Skip to main content

What’s wrong with Congress?

▶ Watch Video: What’s the matter with Congress?

Inside the U.S. Capitol, statues memorialize distinguished Americans, including famed social commentator and actor Will Rogers, who once quipped about Congress, “Every time they make a joke, it’s a law, and every time they make a law, it’s a joke.”

Humor like that still rings true to the nearly 9 in 10 Americans who say they’re unhappy with Congress.

“It’s a great American pastime to hate Congress,” said Carl Hulse, chief Washington correspondent for The New York Times. “But I do think there’s a lot of frustration with Congress.”

Hulse has covered Capitol Hill since the Reagan administration. Asked if he sees a broken institution today, he replied, “Oh yes, totally. I unfortunately have said to people, ‘I’ve spent my career covering the decline of Congress.’ And yeah, they need to get it together. But there’s just very, very little cooperation between the parties, and you can’t make things happen that way.

“I do think a lot of them want to do the right thing, and they just can’t quite get themselves there to do it,” he added.

The fact is, under the Constitution, Congress really does have power. 

“Article I is a real thing,” said Hulse. “I think what’s happened with the Republicans in this Congress, and ceding power to the administration, has been a real mistake on a lot of fronts — tariffs, war powers, the things that are actually enumerated in the Constitution. They’re giving away the store. And once you give away some power, you never get it back.

“The Republicans might be looking at this and going, ‘Well, you know, this is President Trump, our guy. We needed to do that.’ Trust me: the next Democratic president isn’t going to turn around and say, ‘You know, that was a big mistake letting Congress get so weak. We need to empower them again.’ No, it’s not gonna happen. It goes for good.”

Pointing fingers

These days, Republicans control the Senate and the House, and legislation often faces gridlock. So far, the 119th Congress has passed fewer bills than many of its predecessors.

Some bills, though, have had real impact. There was the GOP mega-bill that will cut taxes by $4.5 trillion over the next decade, and a recently passed bipartisan housing bill.

This Congress also will be remembered for the partial government shutdown over funds for homeland security. 

Still, critics left and right want more to be done, be it raising, or cutting, federal spending. And whatever its problems, Congress has been routinely bypassed altogether by President Trump, whether on trade or the war with Iran. He also pressures them to do his bidding, like urging an overhaul of federal voting rules.

This is an especially uncertain time in the Senate. Former majority leader Mitch McConnell has been hospitalized for weeks, and South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham died suddenly this month.

For Hulse, these disruptions underscore how Congress is grappling with age, and an increasingly grim political climate – worse, he says, than when he first came to Capitol Hill four decades ago: “1985, Congress was different,” he said. “Lot of World War II vets who had already experienced a lot of life. So, this was not, you know, a big, difficult thing for them. They were trying to do the right thing.

“And now it’s both parties, much more aligned with the President. Hard to get things done. Margins are tight. The districts are really gerrymandered. There’s a lot wrong with Congress.”

Who is to blame? Both parties point the finger at the other for the mess. Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) said, “Well, the Republicans don’t control the House; the place is chaos.”

Meanwhile, Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) said, “Unfortunately, Democrats have chosen to play politics and put that over people time and time again under this administration.” Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) told us, “You’ve got the biggest voice in the room, Trump, fighting against his own Congress.”

“People should be mad”

Sarah Binder, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, says that the legislative branch is “struggling,” while Philip Wallach, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, describes Congress as “marginalized” — the result, in part, of an empowered president.

Asked whether she believes Congress is broken or diminished, Binder replied, “Well, both, for sure. Certainly diminished in the sense that it has enormous authority under the Constitution: Power of the purse, power to declare war. And yet, oftentimes, not just under Trump, this current president, but reaching back decades, Congress cedes that authority to the president. All the authority on the table, but struggling to try to use it, or even to try to get it back.

“So, the muscle memory for how to make deals, how to legislate, how to solve problems? The muscles, they’re there, but they’ve really atrophied,” Binder said.

“For me, what’s changed is how the members themselves see their jobs,” said Wallach. “I think what we’ve lost is the sense that, I’m sent here to solve the problems of the American people. I have to find a way to do that. That means building coalitions. That means compromise. Compromise has too much become a dirty word in American politics today. There’s a sense that if you’re willing to compromise, you’re not really holding true to your values.

“Today, people see their job as supporting the White House when it’s their ally there — or fighting against them in various ways when it’s the other party that has the presidency. And since Congress has for decades ceded so much authority to the executive branch, there’s a sense among the members on Capitol Hill, that’s where the real action is, in the executive branch, [and] in the judiciary.”

In his current term, President Trump has issued a flurry of executive orders — over 260 so far. The two presidents before him issued many of their own, leaving many Americans to wonder, What is Congress doing?

executive-orders.jpg
In his total of five-and-a-half years in office, President Trump has issued more executive orders than were issued in the 12 years of the Obama and Biden administrations. 

CBS News

Is the public being too hard on Congress? “I think the truth is, Congress doesn’t need to be a very popular organization, even if it’s working well,” said Wallach. “The old line about lawmaking and sausage-making is there for a reason. There’s something unseemly about the way legislative politics has to operate that makes it hard to be really popular as a Congress.”

“I think the public should be hard on Congress,” Binder said. “There’s $30 trillion in public debt; Social Security seemingly on the brink if they don’t act soon — the whole host of issues and problems that we see around us. The cost of housing? People should be mad.

“At the same time, the public often does have quite unreasonable expectations of what’s possible. You need big, broad bipartisan majorities to get stuff done,” she said. “And in a polarized America, with factions in each party, that’s really hard.”

For Binder and Wallach, today’s Congress might be troubled, but it is, as ever, a reflection of its times — and of the people it represents.

Looking ahead, are they hopeful about Congress?

“I am an eternal optimist, but I’m not that hopeful about Congress,” said Binder. “I think the problems and the roots of the problems we’ve been talking about, they’re going to be with us for a long time. And whenever Congress has difficulties trying to tackle problems, they kick ’em to the future. And that just means the challenges are going to get harder.”

“I will say, taking the very long view about Congress makes me a little bit more hopeful,” Wallach said. “Congress has looked a lot of different ways over our two centuries. Members have found ways to reform the institution to make it act completely differently. And so, I think at some point, we’re gonna turn a corner. Congress has the power to regenerate itself, to put itself back at the center of the action. And I expect someday it may do that.”    

Story produced by Robbyn McFadden and Reid Orvedahl. Editor: Jason Schmidt. 

Nigel Farage wins election in which his main rival was a trash can

(CNN) — When voters in the English seaside constituency of Clacton went to the polls on Thursday, they ostensibly had more choice than in any other election in British history.Thirty-four candidates stood in this by-election, the equivalent of a US special election, making the ballot paper 3 feet long. But almost all the country’s half-dozen major political parties declined to participate, with only the populist hard-right Reform UK party fielding a candidate – its leader Nigel Farage.Farage was ultimately re-elected by a substantial margin, winning 22,239 votes. He had declined to attend the results ceremony, citing a police warning about a campaign to disrupt it.His main opponent, Count Binface – a self-described intergalactic space warrior dressed as a trash can – won a creditable 9,455 votes.But this election, rather than helping to solve Farage’s problems as he perhaps hoped, has only added to them.The country’s chief anti-immigrant activist and Brexit architect, Farage was already the member of parliament (MP) for Clacton but resigned from parliament – triggering the by-election – after facing unprecedented scrutiny over his finances. Those challenging him were Binface and 32 other fringe or novelty candidates.The spectacle promptly became an object of ridicule, derided as a “circus” by commentators, while the claims over Reform’s finances refuse to go away. At the same time, Farage faces both a split in his natural coalition of voters and a more formidable opponent in Britain’s new center-left prime minister, Andy Burnham. Such headwinds are unfamiliar for Reform, which had previously been in the ascendancy, leading national opinion polls and enjoying historic gains in local elections.Novelty candidatesFarage resigned as Clacton’s MP six weeks ago, as a steady drumbeat of allegations surrounding his and his party’s financing forced him to confront questions he hadn’t previously had to answer in his political career.He has consistently denied any wrongdoing, and said: “I’ve decided the people of Clacton should be the judges of my actions” when triggering the by-election.Farage sought to frame the contest as him taking on the establishment. But, said Tim Bale, a professor at Queen Mary University of London who studies right-wing politics, “it’s not worked because the other political parties … declared they wouldn’t stand, meaning the … framing has been him versus a bunch of novelty candidates.”And holding an election has opened Farage to criticism over its cost, which is expected to be around £250,000 ($338,000). The public is legally bound to pay that, despite Farage’s protestations that Reform would foot the bill.Before Farage resigned, he was facing an investigation by the parliamentary standards committee and that inquiry will resume now he has been re-elected. If it finds he breached parliamentary guidelines, that will trigger a process which could ultimately lead to another by-election. The other major parties would be expected to field candidates in that vote.Challenge from the rightWhile Farage is caught in this election spin-cycle, the grip he holds over his voter base is also faltering. Reform is now facing a challenge from its right flank as the newly established party Restore Britain – founded by former Reform MP Rupert Lowe – siphons off a small but significant portion of voters.Lowe, who has a longstanding feud with Farage, was forced out of the party last year and subsequently started his own, egged on by US billionaire businessman Elon Musk. Now sensing an opening, Lowe has sought to form an alliance with Farage, conditioned on Farage accepting some of Restore’s more extreme policies. Farage has not so far appeared keen to bury the hatchet.“A pact would be tricky because Restore’s policies are so extreme that adopting them would make Reform less attractive to voters who aren’t really into the whole far-right package,” Bale told CNN.All this comes against the backdrop of a new national government. Labour leader Burnham is more popular than his predecessor Keir Starmer and has already proven his ability to take on Reform during his successful return to parliament earlier this summer.In this by-election, Farage has only proven his ability to defeat an intergalactic space warrior with an upturned trash can on his head. Of course, Count Binface is not actually from space; he is a satirical character created by the comedian Jon Harvey, and has stood in several other elections.“Until August 13th, I want it to be absolutely clear that there is nowhere at all that matters to me more in the cosmos than Clacton,” he told CNN’s Max Foster from his “starship,” which he said he had transformed using a holodeck “to create the precise look of a budget hotel in Clacton.” Farage did not respond to an interview request from CNN.Binface’s manifesto is packed with national in-jokes, like promising to “cut your taxes, and raise everyone else’s,” nationalize the singer Adele and impose a “windfall tax on cosy crime novels written (or ‘written’) by celebrities.”Outlandish costumesBinface is just one in a long line of satirical candidates dating back more than six decades, who have become a unique staple of British elections. Almost anyone can run for parliament in the UK – only a £500 ($675) deposit and 10 supporters of the bid are needed – allowing for people to make their joke, or point, without too much trouble.The tradition took hold in 1963, when a young musician later known as Screaming Lord Sutch stood in a by-election. He would contest 41 parliamentary seats in all, including against three sitting prime ministers, and founded the Official Monster Raving Loony Party in 1982, according to its website.None of the party’s candidates — think Nick the Incredible Flying Brick and its current leader, Howling Laud Hope — have ever been elected to Westminster. But it inspired others to follow in its footsteps, and its three candidates in Clacton together took 61 votes.Behind the jokes, some campaigns have carried serious messages, like a man dressed as a fox advocating for animal rights who stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Burnham when the former Manchester mayor returned to parliament in June.Several of the late Sutch’s policies, such as lowering the voting age from 21 to 18 and legalizing commercial radio, were eventually enacted. Still, some have derided the spectacle of novelty candidates.As for Binface, his vow to be a unity candidate was not enough to win, despite his pre-vote bravado.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story