Skip to main content

Wesley Bell beats Cori Bush in Missouri Democratic House primary rematch

▶ Watch Video: Key primaries to watch as U.S. hits 100 days until 2026 midterm elections

Rep. Wesley Bell on Tuesday beat former congresswoman Cori Bush in a heated Democratic primary in Missouri’s 1st Congressional District, CBS News projects. 

The race was the latest display of intraparty rifts between establishment Democrats and democratic socialists over the future of the party and the U.S. alliance with Israel. Given the district’s heavily Democratic leaning, Bell is favored to win in November.

Bell, a moderate Democrat who is supportive of the U.S. relationship with Israel, has represented the solid-blue district, which includes St. Louis, since 2025 after unseating the two-term Bush, who rose to prominence as a Black Lives Matter activist and blamed her 2024 defeat on the pro-Israel lobby, which spent millions against her. 

The two clashed in a fiery debate on July 24 over their support for Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election, U.S. military aid for Israel and campaign spending. 

On Israel, Bell voted earlier this month against eliminating $3.3 billion in assistance to Israel in a vote that split House Democrats. Bell was in the minority, with more Democrats voting in favor of ending aid. 

“I am no fan of Bibi Netanyahu, but we’re still going to stand with our allies,” Bell said. 

Bush said she supports cutting off military aid “while human rights violations are happening.” 

“Now funding for other things that they may need, I have no problem with that,” she added. 

While Bush said she believes Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, Bell did not directly answer the question. 

Bell accused Bush of calling Harris a fascist in comments she made two years ago in an interview with Al Jazeera, in which she said: “What I’m hearing is people say: ‘Well, we’re talking about fighting fascism. We don’t need the fascism that comes along with a Donald Trump presidency.’ But I feel like I’m seeing fascism right now, with a Joe Biden presidency and a Vice President Harris presidency.”

“You called her a fascist at a time when this election came down to a few thousand votes in five or six states, and everyone understood the assignment except you,” Bell said. 

Bush responded, “Did I call them fascists? No. There was a rise in fascism, starting with the Trump administration. And then how we were able to send so much money to go and bomb people in another country, and it was so much of that was funded by a lot of the people that fund Congressman Wesley Bell through these PACs.”

Bush accused Bell of “revisionist history” while Bell argued Bush was twisting “herself into a pretzel to try to explain some things.” 

The bitterness between the two escalated as Bell alleged Bush has a penchant for “exploiting tragedies,” referring to federal charges her husband faced related to pandemic-era relief. 

“That is actual defamation,” Bush interjected. “I will not allow you to say something that is actually untrue.” 

Bell also emphasized how Bush paid herself a salary and her husband, who provided her security, with campaign donations, which is legal under certain rules. 

“What Cori has done is she’s raised money and then routed it into her own bank account for our own use,” he said. 

“I don’t talk about your personal stuff, even though I know it. I’m going to keep my holiness and not talk about your personal stuff,” Bush responded. “Just because you say something, like Donald Trump, it doesn’t mean it’s true.” 

Trump administration’s antisemitism lawsuit against Harvard dismissed

A federal judge in Massachusetts on Thursday dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit against Harvard University that accused the school of failing to protect Jewish and Israeli students, finding the instances of alleged discrimination cited by the government were "too isolated and episodic" to support federal civil rights violations. U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns in Massachusetts issued a four-page order granting Harvard's motion to dismiss the suit."Without diminishing any concern arising from these occurrences, the court finds them, singly and collectively, to be too isolated and episodic to support a plausible inference that any institutionalized noncompliance with Title VI persists at Harvard to this day," Stearns wrote. Stearns wrote that the government's complaint was "devoid of any factual allegations" that occurred after the Trump administration notified Harvard that it believed it had failed to comply with federal civil rights law, as is required before any legal action can be taken, and the other three instances in the complaint occurred between 2023 and 2024. In March, the Justice Department filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the university, alleging that it violated the law by failing to protect the students after the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack by Hamas, claiming Harvard's "intentional conduct and its deliberate indifference to discriminatory harassment of Jewish and Israeli students and creation of a hostile educational environment." The administration sought to recover billions of dollars in taxpayer money that Harvard has received from federal agencies. In its lawsuit, the Justice Department alleged that Harvard defied federal law by discriminating against the students "without remorse" and the students were subjected to "severe, pervasive and objectively offensive harassment" on campus, including during protests against Israel, because of their race or national origin. The government alleged that Harvard knew about the harassment against the Jewish and Israeli students but did not stop it.The lawsuit was one of many steps against the university that the Trump administration has taken since President Trump's return to office, in addition to attempting to cancel billions of dollars in federal funding. Harvard, the White House and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Melissa Quinn contributed reporting.
Read Next Story