Skip to main content

Johnson & Johnson offers up to $5.5 billion to settle baby powder cancer lawsuits

(CNN) — Johnson & Johnson has set aside $5.5 billion to resolve tens of thousands of US lawsuits alleging that its talcum powder-based products caused ovarian cancer.

The pharmaceutical giant has offered to pay plaintiffs up to $3 billion in 2027, with any remaining payouts made after 2028. It said in a statement on Monday that it hoped the settlements would bring closure to “meritless 15-year litigation.”

The settlement relates to about 76,000 claims against the company. The proposal needs to be accepted by law firms representing at least 95% of the claimants to go ahead, J&J said in its statement.

J&J has been dogged for years by accusations that talcum powder in its products, including baby powder, contained cancer-causing asbestos. The New Jersey-based firm has repeatedly denied that its products caused cancer. Some scientific studies have shown that women do have an increased risk of ovarian cancer with talc use in the genital area, but others do not.

In 2020, the company ditched its talc-based baby powder in North America to rely on a cornstarch-based formula, and did the same in 2023 for its global sales. In both cases, J&J said it wanted to simplify its portfolio of goods and defended the safety of the talc-based product.

Erik Haas, J&J’s vice president of litigation, said the lawsuits “lack scientific merit.”

“While we are confident the company would have ultimately prevailed with further litigation, as it has in the vast majority of cases tried to date, this resolution allows the company to put this matter behind it,” he said in Monday’s statement.

Chris Seeger, a lawyer representing some of the plaintiffs, called the settlement “a fair measure of long-delayed justice” in a statement on Monday.

In a statement to CNN, Seeger said that the value of the settlement is uncapped and could rise further. He did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding J&J’s claim that the cases lacked a scientific basis.

Last week, a federal judge cast doubt on around 69,000 claims, saying that plaintiffs must provide specific evidence linking their ovarian cancer to J&J’s baby powder and other talc-based products, according to Reuters.

The lawsuits against J&J have seen mixed outcomes, with the company being held responsible for large verdicts in some cases, and others where juries found the company not liable.

In October, a Los Angeles jury ordered J&J to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died from mesothelioma, a rare type of cancer usually caused by asbestos exposure. The company, which has seen some awards reduced on appeal, said it planned to appeal the most recent decision and called the verdict “egregious and unconstitutional.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Woman says tenant changed locks, used fake sale agreement and kept her out for a year

Click here for updates on this story    OKLAHOMA CITY (KOCO) -- A woman who rented out a room inside her home in exchange for work being done on her property is now warning others about squatters' rights after the tenant kept her out of her home for more than a year.Traci Bates said there is some relief in sight after the tenant changed the locks and kicked her out. A judge just sided with her earlier Monday on a default judgment, but she has been going back-and-forth with the case for more than a year."I feel bullied, pushed into a corner. I feel like I had no rights, especially in the beginning," Bates said.Bates said this happened at her late father's home after she agreed to rent out one of his rooms to a mutual friend."Asked him if he would like to exchange for rent to help me clean up the house, you know, do some remodeling, some small jobs, just some minor things like hauling off some trash from the backyard or whatever. Fixing a fence, repairing it," Bates said.After just three weeks, things took a turn."He changed the locks to the house. I show up to go to get something because all my clothes are there. All my dad's belongings, everything are still in the house," Bates said.She said she hasn't been able to get it back since. Bates said he actually called the police on her, but they couldn't do much because it was a civil matter.Bates said he produced a fake sales agreement, claiming she sold the house to him for $13,000."There's no proof. That's not how you're buying a property," Bates said.A police report filed by Bates accused him of fraud for that agreement, saying she never signed it. It points to a letter from the secretary of state, acknowledging that the notary stamp he used was reported missing around the time that the agreement was supposedly made."This isn't just a problem in Oklahoma. You see this problem all over the country," attorney Noble McIntyre said.McIntyre, who is not tied to the case, said the situation is sort of a civil court loophole."If you had somebody that was very, very wealthy that had all the resources in the world, they could push this much more aggressively. But the average person doesn't have that kind of money. So, they get caught in these situations where they're a law-abiding citizen. They own the property. They're doing everything right. They're doing everything right. But the law is treating them like the bad person. It's ridiculous," McIntyre said.The property assessor's website still lists Bates' family trust as the owners, but the man has since tried countersuing for everything from breach of contract to intentional infliction of emotional distress.KOCO went to the home Monday to try and speak with him about the situation, but no one answered.But just hours after the interview with her Monday, Bates got a notice that the judge granted a default judgment, meaning, soon, she finally gets her house back." Oh, my goodness! I'm so excited," Bates said. "This is such a big release. I'm in tears because of it. I didn't think this day would come."There are a couple of things that still need to happen. Her attorney will have to bring that notice to the sheriff's office, giving the man 48 hours to move out.Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.
Read Next Story