Skip to main content

France becomes first EU country to ban social media for kids under 15

▶ Watch Video: France passes law banning some social media apps for kids under 15

France has become the first country in the European Union to ban social media for children under the age of 15, after its parliament overwhelmingly approved landmark legislation by 279 votes to 81.

Under the new law, children under 15 will be prevented from creating new social media accounts on platforms such as TikTok and Snapchat from September, while existing accounts will be blocked from January 2027, according to the legislation. 

The law will also ban students from having phones in high schools from next year, and require social platforms to introduce age verification checks. Students were already prohibited from having phones in French elementary and middle schools. 

“France is leading the way in Europe when it comes to protecting our children and teenagers,” President Emmanuel Macron said, hailing the legislation’s passage as a landmark moment. 

Earlier this year, France’s public health watchdog concluded that social media had harmful effects on teenagers’ mental health, especially girls.

FRANCE-SOCIETY-ADDICTION-SMARTPHONE-YOUTH-SCHOOL
Teenage girls look at their phones in front of their school in Valence, France, on July 7, 2026.

Nicolas Guyonnet/Hans Lucas/AFP/Getty

Macron has made online child safety a defining issue of the final years of his presidency, and the ban will likely be one of the last major domestic reforms he ushers through. Macron will mark a decade in office next year, and he cannot run again in April’s national election as, like the U.S., France has a two consecutive term limit for its presidents.

Will it work?

Critics argue that the biggest challenge will be enforcement. Many question whether age-verification technology is robust enough to prevent children from accessing social media. 

Some teens may bypass the restrictions by using VPNs, fake dates of birth or accounts created by older friends or family members.

Privacy campaigners have also warned that stronger age checks may require users to hand over more personal information, while others argue the ban could simply push young people toward less regulated platforms rather than reducing the amount of time they spend online. 

“The global rollout of social media bans represents a serious threat to the freedom and privacy of millions of internet users across the world. Requiring users to upload sensitive ID or biometric information to access social media does not keep children safe, but does introduce serious cybersecurity and privacy risks for all users of all ages,” Maya Thomas, a legal and policy officer at the British organization Big Brother Watch, told CBS News.

“We have already seen in Australia that a social media ban can easily be circumvented, with some children even bypassing age gates by drawing on fake moustaches. Governments wishing to tackle the harmful business practices of social media companies must do so by regulating the companies directly, not by imposing restrictions upon their users,” Thomas said.

Australia’s experience has fueled concerns about the practicality of blanket bans.

Australia became the first country to impose such a measure when it banned under-16s from social media at the end of 2025. But around 70% of parents polled by Australia’s internet regulator in March said their children remained on the platforms, having found ways to bypass age-gating systems.

The French legislation includes exemptions for educational platforms and online encyclopedias.

Wider trends and “digital sovereignty”

The social media ban aligns with a wider push by France under Macron, along with some EU partners, for “digital sovereignty.” The idea is that Europe should become less dependent on American and Chinese technology companies, while taking a tougher regulatory approach to the digital economy and encouraging European alternatives.

In January, Macron said in a post on X that French “children’s brains are not for sale. Neither to American platforms nor to Chinese networks.”

The strategy extends beyond social media. France and Germany recently announced plans to develop an alternative to military software supplied by the U.S. firm Palantir, while France’s domestic intelligence service ended its contract with the American tech firm earlier this year.

And while France is the first EU member state to introduce such a ban, it is unlikely to be the last.

“It is clear we need age-appropriate restrictions to platforms,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said last week.

Last month, the U.K. also announced plans to introduce a ban on social media accounts for under-16s from January 2027.

But looming bans aside, the parliamentary vote makes France just the second country in the world to introduce a nationwide social media ban for children, following Australia. 

As more than a dozen other countries, including Canada, Denmark and Malaysia, weigh up their own legislation to restrict children’s access to social media, France may provide another early test case, with governments across the world watching closely to see if the outright ban can achieve its intended aims.

US Army attack helicopters crashing at historically high rate amid mechanical issues

(CNN) — The US Army’s Apache helicopters are crashing at a historically high rate amid a widespread problem with the model’s transmission, according to a CNN analysis of military accident data.The helicopter type has experienced five major crashes since October, and a deadly mishap earlier this month in Texas killed two soldiers, sparked a wildfire and led the Army to temporarily bar Apache pilots from conducting routine training flights. With that crash, fiscal year 2026 is on pace to be the second worst for Apache flight accidents since a new model of the AH-64 was rolled out in 2011.The Army announced that the pause in training flights, which exempted units deployed to the Middle East, ended Wednesday.This year’s rate of major Apache crashes — known as Class A mishaps in Army parlance, meant to represent any accident that kills or permanently disables a person or results in the loss of an aircraft or $2.5 million in damage — surpasses typical years and rivals that of the service’s most severe rate in the 2024 fiscal year, according to CNN’s review of data. The accident rate is based on the number of incidents compared to the total hours the aircraft spent flying, calculated using data that has been publicly released and flight hour estimates for the current year provided to CNN by the Army.In Fiscal year 2024 there were nine major Apache crashes amid a spike in accidents across all Army helicopter models. Army leaders ordered a special safety training initiative that year and attributed the accidents to human errors stemming from decreased experience among its pilots and an increase in training intensity and complexity after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine inspired a new focus on preparing for major conflicts.But the causes of this year’s spike are murkier. The July issue of an official Army flight safety newsletter said that just over half of this year’s Apache accidents, including more minor incidents, are primarily attributable to human error. It’s unclear how many of the most-severe crashes are due to equipment failures, but the magazine said that “a catastrophic transmission failure was noted in one Class A mishap.”CNN estimated this year’s major Apache crash rate to be approximately 6.24 per every 100,000 flying hours. Thus far in fiscal year 2026, five Class A flight mishaps involving the attack helicopter have occurred. The Apache, through August 15, had flown approximately 80,171 hours. That number combines 42,971 hours through March 31 that were listed in the internal Army safety newsletter and an estimate provided to CNN by an Army safety spokesperson that pilots had logged approximately 37,200 additional flight hours through August 15.Fiscal year 2024, by comparison, had a rate of 7.02 major crashes per 100,000 hours for the aircraft.The E-model Apache, introduced in 2011, has faced significant problems this year with its transmission that could knock out the aircraft’s tail rotor, electrical power and hydraulics, according to a pair of internal safety messages obtained by CNN. The loss of those systems can put a helicopter into a sudden spin and potentially knock out its flight controls. As of mid-July, the cause of the problems remained “under investigation,” according to a safety message released at the time.Army spokesperson Maj. Montrell Russell declined to answer questions regarding the transmission investigation or disclose any “preliminary findings” regarding the causes of this month’s deadly Texas crash at Fort Hood.“We express our deep sadness over the loss of the two Soldiers near Fort Hood,” Russell said in a statement to CNN.He said that “special controls and release protections” prevent the service from providing detailed “technical aviation information,” to include how many of this year’s crashes are related to the helicopters’ transmission.The initial April safety message, first reported by trade publication Defense One, identified 70 potentially faulty transmissions and ordered all units to stop flying affected Apaches pending repair. A follow-up message sent in mid-July said the root cause remains “under investigation” and added 10 more suspect transmissions to the no-fly list.The two safety messages combined to impact roughly a tenth of the Army’s attack helicopter fleet. In early June, an Army official told CNN that all affected Apaches remained grounded, and the Army did not answer CNN’s questions about how many, if any, have returned to flight since then.Meanwhile, the Apache’s transmission issues continue to be mentioned in Army flight documents. CNN obtained an August 14 internal Army order that formally cited the two transmission safety messages in its references for the service’s training flight pause after the Texas crash. Russell cautioned that “including these messages in safety reviews does not imply causation for any individual mishap.”The Apache’s manufacturer, Boeing, has deployed teams to Army maintenance depots to assist with inspecting and fixing the transmissions, according to the Army order.The Army and Boeing did not answer questions on how they identified the potentially faulty parts.A Boeing spokesperson confirmed to CNN that the company is “supporting the U.S. Army’s investigation to ensure the operational readiness and safety of any affected aircraft,” but referred additional questions to the Army.Davis Winkie’s work at CNN is supported by a partnership between Outrider Foundation and Journalism Funding Partners (JFP). CNN retains full editorial control of the reporting.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story