Skip to main content

Senate Judiciary Committee advances Todd Blanche’s nomination for attorney general

Sen. John Cornyn speaks as members of the Senate Judiciary Committee gather to vote on the nomination of Todd Blanche to be U.S. Attorney General on Capitol Hill, Aug. 4, 2026, in Washington. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — The Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday voted to advance acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s nomination to permanently lead the Department of Justice.

Blanche advanced in a 12-10 party line vote. All Republicans voted in favor of him, while all Democrats voted against. 

Republican Sens. John Cornyn and Thom Tillis ultimately supported Blanche after securing an agreement that clarified the scope of President Donald Trump’s IRS immunity deal and formally rescinded the administration’s so-called $1.8 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund.”

Despite the fact that the agreement reached has no language preventing the resurrection of the controversial fund under a different name or method, Cornyn said the DOJ has been “consistent” about their assertions that the fund is dead. 

“And of course, I expect them to live up to that in any future litigation,” Cornyn said in remarks on the Senate panel ahead of the vote.

Tillis also said the agreement reached with Blanche satisfies his concerns. 

“I believe that we have addressed the concerns that I have. The first one I called the ‘payout pot for punks.’ I’ve never liked this 1776 fund. It made no sense to me, and I thought it was an insult to the police officers and the people that defended us on January the 6th. It’s done. It’s been rescinded, and I am satisfied,” Tillis said.

Tillis said that both sides on the aisle “have a problem” when it comes to malicious prosecution. He said he hopes to see a “bending of the curve of this absurdity” when Blanche is confirmed.

Ahead of the vote, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley thanked Cornyn and Tillis for their work securing the agreement. He said many senators shared their concerns.

“Formally rescinding the fund and clarifying the scope of release of claims has put this issue to bed once and for all,” Grassley said.

Democratic Sen. Chris Coons took a different view on the so-called “Anti-Weaponization Fund” than his Republican colleagues, arguing that Blanche’s willingness to go along with its creation in the first place should disqualify him from the attorney general job. 

“In my view, we never should have gotten to this place. As acting attorney general, when asked by the president to do something plainly unethical and corrupt, Mr. Blanche should have simply said no. He did not do that, and I pressed him in his confirmation hearing whether he even tried to talk President Trump out of this widely rejected plan, and he refused to answer,” Coons said.

During the hearing, Blanche responded to Coons’ questions, saying he was not simply a “yes-man” in giving Trump counsel. 

“I will say that President Trump trusts me to give him counsel. Counsel does not mean I’m a ‘yes-man.’ And that’s true in my case, like it should be in any attorneys general case,” Blanche said during his confirmation hearing.

Several Democrats on the panel raised a number of concerns about Blanche.

“Today I think is a sad and embarrassing day for this committee, as it looks like, on a party line vote, we are going to advance out of this committee probably the most discreditable person ever to seek the office of attorney general of the United States,” Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse said.

Democratic Sen. Cory Booker, in a lengthy speech, warned that the country was in “dangerous waters” with Blanche.

“This man is not our lawyer. He is not America’s lawyer. He is about to become Trump’s sword against his adversaries and shield against any scrutiny,” Booker said.

What’s next for Blanche’s nomination? 

Blanche’s nomination is now ready for consideration on the Senate floor.

Unless there is an agreement to speed things along, the soonest the Senate can take a procedural vote on Blanche’s nomination is Friday. That would set up a final confirmation vote sometime on Saturday.

Though Tillis and Cornyn were the most closely watched Republican votes on the Senate Judiciary Committee, there remains other GOP senators who have raised concerns about Blanche.

With Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell still absent from Congress, Blanche will ultimately only be able to lose the support of two Republicans when his nomination comes up for a vote on the Senate floor.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Baby with heart defect at center of surrogate dispute receives first surgery

▶ Watch Video: Where the Texas surrogate dispute stands right now A baby born with a rare heart defect who is at the center of a dispute between a surrogate and the parents underwent the first in a series of surgeries, a lawyer representing the child's parents said Monday.The baby, whom the parents have named Rumi, was born Wednesday in Texas with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, a rare heart defect that requires a series of surgeries, with the first typically happening during the first weeks of life. Lee Budner, the attorney for parents Omar Ahmed and Nausheen Gilkar, said the baby's medical team determined Friday, "after thorough examination and imaging, that Rumi was eligible for a Norwood procedure, a complex palliative heart surgery that is the first of a series of three surgeries that are required within the first several years of life for babies born with HLHS."The procedure was performed Monday morning, Budner said, and "Rumi is now recuperating under the loving care of his parents and his heroic team of doctors, nurses, and medical staff." "This is the last update on Rumi's health that his family intends to share. His condition remains critical and complex, and his family seeks privacy in caring for their son on his long road to recovery," Budner added.The second surgery is usually performed at 4 to 6 months, and the third between 18 months and 5 years old, according to the Cleveland Clinic. The heart condition is rare and complex, the Cleveland Clinic says, and can cause lifelong complications. Several months before Rumi was born, when Gilkar and Ahmed learned of the heart defect, they asked the surrogate, McKenna West, to get an abortion, according to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who intervened in the case last week. Gilkar and Ahmed are from California and West is from Alaska. West refused to get the abortion and instead went to Texas before the baby was born. Paxton had secured a court order saying the baby must receive lifesaving medical care after birth. The court also ruled that Gilkar and Ahmed are responsible for medical decisions within the requirements of the court order.As a result of those orders, West was not allowed any contact with the child after his birth, her attorney, Lincoln Davis Wilson, told CBS News last week. Wilson said West intended to continue efforts to gain custody of the child, whom she had been calling Gabriel."We are working on challenging those orders of parentage because we think that Texas law makes a woman who gives birth [to] a child, the mother of the child," he said last week.CBS News has reached out to Wilson for comment.Gilkar and Ahmed had previously asked a California court to order West to give birth there.Budner said Monday that West "continues to assert baseless claims for custody of Rumi, in violation of multiple courts orders out of both Alaska and California. We look forward to quickly defeating those claims as Rumi's parents continue to focus on his health and safety above all else."
Read Next Story