Skip to main content

HHS shutting down Kentucky organ procurement group over safety concerns

(CNN) — The federal government is moving to shut down the organization that manages organ donations in the Kentucky region, US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. announced Wednesday, calling the organization a “bad apple.”

“When an organization entrusted with the gift of life repeatedly puts patients at risk, the federal government has the duty to act, and that’s why we’re acting today,” Kennedy said at a news conference in Lexington.

The group, Louisville-based Network for Hope, said Wednesday that it “strongly disagrees” with the move and will appeal.

Network for Hope has been under federal scrutiny for more than a year, since a whistleblower who worked with an earlier version of the nonprofit told Congress about a case in which staff started to harvest a man’s organs before he was actually dead.

CNN was the first national news organization to speak with the man, TJ Hoover, who survived that experience.

In 2021, Hoover overdosed and was taken to the hospital in cardiac arrest. After being unresponsive for several days, he woke up on the operating table as his chest was being shaved and his body bathed in surgical solution, and he heard staff discussing how they would take his organs, Hoover told his sister. A doctor finally called off the surgery, and Hoover was not operated on.

Earlier in the day, hospital staff had expressed concern that Hoover seemed aware of what was happening and was resisting the procedure, but the organ procurement organization kept “pushing, pushing, pushing to go,” Natasha Miller, a perfusionist who worked with the group at the time, told CNN. The family says they also had not been told that Hoover had regained consciousness and had cried while his body was being prepared.

Hoover now lives with his sister in Richmond, Kentucky, and is undergoing extensive physical therapy and treatment, much of which they share on TikTok in an effort to inspire others.

At the time Hoover’s case came to light, Network for Hope said it had reviewed the case and “remains confident that accepted practices and approved protocols were followed.” It also said the case had been “inaccurately represented,” including by “individuals never involved with this case.”

Hoover and his sister, Donna Rhorer, attended the HHS news conference Wednesday.

“TJ, we are grateful that you’re here, and we’re grateful to those physicians who had the courage to do the right thing,” Kennedy told them. “TJ’s story is a powerful reminder that every safeguard exists for a reason.

“Most organ procurement organizations carry out this work with professional compassion, deep respect for both donors and recipients. Network for Hope repeatedly failed to meet those standards,” he added.

Network for Hope was created in 2024 through the merger of Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates with LifeCenter Organ Donor Network.

Last year, an investigation by the Health Resources and Services Administration into Hoover’s case and other suspected problems with Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates found that of the 351 cases it examined in which organ donation was authorized but ultimately not completed, more than 100 had “concerning features,” including 73 patients with neurological signs that were incompatible with organ donation.

Evidence pointed to poor neurological assessments, a lack of coordination with medical teams, questionable consent practices and misclassification of causes of death, according to HHS.

Network for Hope said at the time that it was “fully committed to transparency” and was in full compliance with all requirements of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which regulates organ donation organizations. “Our goal has always been and will remain to meet the highest ethical and medical standards in donation and transplantation.”

HHS ordered Network for Hope to do its own investigation and asked the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), the private organization that oversees transplants in the US alongside HHS, to figure out why there were so many problems.

“Despite intensive oversight, ongoing monitoring by the OPTN and repeated opportunities for improvement, significant patient safety concerns remained,” Thomas Engels, administrator of the Health Resources and Services Administration, said Wednesday. “I want to emphasize, even though the action that the secretary is announcing today, care will still be offered to the patients that are served by this organization.”

Network for Hope CEO Barry Massa said Wednesday that the group “is compliant with all OPTN policies. … Under HRSA’s oversight, organ donation went down for the first time in 14 years. As a result, more than 3,000 people waiting for a life-saving organ transplant will be negatively impacted by the decision announced today.”

Network for Hope is one of 55 nonprofit organ procurement organizations (OPOs) that manage the logistical part of the United States’ organ donation system. The organization coordinated organ donations for nearly 7 million people, covering the entire commonwealth of Kentucky as well as counties in southern Indiana, Ohio and West Virginia. It’s the nation’s 16th largest, according to its website, with more than 300 employees.

Organ donations in the US are directly managed by OPOs, nonprofits that deploy staff to local hospitals. Those staff help determine whether organs are viable for transplant, make matches between donors and recipients, work directly with families of the deceased and manage the physical transfer of organs to the recipient.

OPOs have come under strict scrutiny in recent years amid accusations that they haven’t provided the kind of care expected of such organizations. Trust in such networks is key, experts say, because the nation’s organ donation system relies on volunteer donors who often sign up when they are applying for a driver’s license.

As of 2022, about 170 million people in the US have signed up to donate their organs, but there is always more demand than there are organs available, and less than 1% of donors end up meeting the specific medical criteria to actually donate.

Last year, there were more than 48,000 transplants in the US, but more than 103,000 people were on waiting lists, with another person being added to the list every 8 minutes. About 17 people in the United States die every day waiting for a transplant, according to the Health Resources and Services Administration.

There have been several federal investigations into the country’s organ donation system, but there has been little action to remedy the problems, according to a Government Accountability Office report published in January.

A federal investigation found that mismanagement in the donor system can sometimes result in organs being thrown away, being mishandled or even going missing. About 28,000 donated organs go unused because of inefficiencies in the system, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

An investigation by the House Ways and Means Committee found fraud, waste and abuse in the OPO system in general, including “questionable” and “troubling” practices such as interfering with the decision to declare someone dead. A death declaration is the sole responsibility of the hospital caring for the patient, not the organization that procures the person’s organs.

In September, HHS moved to shut down another OPO that managed organ donations in the Miami area. An investigation found that Life Alliance Group, an organization working with the University of Miami, had problems with chronic understaffing, safety concerns and underperformance that HHS said resulted in the loss of several opportunities to harvest organs from viable donors.

At the time, Kennedy directed all OPOs to have an Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network patient safety officer to oversee patient safety so any events could be investigated in real time.

Kentucky passed its own organ transplant safety law, which went into effect in July, allowing any staff involved in the transplant process to stop the procedure if they have questions or concerns. The law also clarifies that donor consent to having organs harvested must be properly documented, and it spells out that a patient must be formally declared dead before their organs can be removed.

Rhorer said at the news conference Wednesday that when the hospital sent her brother home, they told her to make him comfortable because he wouldn’t live long – but that was five years ago.

“We’re barely scraping by. My life is taking care of my brother, and it wears me out sometimes. But this isn’t just about TJ. Families deserve confidence that every patient is treated safely and every safeguard is followed,” she said.

“If we don’t act, this will happen again,” she added. “I will keep fighting until the people responsible are held accountable so no other family has to live what we’re living here.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Why is there fighting in Yemen and what does it mean for the Iran war?

(CNN) — The Middle East war is widening as Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels launch a spate of attacks on United States’ allies and close yet another key shipping waterway.One of the strongest Iran-backed militias in the region, the Houthis entered the war in March, a month after Israel and the US attacked Iran, by firing missiles towards Israel. Today, the group is trading fire with Yemen’s internationally recognized government, and striking Saudi Arabia after a four-year de facto ceasefire with the kingdom.The escalation comes while there is shaky maritime security in both the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea, and as Iran and the US give conflicting accounts of whether direct talks to reopen the waterway were taking place.The latest attacks also raise the threat of an outbreak of another full-scale war in Yemen. The last war, which began in 2014, left the country facing the world’s worst humanitarian crisis.Here’s what we know about the escalation and how it might impact the US-Iran war.Why is there fighting in Yemen?The war in Yemen dates back over a decade, and is primarily a conflict between the Houthi rebels and a Saudi-led coalition backing the internationally recognized government.The Houthis belong to Yemen’s Zaidi Shia Muslim minority and are formally known as Ansar Allah – “Partisans of God.” After the Arab Spring in 2011, they seized a northern province and later the capital Sanaa, which they still hold, along with much of Yemen’s Red Sea coastline.In the process they became part of Iran’s “Axis of Resistance,” a network of allied militant groups across the region, receiving weapons and technology.US-allied Saudi Arabia spent seven years trying and failing to dislodge the Houthis from northern Yemen, launching a large-scale offensive against the militant group in 2015. The ensuing conflict provoked one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises.A truce was arranged in 2022, but it never became a peace. In the same year, Yemen’s internationally recognized government, operating under the Saudi-backed Presidential Leadership Council (PLC), was established in Saudi Arabia. Riyadh has worked to prop up the government with air and naval operations, as well as limited troop deployment.Since then, Saudi Arabia maintained an economic and air blockade against Houthi-controlled area, which the group has sought to break in recent weeks.Why has the conflict erupted again?Despite efforts to stay clear of the conflict, Saudi Arabia has been dragged into the war. Riyadh faced a barrage of missiles during the war and continues to face attacks from Iran-backed groups in Iraq and the Houthis in Yemen.The Houthis have particularly risen as a menace to Saudi Arabia, targeting oil tankers and imposing a blockade on Saudi shipping in a critical maritime trade route, the Bab al-Mandeb Strait located at the base of the Red Sea.Experts say that the Yemeni rebel group saw an opportunity to regain some of its losses during the Iran war. While its values are linked to those of Iran, they do have their own reasons to fight with Saudi Arabia.Danny Citrinowicz, former head of the Iran branch of Israeli military intelligence, said Saudi Arabia’s conflict with the Houthis is far from over, adding that the group has appeared to cross a key threshold.“At the heart of Riyadh’s problem is the fact that the Houthis appear to have crossed a political and military threshold: they are no longer willing to return to a status quo in which Saudi Arabia can impose or support a maritime and land blockade on areas under their control without facing retaliation,” he wrote on X.The Houthis appear to follow Iran’s leadership logic, thinking “that time and strategic asymmetry work in their favor,” Citrinowicz said.How are the Saudis involved?Getting embroiled in a broader conflict would be a risky and potentially costly option for Riyadh. Over the last decade it has been focused on opening the kingdom up to foreign investment and making it the regional economic powerhouse. That in part drove its policy of détente with Iran long before the war, which led to an agreement mediated by China in 2023.That strategy is now on life support, as Saudi Arabia finds itself in the eye of a storm. Confronting unpredictable adversaries well-versed in asymmetrical warfare from three directions is a military planner’s nightmare.On Thursday, a Saudi official told CNN that the kingdom is bracing for a “multiple coordinated attacks” by Iraqi militias factions and Iran-backed Houthis.The official cited “multiple intelligence reports” from Saudi Arabia, the US and regional countries indicating some Iraqi militia members, “in coordination with the Houthis” are planning to attack the Gulf nation “in the very near future” under the guidance of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).The official expressed alarm on Thursday, saying the reports came as Saudi Arabia was pursuing de-escalation and negotiations involving Iran appeared to be heading in the right direction.The recent attacks – and potential ones – leave Riyadh with “an uncomfortable choice,” Citrinowicz wrote. “Escalation could lead to another open-ended war whose costs and end state are difficult to predict. But major concessions could strengthen the Houthis politically and militarily, making them an even more formidable threat in the future.”“Saudi Arabia, in other words, is caught between deterrence and accommodation,” he said. “Neither path offers a clean strategic victory.”On Thursday, the rebel group claimed to have carried out a “large-scale” military operation targeting Saudi troops with ballistic missiles and drones in several areas of the country.The Houthis offered no evidence for the claim, but Reuters reported earlier that day that at least 30 Yemeni ‌government troops were killed in Houthi attacks on ⁠military camps in the provinces of Marib and Hadhramawt, citing government sources.On Friday, the Saudi-led military coalition supporting Yemen’s internationally recognized government said 11 civilians were wounded in a Houthi attack on the southern Saudi border region of Najran.Riyadh is, however, working to prop up its defense strategy. On Friday, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan signed a mutual defense pact stipulating that an attack against any of them “shall be regarded as an attack against them all.”It was a landmark deal between three nations that have all played a role in stalled diplomatic efforts to end hostilities between the US and Iran.What are the risks?The escalation comes as a dangerous and costly threat to both Saudi Arabia and Yemen.For Riyadh, the revived Houthi threat is sabotaging its attempts to reroute millions of barrels of oil from the Persian Gulf to the Red Sea for export as the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively shut.Saudi crude exports via the Bab al-Mandeb strait have at least halved since the Houthis declared a blockade on Saudi ships transiting the waterway, according to Rahul Choudhary, vice president of upstream research at Rystad Energy.Currently, up to 1.5 million barrels are able to cross the strait every day, he told CNN earlier this week, well below the 3.2 million barrels per day seen earlier in the conflict. Before the war, Saudi Arabia produced roughly 10 million barrels per day.Still, state-run Saudi Aramco has benefited from soaring global oil prices, reporting a $33 billion profit during the second quarter, up 33% from the same period in 2025.But results like these “cannot hold forever,” Choudhary noted. Aramco’s figures were partly driven by oil sold from now-reduced stockpiles, he said, adding that prices — while volatile — are lower than in earlier phases of the conflict.For Yemen, the spate of attacks risks driving the country back into full-scale civil war.During the last round of internal fighting, the United Nations designated Yemen as the world’s worst humanitarian crisis, with more than 22 million people – three-quarters of the population – in desperate need of aid and protection.Nine years of war had killed thousands, destroyed the economy and left tens of thousands of Yemenis living in famine, according to the UN.Renewed fighting risks pulling the country back into the throes of an even worse humanitarian and economic crisis.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story