Skip to main content

Extinct toad from the ice age discovered at Los Angeles’ La Brea Tar Pits

(CNN) — In the heart of urban Los Angeles lie the La Brea Tar Pits, a group of natural asphalt seeps made famous by the millions of ice age fossils preserved within the bubbling, dark pools of goo.

Excavations of the pits have yielded bones of species that once roamed the area tens of thousands of years ago, including giant mammoths, mastodons, saber-toothed tigers and dire wolves.

But large mammals aren’t the only window into history that the asphalt has provided. Now, scientists have discovered the first extinct ice age amphibian from Los Angeles, a spadefoot toad named after the tar pits: Spea labreae. The findings are reported in a study published Wednesday in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.

The newly discovered toad is only the second extinct Pleistocene (2.58 million to 11,700 years ago) amphibian from North America to ever be found, according to the study’s authors.

Researchers with the La Brea Tar Pits uncovered two distinct fossils — both fragments of the sacro-urostyle, an amphibian body part that connects the lower spine to the hips — from the spadefoot toad that were hidden in plain sight in a collection of specimens excavated in 1929. Because smaller bones typically receive less attention than those from larger animals, the fossils remained unstudied until 2023, when lead study author Dr. J. Alberto Cruz began to sift through the collection. He was not expecting to find a new species, he said.

“I’m more like a paleoecologist and paleogeographer, not a taxonomist. So, it is my first new species. For me, it’s very exciting,” said Cruz, who is a research associate at La Brea Tar Pits and a researcher for Mexico’s Quinametzin Paleontological Research Center operated by the National Institute of Anthropology and History.

Because amphibian bones are small and fragile, they are rare to come by. The tar pits are excellent for preserving fossils, as they protect bones from weathering, decay and scavengers, and exposure to water, oxygen, sunlight and microbial activity. The sticky asphalt also acts like flypaper, trapping any organism that falls in and providing scientists with evidence of a distant world.

Since amphibians remain near water sources and don’t venture far from home, these fossils provide a glimpse into the prehistoric climate of Los Angeles and could help researchers protect endangered amphibians today, Cruz said.

Rare amphibian fossils

Cruz compared the tiny fossils, both about 1 centimeter (0.4 inch) in length, to other amphibian bones within the collection, as well as 80 specimens in the Herpetology Collections at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology at the University of California, Berkeley.

He found distinctions in the fossil — such as the axe-shaped part of the animal’s sacro-urostyle, which was much smaller than that of other species — indicating that the toad was a previously undiscovered species.

It’s not possible to precisely date the fossil without destroying the specimen, but the researchers know the toad existed at some point within the last 60,000 years, as that is how long the tar pits have been active and trapped animals, said study coauthor Dr. Emily Lindsey, curator and excavation site director at the Samuel Oschin Center for Global Ice Age Research at La Brea Tar Pits.

“We’ve now doubled the number of known extinct ice age amphibians from North America, and so that’s a pretty big finding,” Lindsey said. “People didn’t even bother really collecting small fossils until maybe the latter part of the 20th century. So, they were ignored largely in early excavations around the world.”

But the remains of the spadefoot toad weren’t the only amphibian fossils worth looking into.

Within the understudied collection, Cruz found another oddball amphibian known as the Mexican burrowing toad, the only still living species from the family Rhinophrynidae. Today, the toad lives in the lowlands of Central America, Mexico and extreme southern Texas, so unearthing it in Los Angeles was quite unusual. Their nearest known populations are about 1,550 miles (nearly 2,500 kilometers) away in southern Mexico, according to a news release from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.

Because the Mexican burrowing toad lives in rainforest conditions with lots of trees and precipitation, the Los Angeles area likely had similar conditions when the amphibian occupied it, Cruz said.

“The fossil record of frogs and toads goes back to 200 million years, and most of what we know is isolated and broken bones. These are probably much more common than usually thought and often overlooked in collections because many vertebrate paleontologists aren’t deeply familiar with many of the bones or the variation among the many lineages of frogs,” said David Blackburn, the associate director of research and collections, as well as the curator of reptiles and amphibians, at the Florida Museum of Natural History. Blackburn was not involved with the new study.

“It is surprising that relatively few frog fossils have been previously recovered from La Brea, and I’m confident more will turn up,” he said in an email.

Window into a prehistoric climate

Amphibians are sensitive to climate change because they depend heavily on bodies of water, precipitation and temperature for survival and reproduction. Their fossils can therefore help scientists predict what the climate might be like in the future through the field of conservation paleobiology, which uses evidence from prehistoric ecosystems to inform modern conservation efforts, Cruz said.

“It’s kind of like a time machine,” Lindsey said. “We can go and actually kind of rewind the clock and see what happened, and then kind of use that to make predictions about how things are going to continue changing.”

Cruz said he hopes future studies can reveal certain factors that the toads may or may not have been dependent on, such as humidity, food sources and other habitat features.

“There are many localities where amphibians and other small creatures have been preserved but have simply not been studied (or linger in unpublished student dissertations) because they were considered less ‘sexy’. Fortunately, that is beginning to change,” Susan Evans, a professor of vertebrate morphology and paleontology at University College London, said in an email. Evans was not involved with the new study.

Because amphibians give us important clues about local environmental conditions, they are worth studying, she added.

“Think of the East African savannas. The large members of the community (elephants, lions, rhinos, etc.) roam across wide areas and enter different subhabitats. They might die and leave their bones anywhere across their range, open grassland, woodland, mud pool. The smaller animals in the ecosystem don’t travel so far, and amphibians, especially, only rarely move far from a source of water. They can therefore often be a good alternative source of information,” Evans said.

“There is a caveat however. Many larger animals eat frogs (and other small animals) and may carry them far away from their normal habitat before dumping the bones (either as a regurgitate or poo). That can leave small animal remains in places you wouldn’t expect,” Evans added.

It is a possibility that the toad traveled to the tar pits in this way, but there is no evidence to support that theory at this time, Cruz said.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Trump declines to rule out declaring a national security emergency to control the 2026 election

(CNN) — President Donald Trump in a new interview declined to rule out declaring a national security emergency as a means to try to assert more control over the 2026 midterm elections.It’s merely the latest warning sign that Trump could try to mess with the election not just by baselessly claiming voter fraud and challenging the results afterward — as he did in 2020, leading to a violent riot at the US Capitol — but by trying to unilaterally take control before votes are cast.In the interview, Wayne Allyn Root of Real America’s Voice pitched such a scenario to Trump. He suggested it as an alternative, given the Senate has failed to pass Trump’s coveted elections bill, known as the “SAVE America Act.”“If they never get the SAVE America Act done, you have the right to declare a national security emergency for elections,” Root said. He added that “if you declare a national security emergency as the president of the United States, they can’t challenge it. It can only be overturned by a two-thirds vote by both houses of Congress. So if you do this in the next month, we will get photo ID, proof of citizenship (for voter registration) and a limit to mail-in ballots.”It’s at this point that Trump cut Root off and coyly suggested such an option was indeed in play.“Let me just say that stranger things have happened, OK?” Trump said. “I’ll leave it at that.”Despite Root’s comments, it’s far from clear such a gambit would even work. And CNN has asked the White House for more detail on what the president meant.Trump often responds to hypotheticals by declining to rule them out — no matter how extreme the proposal might be. So it’s possible to read too much into this.But as CNN’s Jake Tapper has noted, there are plenty of signals that Trump at least aspires to try to exert more control over elections. And these methods often appear transparently geared toward helping Republicans.A major one is the administration’s threat to have the US Postal Service not deliver mail ballots for states that don’t comply with its demand that they hand over their voter lists. This is a request that even many red states have rejected, citing privacy concerns.Democrats are much more likely to use mail ballots, which Trump has baselessly connected to widespread fraud. So curtailing them could greatly help Republicans.(Federal courts have blocked this Trump executive order, and the administration recently appealed to the Supreme Court.)Trump has also gone to great lengths to try to substantiate his still-baseless claims of widespread fraud. That includes the administration seizing 2020 ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, and Trump’s recent primetime address about election security that some read as a statement of intent — a pretext for more direct federal involvement in elections, which are run by states.Ty Cobb, who served as White House counsel in Trump’s first term, said he interpreted the speech last month as a “predicate that he needs to declare an emergency.”And Trump has occasionally said things, like he did in the new interview, suggesting he would like to take control of US elections.Back in February, he urged his party to “take over the voting in at least 15 places,” adding: “The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.”The Washington Post also reported in March that pro-Trump activists were circulating a potential executive order that claimed Chinese interference in the 2020 election gave Trump emergency authorities over the 2026 election. And Trump’s primetime address focused on China, despite the tenuous evidence.Trump’s intense focus on the “SAVE America Act,” which has never appeared to have a chance to pass but Trump has said is vital, could also be read as part of building the case for more drastic action.But whether Trump could take over elections himself, as Root posits, is far from certain.As CNN’s Marshall Cohen and Michael Williams reported in February, the Constitution makes it difficult for Trump to truly “nationalize” elections. Courts have overwhelmingly upheld the principle that states are in charge of elections.Presidents generally have more authority to act unilaterally when national security is involved — hence the significance of invoking China — but some experts are skeptical that Trump’s effort would pass legal muster.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story