Skip to main content

Woman shares ‘horrific’ experience with Cyclosporiasis

Click here for updates on this story

    FRANKLIN, Kentucky (WLKY) — Jessica Mallard of Simpson County, Kentucky, fell seriously ill with Cyclosporiasis during the Fourth of July holiday.

“We don’t have any deadly cases, but I can tell you I feel like I’m dying,” Mallard said.

She was admitted to the hospital with explosive diarrhea, fatigue, and unbearable stomach pain before being diagnosed as one of more than 100 confirmed cases of the parasitic illness in Kentucky.

“I don’t know if you’ve ever had a child, but it’s worse than labor. It like somebody was ripping my stomach into two pieces,” Mallard said. “I couldn’t even barely get in the shower. I had a total of nine IVs.”

Her husband, Christopher, stayed by her bedside throughout the antagonizing ordeal.

He admits he was terrified.

“Just seeing her in that much pain and, you know, after 18 years of marriage, I was just like, what is going on?” he said.

After spending 10 days in two separate hospitals, Mallard was able to return home this past weekend. While she continues to experience lingering symptoms and is unable to go back to work at the moment, she also remains uncertain about what caused her illness.

“I never switched up. I never eat anything different. It’s the same salad,” Mallard said.

Mallard had consumed Marketside bagged salad with lettuce from Taylor Farms, a Mexican grower currently under investigation by the FDA as a potential source of contamination in the Cyclosporiasis outbreak.

The agency stated that its investigation is ongoing despite a false positive test result on Taylor Farms’ products. A voluntary recall of iceberg lettuce and salad mix from the company remains in effect.

Dr. Monalisa Tailor, a primary care doctor at Norton Healthcare, addressed concerns about salad safety.

“You can still eat a salad,” she said, while emphasizing the importance of washing fruits and vegetables.

Taylor also encouraged shoppers to consider local farmers markets for fresh food options, explaining that smaller-scale farming practices reduce the risk of exposure to parasites.

“They don’t get this exposure to this type of parasite because there’s less people managing and tending those areas,” said Dr. Tailor. “It’s not a commercial garden, so they’re watering everything on their own, and that helps significantly reduce the risk for an organism like this. Sometimes, some of the berries can also be a risk for this. So your raspberries, strawberries, blackberries, if you do have some of those that are ones that you picked up from the grocery store, maybe this is a good opportunity to turn them into jam or some other baked item. Because if you heat something up, that actually ruins your risk of Cyclospora and takes it away.”

Dr. Tailor also debunked the myth around Cyclosporiasis being a source of weight loss.

“Your likelihood of becoming dehydrated is really, really high given how hot it is outside right now and I don’t want someone to end up in the hospital just for IV fluids,” she said. “So, no, you don’t want to get this, it’s not the quick thing to help you lose the weight. It is a quick way to end up really dehydrated, feel dizzy, lightheaded.”

The Mallards have started a GoFundMe amid this unexpected health journey.

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Secretive terrorist removal court set for first hearing in Afghan woman’s case

(CNN) — The Trump administration is testing a secretive, never-before-used deportation court for alleged alien terrorists with a case concerning the Afghan mother of a convicted terrorist, with the Justice Department accusing the Texas-based woman of having ISIS sympathies.The Alien Terrorist Removal Court will have its first ever hearing Thursday at 11 a.m.ET, court documents made public Wednesday night revealed. The Justice Department is asking the court — which has lain dormant since it was created 30 years ago — to deport Nazira Haji Zada, whose son was convicted last year for an ISIS-aligned terrorist plot targeting the 2024 Election, according to the filings.Zada herself has no criminal history, the court filings said. But DOJ described her in an unclassified summary of the case as having “worked to indoctrinate her children with ISIS ideology and have them pledge loyalty to ISIS.”“The underlying information is classified because disclosure would enable terrorists and terrorist organizations to avoid preventative or detection measures or would reveal FBI or other U.S. Intelligence Community sources and methods by which such information is obtained,” the DOJ said in the unclassified summary.Thursday’s court proceeding, an initial status hearing that will be held at the federal courthouse in DC, will be public. But many details about the DOJ’s case will be withheld from public view and even from the woman targeted in the proceedings. That highly-limited view that the alleged terrorist will have about the case against her— under procedures set forth in the 1996 law that created the court — has prompted some legal observers to question the court’s constitutionality.The judges who sit on the ATRC fall under the judicial branch, making them more independent arbiters than the executive branch immigration judges that typically preside over deportation proceedings. The ATRC is made up of five US district court judges, and its chief judge, Joan Ericksen, is reviewing the current case.The documents unsealed Wednesday provide additional details about how the proceedings have unfolded so far and include the judge’s order granting the DOJ’s initial application for the case to move forward in the court. In the order, she noted that, at that initial phase, the DOJ only had to clear a bar of probable cause. For the next phase — when the judge holds the removal hearing in the case — the DOJ will face a higher bar of evidence, the preponderance of the evidence standard. That standard is still lower than the beyond-reasonable-doubt standard in criminal cases.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story