Skip to main content

How Jeffrey Epstein parlayed his elite network into a $25 million payday

▶ Watch Video: Billionaire Leon Black testifies on Epstein payments, told to return under subpoena

When elite Swiss banker Ariane de Rothschild sought to extract her company from the teeth of a federal investigation into its role in helping high-end customers hide potentially billions from the IRS, documents show she turned to an unexpected American businessman for help: convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

In this new role, Epstein appears to have helped Edmond de Rothschild, one of Europe’s largest private banks, resolve a menacing Justice Department investigation, garnering him a $25 million fee. And in doing so, he displayed another facet of his ability to tap his network of wealthy and powerful patrons for his personal gain.

As Epstein himself explained it in a Dec. 11, 2015, email to Rothschild, he had helped negotiate a deal for the bank to pay $45.5 million to the IRS, $10 million in legal fees, and $25 million to him — which he sold as a bargain.

“All less than 80 [million dollars] pretty good,” he wrote. 

Congress will hear from a figure at the center of those negotiations Wednesday. The Swiss bank’s American lawyer on that matter, Kathy Ruemmler, a former Obama White House attorney, will be appearing before the House Oversight Committee to answer questions about her documented longstanding ties with Epstein.

A review of documents from the Epstein files released by the DOJ reveals details about his involvement in that settlement and how he achieved the mega payout. 

What emerges is a glimpse at how Epstein mastered the appearance of expertise, combined it with a talent for brokering relationships, and through minimal work parlayed it into immense wealth.

The Swiss investigation

The Justice Department launched an investigation it called The Swiss Bank Program in August 2013. It was based on allegations that certain Swiss banks, including Rothschild’s, had assisted Americans in hiding assets through a variety of means including concealing ownership of accounts.

Epstein and Ariane de Rothschild, the bank’s leader, were first introduced that same year by a mutual friend, emails show. Epstein had finished up his period of incarceration and house arrest in 2011 following his plea deal for soliciting a minor for prostitution, and was a registered sex offender. But his social and business calendar remained full. 

Epstein quickly began offering advice to Rothschild. Soon after their first meeting, Rothschild wrote to Epstein: “Thank you much for sharing your thoughts with me. I truly appreciate it as you well know how few people do so and have the courage of their opinions.” 

People who interacted with Epstein at the time told CBS News that the academics, financiers and diplomats who continued their association with him gave him a patina of respectability, persuading them to ignore his past crimes. 

Epstein’s criminal charges and the resulting negative publicity had, however, led to his loss of the billionaire retail magnate Leslie Wexner as a client, who had been the main source of Epstein’s wealth for over a decade. Payments from the financier Leon Black allegedly for tax and estate planning were now bringing in tens of millions of dollars, allowing him to continue his lavish lifestyle. In a statement to Congress, Black called Epstein’s services “highly valuable,” and he said Epstein’s work on his taxes “was responsible for billions of dollars in savings” and “had been vetted by reputable law and accounting firms.”

But emails show Epstein was still on the hunt for other sources of income. 

Rothschild had married into the famous banking family and had been handling operational duties there since the mid-1990s. Suddenly the bank was facing an existential moment as the U.S. government threatened major fines and potential charges. Enter Epstein. 

In June of 2014, Epstein sent an email to Rothschild, saying, “If I can be helpful, I would be glad to, I expect no, nor do I want any financial relationship of any kind. I am doing this as my way to do good. and to repay a deep debt that i feel I owe to edmonde.” This appears to be a reference to her father-in-law Edmond Adolphe de Rothschild, the bank’s founder, who died in 1997. 

Kathy Ruemmler

In the summer of 2014, Ruemmler had just left the Obama White House, where she served as White House counsel, and returned to Latham & Watkins, the law firm she had departed five and a half years earlier. Her return came with the expectation that she would leverage her experience and connections to bring significant new business to the firm. 

Ruemmler had also previously served as a prosecutor at the Department of Justice, where she helped secure convictions of Enron executives. Her legal credentials were so highly regarded that she would soon be considered a potential nominee to serve as the next attorney general.

It is unclear how Ruemmler first came to Epstein’s attention. Email correspondence between the two began in the summer of 2014. Ruemmler has said that Epstein cold-called her and offered to arrange a meeting with Bill Gates — an opportunity that was both professionally attractive and potentially highly lucrative.

In September of 2014, Epstein introduced Ruemmler to Rothschild. A mutual friendship and agreement to work together was quickly cemented. By October, just five months after leaving public service, Ruemmler appeared to have begun meeting with Justice Department lawyers on behalf of the bank. 

Ruemmler has previously said she only shared a client with Epstein, but documents released last fall by the House Oversight Committee and by the DOJ in January suggested that that relationship grew more personal. Emails show that she sometimes addressed him as “Uncle Jeffrey” and accepted expensive gifts from him. Their correspondence continued until Epstein’s death in 2019. A search of the Epstein files reveals nearly 10,000 results for her name. Epstein opened doors and provided opportunities to meet some of the richest and most influential people in the world including Gates, Peter Thiel and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Their friendship proved lucrative for both of them. 

Survivors and advocates have accused her of turning a blind eye in the interest of advancing her own career. 

In a statement to CBS News, a spokesperson for Ruemmler said “As has been well established, Ms. Ruemmler knew him in private practice, he was a referral source (including referring the Rothschild Bank) and she did not see or hear anything to suggest that Epstein was abusing women. Ms. Ruemmler has been open and transparent about her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein when she was a defense lawyer in private practice many years ago. She has done nothing wrong and had no knowledge of any ongoing criminal activity on his part.”

Ruemmler and the Swiss investigation

Over the next few months Ruemmler and her team traveled to Switzerland to do the laborious work of analyzing client files to counter DOJ claims and find ways to reduce the bank’s fine, according to a source familiar with the discussions. That was followed up with meeting after meeting in Washington, D.C., with the DOJ to hammer out the terms. 

All the while, Epstein monitored the developments, but according to a source involved, he had no direct role in the actual work. 

That summer, with the bank facing a fine that Ruemmler said could be as high as $556 million, Epstein broached payment with Rothschild for the first time. “If you choose to have me and my team involved . doj negotiation etc. structuring family ,KBL etc. , we should be able to invent a method of compensation,” he wrote. “I spoke with Kathy about an idea last night. And she or I can fill you in, if you choose to want it.”  

A few days later Epstein wrote to Ruemmler laying out a plan: If the fine was $150 million to $200 million he’d receive $5 million; if it was $100 million to $150 million, he’d get $10 million; and under $100 million, his fee would shoot up to $25 million. 

In the documents, Ruemmler never acknowledged that proposal. But in the same email chain she proposes hiring Epstein as a consultant through her firm to avoid issues “you were concerned about” and that “from a privilege perspective, that is the best way to do it.” 

As DOJ negotiations continued, a payment agreement between Rothschild bank and Epstein’s company, Southern Trust, was formalized on Oct. 5. The agreement said Epstein was involved in “risk analysis” for the Rothschild Group. 

Two months later, Rothschild wrote Epstein with two words: “45 mio?” — a reference to the DOJ’s agreement to settle matters for around $45 million. 

Epstein would make his maximum payday of $25 million. The two firms actually representing the bank apparently would receive a combined $10 million for their work. 

Shortly after, the DOJ sent out a press release announcing the agreement. Two days later, the first of two money transfers landed in Epstein’s bank account, records show. That week, Epstein’s assistant arranged for the purchase and delivery of a new television for Ruemmler.  

Their mutually beneficial relationship and friendship would continue up until his death. By then, Ruemmler had left Latham and was hired as chief counsel for the investment firm Goldman Sachs. This spring she announced she was leaving that position but is reportedly staying on as a consultant. 

In a recent interview in the New York Times Opinion section she said that she did not understand the full extent of his crimes until she was sitting in a courtroom following his July 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges and heard the details of the charges read out by the prosecution. 

A spokesperson for Edmond de Rothschild Group declined to comment and Latham & Watkins did not respond to multiple inquiries.  

Iranian women defy efforts by hardliners to enforce wearing of hijab

(CNN) — A cultural fault line in Iran has re-emerged in recent months amid the turmoil of war and the revamping of the country’s hardline leadership: how and whether to enforce the wearing of the hijab by women.At the height of the conflict with the United States this year, women without the headscarf were often seen at pro-government gatherings and in state media. The government and internal security forces had bigger issues to deal with.In one video an unveiled woman carrying an Iranian flag said her husband was in the military, and that she was proud of him.But in recent weeks, the clamor for restoring a hard line on what conservative clerics and politicians call “public nudity” has grown.Many Iranian women are openly flouting the rule – and authorities seem wary of launching a crackdown, for now. The regime appears to have more pressing priorities – presenting the conflict with the United States as an existential struggle, managing the deep economic fall-out and reorganizing the security apparatus under the leadership of Mojtaba Khamenei.Still, state media have been highlighting stories about cafes and other businesses being forced to close for failing to enforce rules on clothing. A CNN tally of articles in Iranian media at the end of last month found examples in half a dozen cities, including Tehran.Four years ago, the protest movement “Woman Life Freedom” ignited after the death in police custody of Mahsa Amini, a young woman who had been detained on accusations she was improperly dressed. It was brutally suppressed.Amnesty International reported at the end of 2024 that the Iranian authorities were waging war on women and girls “through an increasingly violent crackdown on those defying draconian compulsory veiling laws.”But the protests had lasting consequences. Despite the drumbeat of warnings and sporadic enforcement, there is widespread defiance of official regulations, especially among young Iranian women.On July 19, at least seven cafes and restaurants in Tehran were closed down for not enforcing the mandatory hijab, according to human rights group HRANA. The group also compiled lists of social media accounts that have been blocked for defying public dress codes.HRANA said authorities were using vague concepts such as “violation of norms,” “violation of modesty” and “failure to observe Islamic decency” in pursuing alleged offenders. But in one instance this month, it said a boutique was closed “due to unveiling,” without giving further details.On Monday the Tehran Prosecutor’s office said it would take serious action against alleged “indecency” violations and offenses at certain cafes and restaurants in Tehran, as well as shops selling clothing deemed “unconventional” or inappropriate.In the South Khorasan Province in eastern Iran, 10 cafes have been closed over alleged violations of “social norms and mandatory hijab rules,” the Mehr news agency reported, citing the province’s chief prosecutor.The relentless state media campaign on the issue often cites prayer leaders who insist the hijab is part of Iranian cultural identity and that women should observe modesty.Mohammad Javad Haj Ali Akbari, who leads Friday prayers in Tehran, claimed there were organized efforts to promote “nudity” and that some people are paid to appear in public with “improper” dress.There have been some high-profile cases. In June a popular Iranian singer, Parastoo Ahmadi, together with eight members of her band and production team, were sentenced in Qom to 74 lashes and banned from leaving the country for two years. Ahmadi had appeared with bare shoulders and uncovered hair at an event that she livestreamed on her YouTube channel in 2024.The charges included “offending public decency through the production and publication of vulgar and immoral content on cyberspace platforms.”Hardliners are stepping up pressure on the authorities. The editor of the journal Kayhan, Hossein Shariatmadari, wrote that enforcement is both a legal obligation and a religious duty for officials.A television show – “Park Way” – produced for the Tehran Municipality has devoted several episodes to the issue of women’s dress, calling for action against those who flout approved dress codes. One said that “unconventional behaviors should not be exhibited by anyone in public places such as parks.”Women have also been mobilized to demand the hijab be worn. At a small rally in Isfahan this week, one placard read: “Netanyahu: Unveiled women are our soldiers for free.”Netanyahu is not on record as making that remark, but the slogan reflects a broader narrative promoted by Iranian hardliners, portraying women who do not wear the hijab as, at the very least, disloyal to their country.But there’s plenty of evidence that many Iranian women are not intimidated by official campaigns.Social media videos have popped up showing young women on scooters wearing helmets, but no headscarves. The government is yet to fulfil a promise that women will be issued licenses to ride motorbikes.The videos include convoys of young women on scooters riding through Tehran and other cities. One Instagram post features a group of women declaring: “We’re the motorcycle girls of Shiraz! Shiraz girls, let’s go!”Another Instagram account posted video of about 20 female motorcyclists in the central city of Isfahan, describing it as “the biggest female motorcycle event in Isfahan.”As with so many social and cultural issues in Iran, the wearing of the hijab seems to some a misplaced priority at a time of conflict and economic crisis.That appears to include President Masoud Pezeshkian. Referring to an interview with a conservative cleric, he said: “The cleric mentioned hijab… Well, there are neighborhoods, there are mosques – go and work on it there! Can you really change people’s behavior through laws?”Pezeshkian went on to say that his daughter sometimes disagreed with him.“Does it mean I should force her?!” he asked.“Changing behavior is a cultural matter; it’s about belief. You can’t create belief in people through force.”Former MP Gholamali Jafarzadeh Imanabadi argued officials should focus on inflation and livelihoods instead of the hijab.And an unofficial media outlet posted an article entitled: A Provocation to a War-Weary Public - What Is Behind the Return of Hijab Patrols and Business Closures?Iranian authorities first began urging women to wear the hijab after the 1979 revolution. Before that, the monarchy had promoted a more secular and westernized image of women.Article 638 of Iran’s Islamic Penal Code criminalizes women appearing in public without “Islamic hijab,” although it does not precisely define what that means. A much tougher law approved in 2024 would have introduced a broader system of escalating penalties and surveillance, but its implementation was halted following intervention by the Supreme National Security Council.This has antagonized hardliners. One member of Iran’s parliament, Mohammad-Taqi Naqdali, said this week: “We see what the state of nudity and public vice is like in our midst…Israel and America cannot destroy us, but this decay that has plagued our religious culture and is spreading nudity in a disastrous and widespread manner in society will.”But the regime is treading carefully – for now.“They still don’t dare say anything to people on the street. Girls in Tehran are out and about wearing crop tops, shorts, and all kinds of clothes, and headscarves are practically no longer a thing,” one Tehran woman in her 60s told CNN by phone.“I don’t think they can make these girls wear headscarves again. But then again, that’s also what we thought when the revolution happened. We never thought they would be able to force us to wear them, but in the end, they did.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story