Skip to main content

Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh faces pressure to show his hand

Washington (CNN) — Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh is set to deliver his biggest speech yet on Friday, but investors may not hear what they want.

Central bankers, finance ministers and policymakers from around the world will gather at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s annual economic symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, on Friday. For more than two decades, the Fed’s sitting leader has signaled where interest rates are heading in the event’s keynote address.

But Warsh is expected to break from tradition — a move that might not sit well with investors.

Since becoming chairman three months ago, Warsh has stopped spoon-feeding Wall Street clues on what the US central bank will do next. Meanwhile, inflation has moved higher and some of Warsh’s colleagues are already calling to raise borrowing costs for the first time since July 2023.

If Warsh sticks to his guns and stays mum about interest rates on Friday, that will make it brutally clear to investors that they will simply have to live with less guidance.

“I don’t expect any signals to come out of Kevin Warsh’s Jackson Hole speech,” said Jan Groen, chief US economist at global financial firm Societe Generale. “And if I’m right, I think the market is not going to like it.”

Shortly after Warsh’s post-meeting news conference last month — in which he stayed quiet about interest rates — long-term bond yields surged in a potential sign that traders are concerned the Fed won’t do enough to tame stubbornly elevated inflation.

Rising government deficits and the increased supply of corporate bonds, among other factors, have pushed up bond yields in recent months. That means the federal government will continue to make massive interest payments that will only add to its $40 trillion pile of debt.

Guessing Warsh’s ‘reaction function’

Warsh hasn’t even discussed what would move the needle for him on interest rates, a concept known as a “reaction function.”

A reaction function is when a central bank explains “what it is watching, how it interprets the economy, how it weighs competing risks, and what developments would change its judgment,” the Brookings Institution explained in an analysis last month. Warsh has repeatedly refused to describe his reaction function when asked by reporters.

This is different from “forward guidance,” which is a more explicit projection of the path for the Fed’s interest rate if the economy evolves as expected.

At a July event in Sintra, Portugal, Warsh said that the bond market is able to “actually understand quite well” without a reaction function. Some disagree with that characterization.

“The bond market is really looking to the Fed for clues on their reaction function,” said Ian Kresnak, senior investment strategist at Vanguard. “What’s driving a lot of the volatility in the rates market is uncertainty around how the Fed is going to respond to inflation.”

A CNBC survey of 31 economists, strategists and investors this week showed that 80% respondents said Warsh should explain his economic views in more detail. Investors view the Jackson Hole event as Warsh’s best opportunity to do just that.

“The symposium gives him room to lay out his personal views,” investors at financial firm Glenmede wrote in an August 24 analyst note. They added that the revelation of Warsh’s reaction function “could reduce some of the uncertainty driving recent volatility in bond markets.”

Fed officials are grappling with the current uptick in inflation, driven by tariffs, war and companies’ massive spending on AI infrastructure on prices — and whether they should step in with interest rate hikes soon.

Investors currently see a roughly 34% chance Fed officials will raise rates at their September 15-16 meeting, according to CME FedWatch. But those odds are higher in subsequent meetings.

“It’s a close call whether or not they hike at all this year,” said Jim Caron, chief investment officer of portfolio solutions at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Trump’s ‘Lake America’ move revives one of his biggest political flops

(CNN) — It increasingly feels as though President Donald Trump is trying to do unpopular things ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.But he might have outdone himself with his latest move.Trump on Thursday signed an executive order to change the name of Lake Ontario to “Lake America.” He did so after Canada declined to capitulate in the trade war he recently launched.While there’s not yet polling on this specific move, it’s difficult to believe it will be anything but a complete political dud.And while it’s unlikely to exercise Americans too much, it will likely feed into longstanding perceptions that Trump is more focused on trivial matters than the things they actually want, like lowering prices.The move recalls one of Trump’s splashiest (so to speak) moves on his first day back in office last year, when he signed an order renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.”But that went over like a lead balloon.An Ipsos poll that week showed Americans opposed the renaming 70%-25%. About 8 in 10 independents opposed it, as did 45% of Republicans. More than four times as many Americans strongly opposed it (46%) as strongly supported it (10%).A slightly later Marquette Law School poll showed similar — Americans opposed the renaming 71%-29%.Both polls tested a number of early Trump moves or threatened actions. Remarkably, the “Gulf of America” was the most unpopular among eight things tested in the Marquette poll, and it was the second most unpopular among 15 tested in the Ipsos poll.In both polls, in fact, it was more unpopular than even Trump’s pardons of January 6, 2021, defendants — perhaps the prototypical controversial early Trump move.And since then, Americans have taken a pretty dim view of Trump’s penchant for renaming things — including after himself.After his handpicked board of loyalists tried to rename the Kennedy Center after Trump, Americans said by a 2-to-1 margin that he had “gone too far” in making changes to institutions like it, according to CNN polling from last month. Just 9% of Americans in a Pew Research Center poll said it was appropriate to name things after Trump while he’s still president, yet his administration keeps trying to do just that — including, CNN reported last week, by potentially substituting Trump’s name for a Black war hero’s that was set to be on an aircraft carrier.And there’s reason to believe that the “Lake America” move will play even worse than the “Gulf of America” did.The main reason is that Americans tend to be more sympathetic to Canada than Mexico. While there’s a constituency for cracking down on Mexico, especially given decades of illegal immigration over the US-Mexico border, Canada doesn’t engender such negative feelings, recent polling suggests.Indeed, when Trump launched tariffs against both Canada and Mexico early in his second term, the Canada ones were narrowly more unpopular, with more than 6 in 10 Americans opposing them.(This, of course, hasn’t stopped Trump from launching another trade war with Canada.)Americans also balked at Trump’s proposal to make Canada the 51st state. Marquette polling last year showed 75% of Americans opposed that.The other main problem is the passage of time. While these kinds of stunts might have felt a little cuter when Trump was riding higher early in his term, they now risk reinforcing how preoccupied he is with not just trifles, but things that Americans decidedly do not want.Polls have long shown around three-quarters of Americans think Trump is neglecting the most important issues, especially lowering prices. Instead, he’s waging war against Iran (which raises gas prices) and launching a trade war with Canada (which also could raise prices).Now he’s casting a spotlight on the latter with a move that Americans thought was pretty stupid when he did it the first time. And it’s arguably even sillier than that was, given Lake Ontario wasn’t even named after the Canadian province. (It was actually named 200 years earlier, in the 17th Century.)Even some Republicans are balking, with the GOP nominee for Wisconsin governor, Rep. Tom Tiffany, saying Thursday that the name should stay the same.Trump joked in the Oval Office Thursday that he might not be done renaming bodies of water.“We have a gulf. We have a lake. Now all we need is an ocean,” he said. “So maybe we’ll have to change the name of the Atlantic and/or the Pacific. Maybe we’ll change them both.”You could say he’s playing the hits. But it’s really playing the flops.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story