Skip to main content

Weather service faces hurricane season with less experienced staff, missing data

▶ Watch Video: National Weather Service operating with less experienced staff, data gaps amid hurricane season

The National Weather Service is hiring to fill hundreds of predominantly entry-level positions, more than a year after losing about 15% of its staff due to sweeping job cuts and buyouts ordered by the Trump administration. 

Veteran meteorologists are cautiously optimistic about how an influx of workers could benefit the agency as storm season gets underway — and as people in the industry say vacancies may be impeding the collection of data that many see as vital for predicting extreme weather.

But the weather service’s focus on recruiting early career scientists, as its job postings advertise, raises concerns for some former employees who believe their relative lack of experience could be reflected in the nation’s forecasts, especially without more knowledgeable staff around to help train them.

“Obviously, people retiring and new people coming up is a natural part of any business or agency,” said Alan Gerard, a meteorologist who worked for 35 years at the weather service and its parent agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, before retiring early last year. “But it’s meant to be done in an organized process, where the new people coming in have the benefit of working for a period with people who are experienced and can help train them and build up their expertise.”

Hurricane season started on June 1, overlapping with spring and summer months when tornadoes, flash flooding and wildfire outbreaks typically peak in the United States. For forecasters, it’s one of the busiest and most critical periods of the year.

Impact of last year’s staffing cuts 

Last year’s federal downsize shrunk the weather service by about 600 employees, most of them experienced workers who accepted early retirement packages, said Tom Fahy, the legislative director of the National Weather Service Employees Organization, a labor union representing weather service and other NOAA staff. About 100 probationary employees, in their first year of federal service, were fired.

Federal employment data reviewed by CBS News showed staffing gaps have persisted since then. NOAA had nearly 300 fewer meteorologists and hydrologists in its workforce at the end of May, compared with January 2025. While the data doesn’t specify which NOAA employees are part of the weather service, meteorologists and hydrologists working in other subagencies contribute heavily to the research that informs forecasting operations.

Rick Thoman, a climate specialist in Alaska who worked for three decades as a weather service meteorologist before his retirement in 2018, said the loss of specialized forecast experience in his state due to last year’s job cuts “has been a really bad thing.”

“Alaska is not like forecasting for Nebraska, and there are no schools of meteorology in Alaska. Everyone has to come here and learn it,” Thoman told CBS News. “So, even though there’s some effort to increase staffing now, because there are no old-timers left, and folks come in here without any experience in high-latitude weather forecasting, it just makes it that much harder.”

Honing meteorological skills requires hands-on experience and practice even in more accessible locations, said Gerard. He said a number of senior-level scientists who left their roles at forecast offices “had real knowledge of local weather patterns” and noted how complex weather conditions, like storm surge, call for a degree of finesse and familiarity as they can be “intricate” phenomena to forecast.

“Growing pains” as “gloomy days” over

The weather service had already faced declining employment before the Trump administration’s firing spree. In its aftermath, forecast offices in at least six locations entered last year’s hurricane season with critical staff shortages. Several offices stopped operating full-time, and almost a dozen suspended or limited weather balloon launches. 

Current and former weather service employees told CBS News that progress is now being made to address those issues, in part by hiring new people. Fahy, with the National Weather Service Employees Organization union, said that while some forecast offices remain understaffed, there have also been “significant hires.” The agency has said it will place new staff at locations based on their vacancy rates.

Fahy emphasized that “those gloomy days of 2025 are far away in the rear-view mirror.”

“I think the National Weather Service is going through some growing pains at the current time, with the loss of late-career experience,” said Brian LaMarre, a former weather service meteorologist who retired early from the agency last year after three decades. “But things are gaining on the front end with the new generation of ideas, the new generation of skills, especially in this extremely advanced technology era that we have right now.”

Trump NOAA Cuts Weather Balloons Explainer
A National Weather Service weather balloon at a launch site in Sterling, Virginia, in 2006.

Chris Greenberg / AP

Some former weather service employees told CBS News they’re hopeful newcomers raised in the digital age will bring value to the agency as it upgrades its technology. Others said additional workers could help restore the flow of key atmospheric data that has been missing or interrupted since staffing levels at the weather service abruptly dropped. 

LaMarre, who mentors students, recent graduates and young professionals aspiring to work for the weather service, views the future as “extremely exciting.”

Erica Cei, a weather service spokesperson, told CBS News that forecast offices currently experiencing “temporary staffing changes” receive “mutual aid” from neighboring offices, which allow their forecasting operations to run without interruption. 

Cei said the agency “remains ready to meet its mission by maintaining 24/7 operations and ensuring critical forecasts, warnings, and decision support are delivered to partners and the American people.”

Hiring “will continue as needed,” says weather service

New hiring comes after deadly Texas floods last July raised questions about whether the region could have been more prepared had regional forecast offices been adequately staffed. Mr. Trump granted an emergency authorization to the weather service last August that allowed it to hire 450 meteorologists, hydrologists and radar technicians over the course of a year, ending this September.  

More than 300 new weather service employees were onboarded as of late June, according to Cei, who said they’re predominantly field workers, including meteorologists, hydrologists and electronics technicians, as well as other physical scientists. 

Cei told CBS News that around 50 people were onboarded in the last two months alone – after the weather service announced in May that it would recruit another 150 entry-level meteorologists to work at forecast offices across the country.

“Our hiring actions and plans are robust, and will continue as needed,” said Cei. “The agency is well postured to recruit entry-level candidates to fortify our front lines and build talent pipelines for the future.”

Missing weather data

Everyone who spoke with CBS News pointed out ways that new hires may be able to improve weather service operations, regardless of their experience level. Among the most urgent is the restoration of what’s called “upper air” data, which Thoman and Gerard said has noticeably declined or degraded since January 2025.

The data is considered by many to be fundamental to forecasting models, particularly in scenarios where weather is changing rapidly. It has historically been collected by weather balloons, synced to launch twice daily from sites nationwide, and in other parts of the world, too.

Several U.S. weather stations no longer launch balloons twice daily, or at consistent morning and evening times, records show, which Cei said is “due to temporary resource and equipment constraints.”

It’s an unprecedented change, Gerard said. 

“There’s concern about the quality of the models because of the lack of upper air data,” he said. “There’s a lot of expression of just being less confident, and having less confidence in your data tends to undermine a lot of your operational decisions, right?”

Thoman told CBS News that two remote weather service outposts in Alaska have not launched weather balloons since February and August of last year, respectively, and several others are launched much less frequently than they used to be.

While the extent of the impact on forecasts is unclear, Thoman said weather models last October incorrectly predicted the track of a storm that displaced about 1,000 people along the Bering Sea. More than half of the area’s scheduled balloon launches failed to take place in the days leading up to its landfall.

Thoman said “it’s inconceivable to me, as a meteorologist,” that lack of data due to the diminished balloon launches “had no impact on the weather model forecast.”

El Gobierno de Trump admite que canceló subvenciones de energía limpia en estados que votaron por Kamala Harris

Los legisladores demócratas acusaron al Gobierno de Trump de abusar de su poder después de que funcionarios admitieran en un documento ante un tribunal federal que recomendaron poner fin a varios miles de millones de dólares en subvenciones para proyectos de energía limpia con base “únicamente” en la “identidad política” de los estados y en si el presidente Donald Trump ganó las elecciones de 2024 en esos estados.En un documento presentado el 15 de julio, que forma parte de una demanda colectiva para revocar la decisión, los funcionarios dijeron que el Departamento de Energía envió a la Oficina de Administración y Presupuesto una lista de más de 600 subvenciones que recomendó cancelar a beneficiarios en estados donde la exvicepresidenta Kamala Harris ganó el voto, y que tienen dos senadores que se alinean con los demócratas. En última instancia, la Oficina de Administración y Presupuesto (OMB, por sus siglas en inglés) canceló 284 subvenciones en octubre de 2025.La medida está en línea con el impulso más amplio de Trump en su segundo mandato para tomar represalias contra una variedad de oponentes políticos, y con sus agresivos esfuerzos por frenar la financiación federal en estados gobernados por demócratas. A principios de este año, el Gobierno intentó congelar US$ 10.000 millones en financiación para servicios sociales de cinco estados demócratas, antes de desistir de la iniciativa.En febrero, la Agencia Federal para el Manejo de Emergencias (FEMA, por sus siglas en inglés) liberó más de US$ 5.000 millones en ayuda por desastres largamente retrasada para los estados, pero dejó fuera a varios estados liderados por demócratas donde Trump había tenido enfrentamientos con gobernadores. El Departamento de Seguridad Nacional negó que la política influyera en la decisión.Esos acontecimientos se produjeron durante el apogeo de un esfuerzo sin precedentes del director de la OMB, Russell Vought, por ejercer nueva autoridad y poder sobre el proceso de gasto federal, un impulso que se aceleró rápidamente tras amplias acusaciones de fraude en Minnesota a finales del año pasado.La revelación de la medida del Gobierno para recortar subvenciones en estados donde Harris ganó los votos electorales fue informada por primera vez por el New York Times. Los demandantes en el caso, un grupo de investigadores de la Universidad de California, argumentan que la gestión de Trump optó por la cancelación de subvenciones federales por motivos políticos.En la presentación del 15 de julio, el Departamento de Energía (DOE, por sus siglas en inglés) declaró que “acepta que la inclusión de subvenciones en el aviso de octubre se basó únicamente en la afiliación política del estado beneficiario, es decir, si la ubicación o el lugar de ejecución del proyecto se encontraba en un estado demócrata o no”.El líder de la minoría del Senado, Chuck Schumer, demócrata, calificó la admisión del DOE de “trumpismo sin precedentes y algo a lo que nunca deberíamos insensibilizarnos”.“Trump admite que les quita el sustento a familias trabajadoras para vengarse de los estadounidenses que no votaron por él. Es enfermizo y desquiciado”, escribió Schumer en X. “Su ego es tan frágil que castigará a familias que ya luchan por llegar a fin de mes solo por un poco de venganza”.El representante de Maryland, Jamie Raskin, afirmó que las acciones del Gobierno de Trump constituyen una “profunda traición a Estados Unidos”, y añadió que los fondos deben ser restituidos de inmediato a los estados demócratas.“Esta represalia partidista masiva es espantosa, indignante, peligrosa, ilegal, inconstitucional, antipatriótica y una grave ofensa contra la República”, escribió Raskin en X. “Trump sabía lo importantes que eran estas subvenciones de la era Biden para el pueblo estadounidense, por eso no las recortó a los estados republicanos, pero sí a los demócratas”.La representante de Ohio, Marcy Kaptur, y la senadora de Washington, Patty Murray, ambas demócratas que integran las comisiones de asignaciones en sus respectivas cámaras, declararon en un comunicado conjunto el viernes: “Esta es una admisión asombrosa de que el presidente y su equipo abusaron corruptamente de su poder para destruir empleos dignos y castigar a familias trabajadoras debido a sus opiniones políticas”.“Utilizar al Gobierno federal como arma de esta manera es completamente antiestadounidense”, añadieron las legisladoras.CNN contactó a la Casa Blanca, el Departamento de Energía, la Oficina de Administración y Presupuesto y el Departamento de Justicia para solicitar comentarios.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story