Skip to main content

Vietnam Veteran back the uniform he once thought was gone forever

Click here for updates on this story

    BALTIMORE, Maryland (WMAR) — A Vietnam veteran first introduced to WMAR viewers in July through a story by Voice for Veterans reporter Cyera Williams is now at the center of an emotional act of kindness.

Carroll “Sonny” Smith, a U.S. Marine Corps veteran who served from 1965 to 1969, told Williams in that original story that one of his biggest regrets was destroying his Marine dress blues after returning home from Vietnam.

For Smith, the uniform was part of the reason he wanted to become a Marine in the first place.

“I fell in love with the uniform,” Smith said.

He remembers being about 10 years old, watching Marines march in a parade near Patterson Park, and telling his mother that one day he would have one of those uniforms.

“I always wanted to be a Marine,” Smith said.

Smith did become a Marine, serving four years. But when he came home from Vietnam, he said the country’s treatment of returning service members was painful.

“It made us feel like we had done something wrong by going over there,” Smith said.

At the time, Smith said he put peace signs and stickers on his dress blues before eventually throwing them away. It was a decision he would regret for decades.

“I just wish I hadn’t destroyed my uniform. That’s all,” Smith said.
After seeing WMAR’s story in July, an anonymous Maryland couple reached out. They wanted to replace Smith’s dress blues while keeping their identity private.

When Williams told Smith about the offer, he was overcome with gratitude.

“I don’t know how to thank them,” Smith said.

The anonymous donor later shared this statement:

“My gesture wasn’t about a uniform — it was about honoring a Marine’s service, preserving his story, and reminding him that people care about him and the sacrifices he made.

When I heard his story, how destroying his uniform was one of his biggest regrets, I knew I had the ability to fix that single issue. Too often, people wait for someone else to step forward and help. My message would be that when you can make a difference in someone’s life, no matter how small, you should act.

Real change happens when ordinary people choose to help where they can, when they can, rather than assuming someone else will do it. In this case, it was simply one Marylander helping another, and that’s exactly how it should be.

I am especially grateful to SSgt. Najafabadi, whose ‘can do’ attitude made “this mission” a success. From the moment I reached out, he demonstrated that the Marine Corps values of commitment, service, and brotherhood do not end with a deployment, a retirement, or even a generation. His willingness to go above and beyond reinforced a simple truth:

Once a Marine, always a Marine!

The “esprit de corps” that binds Marines together remains as strong today as it was decades ago.

My hope is that SSgt. Najafabadi’s actions serve as an example of the character and values the Marine Corps instills in its people. I also hope that those considering military service see this story as a reminder of how deeply Americans appreciate the men and women who serve this great nation.”

The Bel Air Marines helped make the moment possible. SSgt. Nima Najafabadi helped secure the uniform, and when there was no belt buckle, he removed his own and gave it so Smith’s dress blues would be complete.

When Smith learned that detail, he became emotional.

“Please do thank them all for me,” Smith said.

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Jury begins deliberations in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial

(CNN) - The jury is now deliberating in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, after weeks of testimony wrapped up with closing arguments from both sides this morning. The courtroom was packed with reporters and members of the public. A few women in the gallery were wearing pink, presumably in support of Clancy. Before the closing arguments began, Clancy was seen wiping the corner of her eyes, and her shoulders shook as Judge William Sullivan reviewed the charges against her. The jury that will consider Lindsay Clancy’s fate is made up of nine women and three men. The panel includes a woman who was wiping her eyes during closing arguments, a man who yawned during the commonwealth’s closing, and a woman who nodded when a psychiatrist testified Clancy’s choice to not take a certain medication was reasonable “in her mind.” Many of the empaneled jurors have been diligently taking notes during the testimony. The jury foreperson is a woman with gray hair and glasses. Six alternates — three men and three women — were dismissed and so will not deliberate. After the jury exited the courtroom, Judge William F. Sullivan took a moment to commend all three attorneys for their work on the case. “Unless you’ve tried a difficult murder like this one, you may not be aware how difficult and tough it is to try a case like this,” Sullivan said. “It’s emotionally taxing. It’s intellectually, it’s physically exhausting. So I just wanted to commend all three counsel for their work and their efforts in this case in this trial. I know how challenging it’s been for them.” The jury can consider charges of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, or manslaughter. First-degree murder is punishable by life in prison without the possibility of parole. Second-degree murder is punishable by life in prison with the possibility of parole. Manslaughter is punishable by up to 20 years in prison. If the jury finds Clancy not criminally responsible for the killings of her children, she could spend the rest of her life in a hospital. The court would periodically review Clancy's mental health to determine whether she could be released. In his closing argument, defense attorney Kevin Reddington said evidence shows Clancy was “a darn good mother” and the killings happened “because of the damn medicine and the lousy medical care” Clancy received. Reddington said Clancy “lived for her kids” until doctors began overprescribing her medications. The evidence presented showed Clancy had raised concerns and fears about the medications, he said, and her handwritten notes show how her mental state deteriorated. Clancy is not “criminally responsible” for the crime because of her psychological state, he said, citing the expert opinion of forensic psychiatrist Dr. Phillip Resnick. The psychiatrist examined Clancy and testified she was “frankly psychotic” and not in control of her actions during the killings. Experts for both sides acknowledged during the trial that Clancy made a “serious suicide attempt,” Reddington said. The jury was also presented exhibits that support that, he said. The defense lawyer also accused police of not conducting a thorough investigation. Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Sprague told jurors that “there’s no dispute that Lindsay Clancy was suffering from a mental illness and that she tried to kill herself,” but the issue is if she “knew the difference between right and wrong” when she killed her three kids. Killing them “was a choice,” she said. Sprague argued Clancy interacted with the public and presented “herself as a functioning adult, a functioning mom.” She pointed out Clancy chose not to tell mandated reporters about thoughts of harming her kids and how she took her daughter to the doctor the day of the killings. Sprague also said Clancy did not immediately tell her husband that she heard a voice that directed her to kill the kids. Further, the failure of the suicide attempt shows that there was no voice in her head, Sprague argued, pointing out that the pills she took were not at a lethal level and cut wounds were “superficial.” Clancy had resources, support and access to great medical care but did not follow through on a plan, Sprague said. Medical providers aren’t at fault for Clancy’s depression because she wasn’t always being honest with her doctors about her condition and what medications she took, according to Sprague. Judge William F. Sullivan showed the jury the verdict slips that the panel will use to come to a unanimous decision in Lindsay Clancy’s trial. There are three verdict slips, one for each of Clancy’s three children. Each verdict slip has several options: Not guilty, not guilty by lack of criminal responsibility, guilty of first-degree murder, guilty of second-degree murder and guilty of manslaughter. “Reaching a verdict in this case is not necessarily going to be an easy task,” he said. The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story