Skip to main content

In the city where Haitian deportees are being sent, locals say they’re not ready

(CNN) — Haiti’s northern coast is where the country faces the vast Atlantic with all its baggage. There’s Labadie, the private resort open only to American cruise ships and foreign holiday makers. Just next door is Ile de la Tortue, an infamous way station for human traffickers. And then there’s Cap-Haitien, a city steeped in the country’s revolutionary history – and more recently, the first-choice destination for the Trump administration to deport Haitian migrants.

Since Haiti’s devastating earthquake in 2010, Cap-Haitien has been a major hub for internally displaced people fleeing disaster and violence in other parts of the country. And after the Trump administration’s legal victory this month to remove temporary deportation protections from hundreds of thousands of people in the United States, the city may soon see many more arrivals.

Thursday marked the first deportation flight to Haiti from the US since the revocation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS), which had protected about 350,000 Haitians in the US from deportation and given them legal work permits. Now Haitian communities across the US are coming to terms with the new reality that they’re vulnerable to the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown.

“It’s a great day to deport illegal aliens. Good morning America!” DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin posted on X Thursday morning, hours before the deportation flight to Haiti took off.

A little after noon, 161 people descended from the charter flight in Cap-Haitien, according to Haiti’s National Migration Office. Some fell to their knees to kiss the ground, others covered their faces and hurried away from the gathered local press.

The question in Cap is how many more will follow. Locals say the city is already inundated.

“Cap-Haitian alone can’t receive more people,” said Demonstène Reynold, a mechanic living in Cap. “We’re not just receiving deportees from outside of Haiti … due to the political crisis, we have people from Hinche and Port-au-Prince, from the interior of the country.”

The city these days looks different from years past. Street traffic is snarled, trash collection sites overflow. A hospital visited by CNN was overwhelmed with patients queuing outdoors, mothers rocking babies in the heat as they waited.

Louis Ronald Espoir, an administrator at the city’s Hospital Fort Saint Michel, said the city’s medical facilities are at capacity. “As you can see here with your own eyes, all the hospitals in the region are full despite the best efforts of the government. If they’re full with the current population, I’d be lying to say we can take in anyone else.”

Thursday’s flight comes as immigrant rights advocates in the US raise concerns about the dangers of deporting people to the Caribbean nation. Critics, who want more immigration restrictions, have accused the Trump administration of not removing undocumented immigrants quickly enough.

The Trump administration has repeatedly argued that Haiti is safe enough for Haitians to be returned to, despite a State Department “Do not travel” advisory and a Federal Aviation Administration ban on US commercial flights there.

In a June interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Mullin defended the decision to send Haitians back and argued that the country would benefit from the returnees. The State Department’s “do not travel” advisory was issued out of concern for Americans, not Haitians, he said, “because they are kidnapping or trying to kidnap individuals from the United States because they feel like they – their family has the money to pay the ransom.”

But the country’s kidnapping epidemic has been overwhelmingly felt by Haitians, with gangs notorious for taking victims from among even the very poor. The brutal business is centered around capital Port-au-Prince, where US deportation flights have also landed.

CNN is seeking comment from DHS about Thursday’s flight to Cap-Haitien, why the passengers onboard were deported and whether any of them are among those who recently lost TPS.

On the far side of the country from Port-au-Prince, Cap-Haitien is considered largely safe from gang violence. But some worry a large influx of newcomers could destabilize an already crowded place.

Angie Bell, the city’s former mayor, says she encourages people to come back – but that the country needs to build its ability to welcome them. “We need much more development, and we need more security as a preventative measure, with so many people coming in,” Bell says.

She estimates that the city’s population has shot up from around 350,000 people in the last census in 2003, to at least 800,000. “Because of the lack of housing, we have a lot of people that are working in the city but living in the outskirts,” she said.

The Haitian government and aid organizations like the International Office for Migration are working to ease the burden on locals and help new arrivals disperse across the country. Deportees are typically offered food and some money for their onward travel, as well as a place to stay for a few nights and assistance in locating family members.

But as the population numbers suggest, many are not moving on from Cap-Haitien. And not all the deportees will even know where to go. According to the head of Haiti’s migration agency, Jean Négot Bonheur Delva, who met Thursday’s deportation flight at the airport, one of the disembarking passengers had never been to Haiti before.

Born in the Dominican Republic to Haitian parents before moving to the US, it was unclear where he should go next, Delva said, adding, “he knows nothing of Haiti.”

Reporting contributed by CNN’s Catherine Shoichet.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Supreme Court temporarily allows work on White House ballroom to continue

▶ Watch Video: Trump asks Supreme Court to intervene in White House ballroom fight Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday temporarily allowed construction of the White House ballroom to continue, freezing for now a lower court decision that would have halted work on the project.Chief Justice John Roberts issued a stay that will remain in place until the Supreme Court takes further action. His order is temporary and gives the high court additional time to consider the Justice Department's request to pause a district court's injunction, which was set to take effect at midnight unless the Supreme Court acted.The Trump administration asked the high court last week to intervene and allow construction of the 90,000-square-foot ballroom to continue.Roberts' stay came after a divided federal appeals court concluded earlier this month that Congress, not President Trump or the White House, has "full constitutional control over federal property and the funding of its maintenance and development," and noted an "absence of any express or implied authorization" that grants Mr. Trump the ability to construct the $400 million ballroom. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the injunction issued by the district court earlier this year that would've stopped construction on the White House ballroom. But the D.C. Circuit halted its ruling for 14 days, through Friday, to give the Justice Department time to seek relief from the Supreme Court.In a filing with the court, Solicitor General D. John Sauer had asked the justices to pause the lower court ruling that blocked above-ground construction while the legal battle over the project plays out. The overhaul also includes an underground bunker, medical facilities and other features, and judges have allowed that work to continue."This case involves an extraordinary and unlawful injunction that will halt the ongoing construction of the integrated military complex, including a totally secure ballroom space, at the East Wing of the White House, which is vitally required by national security," Sauer wrote.Mr. Trump has reiterated that concern, arguing that construction must continue because it is "vital" to his safety and the safety of future presidents, and American national security, especially in light of recent foiled assassination plots against him. In a Truth Social post earlier this month, Mr. Trump called the National Trust for Historic Preservation "TREASONISTS" and alleged without evidence that they "revealed Top Military Secrets!"But Mr. Trump has often conflated the ongoing construction of a new presidential security bunker that is being built underneath the proposed ballroom, and the construction of the ballroom itself. As the legal challenge has played out in lower courts, all below-ground construction on national security facilities has continued, and only above-ground work on the physical construction of the ballroom is at issue. "The lower section does not work without the upper section and, likewise, the upper section does not work without the lower. It is all one highly integrated unit," Mr. Trump wrote in the same Truth Social post criticizing the Trust. He later added in the same message that the lawsuit "is this kind of gross and flagrant abuse of our Courts that is exactly why Americans are losing faith in our System of Justice."The administration has warned the Supreme Court that work on the ballroom is too far along to stop. The White House official managing the project, Joshua Fisher, said in a declaration submitted to the justices that even if a court ordered the building to be taken down or altered, "there would be no way to do so." And Sauer wrote in the filing with the high court that the "stop-work mandate" from the district court is "impossible."Lower court stays, which have allowed ongoing work on the ballroom, have pushed construction "beyond the point of return," he said.In response, the National Trust for Historic Preservation has accused the Trump administration of trying to "outrun judicial review." While the case was before the D.C. Circuit, the White House "accelerated construction" with a 250-person crew working 20 hours a day, seven days a week, they wrote.Mr. Trump has claimed to have raised most of the $400 million he says he needs to complete the project through donations from private donors and major corporations like Lockheed Martin, Amazon and Microsoft.U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, the judge who is overseeing the legal challenge to the project, found that the Trump administration's means of funding the project — in which donations were collected through a nonprofit organization, transferred first to the National Park Service and then to a fund used for typical White House maintenance and repairs — was unlawful. Construction on the ballroom project began in October following demolition of the East Wing. The National Trust for Historic Preservation filed its lawsuit to halt ballroom construction in December, arguing the work is unlawful.Leon issued his preliminary injunction that would block construction in March and clarified in April that work on the below-ground, national security facilities was not covered by his order.The D.C. Circuit then ruled in favor of the Trust in a 2-1 decision, finding that the White House could not build the ballroom without authorization from Congress. 
Read Next Story