Skip to main content

Judge temporarily blocks Justice Department’s use of evidence in dismissed Comey case

(CNN) — A federal judge on Saturday temporarily locked down the Justice Department’s access to some evidence used in its criminal case against former FBI Director James Comey, just as the Trump administration prepares to seek a new indictment after the dismissal of previous charges early last week.

The judge’s order sets up a fast-moving emergency court proceeding over this week that could exclude key pieces of evidence from any future proceeding against Comey, potentially limiting what prosecutors may present to a grand jury after his previous case was dismissed for different reasons.

The development follows a court challenge from Comey’s friend and former lawyer Dan Richman, who went to court after learning federal investigators may have used unauthorized access to his digital communications to prosecute Comey.

Richman asked for his data to be returned and to block the Justice Department from accessing it without proper warrants. The judge temporarily agreed.

“The Court concludes that Petitioner Richman is likely to succeed on the merits of his claim that the Government has violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures by retaining a complete copy of all files on his personal computer (an ‘image’ of the computer) and searching that image without a warrant,” DC District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly wrote in a four-page ruling.

The court orders the DOJ to “identify, segregate, and secure” an image of Richman’s personal computer made in 2017 as well as his Columbia University email and iCloud accounts, any copy of those files, and “any material obtained, extracted, or derived” from the files currently in the government’s possession.

The judge ordered the Justice Department to certify by Monday that it is complying with the court. Further developments in the disputed evidence are expected this week.

The evidence the Justice Department collected from Richman’s online accounts, iPhone, iPad and a hard drive was becoming a serious issue in the recently dismissed criminal case against Comey in Northern Virginia.

Richman, a Columbia University law professor, called the Justice Department’s access to his files a “callous disregard” of his Fourth Amendment rights.

Saturday’s temporary court restriction also creates the possibility for a judge to dig into the allegations of prosecutorial missteps, which were not fully exposed or litigated in the Comey case before it was dismissed last Monday, or close off evidence prosecutors may want to use as they try to refashion charges against Comey related to his 2020 congressional testimony.

Comey had pleaded not guilty before the charges were dismissed. The indictment alleged he had misled Congress in 2020 on his interactions with Richman. The Alexandria, Virginia, grand jury heard evidence from the Richman files, according to court records.

Virgina federal magistrate judge William Fitzpatrick wrote last month that the original search warrants in the national defense leak investigation known as Arctic Haze didn’t authorize federal investigators to seize evidence related to Comey’s alleged crimes of lying to Congress in his 2020 testimony, the charges for which he was ultimately indicted.

The evidence from Richman was also dormant for years, and the Justice Department hadn’t obtained new warrants to access it again for investigating Comey this year, Fitzpatrick also noted. Comey’s team said they had never had access to the evidence before he was charged.

The Arctic Haze investigation never resulted in a criminal case, and Richman has never been charged.

The Comey criminal case ended abruptly last week with a separate judge’s ruling that Trump-backed lawyer Lindsey Halligan, who had been acting as the US Attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia and solely presented the case to the grand jury in late September, didn’t have prosecutor powers at that time.

The Justice Department has said it planned to appeal the decision voiding Halligan’s work, though that appeal hasn’t been filed yet.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2025 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

‘Maybe we’ll never take it down’: Trump compares White House UFC arena to Eiffel Tower, says it could be permanent

Construction continues on a venue for the upcoming UFC match on the South Lawn of the White House on June 1, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)(WASHINGTON) -- President Donald Trump is floating the possibility of keeping the UFC arena on the White House South Lawn -- built for a series of fights on his birthday and Flag Day -- permanently.In a video posted to his official TikTok account Tuesday evening, Trump sat in the Oval Office and said that the Eiffel Tower in Paris was supposed to be a temporary structure, but that France kept it up -- suggesting that the UFC arena is "quite attractive to a lot of people" so "maybe we'll never ever take it down.""People don't know that in Paris, France, the Eiffel Tower, 1889 it was built. It was supposed to be taken down immediately after the world's fair, and then they said: 'leave it up a little bit longer, and then they said, 'let's leave it up longer and longer and longer,'" Trump said in the video."Well, they never took it down, and you know we're building something in front of the White House that's quite attractive to a lot of people. Really, it's going to have the big UFC fight on June 14, and I'm looking at it and maybe we'll never ever take it down," Trump added.The Eiffel Tower was constructed for the 1889 World Exhibition, and was only meant to stay up for 20 years -- until 1909, according to the Eiffel Tower's website. Yet the tower's architect Gustave Eiffel fought to keep the tower intact, according to the website.The "UFC Freedom Fights 250" will take place on June 14 and feature a lightweight title matchup between undisputed champion Ilia Topuria and interim title holder Justin Gaethje alongside four other fights.The arena is visible from the White House North Lawn, cresting over the historic West Wing and Executive Residence.The White House South Lawn, where the arena is located, is a place often utilized by presidents.Trump and past presidents depart and arrive on Marine One from the lawn ahead of any travel to Joint Base Andrews -- an opportunity for members of the media to shout questions to the president as he moves from the White House to his helicopter. These arrivals and departures have been closed to the press since the week of May 20, when construction on the arena began.Other events, including the White House Easter Egg Roll and the annual Congressional Picnic, which was just held in May, are traditionally hosted on the South Lawn, too.ABC News' Sarah Beth Hensley contributed to this report.Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story