Skip to main content

Correspondents’ Dinner’s biggest moments involve laughs, cringing and high-stakes politics

The White House Correspondents’ Dinner has had multiple iterations since it began a few years after World War I.

Washington’s premier soiree on Saturday is most identified by its modern form: a red carpet for the capital’s journalism elite, political staffers and an assortment of American business leaders and celebrities — with the leader of the free world and a comedian offering roasts.

Some years are forgettable and relegated to C-SPAN archives. Others produce viral moments — funny, cringeworthy or undeniably tense — and endure across social media.

Here’s a look at some of that history as Donald Trump prepares for the first time to attend as president:

Ronald Reagan once gave up the chance to rebut a comedian

As a former Hollywood actor, the 40th president had a magnetic stage presence and easy manner with a joke, and it was during Reagan’s presidency that comedians became an annual part of the dinner.

In 1983, Mark Russell, whose satire was a PBS staple, offered relatively tame jabs at Reagan. “There is another speaker following me,” he opened, “and so it is quite an honor for me to be doing the warmup for my chief writer here.”

When it was the president’s turn, Reagan demurred. He reminded the audience that he’d made “a sad journey” to Andrews Air Force Base earlier that day to receive the remains of the Americans killed in the April 18 bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon.

“I realize the original plan was that I would, in a sense, sing for my supper. In fact, I was prepared, not really to sing, but to do what you expected,” Reagan said, before explaining that it would be inappropriate for him to deliver humorous remarks. “If you’ll forgive us,” he said, “I’ll keep my script, and I hope you’ll give us a rain check, and it’ll still be appropriate next year.”

Dana Carvey and George H.W. Bush: A rare friendship

Presidents have been lampooned on NBC’s “Saturday Night Live” since Chevy Chase first depicted Gerald Ford in 1975. But Dana Carvey and President George H.W. Bush set the standard.

Carvey, who also played the iconic Church Lady, embellished the 41st president’s nasal tone and patrician air to caricature his signature phrases: “Not gonna do it. Wouldn’t be prudent.”

Bush became a fan. He and Carvey sat together at Bush’s last dinner as president, in 1992. After he lost to Bill Clinton that November, the president invited Carvey to the White House for a Christmas party. The two remained friends.

George W. Bush jokes about weapons of mass destruction

In 2004, American forces remained in Iraq after the 43rd president ordered an invasion based on assertions that Saddam Hussein had weapons that threatened U.S. security.

By the time of the annual dinner, it was apparent those claims were overblown. Bush made light of the situation with pictures of him looking around the White House for Saddam’s weapons.

“Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be here somewhere,” he said as one slide showed him looking under furniture in the Oval Office.

The audience laughed and applauded. Some veterans, including then-Sen. John Kerry, a 2004 presidential nominee, were not amused. Bush defeated Kerry that November anyway.

Colbert skewers Bush and the media

Not long into his second term, Bush sat uncomfortably as Stephen Colbert, then a Comedy Central host, hammered him with an aggressiveness unusual for the dinner.

“The greatest thing about this man is he’s steady,” Colbert said in 2006. “You know where he stands. He believes the same thing Wednesday that he believed on Monday, no matter what happened Tuesday. Events can change; this man’s beliefs never will.”

He sarcastically urged Bush to ignore his approval ratings, then in the low 30s: “We know that polls are just a collection of statistics that reflect what people are thinking in reality. And reality has a well-known liberal bias.”

Colbert lambasted the dinner hosts, too, suggesting Washington media protected the Bush administration.

“Over the last five years you people were so good — over tax cuts, WMD intelligence, the effect of global warming. We Americans didn’t want to know,” Colbert said, “and you had the courtesy not to try to find out.”

A Trumpian dinner without Trump

During his first White House term, Trump broke the long streak of presidential attendance. Comedian Michelle Wolf targeted him anyway.

“It’s 2018, and I’m a woman, so you cannot shut me up — unless you have Michael Cohen wire me $130,000,” she cracked, referencing payments made to keep an adult film star from disclosing her allegations of a sexual encounter with Trump.

When the audience groaned at her crassness, Wolf quipped, “Yeah, shoulda done more research before you got me to do this.”

With Trump absent, his press secretary and now-Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders sat at the head table and at the center of Wolf’s routine. Wolf compared Sanders’ role for Trump to being a character in “The Handmaid’s Tale,” a dystopian novel about an authoritarian, misogynistic society.

Her harshest barb riffed on a famous Maybelline mascara ad.

“I actually really like Sarah. I think she’s very resourceful,” Wolf said. “But she burns facts and then she uses that ash to create a perfect smoky eye. Like maybe she’s born with it; maybe it’s lies. It’s probably lies.”

Trump, who was in Michigan, called the routine “disgusting.”

Within hours, the Correspondents’ Association issued a statement saying the dinner is meant to celebrate “our common commitment to a vigorous and free press while honoring civility, great reporting and scholarship winners” and saying Wolf’s monologue “was not in the spirit of that mission.”

Sanders rekindled the moment earlier this year at Washington Gridiron, another annual politics-journalism event. “I’m proud to note that color has really taken off,” she said. “In fact, it’s the exact same thing worn by Vice President JD Vance.”

Obama vs. pre-presidential Trump

Despite not yet attending as president, Trump’s had his moment at the dinner.

In 2011, he helped lead the birther movement against then-President Barack Obama. Trump used social media and frequent Fox News Channel appearances to push the false narrative that the first Black president was born in Kenya and not a natural-born U.S. citizen.

But at the Washington Hilton, Obama had the lectern — and he used it with Trump sitting in front of him.

“Tonight, for the first time, I am releasing my official birth video,” Obama deadpanned, before showing the opening scene of Disney’s “The Lion King,” when the royal cub Simba is presented on the savanna.

Obama then turned his fire directly on the reality TV star.

“No one is happier, no one is prouder to put this birth certificate matter to rest than the Donald,” Obama said. “And that’s because he can finally get back to focusing on the issues that matter. For example, did we fake the moon landing? What really happened in Roswell? And where are Biggie and Tupac?”

As cameras captured a dour Trump, Obama mocked Trump’s role on “Celebrity Apprentice.”

“We all know about your credentials and breadth of experience,” the president said, marveling that Trump had to decide who to blame when “the men’s cooking team cooking did not impress the judges from Omaha Steaks.”

“These are the kind of decisions that would keep me up at night,” Obama concluded. “Well handled, sir. Well handled.”

Trump glared icily.

By November 2012, as Obama prepared for his second term, Trump had filed a trademark application for the phrase he would emboss in the national culture four years later: “Make America Great Again.”

When you have advanced prostate cancer: What living with the disease looks like

(CNN) — “How long do I have to live ?”When I tell a patient he has prostate cancer, this is usually what he asks me first.With early-stage or low-grade prostate cancer, I can offer strong reassurance: Your life expectancy is good — expect a five-year relative survival rate of greater than 99% with treatment. Simply put, most men will not die from low-grade prostate cancer.However, once the cancer has spread outside the prostate to the bones and other organs the answer becomes more difficult. Treatment has changed dramatically over the past decade for advanced prostate cancer. New drugs, better imaging and the earlier use of combined therapies are helping men live longer.In a video released July 15, former President Joe Biden gave an update on his prostate cancer, saying he was receiving treatments that have been going well. In May 2025, Biden officially announced that he had an aggressive form of prostate cancer that had spread to his bones. Since then, based on official updates, he has continued hormone therapy, completed a course of radiation and maintained a public presence.His diagnosis brought renewed attention to prostate cancer screening and treatment. Now, more than a year later, his cancer journey offers an opportunity to examine what has changed in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer — and the hope these offer men living with the disease.I recently saw a patient who was diagnosed three years ago with cancer that had already spread to multiple areas in his bones. Since then, he has taken cruises, traveled with his family and spent weekends babysitting his grandchildren.He gets tired and cannot garden the way he once did. But he is still alive and considers every day a blessing. His experience, and what we see with Biden, shows what living with metastatic prostate cancer can look like today.Understanding survival ratesIf they haven’t asked their doctor already, many patients go online and find five-year survival rates, but every number they may find online comes with a huge asterisk.The American Cancer Society reports five-year relative survival of greater than 99% when prostate cancer is found in or near the prostate. The figure drops to 38% when it has reached distant parts of the body.But that number is based on large groups of men treated years ago. It does not fully reflect the impact of newer treatments — or account for an individual man’s age, overall health and response to therapy.Survival statistics describe groups of patients but do not predict what will happen to one person. That is why the 38% figure cannot tell us how long Biden — or any individual patient — will live. These patients’ outlook depends on details of their cancer and how they are responding to treatments.It’s treated more aggressively nowA man diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer a decade ago and a man diagnosed today would not receive the same treatment. The thinking now is to use our best treatments early instead of holding back.For years, doctors began with hormone therapy — usually injections that lower testosterone — and saved other treatments until the cancer stopped responding.Today, those injections are often combined from the start with a newer hormone-blocking drug and/or chemotherapy. These combinations have helped men live longer and are one of the biggest shifts of the past decade.What Biden’s diagnosis told usThere are three details about Biden’s cancer that help doctors like me understand how aggressive it is and how to manage it effectively. Official statements highlighted that his cancer had a Gleason score of 9. The cancer had spread to his bones, and it was labeled as hormone-sensitive.The Gleason score is assigned after a pathologist examines biopsy samples. Scores typically range from 6 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more aggressive cancer. A score of 9 falls into the most aggressive category. However, the score alone cannot tell us whether the cancer has spread outside the prostate.When prostate cancer spreads, the most common destination is the bones — particularly the spine, pelvis and ribs. It can also reach organs such as the lungs or liver. Once it has reached distant parts of the body, it is generally not curable, but treatment can put a brake on it for years.Prostate cancer can also be hormone-sensitive or hormone-resistant. Because it typically relies on testosterone to grow, lowering the hormone or blocking its effects can help control the cancer. Hormone-sensitive means it still responds to these treatments.Over time, most advanced or metastatic prostate cancers find ways to grow despite low testosterone levels, which mean they are now hormone-resistant. Lowering testosterone alone is no longer enough to control the cancer, so doctors have to turn to additional therapies.Knowing if the cancer has spreadThe most sensitive imaging test available today is a PSMA PET scan. It uses a radioactive tracer that seeks out a protein found on the surface of prostate cancer cells. Areas containing cancer may appear as bright spots, helping identify where the cancer has spread. The American Urological Association supports using this imaging test to determine whether high-risk prostate cancer has spread and to help establish its stage.A traditional bone scan, used for decades, highlights areas where bone is reacting to injury or disease. It remains an alternative imaging option, but PSMA PET is increasingly replacing its use.What areas light up and where matter when deciding on treatments. A single spot in the spine and cancer that has spread to the liver are both called stage 4, but they are not the same disease and may not be treated the same way.Doctors also consider how much cancer has spread. We label it as “low-volume” disease when the cancer has reached a limited number of areas. High volume is when the spread is more widespread or has reached other organs such as the liver or lungs.Both require treatment that works throughout the body. Treatment for metastatic disease generally includes therapy that works throughout the body. For men with low-volume disease, adding radiation to the prostate may also help them live longer.Biden has completed a course of radiation, but his team has not disclosed what area was treated or enough detail to determine whether his cancer would be considered low- or high-volume.Treatment has become more preciseBeyond starting more treatments earlier, doctors can increasingly tailor therapy to the biology of an individual man’s cancer. We can now test both the tumor and a patient’s own DNA for mutations that help guide treatment.Roughly 1 in 10 men with metastatic prostate cancer carries an inherited mutation affecting the body’s ability to repair DNA. The best known are BRCA1 and BRCA2, the same genes linked to some breast and ovarian cancers.Certain mutations found in the tumor or inherited DNA may make targeted drugs called PARP inhibitors an option. If a mutation is inherited, it also gives family members information they can act on through genetic counseling, testing and earlier screening.Another advance is radioligand therapy. If a scan shows that cancer cells carry a protein called PSMA, doctors can attach radiation to a molecule that seeks out that protein. Delivered through an IV, it targets cancer cells throughout the body. This approach was expanded last year to more men whose cancer had become hormone resistant.Living longer can come with costsEvery treatment can cause side effects. With hormone therapy, one of the first is often hot flashes, similar to what women experience during menopause. These are not dangerous, but they can affect a man’s quality of life.Fatigue is also common. Testosterone helps maintain muscle, so lowering it can reduce strength and energy. Regular walking and resistance training can help preserve muscle and reduce fatigue.The side effect almost no one talks about is loss of sex drive or low libido. At diagnosis, most men are thinking about staying alive, not their libido. But months later, it often matters. It is worth discussing with your care team and your partner rather than assuming it is simply the price of treatment.The side effect I worry about most is weaker bones. Low testosterone reduces bone density, while cancer deposits can weaken the bone’s structure. Follow-up care should include exercise, a bone-density scan, and ensuring adequate levels of calcium and vitamin D. For men with hormone-resistant cancer that has spread to bone, bone-protecting drugs can reduce the risk of fractures and other complications.New or worsening back pain, especially with leg weakness, numbness or trouble controlling the bladder or bowels? These could mean the cancer is pressing on the spinal cord. It is a true medical emergency that requires immediate attention.Cancer care requires a team approachIdeally, several doctors work together to coordinate a patient’s care. The urologist is often the starting point. A medical oncologist manages treatments that work throughout the body, while a radiation oncologist targets specific areas, whether that is the prostate itself or a painful bone lesion. The primary care doctor helps protect the patient’s heart and bones and looks after the person’s overall health.A man’s age, other medical conditions, ability to tolerate side effects and goals for treatment all shape treatment plans. Two men with nearly identical test results may be offered — or choose — different paths based on their health and priorities.Good communication among doctors is essential, but gaps can happen. Being your own advocate means knowing who is on your care team, asking questions and understanding your options.I also recommend bringing someone you trust to important visits for support and to take notes and help you remember what was discussed.More treatments, better testing offer hopeFor men worried about prostate cancer, talk with your health care provider about the benefits and risks of PSA testing. Black men and those with a strong family history should begin that conversation in their 40s. New urinary symptoms are often not cancer, but they still deserve attention, as does blood in the urine or semen, unexplained weight loss and/or persistent back or bone pain.For men living with advanced prostate cancer, there is reason for hope. There are more treatments and better testing than there were a decade ago, and good care pays attention to how a man feels, not just to what his scans show.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story