Skip to main content

Lindsay Clancy hasn’t taken the stand, but she’s spoken volumes at her murder trial

Women's health psychiatrist says she "100%" believes that Lindsay Clancy experienced postpartum psychosis

(CNN) — Lindsay Clancy has not taken the stand, but the Massachusetts mother accused of killing her three children communicated in multiple ways at her murder trial this week.

She vocally answered the judge’s questions about a legal issue, her first audible words in the trial. She sobbed and shook during difficult testimony about the autopsy of her infant son. And her diary entries about her parenting stresses and postpartum issues were read aloud in court.

Together, Clancy’s vocal, physical and written messages offered key insights into her perspective in the second week of her trial on three counts of murder in the killings of her children Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and Callan, 8 months.

This week’s proceedings in a Plymouth, Massachusetts, courtroom also featured testimony about her mental health status before and after the killings, her physical injuries from her suicide attempt, and her friends’ and family’s concerns.

Prosecutors argue Clancy, 35, “acted intentionally, rationally and swiftly” when she fatally strangled her three children at their Duxbury home on January 24, 2023. Her defense attorneys argue she is not criminally responsible because she was in the midst of a psychotic episode stemming from postpartum mental illness.

Testimony began two weeks ago with opening statements and an emotional witness account from her husband, Patrick Clancy.

Here’s what we learned at Lindsay Clancy’s trial this week:

Defendant speaks, sobs and writes

With the jury outside of the room, Clancy answered several questions from the judge Tuesday about her understanding of a stipulation agreement, which is an acknowledgement of specific facts to save time in a trial. Judge William F. Sullivan repeatedly asked her if she understood her rights, and she responded with an even voice: “Yes, your honor.”

The topic was not particularly notable – basically agreeing the chain of custody of some evidence was proper – but it was the first time the public has heard her voice in this trial.

The jury saw her get emotional, too. On Thursday, Clancy loudly sobbed, shuddered and covered her face with her hands as a medical examiner testified about Callan’s autopsy.

Prosecutors displayed multiple pictures of Callan at the time of his autopsy to the parties and jury, though they were not shown on camera. The baby’s injuries were consistent with a ligature strangulation, and his cause of death was complications of mechanical asphyxia, the examiner testified.

Further, the jury heard her written messages in her diary. On Monday, attorneys read aloud some of her diary entries about her declining mental health while trying to care for her three children.

“It’s like I’m so desperate to get a mental break from taking care of everyone that my mind is trying to make something physically wrong with me,” she wrote.

She wrote she felt “guilty” and was struggling to sleep-train Callan.

“I want help. I want to be well,” she wrote.

Her mental health before the killings

On Friday, the court heard testimony from two psychiatrists who treated Clancy in the weeks and months before she killed her children.

Dr. Jennifer Tufts, a licensed psychiatrist, described her interactions with the defendant over roughly a dozen sessions from September 2022 to January 2023, and repeated adjustments to Clancy’s medication as she grappled with anxiety and trouble sleeping.

At their first session, Clancy told the psychiatrist she didn’t have any suicidal intent, homicidal intent or hallucinations, Tufts said. The psychiatrist’s records from the appointment indicated Clancy said she was feeling overwhelmed, her children were challenging and she felt anxious leaving her baby.

The doctor met with Clancy on October 3, 2022, after Clancy asked her to facilitate an extension for her maternity leave, citing “postpartum anxiety/depression.”

Clancy worked as a labor-and-delivery nurse.

“I don’t feel mentally well enough to return to taking care of patients with a baby at home that still won’t take the bottle,” Clancy wrote in a message to Tufts before the appointment, per the prosecution. “I know this will trigger my anxiety too much.”

By the start of December 2022, Clancy was seeing another medical provider in addition to Tufts and had tried “a few different medication combinations,” the psychiatrist testified. According to prosecutors, Tufts’ notes included a quote from Clancy, which said: “I think it’s my problem. I keep reaching out to different people and not sticking with the plan.”

At that time, Clancy reported having intrusive thoughts which she described as “a feeling like I’m going to die.” Still, she denied having thoughts of self-harm, according to Tufts.

By mid-December, Clancy was feeling very depressed, Tufts said. She had recently gone to the emergency room due to suicidal ideation and was planning on attending a partial hospitalization program, as well as starting a new medication, she said.

In early January 2023, weeks before the killings, Clancy underwent a multiday stay at a psychiatric facility, where she was treated by another psychiatrist, Dr. Alia Goodheart, who also testified Friday.

Clancy then said she felt “numbness” and appeared anxious, but she displayed linear thinking and was goal-directed, Goodheart said. The psychiatrist diagnosed her with insomnia and worked to adjust her medication.

After several nights of sleep, Clancy asked to be discharged from the facility a day early “so she could be home with her family and her children,” Goodheart said.

“She was future-oriented, she was clearly invested in her children, she was a caring mother,” the psychiatrist said.

Days after her discharge from the in-patient facility, Clancy still felt “numb” and “flat,” Tufts testified.

“She wasn’t able to cry, but she said she was able to laugh a little bit and hadn’t been having recent thoughts of suicidal ideation,” the psychiatrist said, adding she again adjusted Clancy’s prescriptions.

In an email to Tufts on January 11, 2023, Clancy asked the psychiatrist’s opinion on ketamine therapy. “This has been going on for months now and I’m getting desperate for something that would work quickly to get me out of this depressed state,” Clancy wrote in part, according to prosecutors.

Clancy was still depressed on January 16, the psychiatrist said, and they agreed on a plan to taper her off one medication and start taking a new antidepressant.

“She was doing what she needed to do to take care of her baby, though she subjectively felt like the bonding was forced with the baby,” Tufts testified.

Clancy met with Tufts the day before she killed her children.

“She said she was doing all right – a little more anxious, and the anxiety was described as the feeling of her heart racing,” the psychiatrist said.

Clancy said at that time she was not having any suicidal or homicidal ideation, Dr. Tufts said. Nothing Clancy said indicated she was a danger to anyone, the psychiatrist testified, and she never showed any signs of psychosis during any of their sessions.

Testimony is expected to resume Monday with the defense’s cross-examination of Tufts.

Her mental health afterward

Two forensic psychiatrists testified Monday that Clancy appeared clear-headed and rational in the days after the killings.

In a hospital evaluation two days afterward, Clancy could not speak because she was on a ventilator, so she asked for a paper and pen to write her responses to questions.

She wrote that she was “horrified” and asked for an attorney, Dr. Jhilam Biswas testified. She also wrote, “is my body broken,” “are my legs straight,” if she could have visitors and where her family was, according to Biswas. Clancy seemed anxious, but she understood the questions and did not show signs of psychosis or hallucinations, Biswas said.

Another psychiatrist, Dr. Sejal Shah, said Clancy was “calm and cooperative” during a psych exam one week after the killings. Clancy’s thought-process was “organized” and “goal-directed,” Shah said, and she agreed Clancy was an “honest” patient.

Clancy had ‘dark thoughts’

Clancy’s friends and family members spoke about her behavior in the weeks before the killings.

In January 2023, days before she killed her children, Clancy said over text that a medication caused her to have “some dark thoughts,” her friend of nearly 30 years testified.

“She had shared that she had been taking a medication that caused her to have some dark thoughts but that she was going to, or had been, tapering off that medication and was trialing new ones that would remove those side effects and be more helpful and therapeutic to what she needed,” Amy Bevins said.

The tone of the conversation was “hopeful,” Bevins said, adding it seemed Clancy thought things were “moving in a positive direction.”

Her father-in-law, Christopher Clancy, said she seemed “very good” during a visit in mid-November 2022 but was “quiet” during Thanksgiving. At times she seemed blank, he testified, saying she sometimes had “a stare – just not totally interacting, almost like nervous.”

He saw Clancy and the family again shortly before Christmas 2022, he said, and was aware she was having “struggles” at the time.

“I knew she was having a hard time sleeping. I knew she just didn’t feel well. I knew she had gone to the emergency room where my wife was working,” he testified during cross-examination.

Elaine Rossi, a part-time nanny for the Clancy family, said Lindsay Clancy told her about having postpartum issues. Rossi said she saw prescription bottles in the house but she had no concerns about Lindsay with the children, calling her a “wonderful mom.”

Clancy brought her daughter, Cora, to the pediatrician just hours before the killings, and nothing seemed amiss, the pediatrician testified.

“I didn’t notice anything out of the norm,” Dr. Lindsay Rosshirt said. “(Cora) seemed perfectly well-behaved, and mom seemed appropriate as well.”

She said she did not remember any visible signs of postpartum issues in Clancy during their appointments and did not see a need to refer her to any resources.

Her physical injuries

Testimony early in the week focused on the extent of Clancy’s physical injuries and medical recovery after her suicide attempt.

Prosecutors say after killing her children, Clancy cut her wrists and neck and jumped from a second-story window, leaving her partially paralyzed. She was first taken to South Shore Hospital and then transferred to Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston for treatment.

Clancy had a thoracic spine injury from her fall, but the cuts on her neck and wrists were considered “superficial,” said Dr. Kelly McDonough, a physician at South Shore Hospital. The cuts on her wrists required several sutures, physician associate Eitan Negri said.

Once she was moved to Boston, Clancy went into cardiac arrest and had to be revived with CPR and chest compressions, ICU nurse Rachelle Amedee said. Clancy also received multiple blood transfusions, she said.

Superficial or not, those cuts were bloody, and prosecutors showed the jury the blood stains found in the family’s Duxbury home. A blood stain analyst testified about the drip stains, smear stains and transfer stains on the floor, mirror, nightstand and windowsill.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Julián Álvarez fue silbado y se fue sin saludar a la afición: ¿qué sigue en la novela del argentino?

No fue un domingo cualquiera para Julián Álvarez. En realidad, no lo ha sido ningún día desde aquella frase que pronunció durante la Copa del Mundo: “lo mejor para todos es una transferencia”, cuando se hablaba de un fuerte interés del FC Barcelona por contratarlo. El fichaje no se hizo —porque el Atlético de Madrid no quiso negociar— y aquellas siete palabras, pronunciadas a un océano de distancia de España, le ganaron la enemistad de toda la afición del Atlético de Madrid, el club que pagó por él más de US$ 87 millones hace dos temporadas.La afición le hizo pagar esas palabras este domingo, en la primera vez que el delantero argentino pisó el estadio Metropolitano, cuando ingresó en el segundo tiempo de un partido que el Colchonero empataba 1-1. Pero ni la urgencia del resultado ni la necesidad por los goles de Álvarez —acaso su mejor centroatacante— para revertirlo le hicieron olvidar a las gradas rojiblancas las palabras del número 9, que recibió una silbatina generalizada al momento de ingresar al campo (ya había sido reprobado por el estadio durante el calentamiento).Álvarez no tuvo un buen ingreso y, aunque su equipo acabó rescatando un empate con 10 jugadores cerca del final, el goleador argentino se llevó la imagen final, sin participar del tradicional saludo que hace el Atlético, dando la vuelta al campo para agradecer a la afición. El delantero se fue a los vestuarios en soledad. Un gesto que, como dice el dicho, vale más que mil palabras.“Me comentaba la gente del club, que el club decidió que él no se acerque a saludar con sus compañeros a la gente. La decisión no fue de Julián Alvarez, fue del club, que tomó la decisión de alejarlo y separarlo para que se vaya hacia el vestuario”, dijo su director técnico, Diego Simeone, tras el juego.Queda exactamente una semana del mercado de fichajes en Europa, por lo que la presencia de Julián Álvarez en el Atlético de Madrid sigue estando en el aire para el resto de la temporada. El problema es que la reacción de la afición este domingo parece mostrar un punto de no retorno en la relación con el futbolista, que tampoco ha salido a expresar una disculpa o una explicación a sus dichos durante el Mundial.Un problema aún mayor es que, pese al deseo de ser transferido que tiene el jugador, el club no tiene ninguna intención de desprenderse de él y, conforme van pasando los días, el mercado se va achicando, porque al conocer las altas demandas de la directiva del Colchonero, los interesados salen a buscar alternativas, apurados por la fecha límite del 1 de septiembre.Por supuesto, el Atleti, a medida que pasan las horas, tiene cada vez menos deseos de abrirle la puerta de salida, porque se quedaría con muy poco tiempo para salir a buscarle un reemplazo al futbolista estrella que tiene la plantilla. Hallar un sustituto para el jugador que marcó 49 goles y dio 17 asistencias en 107 partidos con el club supondría muchos millones arriba de la mesa, posiblemente teniendo que pagar un valor más alto que de lo que dicta el mercado.Los destinos para Julián Álvarez son muy pocos. El Atleti ya dejó claro que no va a negociar con clubes españoles, porque no quiere reforzar a la competencia. Fuera de España, solo se conoció el interés del Arsenal y uno más pequeño del PSG. Ninguno prosperó, en parte por el deseo del jugador de vestirse de blaugrana.Los Gunners, campeones de la Premier League y subcampeones de la Champions League, podrían hacer el intento, a pesar de que en el ataque ya tienen muchas alternativas. Por eso se había barajado la idea de que los londinenses pusieran dinero y algún futbolista —como Viktor Gyökeres, por ejemplo— en la mesa de negociación, algo que le cerraría a la directiva española, ya que el jugador se iría a otra liga y tendría garantizado un nombre de reemplazo. Sin embargo, si la idea no prosperó es porque o no hubo acuerdo por el monto de dinero, o porque el futbolista no tiene grandes deseos de volver a una liga de la cual ya se fue —jugó en el Manchester City de 2022 a 2024—.La posibilidad de los parisinos se mencionó mucho al comienzo del mercado de fichajes, pero fue perdiendo fuerza con el correr de los días. Mucho más desde que los bicampeones de Europa se hicieron con los servicios de Ferran Torres, el héroe de la final del Mundial 2026, que ya empezó a pagar la confianza de Luis Enrique con goles, marcando un doblete en su presentación, también este domingo.Entonces, el futuro de Julián Álvarez parece estar entre tres destinos: quedarse en el Atlético, ya sea para revertir la situación o para esperar la ventana de transferencias de enero; reflotar la idea de volver a la Premier League, pero con la camiseta del Arsenal —un equipo que quizás tampoco seduce tanto por el estilo de juego que tienen los dirigidos por Arteta—; o que el FC Barcelona finalmente abra la chequera y ponga muchísimos millones arriba de la mesa, 500 millones de euros, para ser exactos, que es su cláusula de recisión. Una cifra jamás pagada por un futbolista, y por mucha diferencia.“Primero, juntos siempre somos más fuertes. Eso siempre nos caracterizó siendo el Atlético de Madrid distinto al resto. Julián es un jugador nuestro”, dijo Giuliano Simeone —autor del empate 2-2— a la prensa tras el partido.“Tenemos que estar todos juntos tirando para el mismo lado, porque, si no, nos vamos a dividir y eso no es bueno. Julián es jugador nuestro y vamos a apoyarlo siempre”, agregó el mediocampista.Su padre, el entrenador del equipo, también defendió a Julián Álvarez, pero con un poco más de cautela.“No estoy para dar consejos. Tengo que centrarme en mi trabajo, que es deportivamente hacer lo mejor para el Atlético de Madrid. Si el Atlético de Madrid quiere ganar algún título necesitamos estar juntos, tener delanteros importantes y para eso necesitamos trabajar en consecuencia todos de lo que necesitamos”, dijo en la rueda de prensa.“Creo que fui bastante claro. Necesitamos estar juntos. Cuando estuvimos juntos siempre hemos podido hacer cosas importantes”.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story