Skip to main content

Saudi, Israeli leaders try to shape Trump’s decisions on Iran conflict

▶ Watch Video: Netanyahu says he defers to Trump on Iran war expansion but differences may remain

President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu estimated the intense part of the U.S.-Israeli war in Iran would last four to six weeks. It is now entering the sixth month without a decisive military victory or a diplomatic breakthrough. 

Now, as Mr. Trump weighs his next steps and the future of roughly 50,000 U.S. troops across the Middle East, two of Washington’s closest regional partners are pressing the president with sharply different visions for how the conflict should proceed. 

The president received input Wednesday from his partner in this war, Netanyahu, as well as from Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman.

During his Tuesday Oval Office meeting with Netanyahu, Israeli officials were struck by Mr. Trump’s serious and “very clinical” approach to the Iran war. A senior Israeli official shared with CBS News that Netanyahu counseled the president on three options for the war: First, an enforceable deal focused on removal of the nuclear material; second, a blockade with added economic pressure; and a third involving military strikes particularly focused on attacking land routes used for transporting supplies.

Tension with Israel spilled into public view last month when conservative members of the Netanyahu coalition criticized the JD Vance-led diplomatic deal with Iran, and Vance told an interviewer that a country of nine million people should not think it can bomb itself out of every national security threat. Trump himself voiced frustration that Netanyahu needed to take a ‘softer touch’ in dealing with Iranian proxy group Hezbollah.

The official acknowledged Netanyahu is now sensitive to being seen as pushing Mr. Trump in any direction regarding the war and described the dynamic of their relationship as one where Mr. Trump is the senior partner and Israel is the junior.  Neither the White House nor the Israelis have released a readout of that meeting.

Speaking to reporters a day after the Oval Office meeting, a senior Israeli official defended Netanyahu’s original estimate to Mr. Trump of a war that would last just four to six weeks — one that the president publicly repeated at the outset of the conflict — by saying that the “tense part” was only four to six weeks long. Since U.S. combat resumed this month, Israel has stood on the sidelines, neither striking Iran nor having been attacked by it. The senior Israeli official told CBS News that if attacked, Israel would have no choice but to rejoin military operations.

Netanyahu held a follow-up meeting Wednesday with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Defense Under Secretary for Policy Elbridge Colby, and met privately with U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff. He also visited with senators known to be Iran hawks, Republicans Tom Cotton, Ted Cruz, Tim Sheehy and Democrat John Fetterman. 

In separate meetings with President Trump and Vice President JD Vance Wednesday, Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman conveyed the Kingdom’s assessment that Iran is trying to find leverage in the conflict through escalation, and its main leverage points are through proxy forces in Yemen, the Houthis, and Iraqi militias. The White House acknowledged that Mr. Trump “had a brief drop-by meeting with the Saudi defense minister.”

The Saudis joined the United States in strikes against Iranian-backed militias in Iraq on Wednesday and bombed Houthis days earlier, in the first public engagement of any Persian Gulf nation during the war. The Kingdom described the strikes as defensive actions in response to a series of attacks on Saudi civilian infrastructure.  At least 20 people, including some Iranian military advisers, were killed in the Saudi-U.S. strikes, according to the Iran-backed militia groups.

Saudi Arabia’s leaders are trying to avoid further regional escalation that would risk miscalculation or prolonging of the war. A person familiar with the Saudis’ thinking told CBS News that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and his brother Khalid bin Salman have been concerned that Netanyahu, who launched the war in February alongside the U.S., is pushing for further escalation. 

Prince Khalid was originally supposed to visit Washington last week but was delayed due to recent strikes, according to a person with knowledge of his plans.

The Kingdom struck the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen last week after militants fired missiles at a Saudi oil tanker in the Red Sea, after declaring a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia. CBS News tracked at least five vessels early last week, including several laden with Saudi crude oil, making U-turns before reaching the Bab el-Mandeb Strait soon after the Houthis had vowed to block Saudi-linked ships.

In the meantime, diplomacy with Iran remains unproductive. Iran rejected an initial proposal from Oman to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Witkoff and Mr. Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, as well as Vance, had thought they had negotiated a diplomatic agreement to do so, which was announced in late June as a memorandum of understanding. That truce lasted less than three weeks.

Pressed by reporters as to whether Israel has determined there is anyone worth negotiating with in Iran, a senior Israeli official offered only one name — Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi — and characterized him as a realist, but not a moderate. The senior Israeli official acknowledged that economic sanctions and blockades could be effective in persuading more pragmatic Iranian officials to pursue diplomacy. 

Netanyahu still believes that regime change is necessary and hopes to achieve that goal by laying the groundwork for an uprising. Mr. Trump has repeatedly said he favors negotiating with the regime, which would arguably extend a lifeline to those the Israelis hope to extract.

U.S. intelligence assesses that further bombing of Iran will not dislodge the IRGC controlled regime, two U.S. officials said. 

The United Arab Emirates had also carried out dozens of airstrikes in Iran this spring but has not publicly advertised it. Gulf allies who house U.S. troops, including Kuwait and Bahrain, have fielded near daily incoming drones and missiles, some of them launched from Iran and some from Iraqi territory. Kuwait’s ambassador to the U.S. Sheikha al Zain al Sabah issued an on the record denial that the country had participated in strikes on Iran after the Wall Street Journal reported it last week.

The Strait of Hormuz remains congested by Iranian threats, and Iran’s enriched nuclear material remains under Iranian control — albeit under monitoring by U.S. and Israeli intelligence. The Pentagon has requested $67 billion in funding for the war on an emergency basis to pay for troops and restocking of munitions.

Iranian women defy efforts by hardliners to enforce wearing of hijab

(CNN) — A cultural fault line in Iran has re-emerged in recent months amid the turmoil of war and the revamping of the country’s hardline leadership: how and whether to enforce the wearing of the hijab by women.At the height of the conflict with the United States this year, women without the headscarf were often seen at pro-government gatherings and in state media. The government and internal security forces had bigger issues to deal with.In one video an unveiled woman carrying an Iranian flag said her husband was in the military, and that she was proud of him.But in recent weeks, the clamor for restoring a hard line on what conservative clerics and politicians call “public nudity” has grown.Many Iranian women are openly flouting the rule – and authorities seem wary of launching a crackdown, for now. The regime appears to have more pressing priorities – presenting the conflict with the United States as an existential struggle, managing the deep economic fall-out and reorganizing the security apparatus under the leadership of Mojtaba Khamenei.Still, state media have been highlighting stories about cafes and other businesses being forced to close for failing to enforce rules on clothing. A CNN tally of articles in Iranian media at the end of last month found examples in half a dozen cities, including Tehran.Four years ago, the protest movement “Woman Life Freedom” ignited after the death in police custody of Mahsa Amini, a young woman who had been detained on accusations she was improperly dressed. It was brutally suppressed.Amnesty International reported at the end of 2024 that the Iranian authorities were waging war on women and girls “through an increasingly violent crackdown on those defying draconian compulsory veiling laws.”But the protests had lasting consequences. Despite the drumbeat of warnings and sporadic enforcement, there is widespread defiance of official regulations, especially among young Iranian women.On July 19, at least seven cafes and restaurants in Tehran were closed down for not enforcing the mandatory hijab, according to human rights group HRANA. The group also compiled lists of social media accounts that have been blocked for defying public dress codes.HRANA said authorities were using vague concepts such as “violation of norms,” “violation of modesty” and “failure to observe Islamic decency” in pursuing alleged offenders. But in one instance this month, it said a boutique was closed “due to unveiling,” without giving further details.On Monday the Tehran Prosecutor’s office said it would take serious action against alleged “indecency” violations and offenses at certain cafes and restaurants in Tehran, as well as shops selling clothing deemed “unconventional” or inappropriate.In the South Khorasan Province in eastern Iran, 10 cafes have been closed over alleged violations of “social norms and mandatory hijab rules,” the Mehr news agency reported, citing the province’s chief prosecutor.The relentless state media campaign on the issue often cites prayer leaders who insist the hijab is part of Iranian cultural identity and that women should observe modesty.Mohammad Javad Haj Ali Akbari, who leads Friday prayers in Tehran, claimed there were organized efforts to promote “nudity” and that some people are paid to appear in public with “improper” dress.There have been some high-profile cases. In June a popular Iranian singer, Parastoo Ahmadi, together with eight members of her band and production team, were sentenced in Qom to 74 lashes and banned from leaving the country for two years. Ahmadi had appeared with bare shoulders and uncovered hair at an event that she livestreamed on her YouTube channel in 2024.The charges included “offending public decency through the production and publication of vulgar and immoral content on cyberspace platforms.”Hardliners are stepping up pressure on the authorities. The editor of the journal Kayhan, Hossein Shariatmadari, wrote that enforcement is both a legal obligation and a religious duty for officials.A television show – “Park Way” – produced for the Tehran Municipality has devoted several episodes to the issue of women’s dress, calling for action against those who flout approved dress codes. One said that “unconventional behaviors should not be exhibited by anyone in public places such as parks.”Women have also been mobilized to demand the hijab be worn. At a small rally in Isfahan this week, one placard read: “Netanyahu: Unveiled women are our soldiers for free.”Netanyahu is not on record as making that remark, but the slogan reflects a broader narrative promoted by Iranian hardliners, portraying women who do not wear the hijab as, at the very least, disloyal to their country.But there’s plenty of evidence that many Iranian women are not intimidated by official campaigns.Social media videos have popped up showing young women on scooters wearing helmets, but no headscarves. The government is yet to fulfil a promise that women will be issued licenses to ride motorbikes.The videos include convoys of young women on scooters riding through Tehran and other cities. One Instagram post features a group of women declaring: “We’re the motorcycle girls of Shiraz! Shiraz girls, let’s go!”Another Instagram account posted video of about 20 female motorcyclists in the central city of Isfahan, describing it as “the biggest female motorcycle event in Isfahan.”As with so many social and cultural issues in Iran, the wearing of the hijab seems to some a misplaced priority at a time of conflict and economic crisis.That appears to include President Masoud Pezeshkian. Referring to an interview with a conservative cleric, he said: “The cleric mentioned hijab… Well, there are neighborhoods, there are mosques – go and work on it there! Can you really change people’s behavior through laws?”Pezeshkian went on to say that his daughter sometimes disagreed with him.“Does it mean I should force her?!” he asked.“Changing behavior is a cultural matter; it’s about belief. You can’t create belief in people through force.”Former MP Gholamali Jafarzadeh Imanabadi argued officials should focus on inflation and livelihoods instead of the hijab.And an unofficial media outlet posted an article entitled: A Provocation to a War-Weary Public - What Is Behind the Return of Hijab Patrols and Business Closures?Iranian authorities first began urging women to wear the hijab after the 1979 revolution. Before that, the monarchy had promoted a more secular and westernized image of women.Article 638 of Iran’s Islamic Penal Code criminalizes women appearing in public without “Islamic hijab,” although it does not precisely define what that means. A much tougher law approved in 2024 would have introduced a broader system of escalating penalties and surveillance, but its implementation was halted following intervention by the Supreme National Security Council.This has antagonized hardliners. One member of Iran’s parliament, Mohammad-Taqi Naqdali, said this week: “We see what the state of nudity and public vice is like in our midst…Israel and America cannot destroy us, but this decay that has plagued our religious culture and is spreading nudity in a disastrous and widespread manner in society will.”But the regime is treading carefully – for now.“They still don’t dare say anything to people on the street. Girls in Tehran are out and about wearing crop tops, shorts, and all kinds of clothes, and headscarves are practically no longer a thing,” one Tehran woman in her 60s told CNN by phone.“I don’t think they can make these girls wear headscarves again. But then again, that’s also what we thought when the revolution happened. We never thought they would be able to force us to wear them, but in the end, they did.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story