Skip to main content

Johnson & Johnson offers up to $5.5 billion to settle baby powder cancer lawsuits

(CNN) — Johnson & Johnson has set aside $5.5 billion to resolve tens of thousands of US lawsuits alleging that its talcum powder-based products caused ovarian cancer.

The pharmaceutical giant has offered to pay plaintiffs up to $3 billion in 2027, with any remaining payouts made after 2028. It said in a statement on Monday that it hoped the settlements would bring closure to “meritless 15-year litigation.”

The settlement relates to about 76,000 claims against the company. The proposal needs to be accepted by law firms representing at least 95% of the claimants to go ahead, J&J said in its statement.

J&J has been dogged for years by accusations that talcum powder in its products, including baby powder, contained cancer-causing asbestos. The New Jersey-based firm has repeatedly denied that its products caused cancer. Some scientific studies have shown that women do have an increased risk of ovarian cancer with talc use in the genital area, but others do not.

In 2020, the company ditched its talc-based baby powder in North America to rely on a cornstarch-based formula, and did the same in 2023 for its global sales. In both cases, J&J said it wanted to simplify its portfolio of goods and defended the safety of the talc-based product.

Erik Haas, J&J’s vice president of litigation, said the lawsuits “lack scientific merit.”

“While we are confident the company would have ultimately prevailed with further litigation, as it has in the vast majority of cases tried to date, this resolution allows the company to put this matter behind it,” he said in Monday’s statement.

Chris Seeger, a lawyer representing some of the plaintiffs, called the settlement “a fair measure of long-delayed justice” in a statement on Monday.

In a statement to CNN, Seeger said that the value of the settlement is uncapped and could rise further. He did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding J&J’s claim that the cases lacked a scientific basis.

Last week, a federal judge cast doubt on around 69,000 claims, saying that plaintiffs must provide specific evidence linking their ovarian cancer to J&J’s baby powder and other talc-based products, according to Reuters.

The lawsuits against J&J have seen mixed outcomes, with the company being held responsible for large verdicts in some cases, and others where juries found the company not liable.

In October, a Los Angeles jury ordered J&J to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died from mesothelioma, a rare type of cancer usually caused by asbestos exposure. The company, which has seen some awards reduced on appeal, said it planned to appeal the most recent decision and called the verdict “egregious and unconstitutional.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Judge rules FBI can’t abandon Biden-era plan to relocate headquarters to Maryland

(CNN) — A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from abandoning a Biden-era plan to relocate the FBI headquarters to suburban Maryland.The FBI and the General Services Administration had announced plans in July 2025 to move the agency’s headquarters from the J. Edgar Hoover building in downtown Washington, DC, to the Ronald Reagan Building blocks away — scrapping GSA’s 2023 selection of a site in Greenbelt, Maryland.But Judge Theodore Chuang said in his ruling Monday that the Trump administration’s move exceeded the authority of the FBI and GSA.Chuang, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, also agreed with Prince George’s County and the state of Maryland — which sued in November — that the FBI’s reprogramming of $555 million toward the Reagan building move, which included $323 million that was appropriated by Congress for the Greenbelt project, was “arbitrary and capricious” and not in accordance with law.While the Hoover building has long been in need of drastic repairs, the question of where to move the FBI has been a drawn-out political fight. The 2023 selection of Greenbelt was nearly 15 years in the making, Chuang said in his ruling.The Reagan building was home to the now-defunct US Agency for International Development. It also houses other agencies, including US Customs and Border Protection.In his ruling, the judge also considered the economic impact to Prince George’s County and the status of the FBI’s move to the Reagan building.“[I]f the Reagan Building project moves forward, Plaintiffs will lose the opportunity to have the substantial economic benefits that would have a positive impact not just on individual private parties, but on the community in Prince George’s County,” Chuang wrote. “As for Defendants, they are still at the beginning stages of moving the FBI to the Reagan Building … so the immediate impact of an injunction of Defendants would be limited.”CNN has reached out to the FBI, Justice Department and GSA for comment.Maryland Democratic Gov. Wes Moore celebrated the ruling, saying in a statement on Monday, “President Trump tried to take from Maryland what Maryland had already won. He failed.”“Now it is time to stop the games and get to work building the world-class FBI headquarters that our public servants deserve, where it belongs: in Prince George’s County, Maryland,” he added.Shortly after taking office, President Donald Trump vowed to stop the FBI headquarters from moving to “a liberal state.”“We’re going to stop it. Not going to let that happen,” said Trump during a March 2025 speech at the Department of Justice.The Trump administration argued in 2025 that the Greenbelt project “would have cost the taxpayers billions of dollars and taken years to construct.” FBI Director Kash Patel said that moving the headquarters to the Reagan building “is the most cost effective and resource efficient way to carry out our mission to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story