Skip to main content

How to Cash a Check Without a Bank Account

If you need to cash a check and you have a bank account, you likely don’t give it a second thought — you just head to a branch or ATM. But while most Americans use a bank or credit union, the 2024 survey by the Federal Reserve found that 6% of U.S. adults are “unbanked,” meaning they, along with their spouse or partner, don’t have a checking, savings or money market account.

According to the Fed, low-income adults in the U.S. had particularly high unbanked rates. Among adults making less than $25,000, 22% were unbanked. Younger adults, Black and Hispanic adults, and adults with a disability were also found to have high unbanked rates. On the other hand, only 2% of adults with an income between $50,000 and $99,999 were unbanked.

That’s a lot of people who may need an affordable option when it comes to check cashing. Maybe you got a check from a job or for selling something. In any case, no one wants to hand over a chunk of your money just to get funds that belong to you.

Here are some reasonable options for cashing a check if you don’t have a bank account:

1. Go to the Check-Issuing Bank

Though some banks may cash checks for noncustomers, others will not. However, if you go to the bank that issued the check, you likely just need valid ID to cash it. After all, this is the bank’s own check. Still, you may have to pay for the privilege because you’re not a customer.

Here are some examples: If you don’t have an account, Bank of America will charge an $8 fee to cash its own checks. Wells Fargo charges $7.50. At Citibank there is no charge for checks under $5,000.

[Read: Best Online Banks.]

2. Visit a Retailer

You probably don’t live far from a Walmart, and the big retailer cashes checks relatively cheaply — certainly for less than some major banks.

“My advice for cashing a check when you don’t have a bank is to go to Walmart. Their system is simple. You’ll pay up to $4 for all printed checks up to $1,000 and up to $8 for all printed checks” of more than $1,000, says J.R. Duren, a personal finance writer. “The fees are very reasonable for any check amount and much better than check-cashers who may charge a percentage plus a fee.” Walmart also will cash two-party personal checks up to $200 for a maximum fee of $6.

Some supermarket chains will cash payroll checks and government checks but not personal checks.

[READ 10 Best High-Yield Savings Accounts of May 2026: Up to 4.10%]

3. Consider a Prepaid Debit Card

With this option, you can get a debit card that enables you to deposit your check directly — likely by mobile check deposit — onto the card without needing to open an account with a bank. Then you should be able to get cash from an ATM by using the card. But be mindful of potential drawbacks that include not having immediate access to the funds and possible fees.

The Serve Pay As You Go Visa Prepaid Card is a good option that doesn’t charge a monthly fee and allows you to add direct deposit for free. However, it does charge a $1 fee on transactions and a fee of up to $3.95 for cash reloads. You can use mobile check deposit as well, but the money won’t be available for 10 days. If you want the cash right away, Serve charges 1% (for payroll or government checks) or 5% (all other checks).

On the other hand, Netspend may charge a monthly fee, such as $5 or $9.95, and will hit you with an ATM fee, usually $2.95 per withdrawal. Netspend doesn’t charge for mobile check deposit. As with Serve, you must wait 10 days for funds availability, and you will pay extra to get expedited access to your check funds — 1.5% or 4.5%.

4. Look at Check-Cashing Stores

Check-cashing stores can get you your cash right away, but be wary of their fees. Some of them may charge no more than the other options listed above, but they might charge fees of up to 12%. One issue is that stores generally don’t list fees on their websites and may not reveal them to you until you show up with your check.

[Read: Best Checking Accounts.]

5. Sign Over the Check

If you have a friend or relative you trust and who is willing to help you out — and, of course, that person has a bank account — you can sign over your check. Where you endorse the check, also write, “Pay to the order of” with the person’s name. This is known as a “third-party check,” and bank rules on accepting such a check may vary, including possible fees. But if your friend or relative’s bank will take the check, then he could cash it and give you the money. It could be helpful for you to accompany the person to the bank in case the teller wants to see your ID since you’re the one to whom the check was made out.

The Bottom Line

Whatever you decide, as with every consumer spending decision, it is best to shop around to find the best price. If you frequently use alternative methods of cashing checks, you should research locations nearby for the cheapest fees, so you’ll know where to go whenever you’re in need of check cashing. Better yet, simply open a new checking account.

Adam Marlowe, chief experience officer at Georgia United Credit Union, suggests inquiring about options available with a local credit union. “Many offer free accounts as well as second-chance accounts for consumers with challenging credit histories,” he says.

More from U.S. News

Cashier’s Check vs. Money Order: What’s the Difference and When to Use Each

How to Avoid Bank Fees

Pros and Cons of Online Banking

How to Cash a Check Without a Bank Account originally appeared on usnews.com

Update 05/14/26: This story was previously published at an earlier date and has been updated with new information.

Iran’s hardliners warn of a ‘coup’ as US truce comes under pressure

(CNN) — As Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian walked alongside the coffin of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in Tehran last week, some of the black-clad mourners surrounding him chanted not in tribute to the late leader, but directly at him – “death to the compromiser.”Not far from that site, Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s top diplomat who negotiated a ceasefire with the Trump administration and lifted some sanctions on the Islamic Republic, was forced to flee the funeral after a mob pelted him with rocks amid death chants accusing him of being a “traitorous sellout.”The hostility directed at top officials during the funeral reflects a theory that has been gaining traction within the Islamic Republic’s most radical factions for months: that Iran’s wartime leaders who negotiated and signed the agreement with Washington are staging a soft coup against the Islamic Republic and its revolutionary ideals while the new supreme leader remains largely invisible for fear of his life – or, as some have suggested, because he is incapacitated.The hardline factions that attended the funeral in large numbers believe that instead of avenging Khamenei’s killing, Iranian officials have surrendered by signing an agreement that defies the orders of Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, the late leader’s son and successor. But Khamenei has remained hidden from public view, neither addressing the nation directly nor visibly asserting his authority, even as officials negotiate or govern in his name.Hardliners have accused Iran’s visible leadership – those running and representing the country as Khamenei remains in hiding – of plotting to consolidate power by suspending parliament, defying his orders in negotiations and attempting to disperse the nightly street rallies that had become a potent power base for fundamentalists.“Warning to the people of Iran: Is a coup on the way??” Mahmoud Nabavian, an outspoken radical lawmaker, asked on X days before Khamenei’s funeral.“In these moments of farewell to the martyred Imam (Khamenei), we raise the banner of vengeance for his blood and stand firm against the coup,” he wrote days later.In Mojtaba’s absence, chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Pezeshkian and Araghchi have become the most visible faces in charge of post-war Iran. Without access to the new supreme leader, hardliners who are unhappy with their performance have instead accused them of plotting a coup, Arash Azizi, a US-based Iran expert and author of the book “What Iranians Want,” told CNN.“Mojtaba’s continued absence means that they don’t have access to him and also that Ghalibaf and allies are effectively in charge of the country… the ultra-hardliners have thus accused Ghalibaf and Pezeshkian of plotting a ‘coup’ against Mojtaba,” Azizi said.‘Us, the blade and your throat’Despite widespread calls for wartime unity across Iran, the weeklong grand funeral for Khamenei, killed in late February in Israeli airstrikes coordinated with the United States, became a powerful showcase for the Islamic Republic’s most hardline supporters. They used the occasion to amplify demands to avenge their leader through renewed war with Washington and to declare their rejection of any agreement with Trump.Their wish now appears to have been fulfilled. A fragile ceasefire between Iran and the US all but collapsed this week after the Revolutionary Guards launched attacks on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz to assert control over the waterway. That prompted retaliatory strikes by Washington and fresh demands by Iranian hardliners to scrap the truce.In the weeks before hostilities broke out, hardliners turned their fury on the leaders who signed the deal with the US.“Mr President, if the leader’s conditions are not fulfilled, then it will be us, the blade and your throat,” Mohammad Ali Bakhshi, a security-linked “Maddah” – or religious singer who is loyal to the Iranian regime – warned Pezeshkian during a ceremony. “We will bring hell upon you.”The open threat to kill the president was widely criticized, but Bakhshi is not known to have faced any legal repercussions.Other officials under hardline scrutiny include Iran’s chief negotiator with the US, Ghalibaf, a former Revolutionary Guard commander with deep political experience whose credentials enabled him to step up and take charge during the war, emerging as the regime’s de-facto lead operator with broad acceptability.“They are trying to elevate the role of the Supreme Council for National Security while diminishing the role of the supreme leader and parliament,” Kamran Ghazanfari, a hardline parliamentarian, said in a video statement early July, referring to the council now deciding the country’s most sensitive wartime affairs. “This is the political coup they have designed and are carrying out step by step.”Sidelining the radicalsOn Tuesday, Nabavian, the hardline lawmaker who fiercely opposes the agreement and has been one of the leading voices warning of a “coup,” was removed from his position on the parliament’s National Security Commission, along with another parliamentarian critical of the deal.Nabavian, who was part of Iran’s negotiating delegation before turning against the talks and attempted to derail the agreement by leaking the text to the media before it was signed last month, claimed that Iran’s negotiating team were defying the supreme leader’s red lines in their talks with the US. CNN could not reach Nabavian for comment.He and others echo the views of “Jebhe-ye Paydari” (the Endurance Front) whose hardline members are often described by observers as “Super Revolutionaries.” They see themselves as the guardians of the values of the 1979 revolution that overthrew the pro-Western monarch and established an Islamic theocracy.Experts say Iran’s visible leaders are actively trying to marginalize them.“We’re seeing Ghalibaf exerting influence to sideline these hardline elements,” Hamidreza Azizi, a visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, told CNN. “They are too costly for the system and they’re bringing their rivalries out in the open especially as the situation in Iran becomes unstable.”Their numbers are small, but they hold influential positions across the country, including in parliament and at the national broadcaster IRIB, which launched its own campaigns against the president.It’s unclear how much support the group commands, but one of its most prominent figures – former national security chief Saeed Jalili – garnered more than 13 million votes in the 2024 elections, finishing second. Iran’s population is around 93 million.Over the months of war and diplomacy with Iran, Trump has repeatedly described the Islamic Republic as “seriously fractured,” arguing that internal divisions have hindered any agreement. Yet despite the visible splits between the new leaders and the hardliners, observers say the regime remains unified around a core objective of ending the war on terms that deliver sanctions relief and preserve Tehran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz.Still, Khamenei’s continued absence, his conditional support for the truce, the growing empowerment of the Revolutionary Guards, and the massive attendance at his father’s funeral have emboldened hardliners who instead are now pushing their own aggressive agenda to continue the war with the US and Israel.“My suggestion is that we go to one of the US bases in the region, where there are hundreds, maybe thousands of these American terrorists,” former Iranian foreign minister and hardline figure Manouchehr Mottaki said in a televised interview on Wednesday. “It would be enough if we take 100 soldiers and bring them back to Iran.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story