Skip to main content

What Trump’s newly declassified documents do – and don’t – say about threats to US elections

(CNN) — President Donald Trump in his primetime speech on Thursday is alleging vulnerabilities exist in American election systems, using a large trove of newly declassified documents as evidence to suggest future elections could be at risk of foreign interference, particularly by China.

Though the documents are newly declassified, they largely discuss vulnerabilities that have been known for years and election officials around the country have tried to address.

None of the declassified information supports the claim that any previous election results — including the 2020 presidential contest that Trump lost — were manipulated by foreign interference or fraud in a way that would’ve changed the outcome.

Instead, White House officials have framed the disclosures not as an attempt to re-litigate past elections, but rather as an attempt to correct vulnerabilities ahead of November’s midterm elections. That’s despite the fact that the second Trump administration has shuttered many federal organizations that were tracking and publicizing foreign influence campaigns.

And White House officials suggested the information, some of which has been known for years, was withheld from senior top elected US officials, including Trump, for political purposes.

Among the points Trump plans to discuss:

– Claims that there are major vulnerabilities with US voting machines

– Claims that China has obtained voter data on millions of Americans

– Claims about systemic voter registration fraud by Democrats in Michigan

– Claims there are far more non-citizens on voter rolls than known before

There are indeed some new revelations in the hundreds of pages of documents declassified Thursday. But it appears, based on CNN’s review, that a decent chunk of the documents rehash information that has already been public and widely understood in the US intelligence community.

The documents are part of an attempt by the Trump administration to make the case that foreign countries are aggressively interfering with US elections. It’s worth noting that Trump has spent nearly a decade denying the unanimous conclusions from many of these same intelligence agencies that Russia meddled in the 2016 election.

The documents and notes released Thursday were intended to round up everything the US government had information about that was tied to past reports, said a source with direct knowledge of the US intelligence community’s assessment of foreign interference efforts around the 2020 election. But once that additional underlying information was vetted, the source said it was not considered consequential or credible enough to include.

CNN is reviewing the hundreds of documents that were declassified by the Trump administration and released Thursday night. Here is a breakdown of the main findings.

Claims about vulnerabilities with US voting machines

The White House has declassified intelligence reports saying that American voting machines are hackable by at least five foreign powers.

One National Intelligence Council report from January 2020 offered the concerning conclusion that Russia, China, Iran and North Korea “have the capability to access and potentially manipulate” US election data, like centralized voter registration databases and pollbooks.

However, the report noted that, because US elections are decentralized and run by states and counties, any breaches would likely be localized and it “would be difficult to manipulate on a wide enough scale to alter the election outcome.”

The White House also said the documents show that Venezuela conducted an experiment on voting machines that swapped out votes in a way that was undetectable in a post-vote audit or a hand count.

This claim has been touted by ex-Venezuelan spy chief Hugo “El Pollo” Carvajal, who pleaded guilty to drug trafficking and wrote a letter to Trump in December embracing many of Trump’s election conspiracies.

The machines were made by Smartmatic, a company that Trump allies have falsely accuses of rigging the 2020 US election, largely because of its past ties to Venezuela.

A declassified CIA memo from June said the US intelligence community determined in 2006 that Venezuela and Smartmatic didn’t have the capability “to manipulate the outcome of elections outside Venezuela.”

The report also noted that when Venezuela did manipulate elections in its country, it was possible because officials had “insider access” to voting systems – which Venezuelans obviously wouldn’t have for US elections.

Smartmatic software is currently only used in one jurisdiction across the entire US – Los Angeles County. In a previous statement to CNN, a Smartmatic spokesperson said the company “vehemently rejects the completely baseless and repeatedly debunked accusations about the integrity of our election systems.”

There are well documented vulnerabilities in voting systems used by the US, but no one, including Trump and his allies,, have provided evidence that those vulnerabilities have ever been successfully exploited by a foreign adversary to change votes.

Those vulnerabilities have been cited in several lawsuits, however, filed by Trump allies since 2020, intended to call the 2020 election results into question.

Claims about China accessing US voter rolls

The White House says these documents allege that China obtained more than 200 million American voter registration files in a period between 2020 and 2024. They say this includes individuals’ names, addresses, phone numbers, military status, party registration and record of whether they voted.

The files, according to the White House, were purchased illicitly, stolen, hacked, or otherwise illegally obtained by China. (Many states openly and non-controversially sell versions of their voter data, but only the part that contains public information.)

A foreign adversary can learn a lot about Americans from accessing US voter rolls. And it creates a real possibility of chaos on Election Day, if the foreign actor somehow accesses live databases and starts manipulating entries. But the US has never accused China of tainting or deleting voter records.

A 2019 report from a redacted government agency said eight states’ voter databases were compromised by China.

However, the report also describes Chinse hackers targeting a wide swath of American society, including medical databases, social networking sites, think tanks, and defense contractors. These are not necessarily shocking new findings: US intelligence agencies have long understood China to be trying to hoover up data on as many Americans as possible. scrambling to illicitly breach as many records about Americans as possible.

China has a long history of espionage like this. Chinese hackers breached federal government servers in 2015 and stole more than 20 million sensitive records from the Office of Personnel Management.

Beyond accessing voter rolls, on the topic of trying to influence or interfere with election results, one new report from the National Intelligence Council from October 2020 said China’s activities regarding that year’s presidential election were “low-level” and confined to “exploratory steps.”

After the 2020 election, Trump appointees at the DNI later publicly announced that China considered trying to influence the outcome but decided not to, due to concerns of upsetting US-China relations.

Non-citizens on the voter rolls

The White House says these reports indicate that the Department of Homeland Security believes that at least 250,000 non-citizens were on the voter rolls in several key states. However, there are doubts about the reliability of the datasets that DHS analyzed.

The newly released DHS document says these 250,000 non-citizens are registered in California, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Nevada.

The White House said that the analysis was done from commercially available databases, which are less reliable than government data. Those states have refused to hand over their voter lists for a federal audit from the “SAVE system,” or the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, a government tool used to identify potential noncitizen voters.

The DHS document said a total of 28,000 non-citizens were found illegally registered to vote, drawing from data from 25 states that processed more than 68 million registration records through the more thorough SAVE system.

Even if there are more non-citizens on the rolls than previously known, there is still no indication from the documents that there has been a massive uptick in non-citizens actually casting ballots.

It is illegal for foreign nationals to vote in federal elections, and experts say it rarely happens.

However, some jurisdictions, including San Francisco, California, have passed ordinances allowing people who are noncitizens to vote only in local elections, such as school board contests. Which would explain why non-citizens are registered in states like California.

Trump has long peddled false and fantastical claims about thousands of possibly even millions of undocumented immigrants voting in US elections. (He most famously claimed that he lost the popular vote in 2016, by about two million votes, because of undocumented immigrants.)

The right-leaning Heritage Foundation’s database of confirmed fraud cases lists less than 100 examples of non-citizens voting between 2002 and 2022, amid more than one billion lawfully cast ballots. And the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice analyzed more than 23 million votes from the 2016 election and found an estimated 30 examples.

This story has been updated.

CNN’s Sean Lyngaas, Piper Hudspeth Blackburn, Zachary Cohen, Fredreka Schouten, Aleena Fayaz, Tierney Sneed and Holmes Lybrand contributed reporting

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Voters weigh a DeSantis successor and other key races to watch in Florida, Alaska and Wyoming

(CNN) — Florida Republicans are set to choose their nominee in the race to replace term-limited Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday in a contest that has in some ways turned into a bitter intra-party feud — even though there is little drama about its likely outcome.Naples-area Rep. Byron Donalds, who is endorsed by President Donald Trump, is the favorite in the GOP gubernatorial primary. DeSantis has not endorsed him in the race and, CNN reported last month, shared his concerns about Donalds privately with Trump. But DeSantis also hasn’t backed any other candidate in a field that includes his lieutenant governor.It’s led to a vacuum that has left space for the emergence of James Fishback, a race-baiting 31-year-old who has called Donalds, who is Black, a “slave to his donors” and a “DEI Republican” who would “turn Florida into a Section 8 ghetto.”Tuesday’s contests also mark the first time voters will head to the polls under a new congressional map, designed by DeSantis to help Republicans net an additional four seats, that set off a scramble in down-ballot races.As Democrats settle a series of their own primaries in the redrawn districts, the races will also test whether democratic socialists can continue to make gains and where voters stand on issues related to Israel. Republican voters also have tough choices ahead of them, with several contentious House primaries featuring controversial candidates.Florida is the headliner on a day of primaries that also includes Alaska and Wyoming. Voters in California, meanwhile, will fill a House vacancy in a special election runoff.Here’s what to watch in Tuesday’s contests:How strong does Donalds look?Despite DeSantis’ apparent concerns with Donalds, Republicans have won every governor’s race in Florida in the last 30 years. Whoever wins on Tuesday — likely Donalds — will emerge Wednesday morning as the clear favorite to win in November.However, Democrats came close to winning the governor’s office in 2018 — the last time midterms were held with Trump in office. A relatively weak showing by Donalds on Tuesday could indicate Democrats could have an opening to make the governor’s race competitive.In addition to Fishback, other candidates in the GOP primary are Lt. Gov. Jay Collins, who has framed his campaign around a pledge to protect the DeSantis legacy even though the governor has not endorsed his own No. 2, and former state House Speaker Paul Renner.Democrats are expected to nominate party-switching former Rep. David Jolly in the race for governor. Jolly, a prominent critic of Trump, left the GOP in 2018 and last year officially became a Democrat.Slew of Florida GOP House primariesWhen Trump posted a list of Florida Republicans with his endorsement on social media earlier this month ahead of the primary, there was a notable omission: 7th District Rep. Cory Mills – whom the president endorsed in February. And when DeSantis was asked whether he supports Mills last week, the governor said no.The two-term congressman is being investigated by the House Ethics Committee for potential campaign finance violations, an accusation of a revenge porn threat and an assault allegation. Mills has repeatedly denied wrongdoing. He faces a primary challenge from former news anchor Ryan Elijah and two other candidates. Two other members of Florida’s House Republican delegation, Reps. Anna Paulina Luna and Mike Haridopolos, endorsed Elijah.Mills is not the only Republican facing a challenge on Tuesday. 6th District Rep. Randy Fine, a strident supporter of Israel who has drawn criticism for his anti-Muslim rhetoric, faces social media personality Dan Bilzerian, who has called Fine a “fat disgusting Jew” and run an openly antisemitic campaign.Meanwhile, the 19th District race to replace Donalds is among the wildest Florida primaries, with two former members of Congress from other states — North Carolina’s Madison Cawthorn and New York’s Chris Collins — both in the running, as well as a former Illinois state senator, Jim Oberweis. Trump has endorsed Catalina Lauf, a 33-year-old former Commerce Department staffer, in the race.Florida Democrats look for signs of lifeThe governor’s race and a Senate contest this fall will give down-and-out Florida Democrats, who have watched their state’s former battleground status erode as it has shifted rapidly rightward over the last decade, a chance to show they can still compete in statewide races.The primary to take on Republican Sen. Ashley Moody pits retired Army Lt. Col. Alex Vindman, a key witness in Trump’s first impeachment inquiry, against state Rep. Angie Nixon, a democratic socialist who has called for the United States to end its military support for Israel.That nominee, as well as the winner of the gubernatorial primary, will attempt to reverse a rapid rightward shift in Florida. Among the factors contributing to that change: GOP gains with Hispanic voters, an influx of new conservative residents and a state Democratic Party that has been in disarray.Early this century, Florida was perhaps the nation’s most critical swing state — decisive in the 2000 presidential election and a battleground through 2016. But Trump won the state on his way to losing the election in 2020, and then he cruised to a 13-point win there in 2024. Likewise, DeSantis, who won the governor’s office by less than half a percentage point in 2018, demolished his Democratic foe in 2022, winning by nearly 20 points.Democrats are also settling intra-party squabbles in House primaries taking place in newly redrawn districts.Among those races is the 25th District on South Florida’s east coast, where democratic socialists are looking to pick off another Democratic incumbent in Rep. Jared Moskowitz, who is backed by pro-Israel and artificial intelligence forces. Their candidate is Oliver Larkin, a 34-year-old activist and union organizer.Another Democratic primary to watch comes in the 20th District, where longtime Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is taking on former Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, who resigned from her seat in April to prevent an Ethics Committee vote on whether she should be forced out of Congress. The panel previously found her guilty of a slew of ethics violations, including accusations that she stole millions in pandemic relief funds and used it to bolster her 2021 campaign. Cherfilus-McCormick also faces separate criminal charges and has pleaded not guilty.Wasserman Schultz, however, has faced allegations of carpetbagging in the primary, as she shifted over to run in the historically Black district, which has long had a Black representative in Congress, after her current seat was redrawn to be more Republican friendly.Will AIPAC get its way in California?California is holding its special election to replace former Rep. Eric Swalwell for the rest of this year on Tuesday, and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee has spent millions to try to steer voters away from state Sen. Aisha Wahab and toward its preferred candidate — Bay Area Rapid Transit Board President Melissa Hernandez.Wahab, an outspoken critic of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, earned nearly 43% of the votes in the June 16 special primary — well ahead of Hernandez, who finished second with nearly 17% support in the crowded race. Both candidates vying to represent the East Bay’s 14th District are Democrats.The candidates will also square off again in the fall as they vie for a full two-year term.Because of California’s mid-decade redistricting, the voters within the 14th District in November will be slightly different. The special election is taking place under the current district boundaries, while the new ones will be in effect for the general election.Two Dan Sullivans on the ballot in AlaskaDemocratic leadership believes former Rep. Mary Peltola can give her party a fighting chance at flipping the Alaska Senate seat held by Republican Dan Sullivan.But in the state’s unusual primary system — in which the top four finishers, regardless of party, advance to the general election — the bigger question might be whether another Dan Sullivan makes the cut.Republicans failed in their efforts to get a second Sullivan — a former teacher who shares the incumbent’s first and last name — booted from the ballot.The senator appears on ballots as Dan S. Sullivan and is listed as a registered Republican and the incumbent. The other Sullivan is identified as Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., and he is not listed with a party affiliation, even though he filed to run as a Republican.It’s a quirk that isn’t expected to seriously threaten the incumbent, at least not in Tuesday’s primary, but could make a difference in a razor-tight general election if even a small number of voters are confused.Alaska voters are also selecting general election opponents to take on at-large Rep. Nick Begich III, as well as candidates to replace term-limited Gov. Mike Dunleavy. Both seats are expected to remain in Republican hands in November.Trump’s influence tested in WyomingThere’s little drama about which party will win in November in Wyoming, one of the nation’s most reliably Republican states.But the state is set to see a major political shakeup, with open seats for governor, Senate and House this fall.The primary to replace term-limited Gov. Mark Gordon will test Trump’s influence, as the candidate he endorsed — state Superintendent of Public Instruction Megan Degenfelder — takes on three other viable contenders: professional bull rider Curt Blake, state Sen. Eric Barlow and Brent Bien, a former Marine Corps colonel.Degenfelder, 37, is an advocate for charter schools and vouchers who has broadly backed Trump’s education policies, including downsizing the Department of Education.Sen. Cynthia Lummis is retiring, and Rep. Harriet Hageman, who won her seat by ousting former Rep. Liz Cheney in 2022, is backed by Trump and favored to emerge from a five-person field as the senator’s Republican heir apparent.Nine candidates are vying for the House seat Hageman is vacating, though the president has not waded into that contest.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story