Skip to main content

Avoiding 3 things during middle age may delay dementia risk by 13 years

(CNN) — Avoiding three health factors may delay the odds of developing dementia by about 13 years, a new study has found: type 2 diabetes, smoking and high blood pressure.

Scientific research has long established that these risk factors are three of the strongest for dementia, and that the neurodegenerative disease’s development begins long before symptoms arrive, said Dr. Josef Coresh, senior author of the study that published Wednesday in the journal Neurology Open Access. But Coresh’s new study of more than 12,400 adults quantified how much the combination of these vascular measures in middle age may have influenced when dementia began to set in.

Participants who had those three health hazards when they were, on average, about age 56 were more than twice as likely to develop dementia and more than five times as likely to die prematurely from another cause.

“That’s relatively easy for clinicians to discuss and patients to understand,” said Coresh, founding director of the Optimal Aging Institute at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. For patients, knowing how many more “good years” they can get by making certain lifestyle changes can be more motivating than simply knowing a percentage risk for dementia, Coresh added.

The study only shows an association, not causation, especially since researchers measured participants for high blood pressure, diabetes, smoking and other health factors such as weight just once before following them for a median period of about 26 years. Although brain health was assessed multiple times until 2022 at the latest, many other factors could have changed during that time.

“View the results as an important estimate rather than the exact prediction for every individual,” said Dr. Sanjula Singh, an assistant professor in neurology at Harvard Medical School in Boston, who wasn’t involved in the study.

Cardiologist Dr. Andrew Freeman said the research, which he wasn’t involved in, is “really exciting, and yet it also still calls to action that we need to do a lot more to get people living healthily.”

“One of the things that we’re starting to see a lot of is this concept of health span versus lifespan,” Freeman, director of cardiovascular prevention and wellness at National Jewish Health in Denver, said. “It’s one thing to be alive; it’s another to be alive and well and to avoid the American curse, which is working hard your whole life, saving your money, retiring and then suffering heart attacks, strokes, dementia.”

Lowering your risk for dementia

If you have high blood pressure or type 2 diabetes or want to quit smoking, talk to your doctor, Coresh said.

Hypertension and diabetes share some risk factors, including physical inactivity, obesity, poor diet, alcohol intake and smoking, experts said. Accordingly, preventing or alleviating hypertension and diabetes can partly be done by managing these factors. A lower-fat, plant-based diet such as the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet can work wonders, Freeman said.

You can view the World Health Organization’s recommendations for exercise here. Ensuring you get enough sleep and manage stress is also important.

“The way we live has the most profound impact, and I’m talking about a magnitude that is unachievable by any medication,” Freeman added. About 45% of dementia cases are due to modifiable risk factors, said Singh, also principal investigator at the Brain Care Labs and Global Brain Care Coalition at Massachusetts General Hospital.

When it comes to smoking, quitting must be your own desire for it to be effective, Freeman said. “Once you buy in, there’s a lot of different ways that can help,” he added — including nicotine patches, exercise, lozenges and gums, several medications, therapeutic programs, and acupuncture.

Also remember that smoking is a habit with certain reinforcements and associations, so you may need to also switch up your routine and social circle for at least six months to boost your chances of quitting, Freeman said.

Highlighting more tangible odds

The adults in the new research are from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities cohort study, which has followed nearly 15,800 adults from four communities in the United States since the late 1980s, when participants were between ages 45 and 65. The areas were Forsyth County, North Carolina; Jackson, Mississippi; eight northwestern suburbs of Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Washington County, Maryland. Fifty-six percent of participants in the latest research were women.

Having none of the three risk factors was linked with 30.1 dementia-free years, compared with 17.5 years among those who had the three health risks — hence the nearly 13-year potential delay in risk if participants had managed those health measures.

Women were dementia-free slightly longer than men, and Black participants developed dementia a few years sooner than their White counterparts. By age 85, only 7% of the adults with three risk factors remained dementia-free, compared with 35% of those with no risk factors.

The less healthy participants had a higher body mass index and prevalence of stroke, and lower physical activity and educational attainment. They were also more likely to be Black — potentially explaining the fewer dementia-free years in this group — and to be carriers of the APOE ε4 gene, which is the strongest genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease, the most common form of dementia.

Over time, the three components of concern “can damage blood vessels throughout the body, including those that supply the brain, reducing the delivery of oxygen and nutrients and increasing the risk of stroke and small vessel disease,” Dr. Jacqui Hanley, head of research funding at Alzheimer’s Research UK, said in a statement.

“This damage can make the brain more vulnerable to cognitive decline and dementia,” added Hanley, who wasn’t involved in the study.

Brain health and habits are built from many small, consistent choices over time, Singh said. “Set the goals for yourself. Find friends or family members to keep you accountable or to work out with together.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

GOP lawmakers keep trying to defang voters in their own states

(CNN) — The big headline out of Tuesday’s primaries was the slim victory of former public health official Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan’s Democratic Senate primary — proof that progressives are ascendant in the party, even in a key swing state.But two other results that barely registered in the national news chart another trend in US politics: the increasingly complicated relationship between Republican state legislatures and direct democracy.Voters in Kansas saw through a complicated ideaIn Kansas, voters rejected a proposal placed on the ballot by the state’s GOP-dominated legislature that would have taken the power to appoint state Supreme Court justices away from a merit board and the state’s governor, a Democrat.Instead, the amendment would have given voters power to elect state Supreme Court justices, who have been a thorn in the side of the GOP-dominated legislature. That might sound like voter empowerment, but the longer-term intent was to elect judges opposed to abortion rights so the court might eventually overturn the right to abortion in the state’s constitution, which was affirmed by voters in a 2022 ballot initiative.Bottom line: Anti-abortion rights activists hoped to use this amendment to overrule voters’ decision to uphold abortion rights. But voters understood this and rejected the move.Voters in Missouri protected their powerIn Missouri, voters rejected a measure placed on the ballot by the state’s Republican-dominated legislature that would’ve made it much harder to pass amendments placed on the ballot by citizens gathering signatures.Legislators’ goal was to create a two-tiered system: Constitutional amendments proposed by voters would have had to win in every congressional district in the state to pass, while amendments proposed by the state legislature would still need just a statewide majority.The important additional context is that Missouri’s GOP-dominated government has already drastically gerrymandered the state’s congressional districts to benefit Republicans, including by erasing a Democratic seat earlier this year.Functionally, the change would’ve given conservatives veto power over constitutional amendments proposed by Democrats or progressives, even if they were broadly popular.Missouri voters have routinely crossed their legislatureIt’s not just abortion rights that Missouri voters have endorsed in recent years, frustrating Republican legislators. They also expanded Medicaid and increased the state’s minimum wage.On taxes, Missouri voters on Tuesday rejected the legislature’s request to phase out the state’s income tax and, in theory, replace it with a sales tax, a priority of Republican legislatures elsewhere in the country.Take another look at abortion (but not the congressional maps)Missouri voters will not get the opportunity to weigh in on gerrymandering. The state’s top election official denied a citizen petition signed by hundreds of thousands of voters requesting a statewide vote on congressional districts enacted by the state’s GOP-dominated government. Supporters have promised to fight the decision in court.But voters will be asked to take another look at abortion rights. Missouri’s legislature is asking voters to repeal the citizen-initiated amendment they passed in 2024, but with a tweak, adding in the politically potent issue of banning transgender therapy for people under 18.Gerrymandering, the drawing of legislative maps for partisan gain, is frequently described as politicians picking voters instead of the other way around.Republicans won the redistricting war without input from votersIn fact, Republicans were able to get the upper hand in the unprecedented mid-decade gerrymandering war this year in part because they did not have to consult voters about their plans to erase Democratic districts.In California and Virginia, Democrats redrew maps, but only after consulting voters in statewide referendums, as their laws required. Voters in both states approved the concept of new maps, but only California’s will go into effect. In Virginia, state Supreme Court justices are appointed by the state legislature and a majority made up mostly of justices appointed in years when Republicans controlled the legislature threw the voter-blessed maps out, ruling they did not adhere to a strict process.There are stories like this all over the countryIn Florida, there’s already a supermajority requirement (60%) for citizen-initiated amendments to pass. That’s why, in 2024, solid majorities of voters supported restoring some abortion rights (57.2%) and legalizing cannabis (55.9%), but neither became law.Rather than face such questions again, the state’s GOP-dominated legislature and Gov. Ron DeSantis made it much more difficult and expensive for citizens to add initiatives to the ballot. The new rules, enacted earlier this year, make it a felony to gather more than 25 signatures in support of an initiative without first registering with the state as a petition circulator.When voters are given the opportunity, they tend to uphold abortion rightsIn the 17 states where voters have been asked to weigh in on abortion rights at the state level since Roe v. Wade was overturned, according to KFF, voters have supported abortion rights in all but three instances, in Nebraska and South Dakota, where majorities opposed abortion rights, and in Florida, where the supermajority requirement was not met.Five more abortion-related initiatives are currently expected to appear on statewide ballots in November.Citizen ballot initiatives vs. legislature ballot initiativesIn many of these instances, the divide is between ballot initiatives proposed by citizens and those proposed by the state’s legislature. Citizens have the ability to place initiatives on the ballot in about half of states, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. CNN’s Fredreka Schouten wrote last year about the surge of efforts to put new hurdles in front of these efforts, which are frequently backed by liberal groups who feel locked out of power in red states.South Dakota voters will vote in November on whether to impose a 60% threshold on citizen-initiated ballot initiatives. South Dakota voters will also take another crack at Medicaid. In 2022, South Dakotans voted to expand the program offering health insurance to low-income people, bringing it in line with most of the rest of the country under Obamacare. This year, the legislature is asking the voters to drop that expansion if federal funding drops.Voters don’t always follow the scriptIf the trend is for left-leaning groups to use the initiative process to counter conservative legislatures, there are exceptions. California voters in 2024 narrowly rejected a state law that would have created an $18 per hour minimum wage.An initiative that would have raised the minimum wage in Oklahoma was rejected by voters earlier this year. Supporters of the initiative were frustrated that the state’s leaders moved the question to the June primary rather than the November general election. Voters in most states, given the chance, have supported minimum wage hikes, including in Arkansas and Missouri. Oklahoma’s vote means it will retain the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, the product of a 2007 law. Look for Democrats to try to raise that floor the next time they hold majorities in Congress.Voters, ultimately, hold the power. They could throw out the legislators they disagree with. But that power is muted by gerrymandered legislative maps that feed hyper-partisanship in US politics. It could all get worse if, as expected, the redistricting war restarts next year and politicians do even more to pick their voters instead of the other way around.CNN’s Ethan Cohen contributed to this report.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story