Skip to main content

The Supreme Court ruling at the center of Spain’s Ceuta migrant crisis

(CNN) — Around 50,000 migrants crossed into Spain’s North African exclave of Ceuta this week, a mass influx that overwhelmed local authorities. At least 57 people died during the crossings, which prompted tighter border security measures across Europe.

Spanish leaders said they were working to expel all those who had entered as quickly as possible, and said by Friday evening that most migrants had been returned to neighboring Morocco. Many had returned voluntarily after failing to find food or shelter in Ceuta. However, the causes of the surge remain disputed.

Spanish officials including Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said human trafficking networks encouraged the crossings, by misrepresenting a recent Supreme Court ruling on migrant returns.

According to that explanation, the traffickers and migrants incorrectly assumed that the ruling meant anyone attempting to enter by sea could not be deported. However, the legal decision was extremely narrow.

Spanish Supreme Court ruling

On June 29, Spain’s Supreme Court issued a ruling stating that authorities cannot summarily deport migrants who arrive by sea without due process, because they did not cross the physical border infrastructure referenced in Spanish law.

The decision covers migrants intercepted while swimming into the exclaves of Ceuta and Melilla – also on the North African coast – who have often been subject to immediate removal to Morocco without any formal proceedings.

“It just means you cannot push them back at sea because there is no crossing of a formal border,” Gemma Pinyol-Jiménez, head of migration policies and diversity at Instrategies and an associate researcher at GRITIM–Pompeu Fabra University, told CNN.

“The idea is to facilitate the work of the police, but it doesn’t mean these people can stay in Ceuta.”

Pinyol-Jiménez said the required process could be very brief, allowing people to be deported within days. “And it still means that if you have entered irregularly, you can be sent back to Morocco, because there is also an agreement with Morocco,” she said. Spain and Morocco signed a bilateral readmission agreement in 1992 that requires Morocco, under certain conditions, to take back third-country nationals who entered Spain irregularly via Moroccan territory.

Daniel Thym, a professor of public, European and international law at the University of Konstanz, described the decision as “a very technical ruling.” He said it distinguishes between migrants who climb over the border barriers and those who reach Spanish territory by swimming around them, and it does not constitute a sweeping human rights judgment.

“The court even laid down a possible way the government might circumvent the ruling,” he said, referring to judges’ suggestion that Spain could install physical barriers in the water that would once again allow immediate returns.

“It’s important to understand that migration movements almost never have one single cause,” Thym said. “The ruling might have been a trigger, but there were many other factors at play.”

Beyond the ruling

Spain’s relatively strong economy, a recent regularization program for undocumented migrants already living in the country, favorable summer conditions at sea and longstanding economic pressures on young people in Morocco and elsewhere in North Africa have also been cited by experts as possible drivers for the influx.

Thym also pointed to the large number of adolescents among those who crossed.

“Many of them are 16 or 17,” Thym said. “That creates problems because it’s officially unaccompanied minors. But if they apply for asylum, they get a proper procedure, which often takes months, if not years.”

According to official statistics, the unemployment rate for Moroccans aged 15 to 24 remains high, at 37.2%, despite the nationwide unemployment rate falling slightly to 13% in 2025.

“There is a constant structural attraction to Europe for younger people. The Spanish economy is doing very well,” Thym said.

Spain is also moving in the opposite direction to many other European countries, which are shifting to the right and tightening immigration policies. Earlier this year, Sánchez’s government announced a regularization program initially expected to give 500,000 undocumented migrants already living in Spain a path to legal status.

Thym said applications far exceeded that initial estimate.

“More than 1 million undocumented migrants applied,” he said.

Historical dispute

Ceuta and Melilla are two Spanish territories on Morocco’s Mediterranean coast, which together form the European Union’s only land borders with Africa. They have long been among Europe’s most sensitive migration routes, protected by high border fences and close cooperation between Spain and Morocco to prevent irregular crossings.

Although they are Spanish territory, the exclaves occupy a unique legal and political position. Morocco claims sovereignty over both territories, making migration there not only a humanitarian issue but also a recurring source of diplomatic tension.

A similar migration surge in 2021 was widely viewed as retaliation during a diplomatic dispute over Western Sahara. Moroccan authorities were widely accused of easing border controls after Spain allowed a leader of the Western Sahara independence movement to receive medical treatment.

“These kinds of organized movements don’t happen without, at minimum, passive collaboration from Moroccan authorities,” Pinyol-Jiménez said. Morocco has denied any involvement.

A wider crisis

The migrant surge has quickly become a political flashpoint across Europe.

Italy announced temporary border controls for arrivals from Spain, while France said it would reinforce checks along its frontier. Spain’s opposition has accused Sánchez’s government of losing control of the country’s borders, while European leaders have renewed calls for stricter migration policies.

Although Ceuta is Spanish territory and part of the Schengen area, movement between the exclave and mainland Spain is already subject to identity checks, meaning migrants who reach Ceuta do not automatically gain unrestricted access to continental Europe.

Meanwhile, Sánchez has already announced plans to install floating barriers in the water around Ceuta – a move the government says would comply with the Supreme Court ruling while restoring the ability to carry out immediate returns.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Ohio Rep. running for reelection comes face-to-face in court with the senator whose daughter he’s accused of abusing

Cleveland (CNN) — The senior US senator from Ohio sat with his daughter on a wooden bench in the hallway of the Cuyahoga County courthouse Wednesday, awaiting their turn as a judge in the room next door considered other domestic relations cases, then waiting again as that same judge swiftly declared a break in their case.Bernie Moreno had, for months, declined to wade publicly into the messy custody dispute that had consumed his family and threatened to upend the politics in his state. Now he sat in the thick of it, waiting to hear updates to a series of questions in the case, including whether a judge would grant a restraining order that his daughter’s lawyer had sought against his ex-son-in-law, the congressman Max Miller. Once the proceeding began, he moved to the wooden benches inside amid the press and other family members.Moreno’s daughter, Emily Moreno, was once married to Miller and has accused her now her-ex husband  of abuse, including an incident in which she says he held a gun to her. Miller has denied the assertions, saying his ex-wife is manipulative and suffers from mental illness. Her lawyer denies that.Their case might have been like any of the other domestic matters that went before Judge Debra Boros in the green-carpeted courtroom – except that Miller is also fighting for his political future in a reelection that has drawn national attention. Democrats are bullish they could flip the solidly red district, in part due to people like Moreno and Ohio’s other Republican senator – Jon Husted, who is also on the ballot in November – urging Miller to drop out.As the Morenos chatted on the bench, Miller walked by. The father and daughter bowed their heads.At issue Wednesday was a request not entirely at the heart of the matter.  Andrew Zashin, the lawyer for Emily Moreno, was seeking a restraining order, alleging that Miller grabbed him and another attorney’s bag last month after a hearing in their long-running legal battle. The attorney, filing on Emily Moreno’s behalf, said that it was the second instance in which the Congressman accosted his ex-wife’s legal team outside of court, something Miller’s team has denied.Ultimately the parties agreed to a mutual restraining order: Miller cannot speak to Emily Moreno’s lawyers outside of the court proceedings, and Emily Moreno cannot speak to Miller’s lawyers out of court proceedings.Both sides claimed victory.“What really happened here is their client left in a worse position than when she woke up this morning. When she woke up this morning, she didn’t have a restraining order prohibiting her from having any contact with counsel here,” Miller’s lawyer Larry Zukerman said, alleging that Emily Moreno “verbally attacked my co-counsel.”Emily Moreno’s lawyers deny that.“If that were the case, why didn’t they file something. Just more spin,” Zashin said, adding that he got the restraining order his team had sought.There was also a number of other matters to resolve, including whether an order would be issued in the case to keep court transcripts and depositions from being publicly available, and whether Miller’s private security would have to testify in the case. The judge punted both of those issues for a decision later.Boros was direct with those in the courtroom Wednesday, reminding all parties on two occasions that despite the emotions in the case, there was no excuse to violate court orders – an apparent nod to how the ordinary custody place is playing out in the national spotlight.Attention in the case intensified this month as more media outlets began reporting on allegations that had been part of court filings for months, and Miller faced increasing calls to drop his reelection bid ahead of a key deadline. President Donald Trump even privately told some allies that he didn’t believe Miller can win the race, given the accusations, one source familiar with the conversations previously told CNN.Miller, though, has remained defiant, insisting he would keep running even as the date for party leaders to replace him on the ballot passed. He previously told CNN that Trump had called him and relayed it would be a “tough race.” But Miller insisted he felt good about the decision to stay in.“My daughter is going to grow up one day, and she’s going to see all of this, and she’s not going to see that her father caved to political and social media pressures for something that he never did,” Miller said.After the court hearing on Wednesday, Miller’s attorney blasted the frenzy that has developed around the case, arguing it was unlike most of what he had seen in his time as an attorney.“They are making a political circus out of this,” Zukerman told CNN.The focus on Miller’s political and legal troubles, however, are far from over.After Miller asked the House Ethics Committee for an investigation that he said would clear his name, the committee announced it is “reviewing allegations that Representative Max Miller may have engaged in domestic violence and abuse or illegal drug use.”Miller, who worked as a White House staffer and served in the Marine Corps Reserve before joining Congress in 2023, admitted to last using illegal drugs “several years ago.” He denied currently using drugs but said he takes testosterone replacement therapy in a CNN interview earlier this month.Miller is also still contending with the fallout from his posting a link on social media to hundreds of messages, videos and images involving his ex-wife. While he framed the move as a bid to air out the facts and defend his daughter, the Dropbox folder that Miller shared with his nearly 60,000 followers included sensitive and unredacted details of his own family, including one image that depicted his toddler daughter nude. The photo was taken in the context of an inquiry into an injury the 2-year-old had suffered.Miller’s attorney Aaron Minc took responsibility for the disclosure publicly, and Miller called it “awful,” though he disputed the characterization of it as “shockingly reckless.”“My attorney took full responsibility,” Miller said. “There was never any intent to do that.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story