Skip to main content

Apalachee High School shooter sentenced to life without parole

▶ Watch Video: School shooter Colt Gray sentenced to life without parole

Colt Gray, the Georgia teenager who admitted to killing four people in the 2024 shooting at Apalachee High School, will spend the rest of his life in prison without the possibility of parole. Superior Court Judge Nicholas Primm handed down the sentence Tuesday in Barrow County.

Primm imposed the sentence after hearing three days of testimony from survivors, victims’ families, investigators and mental health experts. Gray pleaded guilty last week to all 55 charges, including four counts of malice murder.

Gray admitted killing teachers Richard Aspinwall and Cristina Irimie and students Mason Schermerhorn and Christian Angulo during the Sept. 4, 2024, shooting at Apalachee High School. Another teacher and eight students were wounded.

Because Gray was 14 at the time of the shooting, Georgia law prohibited prosecutors from seeking the death penalty. His sentence ranged from life with the possibility of parole to life without parole.

Judge says Gray studied trials of shooters and understood his actions

During his sentencing, Primm said that while the Supreme Court considered this sentence for youth only on the rarest occasions, Gray fit those parameters.

“I also recognize that you were failed by each of your parents, you were failed by your extended family, to a certain extent you were failed by a society that can’t stop propagating this misguided value in online cultures and social media rather than making genuine interpersonal connections and relationships,” Primm said. “But that failure does not absolve you from who you chose to idolize, worship, and become.”

He said that Gray’s actions weren’t done out of fear, anger, or hatred. Instead, the judge argued that the shooting was done for “the infamy of it.” Despite knowing that other mass shooters that he idolized were sentenced to life without parole, Gray made moves to plan the shooting, “contemplating the pain over and over,” Primm told the teen.

“You wrote ‘I want to make history. I want people to remember the pain I caused,’ and there you succeeded,” Primm said. “The pain that you visited upon this community is unlikely to disappear in my lifetime.”

Gray was taken away by officers after the judge informed him of his rights to appeal the charges.

Victims’ families describe lives forever changed

The sentencing hearing opened with emotional victim impact statements from survivors and relatives of those killed.

Family members described the lasting trauma left by the shooting, remembering the four victims and detailing how their deaths continue to affect parents, siblings, classmates and the broader Barrow County community.

Georgia High School Shooting
Breanna Schermerhorn, the mother of Mason Schermerhorn, looks toward Colt Gray during the plea hearing at Barrow County Superior Court in Winder, Ga, on July 24, 2026. 

Arvin Temkar/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP

Mason Schermerhorn’s family remembered him as a caring teenager who “was so much more than a victim,” while recounting the frantic search for him and the moment they learned he had been killed. His sisters told the court they continue to struggle with anxiety, panic attacks and the emotional weight of returning to schools and public places. 

Prosecutors argued shooting was carefully planned

Prosecutors sought to show the attack was deliberate and extensively planned.

Investigators testified they recovered notebooks, cellphone evidence and Discord messages showing Gray’s fascination with previous mass shooters, particularly Parkland gunman Nikolas Cruz.

Evidence presented during the hearing included maps of Apalachee High School, writings describing how many people Gray expected to kill or injure and other materials prosecutors argued documented months of planning before the attack.

In their closing arguments, District Attorney Brad Smith argued that the teen had staged “Easter eggs” and references to other shooters in anticipation for his trial to keep his fame going.

“This is not someone is in some sort of uncontrollable emotional breakdown. He is still calculating up to the second of the shooting,” Smith told the judge.

Smith argued that Gray also mimicked other shooters in the interviews with investigators afterwards, saying that the teen was “in the midst of their plan.”

In earlier testimony, Barrow County District Attorney’s Office Investigator Ashley Gilliland played recorded jail phone calls between Gray and his mother.

Georgia High School Shooting
Ashley Gilliland, an investigator with the Barrow County District Attorney’s office, looks over the assault rifle used in the Apalachee High School shooting by suspect Colt Gray during Gray’s sentencing on July 27, 2026, in Winder, Ga. 

Jason Getz/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP

In one recording, Gray said, “Can you believe it, Mom? I took over Thomas Crooks in popularity. Take that,” referring to the gunman who attempted to assassinate then-presidential candidate Donald Trump during a Pennsylvania campaign rally weeks before the Apalachee shooting.

In another call, Gray told his mother he was “in the big leagues,” comments prosecutors argued reflected his desire to achieve notoriety alongside other mass shooters.

After comparing the teen to a shark, Smith said that “Colt Gray cannot be in society” and called for him to spend the rest of his life in jail.

Defense points to mental illness, troubled childhood and progress in custody

The defense argued Gray’s actions should be viewed through the lens of years of trauma, neglect and untreated mental illness.

Forensic psychologist Dr. Kevin Richards testified Gray grew up amid financial instability, conflict between his parents and repeated upheaval at home. Richards said Gray became increasingly isolated, immersed himself in online communities centered on school shootings and exhibited symptoms of anxiety, depression and paranoia.

Richards testified Gray had been prescribed Zoloft, was diagnosed with an unspecified personality disorder and expressed remorse during interviews, telling him he “knew he screwed up a lot of lives.”

During cross-examination, however, Richards acknowledged Gray exaggerated some mental health symptoms and testified he found no evidence Gray suffered from schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or met Georgia’s legal standard for insanity.

Juvenile counselor says Gray followed rules while in custody

The defense also called Steven Baker, a counselor with Georgia’s Department of Juvenile Justice who worked with Gray after his arrest.

Baker testified Gray participated in social skills classes, life-skills programs and counseling designed to prepare juveniles for life after detention. He described Gray as cooperative, saying he generally got along with other youths, followed facility rules and consistently attended psychiatric appointments.

Baker testified Gray was transferred to another juvenile facility after his original facility lost its mental health counselor.

On cross-examination, prosecutors questioned Baker about restrictions inside the facility. Baker testified residents are prohibited from possessing offensive or violent images, including photographs of school shooters, and said rooms are routinely searched and personal belongings screened by security.

Baker said he could not recall any disciplinary reports involving Gray possessing prohibited materials or displaying photos of school shooters in his room.

DFCS commissioner details abuse allegations and family concerns

The defense also called Georgia Division of Family & Children Services Commissioner Candice Broce, who testified about the agency’s history with the Gray family.

Broce said DFCS had longstanding concerns involving the family, including allegations of physical abuse involving Gray and repeated questions about his safety and well-being.

Georgia High School Shooting
Colt Gray, left, stands next to his attorney Charlton Allen and pleads guilty at Barrow County Superior Court in Winder, Ga., on Friday, July 24, 2026.

Arvin Temkar/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP

She testified Gray struggled with sleep and engaged in self-harm while in state care, prompting medication changes. According to Broce, Gray’s condition improved after contact with his mother stopped. She said he slept better, ate more and appeared to become “a different child.”

Broce also testified she believed Gray’s mother fueled his growing obsession with school shooters while he was 14 years old.

During cross-examination, prosecutors highlighted DFCS records documenting excessive school absences by Gray and his siblings, concerns about the children’s hygiene, reports of domestic violence between Gray’s parents, allegations of physical abuse and records showing Gray’s mother tested positive for drugs during the agency’s involvement.

Gray’s grandmother, Deborah Polhamus, echoes the sentiments during her testimony, agreeing with the prosecution that the teen’s parents failed him.

“I wouldn’t call them terrible but they were pretty close,” she said.

While what Gray did was horrible, defense attorney Charlton Allen argued that he could still be redeemed, and that his time in custody has helped him. 

“Life without parole is an extreme policy to look at – especially as a teenager,” Allen argued.

Guilty plea avoided a jury trial

Gray entered a non-negotiated guilty plea last week, acknowledging he understood the charges against him, the constitutional rights he was waiving, and that he was pleading guilty freely and voluntarily.

The plea eliminated the need for a jury trial after Judge Primm previously ordered any trial moved to neighboring Columbia County because of extensive pretrial publicity.

Gray’s father, Colin Gray, is scheduled to be sentenced on Thursday after a jury convicted him earlier this year on 27 charges, including second-degree murder, involuntary manslaughter and cruelty to children. Prosecutors argued he provided the rifle used in the shooting despite repeated warning signs about his son’s deteriorating mental health.

Críticas a Trump terminan en inusuales cargos penales contra un oficial de la Fuerza Aérea que pidió su destitución

Un militar de la Fuerza Aérea de Estados Unidos que fue arrestado dos veces, una de ellas en las escalinatas del Capitolio mientras pedía la destitución del presidente Donald Trump, fue acusado formalmente este lunes por sus comentarios, según un documento de acusación que su abogado compartió con CNN.El mayor Jason Watson enfrenta los siguientes cargos en virtud del Código Uniforme de Justicia Militar, según el documento: tres infracciones del Artículo 88 por presuntos comentarios “desdeñosos” sobre Trump, cinco infracciones del Artículo 92 por presuntamente desobedecer órdenes y dos infracciones del Artículo 133 por presunta conducta inapropiada de un oficial.Los inusuales cargos en virtud del Artículo 88 están relacionados con la entrevista que el oficial de la Fuerza Aérea concedió en junio al boletín de Substack Defenders of our Republic, su protesta uniformado el 1 de julio en el Capitolio de Estados Unidos y una entrevista con CNN del 17 de agosto.Participar uniformado en cualquier actividad abiertamente partidista, como una protesta política, o emplear “palabras desdeñosas” contra el presidente y otros altos funcionarios civiles puede considerarse una infracción del Código Uniforme de Justicia Militar. Muchas infracciones menores de estas normas se resuelven de manera informal, pero las de Watson tuvieron una repercusión pública inusualmente alta.Watson fue arrestado por primera vez en julio mientras protestaba uniformado en el Capitolio de Estados Unidos, y volvió a ser arrestado la semana pasada, apenas unos días después de criticar nuevamente a Trump durante una entrevista con CNN. Uno de sus abogados, Chris Mutimer, dijo a CNN que se ordenó que su cliente permanezca en “detención preventiva” —una medida análoga a la denegación de libertad bajo fianza en un tribunal civil— a la espera de que se emprendan acciones legales contra él.“(Trump) no solo es un fracaso como presidente, sino que está violando flagrantemente la Constitución, infringiendo la ley, involucrado en una corrupción desenfrenada y matando a estadounidenses”, dijo Watson a Erin Burnett, de CNN, durante la entrevista. “Y eso es inaceptable para mí”.En julio, el secretario de la Fuerza Aérea, Troy Meink, dijo en una publicación en redes sociales que esperaba que todos los miembros de la Fuerza Aérea “cumplan todas las leyes y políticas que rigen la conducta personal, la participación política y el uso del uniforme”.“Los estadounidenses depositan su confianza en nosotros”, dijo Meink. “No podemos ni vamos a poner en riesgo la confianza de la nación”.Los cargos contra Watson por desobedecer órdenes alegan que infringió las normas del Departamento de Defensa que prohíben a los militares pronunciarse a favor de causas partidistas; utilizó “indebidamente” su uniforme en una conferencia de prensa en el Capitolio; incumplió las normas sobre permisos al viajar a Washington; y se negó a vestir su uniforme para ir a trabajar la mañana posterior a su entrevista con CNN.Los fiscales de la Fuerza Aérea también alegaron que la protesta de Watson en el Capitolio y su entrevista con CNN constituyeron “conducta impropia de un oficial”.Mutimer, abogado de Watson, dijo a Erin Burnett, de CNN, en “OutFront” que habló con su cliente el lunes y que “básicamente está en aislamiento por su seguridad”.Mutimer dijo: “Él cree verdaderamente en todo lo relacionado con nuestra Constitución y en lo que representa, así como en el juramento que prestó, y sostiene que hizo esto para que otros no tuvieran que hacerlo y para transmitir ese mensaje a cualquiera que tenga miedo y se sienta solo”.La fundadora de la organización que convocó la protesta de julio, Jessica Denson, de Removal Coalition, dijo a CNN en ese momento que Watson era consciente de los riesgos de lo que estaba haciendo y que se había puesto en contacto con ellos por correo electrónico.“Comenzamos a conversar, nos tomamos muy en serio su deseo de manifestarse y pensamos en la mejor manera de hacer que su sacrificio valiera la pena”, dijo Denson.Los consejos de guerra que derivan en cargos por “desacato a funcionarios” son poco frecuentes: una revisión de CNN solo identificó dos condenas de este tipo desde que se promulgó el actual Código Uniforme de Justicia Militar en 1951. En 1965, un teniente del Ejército fue declarado culpable de este cargo después de participar en una protesta fuera de la base contra la guerra de Vietnam en El Paso, Texas. El teniente Henry Howe fue condenado a la expulsión del servicio —el equivalente a una baja deshonrosa para un oficial— y a un año en la prisión militar de Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Finalmente, el secretario de Defensa Robert McNamara concedió la libertad condicional a Howe, poniendo fin a su condena.La condena más reciente en virtud del Artículo 88 se produjo en 2021, cuando el exteniente coronel del Cuerpo de Marines Stuart Scheller se declaró culpable de desacato a funcionarios y de otros cargos relacionados con una serie de videos que publicó en redes sociales en los que criticaba la gestión de la retirada de las fuerzas armadas estadounidenses de Afganistán por parte de la administración Biden. Scheller, quien estuvo recluido en una prisión militar durante un tiempo antes de su juicio, fue condenado a la pérdida de US$$ 5.000 de su sueldo y renunció al Cuerpo de Marines sin pensión como parte de un acuerdo de culpabilidad.Desde entonces, la administración Trump ha nombrado a Scheller asesor principal del subsecretario de Defensa para Personal y Preparación.Aún está por verse si el caso de Watson será remitido a juicio y si ese juicio se considerará un consejo de guerra especial o general. Los consejos de guerra especiales equivalen aproximadamente a juicios por delitos menores, mientras que los consejos de guerra generales son análogos a juicios por delitos graves y pueden imponer condenas más severas.La Fuerza Aérea no respondió de inmediato a una solicitud de comentarios enviada este lunes. En una declaración a CNN del 19 de agosto, un portavoz de la Fuerza Aérea dijo que Watson “se presume inocente” y que el Distrito de la Fuerza Aérea de Washington supervisará su juicio “si (su) caso es remitido a un consejo de guerra general”.Cpn información de Piper Hudspeth Blackburn, Carmen Conte Widman y Francesca Giuliani Hoffman, de CNNEl trabajo de Davis Winkie en CNN cuenta con el apoyo de una alianza entre Outrider Foundation y Journalism Funding Partners (JFP). CNN conserva el control editorial absoluto del informe.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story