratcliffe and FBI Director Kash Patel are expected to attend the speech.

Patel in recent weeks has ordered the FBI to surge personnel to investigate claims of voting irregularities in Georgia and other states. But inside the FBI, some officials are concerned that the evidence to support opening investigations is thin and mostly rely on reports provided by Olsen and other Trump allies who have been making the same fraud claims since 2020. Audits conducted in Georgia and other states haven’t supported claims of fraud sufficient to have changed the election results.

When the president delivers his remarks Thursday night, several state election officials — including from the 2020 battleground states that were the chief targets of Trump’s ire — will be attending a dinner at Mount Rushmore as part of an annual summer conference for the National Association of Secretaries of State. Some worry that Trump might sow doubt about future elections.

Attendees of the conference shared theories of what he might allege, while game-planning how they might respond.

“We’re very nervous, because we don’t know what he’s going to say,” Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, a Democrat who will take over as NASS’ president at the end of the week, told CNN. “I mean, we can assume that he’s gonna say certain crazy things.”

Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate, a Republican, told CNN he hoped to tune out the speech while at the dinner, but added: “We are getting into a window where I have to caution people who want any kind of major changes in an election process, I think it causes more problems.”

This developing story has been updated.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

French has become a sticking point in the Canada-US trade dispute. Here’s why

(CNN) — As a trade war between the United States and Canada looms following the collapse of talks last week, a key issue has emerged that’s further inflamed tensions between the longtime allies: French language laws.Canada is a bilingual country and has laws protecting both of its official languages: English and French, the first language spoken for roughly one fifth of the population, including nearly 85% of primarily Francophone province of Quebec.Among the laws, product labels must be displayed in both English and French, and US streaming platforms must support and promote Canadian content (including Indigenous and French Canadian content) to audiences north of the border.Canada’s language requirements have long been viewed by the US as a trade barrier but are generally a red line for Ottawa — which Prime Minister Mark Carney enforced by walking away from a deal which he said included “threats to French language and culture.”On Monday, Carney said Canada “could not accept” the proposed deal that would have weakened French language protections, telling reporters that his government “will not give (the US) what they have asked.”Many in Canada have rallied behind Carney’s decision — and particularly his comments about protecting French culture, a core part of Canada’s national identity.After US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer called Ottawa’s concerns about French a “funny, fake story” on Monday, the Canadian leader denied the issue was a laughing matter, saying there is an “enormous gap between our perspective and the US perspective.”“For Americans, French language, Francophone culture, Canadian culture, these are irritants,” Carney said in French at a news conference in Lévis, Quebec.“Here in Quebec, here in Canada, these are rights,” he said, as a group of reporters applauded.President Donald Trump has not directly addressed the French issue but revived old attacks on Canada, calling the country “entitled” and “among the worst Nations in the World to deal with” in a Truth Social post Monday.Since negotiations stalled Friday, the US has imposed 50% tariffs on roughly $20 billion worth of Canadian goods, which Carney said he will match “dollar-for-dollar.” The tit-for-tat measures are set to take effect on September 8.Language rights vital part of Canadian identityLanguage rights have been entrenched in Canada’s constitution for decades and are particularly important to Quebec, which has fought to protect its distinct linguistic and cultural identity in an English-dominated North America.This pursuit has at times put the province at odds with the rest of Canada. Quebec has twice held a referendum on whether to secede from the rest of the country, most recently in a 1995 vote where the “no” side won by a razor-thin margin of just 1.16%.Language laws include everything from the right for Canadians to access official services in both languages to the requirement that hair care companies display the French “shampooing” alongside English text on their bottles.For US companies looking to do business in Canada, this means added barriers as they must redesign packaging and pay extra production costs.Stewart Prest, a lecturer in the Department of Political Science at the University of British Columbia, said asking Canada to bend these rules is “not a reasonable request of the Canadian government in a trade negotiation,” and one Canada has “no choice but to say no to.”“People in Canada speak French. It’s not a country where everybody speaks English, and some people like to dabble in French,” he said. “It is not so different than asking France to relax its requirement that packaging must include French.”It’s common for service workers in Montreal to greet customers with “Bonjour-Hi.”Under any circumstance, it would be incredibly detrimental to Carney, who has built a global profile for standing up to Trump, to bow on an issue so central to Canadian identity, said Stéphanie Chouinard, associate professor of political studies at Royal Military College and Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario.But the matter is particularly acute with Quebec just weeks away from a provincial election where the separatist Parti Québécois is surging in the polls, she said.The party’s leader recently said he would delay a possible independence referendum until Trump’s term ends — but any concession on language laws could “stoke secessionist sentiment” in the province where independence talk has been on the back burner, Chouinard said.At odds with WashingtonQuebec has implemented strict nationalist policies in recent years to reinforce French as the province’s sole language, including through the controversial language law Bill 96, which includes stricter requirements for French on products, appliances, packaging and signage.The legislation was included on the 2025 list of global trade barriers compiled annually by the Office of the US Trade Representative.The US has also expressed concerns about Canada’s Online Streaming Act, which requires online video and music services like Netflix and Spotify to invest in and promote Canadian content.Washington also opposed another streaming regulation, known as Bill 109, passed in Quebec last December, which compels streaming platforms to prioritize French-language content. In March, the US listed the measure as a potential trade barrier in its trade estimate report.Greer, in an interview with CNBC Monday, said the US does not have an issue with the French language but rather what he called a “discriminatory tax on American companies.”“I like the Quebecois, and I like that they speak French. What we don’t like is a situation where Canada’s federal government forces American tech companies to take their earnings and give a percentage to their competitors,” he said.For many in Canada, the dispute raises concerns about American interference with Canada’s national identity.Quebec’s Premier Christine Fréchette said Carney made the right decision to walk away from the negotiating table.“Our culture, our language, is central to our identity, and it is important to exclude that from the negotiation table,” said Fréchette in a news conference, according to CNN newsgathering partner CBC News.“Even though we are threatened with different tariffs, it won’t change. We will stay the way we are.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story