Skip to main content

Pentagon moves to fire publisher and editor of Stars and Stripes

▶ Watch Video: Pentagon considering firing longtime Stars and Stripes publisher, sources say

Washington — The Pentagon has given separation notices to both the publisher and the editor-in-chief of Stars and Stripes, the U.S. military news outlet partly funded by American taxpayers, according to people familiar with the matter.

The notices, delivered Friday, gave Publisher Max Lederer and Editor-in-Chief Erik Slavin five days to appeal their dismissals. 

The cause cited was insubordination, one of the people familiar with the matter said. The person did not elaborate on the details of the alleged insubordination.

A Defense Department spokesman declined to comment when contacted Friday afternoon by CBS News. 

Lederer has served as the outlet’s publisher for 19 years and told colleagues this week that he would retire on Sept. 30, citing fundamental differences with the Trump administration. Slavin has spoken publicly, including to CBS News, about disagreements with Pentagon leaders. 

CBS News reported on Wednesday that Pentagon officials had discussed dismissing Lederer before his scheduled retirement.

In a note to staff earlier this week that was obtained by CBS News, Lederer wrote: “It has become clear that my philosophy of leadership, and my understanding of the value and mission of Stars and Stripes, differ in fundamental ways from the direction the leadership of the Department of Defense has for the organization.” 

But he added he would “do everything I can to make sure the transition is smooth for each of you” before his retirement.

Stars and Stripes has been a source of critical information for members of the military and their families for decades, and has prided itself on editorial independence. 

Recently, Stars and Stripes, along with the Military Times, reported on challenging conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, writing that family members of service members aboard the aircraft carrier were concerned about their loved ones’ mental health and risk of self-harm. Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and President Trump downplayed or denied those reports, but the ship left the Middle East this week to begin the journey home to the U.S. after a nine-month deployment.

Roughly half of Stars and Stripes’ $29 million annual budget comes from taxpayers, a person familiar with the newspaper’s operations said. Readership has declined since its peaks during the Vietnam War, the Cold War and World War II, according to two U.S. officials, but an average of 1.4 million people see Stars and Stripes each day. Print editions overseas also reach service members in remote locations where internet access is spotty and unreliable. 

Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell has talked about “bringing Stars and Stripes into the 21st century” and efforts to “refocus its content away from woke distractions that syphon morale, and adapt it to serve a new generation of service members.” 

Woman covertly filmed by Meta smart glasses raises privacy concerns

▶ Watch Video: Looking into the privacy safeguard features of AI smart glasses A woman discovered she had been secretly filmed by a man wearing Meta's AI-powered smart glasses when friends and people she hadn't talked to in years sent her a video posted on social media. "It went viral. Across all platforms, probably over 200,000 views," Toluwa Omitowoju said. It's a growing trend with content creators increasingly using wearable AI tech to record everyday people in prank pickup line videos – often without their consent. Omitowoju was shocked and displeased to see herself in one such video, which has since been taken down. She had no idea she was being filmed, nor was she asked before the video was posted."I had no say," Omitowoju said, adding that other women have shared similar experiences with her."It was a lot worse. It was to the point where they don't even know who filmed them and yet it's being posted online under a burner account," she said.Adam Mosseri, the head of Meta-owned social media giant Instagram, said the platform is cracking down on videos that harass people or invade their privacy."If you're posting content that is taking advantage of people and harassing them, like a lot of these pickup line kind of videos that we've heard of and seen recently, then we're going to take the content down," he said in July. "We don't want people to be surreptitiously taking videos of other people and harassing them and then posting them on our platform."Meta has come under fire for privacy concerns before.In May, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton launched an investigation into Ray-Ban Meta glasses, alleging that the glasses could violate personal privacy by using cameras, speakers and more to covertly film people, including in private moments such as bathroom visits."Privacy and data protection are core to every product we build at Meta, including Ray-Ban Meta glasses," Meta said in a statement at the time. Meta told CBS News that its glasses have built-in privacy and safety features, including a telltale LED light that turns on when the glasses are recording and software that is supposed to prevent recording if the light is covered or disabled.CBS News' Anna Schecter put this feature to the test. She found the disabling mechanism did not appear to work when she covered the light after already starting to record.A Meta spokesperson told CBS News the tamper detection is designed to prevent recording if the light is covered before pressing record."If the glasses detect that the capture LED is covered or obstructed, they will disable capture and prompt the wearer to clear the obstruction," the company said in a statement to CBS News. Meta added it continues to "work to improve this technology."Another privacy complication is that most states only require the consent of one person to record an interaction, which means only the person recording has to know. Omitowoju said she believes that wearable technology is a huge threat to personal privacy."If someone sees a phone in front of their face, they have the opportunity to step away, to approach someone and say, 'Hey, I don't want you to record.' With these smart glasses and the smart technology, you're taking away the right of refusal," she said.
Read Next Story