Skip to main content

Darline Graham’s race in South Carolina is a test of Trump’s chutzpah

(CNN) — President Donald Trump’s endorsement has never looked as feeble as it has in the month of August 2026. Already six of his chosen candidates have been defeated.

But Tuesday’s special primary runoff for US Senate in South Carolina is an especially big test of not just his endorsement and domination of his party, but also his chutzpah.

That’s because Trump has put his reputation on the line like he rarely has before — even as his fortunes with his party have ebbed — and for seemingly relatively little upside.

South Carolina’s voters will decide between Rep. Ralph Norman and the Trump-backed candidacy of appointed Sen. Darline Graham, the political neophyte sister of Sen. Lindsey Graham, who died last month.

It’s difficult to say who has the edge, given the dearth of quality polling and the rapid turnaround from the first round of the primary just two weeks ago.

But those results made it clear Graham was no shoo-in. She took 32.7% to Norman’s 24.6%, and there are plenty of signs the South Carolina GOP has been reluctant to accede to Trump’s advice. The president’s super PAC, MAGA Inc., has also now spent more than $800,000 — perhaps a sign of his political operation’s uncertainty.

And if it doesn’t pay off, it will be a real unforced error for Trump.

The situation looks somewhat accidental. After Lindsey Graham’s death, Trump recommended Darline Graham as the appointee to replace him, and Gov. Henry McMaster complied. That seemed relatively harmless; the seat, after all, was up for election in November.

Darline Graham was widely expected to be a placeholder while a coterie of ambitious South Carolina Republicans tangled over a full term. But things suddenly shifted. Just three days after she was sworn in, Trump began talking her up as a candidate for a full term. And she soon said she would run.

All of this despite Graham having been almost anonymous politically, until about a month and a half ago.

There are a number of ways in which this was brazen.

For one, by trying to anoint Graham, Trump effectively thumbed his nose at a bunch of South Carolina Republicans who have been waiting a long time for an open Senate seat. The last vacancy was also filled by an appointee who later ran for and won the seat, Sen. Tim Scott. Before then, the last vacancy was in 2004.

It would be one thing for Trump to endorse in a crowded primary; it’s another to try to help someone leapfrog experienced politicians who have been building their brands for years.

And that brings us to a related point: Trump is basically asking his voters just to trust him — and Graham.

Because Graham has been such a political nonentity, she has almost no track record. Graham doesn’t even seem to have thought through her positions on some of the big issues, as evidenced by her recent remarks at a debate about whether Taiwan is a national security concern for the United States.

So when it comes to what she believes in and would do, voters might reason it will be similar to what her brother did or what Trump wants, but how can they be sure? With someone like Norman, they can at least gauge him by what he’s done previously.

What’s more, even those shortcuts might not accrue to Graham’s benefit.

While there is surely some goodwill toward the sister of a senator who recently died, her brother was not a beloved figure in the South Carolina Republican Party. His past support for comprehensive immigration reform — some to his right labeled him “Grahamnesty” — haunted him over the years.

He got less than 57% of the primary vote in June before his death, despite not facing a very formidable and well-known challenger. That was the lowest of any incumbent GOP senator running in a primary besides Texas’ John Cornyn and Louisiana’s Bill Cassidy, who both lost.

And finally, it’s brazen from Trump because it seems somewhat pointless. It’s not clear what he gets out of the deal. It’s not like the seat is in serious jeopardy in the general election and Republicans need a strong candidate. And it’s not like whoever wins a South Carolina GOP primary wouldn’t be a pretty strong Trump ally.

Trump also inserted himself in the process even as it was clear his fortunes with his party were waning somewhat.

The president actually did this just a couple of weeks after his endorsed candidate for South Carolina governor, Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, crashed and burned in the primary runoff. (Trump endorsed the other candidate, too, apparently to save himself too much embarrassment.) What better time to roll the dice again?

A Graham loss would also be an especially big setback for the president because true Trump loyalists would seem to have a reason to reject Norman. After all, he initially endorsed former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley over Trump in the 2024 presidential primary. (Norman later backed Trump when Haley’s campaign fizzled)

That kind of apostasy is usually all GOP voters need to vote against you. But imagine voters pick a non-Trump-endorser over a Trump-endorsed candidate.

GOP voters also generally abide by Trump’s wishes in federal races — and especially Senate races. While a series of Trump-backed candidates for governor and other statewide office have lost primaries, only three Trump-endorsed Senate candidates have — and only one since 2018.

That’s the potential rebuke Trump has set himself up for. And if it arrives, it will be the latest in a really curious succession of political moves.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Venezuelan gang member imprisoned after Colorado attacks, three others still at large

Click here for updates on this story    SALIDA, Coloraod (KCNC) -- Three members of a violent Venezuelan gang who are believed responsible for a frightening, rage-fueled pursuit of a Colorado man remain free as a single member of the group begins serving a prison sentence. Two months ago, Daviler Brito Ibarra was ordered to serve three years in the Colorado Department of Corrections.According to case records, Ibarra led the other three men from a party in Buena Vista to a hotel room in Salida in search of revenge. Ibarra and an unspecified number of his friends reportedly groped a woman at the Buena Vista party. That woman's husband came to her defense and confronted Ibarra, according to the arrest affidavit.Ibarra attacked the husband with a rock and injured him, per the report. The man escaped the assault and fled in his vehicle toward Salida. Ibarra and the others followed, but not before Ibarra told the woman that he was going to kill her husband, according to the affidavit.Her husband later told investigators that he "began hiding because he knew how dangerous these guys were and feared for his life."Ibarra's group went to the Sinawav Lodge in Salida. There, at 3 a.m. on Nov. 2, 2025, Ibarra began kicking a car and stabbing it with a six-inch knife that was parked in front of a resident's room. Inside that room was another woman, an acquaintance of Ibarra's from their workplace, who had been at the same party in Buena Vista. But, according to the affidavit, that woman said she had left the party four hours earlier and knew nothing of the conflict. She told investigators that while Ibarra was stabbing the car, he "was explaining this was how he was going to kill someone."She also said Ibarra appeared extremely intoxicated.Ibarra then kicked down the door to the room. It was a solid-core wood door, investigators noted, and was found in several pieces inside the room. Once inside, Ibarra and his friends terrorized the woman and an unidentified person, holding them at gunpoint and knifepoint, per the report. Ibarra yelled that he was going to kill them both if they did not tell him where the man who had fled from the party was hiding. He also tackled the woman onto her bed and held a knife near her face, repeating his demands, according to the affidavit. The affidavit did not describe how the incident ended. Later press releases from both Salida and Buena Vista police departments stated Ibarra and the three other men - Miguel Polo, Carlos Reyes, and their alleged driver, Wisan Ruiz - fled to the Front Range after the attack. The woman and the other person inside the hotel room were scared but uninjured, per the police report.The affidavit did not state how or why Ibarra's group chose to drive to the Sinawav Lodge to pursue the man who fled the party, but their instincts were correct. It stated that the man did drive there but hid some distance from the building. He witnessed Ibarra's arrival, his yelling and stabbing of the car, and the kicking down of the door. The affidavit also did not explain whether the man knew either of the people inside the lodge's room. It also did not describe the severity of his injuries from the attack at the party.Ibarra was arrested four days later in the Denver area by Salida PD officers and agents from the Colorado Bureau of Investigation's Fugitive Task Force. His arrest warrant called for two counts of attempted murder and six other felonies, but he was sentenced to three years behind bars after pleading guilty to a single count of felony burglary.The other three men have not been found. Separately, the police chiefs of the Buena Vista and Salida police departments expressed their concern to CBS Colorado for the safety of the victims. In fact, the Salida officer who wrote Ibarra's affidavit noted the suspects are reportedly "members of a Venezuelan gang, likely Tren de Aragua.""Many persons related to this case," he wrote, "refused to provide witness statements because they were under the influence of fear if Daviler or his friends found out. Specifically, (the husband) stated that when these guys figured out they spoke with police, they would be killed."Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.
Read Next Story