Skip to main content

San Francisco police officers used excessive force on man they mistakenly arrested, report states

Click here for updates on this story

    SAN FRANCISCO, California (KPIX) — The San Francisco Public Defender’s Office Monday called on police leadership and the police commission to act on a findings report that states officers used excessive force during a wrongful arrest in 2024.

The incident took place July 4, 2024, after an officer made a mistake entering a license plate number and believed he had identified a stolen vehicle, the Public Defender’s Office said. San Francisco police officers would then proceed to smash the driver’s window, drag the driver out and pepper-spray him — actions that a San Francisco Department of Police Accountability (DPA) report states were excessive.

In the driver’s seat of the suspected stolen vehicle was Matthew Ludwig. Ludwig was charged with reckless driving and resisting arrest. The Public Defender’s Office said the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office refused to drop the case even after the mistake came to light.

The Public Defender’s Office filed a complaint to the DPA in May 2025 regarding the stop and use of force, and the DPA issued its findings in March of this year.

“The DPA investigated and sustained multiple police abuses that Mr. Ludwig suffered. I call on SFPD leadership and the city’s Police Commission to act on these findings and implement every available measure to prevent future misconduct,” said San Francisco Public Defender Mano Raju.

The DA’s office ultimately dropped the case, the Public Defender’s Office said, after Ludwig died in September of 2025.

“Stopped without justification”
Around 11:30 p.m., officer Vinesh Govindbhai and officer Jonathan Zepeda were near Larkin and Grove streets when they began following a Honda Accord they believed was stolen after Zepeda mistakenly entered the wrong license plate number, a complaint to the DPA states.

The officers followed the vehicle onto O’Farrell Street, saying they had observed the driver run several red lights, the Public Defender’s Office said, and parked behind it at a red light.

“Ofc. Govindbhai stopped his car directly behind the Honda so that, practically, it was pinned in from the front and back,” the complaint says.

The Public Defender’s Office said Govindbhai, without double-checking the plate numbers, walked to the driver’s side door and struck the window with his baton four times, smashing the glass.

“When Ofc. Govindbhai approached the car, he made no realistic attempts to talk to Ludwig—or even order him out of the car—to investigate the moving violation as is ordinary when a person has run a red light,” the complaint states.

On the other side of the vehicle, Zepeda, with his gun drawn and “at low ready,” told the passengers to get out of the vehicle, which they did, the complaint says. He then went to help detain Ludwig, who was already on the ground. Video of the arrest shows Ludwig being dragged out of the car, thrown onto the ground, and then pepper-sprayed as Govindbhai tries to put Ludwig’s arms behind his back.

In explaining his use of force, Govindbhai, in part, states the neighborhood is known as a “high drug trafficking area” and has “suspects with warrants,” the complaint says, which cites officer reports.

“Calling a neighborhood dangerous similarly does not give officers license to smash windows during a traffic stop absent some other justification,” the Public Defender’s Office writes. “It was, instead, both officers’ erroneous belief that the car carried the wrong license plate that supplied the threat. In short, officers’ fears were imaginary and exaggerated.”

The officers eventually realized they had entered the wrong plate number but still recommended Ludwig be charged with reckless driving and resisting arrest, the complaint states.

“The complainant stated the driver was stopped without justification,” the DPA writes. “The driver was not operating a stolen vehicle, and the officers therefore had no reasonable suspicion to stop him.”

“He lost virtually everything”
Ludwig was arrested and booked into jail, and his vehicle was later sold at auction after being impounded, the Public Defender’s Office said; days later, the RV he shared with his girlfriend was towed.

Still facing charges of reckless driving and resisting arrest, he was offered diversion by the prosecution as a final deal, the Public Defender’s Office said. He died in September of 2025 before the charges were dropped and before the DPA found the officers used unnecessary force and approached him without justification.

“As a result of this, he lost virtually everything that he owned,” Deputy Public Defender Brandon Coleman, who represented Ludwig, said. “He told me that he felt like this world lacked compassion for human life and that he had never been given a fair chance in life.”

CBS News Bay Area reached out to San Francisco police and were told to contact the city attorney’s office, as they cannot speak on pending litigation.

We have also reached out to the DA’s office but have yet to hear back.

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

En plena carrera espacial, China aplaza el lanzamiento de una misión lunar sin precedentes para buscar agua

El muy esperado lanzamiento de la misión robótica china Chang’e-7, diseñada para explorar el polo sur lunar en busca de hielo de agua —un recurso de gran valor que Estados Unidos también espera utilizar—, “no podrá llevarse a cabo durante la ventana prevista para este año”, según un comunicado de la Oficina de Ingeniería Espacial Tripulada de China difundido por los medios estatales chinos.Se esperaba que el despegue de la misión tuviera lugar tan pronto como el domingo por la noche o el lunes por la mañana, hora de Beijing. Ahora no está claro cuándo podría intentar lanzar la misión china.La razón exacta del retraso no se aclaró de inmediato. Los medios estatales se limitaron a informar que la “sonda lunar no cumple con las condiciones de lanzamiento” y que la “evaluación se realizó siguiendo los principios de prudencia, fiabilidad y éxito absoluto de la misión”.Estados Unidos y China compiten por establecer asentamientos en el polo sur lunar, donde se cree que existe agua en abundancia en forma de hielo dentro de cráteres en sombra permanente.Ninguna misión ha analizado directamente el agua en la Luna hasta la fecha, algo que la Chang’e-7 intentará hacer.Aunque Estados Unidos ha detectado y comenzado a estimar el tamaño de los depósitos de hielo de agua mediante sensores remotos en satélites en órbita, nunca ha logrado enviar con éxito una sonda para perforar y extraer dicho recurso.Una empresa con sede en Texas, Intuitive Machines, envió a la Luna en 2025 una sonda perforadora destinada a buscar agua. Sin embargo, la nave sufrió un percance al intentar aterrizar en el terreno notoriamente traicionero del polo sur y no pudo cumplir los objetivos de su misión.No obstante, el retraso en el lanzamiento de la misión Chang’e-7 podría devolver la competitividad a este capítulo de la “carrera espacial” (término utilizado por funcionarios estadounidenses para describir la pugna con China).Estados Unidos tiene varias naves espaciales en camino hacia la misma región lunar que la misión Chang’e-7 tiene como objetivo para el próximo año. La empresa Astrobotic Technologies, con sede en Pittsburgh, podría lanzar su módulo de aterrizaje Griffin al polo sur lunar a finales de 2026. Por su parte, Blue Origin, la compañía espacial de Jeff Bezos, planea enviar hasta dos módulos de aterrizaje robóticos a la Luna el año que viene. Uno de ellos podría transportar el rover VIPER, un robot de prospección diseñado específicamente por la NASA para buscar hielo de agua y otros recursos lunares.La convicción de que el polo sur lunar alberga enormes reservas de hielo de agua es una de las razones principales por las que esta región se ha convertido en el escenario central de esta competencia internacional. Este recurso es de gran valor para la exploración del espacio profundo y para una futura base lunar, ya que puede transformarse en aire respirable, agua potable o incluso combustible para cohetes.Actualmente se desconoce si el hielo de agua está presente en cantidades suficientes para resultar útil en estos fines. Sin embargo, la misión Chang’e-7 podría contribuir a lograr “avances importantes en esta cuestión, refinando y centrando los experimentos para futuras exploraciones y pruebas”, declaró a CNN Yuqi Qian, geólogo lunar de la Universidad de Hong Kong.Qian señaló que, con la misión Chang’e-7, el programa lunar de China está “pasando de ser un programa de exploración a uno de aprovechamiento de recursos”.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story