Skip to main content

Woman murdered in 1936 and buried under building is finally identified

▶ Watch Video: Inside the genetic genealogy being used to solve crimes

The remains of a woman murdered nearly a century ago and buried beneath a building have finally been identified thanks to modern forensic testing. 

The woman was identified as Mary McLeod Moffat (née Davidson), a Scottish national who immigrated to Canada with her family in 1913, according to police and the laboratory that performed the testing.

The culmination of the case brings closure to “one of Toronto’s oldest mysteries,” detective Michael Kelly, of the Toronto Police Service, told Canadian news site CTV News Toronto on Monday. 

The case couldn’t have been solved without investigative genetic genealogy, a technique that uses advanced DNA profiling to build a “family tree” that can eventually help identify an unknown individual, said Kelly. 

Although police believe the woman’s murder took place around April 1936, her remains weren’t discovered until May 18, 1995, when workers uncovered them at a demolition site in Toronto, according to the Toronto Police Service. At the time, forensic exams determined that the woman was “intentionally buried,” after being struck at least six times with “a hammer-like weapon,” police said. 

A homicide investigation was opened to learn more about what may have happened to her, but collecting a suitable DNA sample from the remains was difficult because so much time had passed and their condition deteriorated. 

Police began to review the case in 2022, submitting new DNA samples for testing to a lab that specializes in investigative genetic genealogy and unsolved murder cases. Scientists faced substantial challenges as they attempted to recover “only small amounts of severely-degraded human DNA” from the remains, but they did ultimately collect enough to build a forensic profile, according to the lab.

After generating leads and, subsequently, a follow-up investigation, investigators were able to find Moffat’s relatives, collect DNA samples from them and compare those samples to the ones pulled from her remains, which allowed them to identify her. 

Investigators later determined Moffatt’s husband, Andrew Lloyd Moffat, likely killed her. After his wife’s death, he went on to live in Vancouver and the United States under the alias Drake Lloyd Cummings, police said. He died in 1985.

Moffatt’s case was one of two longstanding unsolved murders in Toronto that have now been closed because of investigative genetic genealogy, police said. The second identified the badly burned remains of a woman who died in the passenger’s seat of a vehicle that went up in flames on April 22, 2004, after intentionally crashing into a tractor-trailer. Her name was Patsy Flora Lagarde.

“These identifications represent the significant impact that investigative genetic genealogy can have on long-term unidentified human remains investigations,” said homicide detective Stephen Smith, of the Toronto Police Force’s missing persons and cold case unit, in a statement. “After decades without answers, we have been able to restore the identities of Mary Davidson and Patsy Lagarde, provide information to their families, and uncover important facts about the circumstances surrounding their deaths.”

14-term Rep. John Larson ousted by challenger in Connecticut Democratic primary

▶ Watch Video: Analysis of key primary races in Minnesota, Wisconsin, South Carolina and more Democratic Rep. John Larson — who has represented central Connecticut since the late 1990s — lost his party's primary Tuesday to former Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin, CBS News has projected, after a campaign dominated by debates about generational change.With just over half of the vote counted at around 10:15 p.m. ET, Bronin led Larson by just under 20 percentage points, or nearly 7,000 votes. West Hartford state Rep. Jillian Gilchrest and Hartford Board of Education member Ruth Fortune trailed the two front-runners.The candidates for the reliably blue Hartford-area House seat agreed on many key policy issues. Instead, the primary turned on whether Democrats should send a longtime lawmaker back to Congress or opt for a newer — and younger — candidate. Larson, 78, was seeking a 15th term in Congress, while Bronin was 31 years younger than him.Bronin focused heavily on that theme. His campaign website promised "new energy, new ideas, and new perspectives," and he cast Larson as a "status quo" candidate, telling voters: "The stakes are too high to keep doing the same thing."The Connecticut Democratic Party endorsed Bronin over Larson at its convention in May, an upset that prompted Bronin to call on his rival to "pass the torch." Bronin was also endorsed earlier this year by Biden-era Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who ran for president in 2020 and is widely viewed as a possible 2028 contender.Larson, meanwhile, presented his long tenure in Congress as an asset, arguing he has delivered for constituents and — as one of the longest-serving House Democrats — would have more sway.House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, campaigned for Larson.  "We are going to come in as a full committee chairman, not as some freshman in Congress with some assignment," Larson told Hartford CBS affiliate WFSB-TV.Bronin raised just over $3 million during the primary, ahead of Larson's $2.7 million.Bronin will now face Republican nominee Amy Chai, who ran for her party's nomination unopposed.
Read Next Story