Skip to main content

Christopher Nolan describes challenges of creating ‘The Odyssey’

▶ Watch Video: Christopher Nolan talks “The Odyssey,” its authenticity and challenges faced creating the film

Filmmaker Christopher Nolan said he knew filming “The Odyssey,” which was shot in six countries, “was going to be hard.”

“For us, it was just the sheer magnitude of it’s ‘The Odyssey,’ it should be hard. We’re going to go out there and we’re going to make it as well as we can,” Nolan told “CBS Mornings” co-host Gayle King in an interview that aired on Monday.

“The Odyssey,” which Nolan wrote and directed, pulled in more than $260 million worldwide over the weekend. It features a star-studded cast, including Matt Damon, Anne Hathaway, Zendaya and Tom Holland.

“It was the hardest movie definitely that I’ve ever done,” Damon told “CBS Mornings” recently. “It felt in a lot of ways more like an expedition than a movie because of the locations we were at. We’d be shooting on top of a mountain. We’d have to hike up the mountain to shoot and that part of it ended up being really fun because it was challenging, for everybody there.”

The film is also the first commercial feature shot entirely in IMAX.

Nolan said he told himself as a teenager that if he ever had the opportunity to direct a Hollywood film, he wanted “to do the whole thing on IMAX.”

“It immerses you. The image is so sharp, the color is so clear. It’s so much the way your eyes see the world,” he said. “It fills your peripheral vision when it’s on the biggest screen possible.”

But it comes with more challenges.

“The film is huge. … So after each, sort of just under three minutes, you run out of film,” Nolan explained. “So you have to ask the actors on a longer scene to just stay in the emotional state that they’re in, however intense that is, and then you quietly reload the camera and keep everybody focused and then start the scene again.”

For Nolan, authenticity in the film was key.

“These are great actors. You could stick them in front of a green screen and they’d do amazing,” he said. “But to me, for the audience, if you want to put the audience on the deck of that ship, get out there on a real boat with Matt Damon, with Tom Holland and Zendaya. Put them in the real waves. Get that IMAX camera, put it on that action, and that way you can immerse the audience.”

“It’s exciting, but it’s scary”

The Oscar winner said he still gets nervous despite his success and years in the entertainment industry.

“I make films for audiences, for the theater, for the cinema, and so for me, the movie’s really not done until the audience kind of tells me what it is. That’s what completes the film. It’s exciting, but it’s scary,” he said. 

Nolan grew up watching filmmakers like George Lucas and Steven Spielberg and for him, “making films on the big screen is very much an attempt to get back to that experience that I had as a kid.”

Darline Graham’s race in South Carolina is a test of Trump’s chutzpah

(CNN) — President Donald Trump’s endorsement has never looked as feeble as it has in the month of August 2026. Already six of his chosen candidates have been defeated.But Tuesday’s special primary runoff for US Senate in South Carolina is an especially big test of not just his endorsement and domination of his party, but also his chutzpah.That’s because Trump has put his reputation on the line like he rarely has before — even as his fortunes with his party have ebbed — and for seemingly relatively little upside.South Carolina’s voters will decide between Rep. Ralph Norman and the Trump-backed candidacy of appointed Sen. Darline Graham, the political neophyte sister of Sen. Lindsey Graham, who died last month.It’s difficult to say who has the edge, given the dearth of quality polling and the rapid turnaround from the first round of the primary just two weeks ago.But those results made it clear Graham was no shoo-in. She took 32.7% to Norman’s 24.6%, and there are plenty of signs the South Carolina GOP has been reluctant to accede to Trump’s advice. The president’s super PAC, MAGA Inc., has also now spent more than $800,000 — perhaps a sign of his political operation’s uncertainty.And if it doesn’t pay off, it will be a real unforced error for Trump.The situation looks somewhat accidental. After Lindsey Graham’s death, Trump recommended Darline Graham as the appointee to replace him, and Gov. Henry McMaster complied. That seemed relatively harmless; the seat, after all, was up for election in November.Darline Graham was widely expected to be a placeholder while a coterie of ambitious South Carolina Republicans tangled over a full term. But things suddenly shifted. Just three days after she was sworn in, Trump began talking her up as a candidate for a full term. And she soon said she would run.All of this despite Graham having been almost anonymous politically, until about a month and a half ago.There are a number of ways in which this was brazen.For one, by trying to anoint Graham, Trump effectively thumbed his nose at a bunch of South Carolina Republicans who have been waiting a long time for an open Senate seat. The last vacancy was also filled by an appointee who later ran for and won the seat, Sen. Tim Scott. Before then, the last vacancy was in 2004.It would be one thing for Trump to endorse in a crowded primary; it’s another to try to help someone leapfrog experienced politicians who have been building their brands for years.And that brings us to a related point: Trump is basically asking his voters just to trust him — and Graham.Because Graham has been such a political nonentity, she has almost no track record. Graham doesn’t even seem to have thought through her positions on some of the big issues, as evidenced by her recent remarks at a debate about whether Taiwan is a national security concern for the United States.So when it comes to what she believes in and would do, voters might reason it will be similar to what her brother did or what Trump wants, but how can they be sure? With someone like Norman, they can at least gauge him by what he’s done previously.What’s more, even those shortcuts might not accrue to Graham’s benefit.While there is surely some goodwill toward the sister of a senator who recently died, her brother was not a beloved figure in the South Carolina Republican Party. His past support for comprehensive immigration reform — some to his right labeled him “Grahamnesty” — haunted him over the years.He got less than 57% of the primary vote in June before his death, despite not facing a very formidable and well-known challenger. That was the lowest of any incumbent GOP senator running in a primary besides Texas’ John Cornyn and Louisiana’s Bill Cassidy, who both lost.And finally, it’s brazen from Trump because it seems somewhat pointless. It’s not clear what he gets out of the deal. It’s not like the seat is in serious jeopardy in the general election and Republicans need a strong candidate. And it’s not like whoever wins a South Carolina GOP primary wouldn’t be a pretty strong Trump ally.Trump also inserted himself in the process even as it was clear his fortunes with his party were waning somewhat.The president actually did this just a couple of weeks after his endorsed candidate for South Carolina governor, Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, crashed and burned in the primary runoff. (Trump endorsed the other candidate, too, apparently to save himself too much embarrassment.) What better time to roll the dice again?A Graham loss would also be an especially big setback for the president because true Trump loyalists would seem to have a reason to reject Norman. After all, he initially endorsed former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley over Trump in the 2024 presidential primary. (Norman later backed Trump when Haley’s campaign fizzled)That kind of apostasy is usually all GOP voters need to vote against you. But imagine voters pick a non-Trump-endorser over a Trump-endorsed candidate.GOP voters also generally abide by Trump’s wishes in federal races — and especially Senate races. While a series of Trump-backed candidates for governor and other statewide office have lost primaries, only three Trump-endorsed Senate candidates have — and only one since 2018.That’s the potential rebuke Trump has set himself up for. And if it arrives, it will be the latest in a really curious succession of political moves.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story