Skip to main content

Out of the frying pan? Noma’s Rene Redzepi resigns, and fine dining confronts ‘brigade’ culture

LONDON (AP) — Chef Gordon Ramsay yells at people. His mentor was known for throwing pans and plates. That chef, London’s Marco Pierre White, titled his own memoir “The Devil in the Kitchen” — in part for the punishments he meted out to his chefs.

“If you don’t fear the boss, you’ll take shortcuts, you’ll turn up late,” White wrote, saying his kitchen staff at Harveys accepted that. “They were all pain junkies, they had to be. They couldn’t get enough of the bollockings.”

No more.

The public downfall this week of Denmark’s Rene Redzepi, arguably the world’s top chef, has forced a reckoning in real time over when “brigade de cuisine” becomes abuse and what should happen to perpetrators who direct the creation of edible art.

At issue is whether time is up on the storied bullying and intimidation of fine dining kitchen culture, brought to the masses through pop culture by celebrity chef reality shows and high-end TV like “The Bear.” Lofty, pricey matters like leadership style and legal liability are suddenly at the center of a relatively small industry known for narrow profit margins, not HR departments or training.

“The resources aren’t there for self-policing,” said Robin Burrow, associate professor of organization studies at the University of York. “The general feeling, though, is that things are so tough even for very good chefs that this kind of culture ends up being inevitable.”

Kitchen magician, toxic chef

Redzepi, a Danish knight and the founder of Noma and innovative “New Nordic” cuisine, stepped down Thursday after The New York Times reported that dozens of former employees had shared their accounts of abuse and assault between 2009 and 2017 at the Copenhagen landmark. Redzepi had been dogged for years by reports of mistreating his staff and employing unpaid interns at Noma, which received three Michelin stars and was ranked first on the World’s 50 Best Restaurants List five times.

The allegations overshadowed Noma’s $1,500-a-head pop-up restaurant in Los Angeles. Sponsors pulled their funding for the residency, which opened on Wednesday to a small gathering of protesters. Redzepi announced his resignation on Instagram with a tearful video soon after. “An apology is not enough,” he said. “I take responsibility for my own actions.”

Former employees said Redzepi has never been held accountable for his conduct, which included punching members of the staff, jabbing them with kitchen tools and threatening to get them blacklisted from restaurants or have their families deported.

Jason Ignacio White, a former head of Noma’s fermentation lab, collected anonymous testimonies of alleged abuse at the restaurant and posted them to his Instagram page. The accounts have been viewed millions of times.

“Noma destroyed my passion for the industry,” one post said. “I struggled with intense anxiety, bad enough to give me panic attacks in the middle of the night. The trauma, abuse and idea that nothing would ever change all led me to walk away from the career.”

The kitchen brigade system is entrenched

The process at the heart of restaurants worldwide is the “brigade de cuisine,” a strict organization of the kitchen developed around the turn of the 20th century by French chef Georges Auguste Escoffier, who based it on his own military experience.

Under its hierarchy, every member of the staff has a specialty — from the “chief” to the sauce-maker, the roast cook, the grill cook and the fish cook. Their choreography and their communications — “Hand!” and “Yes, chef!” — are designed for speed, consistency and cleanliness.

Even so, kitchen atmospheres have long been filled with chaos and intensity. Escoffier himself wrote that his first chef believed it was impossible to govern a kitchen “without a shower of slaps.”

George Orwell, the essayist and author of the dystopian classic “1984,” once described the restaurant kitchen of his time as a place where one person in the hierarchy yelled at his subordinate, who yelled at someone below him and so on. Weeping was not unusual. As a plongeur (dishwasher), Orwell ranked at the bottom.

“A plongeur is one of the slaves of the modem world,” he wrote in “Down and Out in Paris and London,” published in 1933. “He is no freer than if he were bought and sold.”

It’s a place ‘where the rules don’t apply’

In the modern era, professional kitchens are thought to be some of the toughest places to work thanks to a recipe of long hours, close quarters, strict hierarchies, grueling physical conditions and relentless pressure.

The rise of the chef as an auteur during the 1970s with an obsession with Michelin-star-level excellence only accelerated the poor behavior as prices and egos rose.

In his 2006 memoir, White described his kitchen at Harveys in London as “my theatre of cruelty” and boasted of giving his chefs “a 10-second throttle.” Anthony Bourdain’s memoir “Kitchen Confidential” helped romanticize that testosterone-fueled vision, describing kitchens filled with “heated argument, hypermacho posturing and drunken ranting.”

Personal accounts and research suggest there’s painful truth behind the romanticized branding. Cardiff University conducted interviews with 47 elite chefs for a 2021 study and found that the isolation of commercial kitchens can produce a sort of “geography of deviance” that create “feelings of invisibility, alienation and detachment” in lower-ranking employees. It also found that chef conduct can make a kitchen “an instrument of social withdrawal and a symbol of deviance around which the community pivots.”

Open kitchens in part were designed to merge the two spaces, kitchens and dining rooms. Several employees told The Times that when Redzepi wanted to discipline them in the open kitchen but there were customers in the dining room, he would crouch under the counters and jab them in the legs with his fingers or a nearby utensil.

Many chefs’ proteges stay silent because they don’t want to risk the opportunity to learn from the best — or the potential to launch high-flying culinary careers of their own. That was the case in the fictional, wildly popular show “The Bear,” in which the main character, Carmy Berzatto, endured open and flagrant abuse so that he can study under one of the world’s greatest chefs.

The downfall of a ‘visionary’

Noma — a contraction of the Danish words for Nordisk and Mad, meaning Nordic and food — opened in 2003 dedicated to “a simple desire to rediscover wild local ingredients by foraging and to follow the seasons.” By the time Redzepi stepped down, he had become so prominent in the culinary world that Noma played a role in “The Bear” as the training ground for two main characters. Redzepi himself appeared on the series in a cameo.

It wasn’t his first time on camera. He’d also been seen yelling at cooks in the 2008 documentary “Noma at Boiling Point,” and has made several public apologies. He acknowledged in a 2015 essay, being “a bully for a large part of my career.” He said he’s “yelled and pushed people. I’ve been a terrible boss at times.”

And — today’s mass-culture excitement around intense kitchen behavior notwithstanding — he seemed to recognize even then that the old way alienated young, talented workers and jeopardized the future of cuisine.

“The only way we will be able to reap the promise of the present is by confronting the unpleasant legacies of our past,” Redzepi said, “and collectively forging a new path forward.”

___

Associated Press Writer Mark Kennedy contributed from New York.

When you have advanced prostate cancer: What living with the disease looks like

(CNN) — “How long do I have to live ?”When I tell a patient he has prostate cancer, this is usually what he asks me first.With early-stage or low-grade prostate cancer, I can offer strong reassurance: Your life expectancy is good — expect a five-year relative survival rate of greater than 99% with treatment. Simply put, most men will not die from low-grade prostate cancer.However, once the cancer has spread outside the prostate to the bones and other organs the answer becomes more difficult. Treatment has changed dramatically over the past decade for advanced prostate cancer. New drugs, better imaging and the earlier use of combined therapies are helping men live longer.In a video released July 15, former President Joe Biden gave an update on his prostate cancer, saying he was receiving treatments that have been going well. In May 2025, Biden officially announced that he had an aggressive form of prostate cancer that had spread to his bones. Since then, based on official updates, he has continued hormone therapy, completed a course of radiation and maintained a public presence.His diagnosis brought renewed attention to prostate cancer screening and treatment. Now, more than a year later, his cancer journey offers an opportunity to examine what has changed in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer — and the hope these offer men living with the disease.I recently saw a patient who was diagnosed three years ago with cancer that had already spread to multiple areas in his bones. Since then, he has taken cruises, traveled with his family and spent weekends babysitting his grandchildren.He gets tired and cannot garden the way he once did. But he is still alive and considers every day a blessing. His experience, and what we see with Biden, shows what living with metastatic prostate cancer can look like today.Understanding survival ratesIf they haven’t asked their doctor already, many patients go online and find five-year survival rates, but every number they may find online comes with a huge asterisk.The American Cancer Society reports five-year relative survival of greater than 99% when prostate cancer is found in or near the prostate. The figure drops to 38% when it has reached distant parts of the body.But that number is based on large groups of men treated years ago. It does not fully reflect the impact of newer treatments — or account for an individual man’s age, overall health and response to therapy.Survival statistics describe groups of patients but do not predict what will happen to one person. That is why the 38% figure cannot tell us how long Biden — or any individual patient — will live. These patients’ outlook depends on details of their cancer and how they are responding to treatments.It’s treated more aggressively nowA man diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer a decade ago and a man diagnosed today would not receive the same treatment. The thinking now is to use our best treatments early instead of holding back.For years, doctors began with hormone therapy — usually injections that lower testosterone — and saved other treatments until the cancer stopped responding.Today, those injections are often combined from the start with a newer hormone-blocking drug and/or chemotherapy. These combinations have helped men live longer and are one of the biggest shifts of the past decade.What Biden’s diagnosis told usThere are three details about Biden’s cancer that help doctors like me understand how aggressive it is and how to manage it effectively. Official statements highlighted that his cancer had a Gleason score of 9. The cancer had spread to his bones, and it was labeled as hormone-sensitive.The Gleason score is assigned after a pathologist examines biopsy samples. Scores typically range from 6 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more aggressive cancer. A score of 9 falls into the most aggressive category. However, the score alone cannot tell us whether the cancer has spread outside the prostate.When prostate cancer spreads, the most common destination is the bones — particularly the spine, pelvis and ribs. It can also reach organs such as the lungs or liver. Once it has reached distant parts of the body, it is generally not curable, but treatment can put a brake on it for years.Prostate cancer can also be hormone-sensitive or hormone-resistant. Because it typically relies on testosterone to grow, lowering the hormone or blocking its effects can help control the cancer. Hormone-sensitive means it still responds to these treatments.Over time, most advanced or metastatic prostate cancers find ways to grow despite low testosterone levels, which mean they are now hormone-resistant. Lowering testosterone alone is no longer enough to control the cancer, so doctors have to turn to additional therapies.Knowing if the cancer has spreadThe most sensitive imaging test available today is a PSMA PET scan. It uses a radioactive tracer that seeks out a protein found on the surface of prostate cancer cells. Areas containing cancer may appear as bright spots, helping identify where the cancer has spread. The American Urological Association supports using this imaging test to determine whether high-risk prostate cancer has spread and to help establish its stage.A traditional bone scan, used for decades, highlights areas where bone is reacting to injury or disease. It remains an alternative imaging option, but PSMA PET is increasingly replacing its use.What areas light up and where matter when deciding on treatments. A single spot in the spine and cancer that has spread to the liver are both called stage 4, but they are not the same disease and may not be treated the same way.Doctors also consider how much cancer has spread. We label it as “low-volume” disease when the cancer has reached a limited number of areas. High volume is when the spread is more widespread or has reached other organs such as the liver or lungs.Both require treatment that works throughout the body. Treatment for metastatic disease generally includes therapy that works throughout the body. For men with low-volume disease, adding radiation to the prostate may also help them live longer.Biden has completed a course of radiation, but his team has not disclosed what area was treated or enough detail to determine whether his cancer would be considered low- or high-volume.Treatment has become more preciseBeyond starting more treatments earlier, doctors can increasingly tailor therapy to the biology of an individual man’s cancer. We can now test both the tumor and a patient’s own DNA for mutations that help guide treatment.Roughly 1 in 10 men with metastatic prostate cancer carries an inherited mutation affecting the body’s ability to repair DNA. The best known are BRCA1 and BRCA2, the same genes linked to some breast and ovarian cancers.Certain mutations found in the tumor or inherited DNA may make targeted drugs called PARP inhibitors an option. If a mutation is inherited, it also gives family members information they can act on through genetic counseling, testing and earlier screening.Another advance is radioligand therapy. If a scan shows that cancer cells carry a protein called PSMA, doctors can attach radiation to a molecule that seeks out that protein. Delivered through an IV, it targets cancer cells throughout the body. This approach was expanded last year to more men whose cancer had become hormone resistant.Living longer can come with costsEvery treatment can cause side effects. With hormone therapy, one of the first is often hot flashes, similar to what women experience during menopause. These are not dangerous, but they can affect a man’s quality of life.Fatigue is also common. Testosterone helps maintain muscle, so lowering it can reduce strength and energy. Regular walking and resistance training can help preserve muscle and reduce fatigue.The side effect almost no one talks about is loss of sex drive or low libido. At diagnosis, most men are thinking about staying alive, not their libido. But months later, it often matters. It is worth discussing with your care team and your partner rather than assuming it is simply the price of treatment.The side effect I worry about most is weaker bones. Low testosterone reduces bone density, while cancer deposits can weaken the bone’s structure. Follow-up care should include exercise, a bone-density scan, and ensuring adequate levels of calcium and vitamin D. For men with hormone-resistant cancer that has spread to bone, bone-protecting drugs can reduce the risk of fractures and other complications.New or worsening back pain, especially with leg weakness, numbness or trouble controlling the bladder or bowels? These could mean the cancer is pressing on the spinal cord. It is a true medical emergency that requires immediate attention.Cancer care requires a team approachIdeally, several doctors work together to coordinate a patient’s care. The urologist is often the starting point. A medical oncologist manages treatments that work throughout the body, while a radiation oncologist targets specific areas, whether that is the prostate itself or a painful bone lesion. The primary care doctor helps protect the patient’s heart and bones and looks after the person’s overall health.A man’s age, other medical conditions, ability to tolerate side effects and goals for treatment all shape treatment plans. Two men with nearly identical test results may be offered — or choose — different paths based on their health and priorities.Good communication among doctors is essential, but gaps can happen. Being your own advocate means knowing who is on your care team, asking questions and understanding your options.I also recommend bringing someone you trust to important visits for support and to take notes and help you remember what was discussed.More treatments, better testing offer hopeFor men worried about prostate cancer, talk with your health care provider about the benefits and risks of PSA testing. Black men and those with a strong family history should begin that conversation in their 40s. New urinary symptoms are often not cancer, but they still deserve attention, as does blood in the urine or semen, unexplained weight loss and/or persistent back or bone pain.For men living with advanced prostate cancer, there is reason for hope. There are more treatments and better testing than there were a decade ago, and good care pays attention to how a man feels, not just to what his scans show.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story