Skip to main content

3 in custody after CBS News Chicago crew attacked near Adler Planetarium

▶ Watch Video: Witness recounts attack on CBS News Chicago crew by 3 men near Adler Planetarium

Three people are in custody after two of our CBS News Chicago journalists were attacked while on the job Monday afternoon. 

During the incident, a reporter and photographer were approached by three men, one with a dog, before their news truck and gear were destroyed. 

Witnesses describe a white tow truck pulling up to the Adler Planetarium as our team was preparing for a live shot for the second half of the 4 p.m. newscast. During the interaction, the dog was ordered to intimidate or possibly attack our crew. The dog did not obey the commands.

Witnesses who saw what was happening said the attack was racially motivated, as slurs were being directed towards the photographer, who is an African American man.

“I think it’s a hate crime,” one witness said. “I believe anybody that uses a racial slur is committing a hate crime.”

Another witness, who wanted to remain anonymous for safety, said he saw the incident as it happened. He said he and his wife saw the CBS News Chicago crew setting up. Before they were able to do their story on the hot weather, he said he saw the dog running towards them, described as a German Shepherd.

“And then the guy was yelling at his dog to attack. He was throwing racial slurs [N-word] at the cameraman and then he started kicking his dog,” he said.

The witness says he and his wife tried to diffuse the situation but backed down when the photographer hit the attacker with a folding stool.

“And he swung it and hit the guy in the head. And he was unfazed. Like, he got hit hard by that chair. For good reason, and it didn’t even, like, flinch him, and I think he hit him again, if I remember correctly, he hit him again and he’s still unflinched, and I’m like, this guy is, like, he’s on something. He’s gotta be,” he said.

Both the reporter and photographer were unharmed.

The same three people in the same tow truck were later arrested less than half an hour after Chicago police said they were pointing weapons at people in Brighton Park.

“We didn’t see any guns in that moment, but to know that it escalated to that, or it could have been that, is just terrifying,” another witness said.

CBS News Chicago uncovered an image of a gun that was posted on social media just a few hours before the attack by a man believed to be one of the suspects.

gun-in-attack.jpg
The photo above is of a gun that was posted on social media just a few hours before the attack by a man believed to be one of the suspects.

Neither of the suspects was officially charged as of Tuesday afternoon. As charges are pending, we dug into the criminal histories of all three men—each with a violent history of charges for using a tow truck to commit another crime. 

One had an active warrant out for their arrest. The second has an order of protection filed against them for threatening to burn a woman’s home down and breaking windows while children were present. The last was previously sentenced to six years in the Illinois Department of Corrections for aggravated battery with a firearm.

CBS News Chicago legal analyst Irv Miller explained that the state’s attorney’s office is likely considering a hate crime charge as the only detainable offence for what happened to our crews near the planetarium.

“Aggravated assault is a misdemeanor. However, if hate crime is also added, that makes hate crime a felony, which, by the way, makes it a detainable offense under the Pretrial Safety Act,” he said.

Miller says the fact there are three people makes it harder for the state’s attorney’s office to distinguish who did what and how to charge accordingly. 

Darline Graham’s race in South Carolina is a test of Trump’s chutzpah

(CNN) — President Donald Trump’s endorsement has never looked as feeble as it has in the month of August 2026. Already six of his chosen candidates have been defeated.But Tuesday’s special primary runoff for US Senate in South Carolina is an especially big test of not just his endorsement and domination of his party, but also his chutzpah.That’s because Trump has put his reputation on the line like he rarely has before — even as his fortunes with his party have ebbed — and for seemingly relatively little upside.South Carolina’s voters will decide between Rep. Ralph Norman and the Trump-backed candidacy of appointed Sen. Darline Graham, the political neophyte sister of Sen. Lindsey Graham, who died last month.It’s difficult to say who has the edge, given the dearth of quality polling and the rapid turnaround from the first round of the primary just two weeks ago.But those results made it clear Graham was no shoo-in. She took 32.7% to Norman’s 24.6%, and there are plenty of signs the South Carolina GOP has been reluctant to accede to Trump’s advice. The president’s super PAC, MAGA Inc., has also now spent more than $800,000 — perhaps a sign of his political operation’s uncertainty.And if it doesn’t pay off, it will be a real unforced error for Trump.The situation looks somewhat accidental. After Lindsey Graham’s death, Trump recommended Darline Graham as the appointee to replace him, and Gov. Henry McMaster complied. That seemed relatively harmless; the seat, after all, was up for election in November.Darline Graham was widely expected to be a placeholder while a coterie of ambitious South Carolina Republicans tangled over a full term. But things suddenly shifted. Just three days after she was sworn in, Trump began talking her up as a candidate for a full term. And she soon said she would run.All of this despite Graham having been almost anonymous politically, until about a month and a half ago.There are a number of ways in which this was brazen.For one, by trying to anoint Graham, Trump effectively thumbed his nose at a bunch of South Carolina Republicans who have been waiting a long time for an open Senate seat. The last vacancy was also filled by an appointee who later ran for and won the seat, Sen. Tim Scott. Before then, the last vacancy was in 2004.It would be one thing for Trump to endorse in a crowded primary; it’s another to try to help someone leapfrog experienced politicians who have been building their brands for years.And that brings us to a related point: Trump is basically asking his voters just to trust him — and Graham.Because Graham has been such a political nonentity, she has almost no track record. Graham doesn’t even seem to have thought through her positions on some of the big issues, as evidenced by her recent remarks at a debate about whether Taiwan is a national security concern for the United States.So when it comes to what she believes in and would do, voters might reason it will be similar to what her brother did or what Trump wants, but how can they be sure? With someone like Norman, they can at least gauge him by what he’s done previously.What’s more, even those shortcuts might not accrue to Graham’s benefit.While there is surely some goodwill toward the sister of a senator who recently died, her brother was not a beloved figure in the South Carolina Republican Party. His past support for comprehensive immigration reform — some to his right labeled him “Grahamnesty” — haunted him over the years.He got less than 57% of the primary vote in June before his death, despite not facing a very formidable and well-known challenger. That was the lowest of any incumbent GOP senator running in a primary besides Texas’ John Cornyn and Louisiana’s Bill Cassidy, who both lost.And finally, it’s brazen from Trump because it seems somewhat pointless. It’s not clear what he gets out of the deal. It’s not like the seat is in serious jeopardy in the general election and Republicans need a strong candidate. And it’s not like whoever wins a South Carolina GOP primary wouldn’t be a pretty strong Trump ally.Trump also inserted himself in the process even as it was clear his fortunes with his party were waning somewhat.The president actually did this just a couple of weeks after his endorsed candidate for South Carolina governor, Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, crashed and burned in the primary runoff. (Trump endorsed the other candidate, too, apparently to save himself too much embarrassment.) What better time to roll the dice again?A Graham loss would also be an especially big setback for the president because true Trump loyalists would seem to have a reason to reject Norman. After all, he initially endorsed former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley over Trump in the 2024 presidential primary. (Norman later backed Trump when Haley’s campaign fizzled)That kind of apostasy is usually all GOP voters need to vote against you. But imagine voters pick a non-Trump-endorser over a Trump-endorsed candidate.GOP voters also generally abide by Trump’s wishes in federal races — and especially Senate races. While a series of Trump-backed candidates for governor and other statewide office have lost primaries, only three Trump-endorsed Senate candidates have — and only one since 2018.That’s the potential rebuke Trump has set himself up for. And if it arrives, it will be the latest in a really curious succession of political moves.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story