Skip to main content

Victims of Iranian-sponsored terror want restitution as part of peace deal

▶ Watch Video: Victims of Iranian-sponsored terror urge Trump to demand restitution in possible Iran deal

Washington — Victims of Iranian-sponsored terrorism and their families are in Washington this week to urge President Trump to demand Iran pay restitution as part of any potential peace deal.

The delegation of more than 100 people includes those who have successfully sued the Islamic Republic in U.S. federal court for tens of billions of dollars in damages for its role in either orchestrating, financing or providing other material support for major terror attacks around the world, including the 1983 Beirut Marine barracks bombing that killed 241 U.S. service members, and scores of suicide bombings that have killed American citizens in places like Israel.

“American victims have been entirely absent from the public and reported negotiating framework,” the group American Victims of State-Sponsored Terrorism United wrote in a letter to Mr. Trump first obtained by CBS News. “Our request is clear and grounded in longstanding U.S. policy: no agreement, interim or long-term, should release, transfer, unfreeze, or return Iranian assets, or lift or relieve sanctions, before the outstanding terrorism judgments owed to American victims are resolved.”

Angela Mistrulli, who spearheaded the two-day gathering in Washington, told CBS News the letter speaks for a coalition of more than 20,000 American victims directly affected by Iran-backed terrorism. She plans to deliver the letter to the president in a meeting at the White House scheduled for Tuesday.

Mistrulli’s father, Joseph, was killed while working at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.

“If we can bankrupt terrorists, then there will be less American blood spilled,” Mistrulli asserted. “There should not be any funds returned to the terrorism regime.”

Victims of Iranian-sponsored terrorism and their families gathered in Washington
Victims of Iranian-sponsored terrorism and their families gathered in Washington to urge President Trump to demand Iran pay restitution as part of any potential peace deal.

CBS News

In recent days, fighting with Iran has resumed and the initial push toward a peace agreement has largely stalled. But the group’s effort comes at what would be the midway point of the initial 60-day Memorandum of Understanding signed by Mr. Trump and Iran’s leaders on June 17. 

The MOU, negotiated in large part by Vice President JD Vance, offered Iran the prospect of receiving hundreds of billions of dollars in frozen assets and sanctions relief if it complied with terms that include opening maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz and eliminating any nuclear threat.

“If it doesn’t get done in 60 days, that’s all right. We go back to bombing,” Mr. Trump said after signing the agreement. “I don’t want to do that, because it’s so good, but we might have to, because we’re never going to let them have a nuclear weapon.”

Vance called the MOU “fundamentally a good deal for the American people” and said it offered Iran an opportunity to be “reinvited into the world economy.”

But there has been little progress toward a longer-term agreement, and the U.S. resumed military strikes on Iran more than a week ago.

Iranian terror from October 1983 to Oct. 7, 2023

According to Mistrulli, Iran and other regimes like Syria and North Korea have been ordered to pay up to $156 billion in judgments dating back to the 1990s after Congress passed a law allowing terror victims to sue U.S.-designated state sponsors of terrorism. Iran has been ordered to pay the most of any country since the law was enacted.

Plaintiffs have included victims and families harmed in attacks spanning decades and continents, including 9/11, which a federal judge found Iran liable for in 2018, saying it provided assistance to the hijackers. 

In one recent case, a U.S. District Court in Washington awarded $573 million to plaintiffs representing American service members killed or injured by Iranian-supported insurgencies in Iraq from 2003 to 2015.

A current pending case focuses on Iran’s alleged role in the Hamas-led terrorist attacks in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Hamas is one of a number of militant groups in the region backed by Iran.

“As a community, the judgments that we pursue are not pursued out of compensation,” Mistrulli added. “The compensation has been the only justice we can receive — and we don’t want another group to lose loved ones like we have.”

Although victims have won billions of dollars in judgments against Iran, collecting those awards has proved far more difficult, as state sponsors of terrorism rarely pay judgments voluntarily. To provide some relief, Congress created the U.S. Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund to provide partial compensation to eligible victims using money from qualifying federal penalties, forfeitures and other congressionally authorized sources.

According to the fund’s website, more than $10 billion has been paid out since its inception in 2015 — less than 10% of what’s been awarded in terrorism cases.

“There has been some relief,” Aryeh Portnoy, an attorney who has represented thousands of victims in terrorism cases and is currently litigating on behalf of Oct. 7 victims, told CBS News. “But even those in the fund that have been in it the longest and have received the most from it have only received pennies on the dollars of their judgments.”

Portnoy also pointed to limited enforcement, legal disputes and chronic underfunding as reasons for the shortfall.

“So there’s more work that needs to be done, but it can be done,” he said. “There’s opportunities for the government, for Congress, for the administration to help these victims, to fill the promise that Congress made when it allowed the victims to come and pursue these terrorist states in court for the horrors that they committed.”

And no country owes more than Iran, Portnoy said. In many of the state-sponsored terrorism cases he has litigated, Iran has repeatedly emerged as the foreign government accused of supporting the terrorist groups responsible for the attacks.

“In each of those cases, the actors themselves could be a terrorist organization,” Portnoy explained to CBS News. “It could be Hezbollah, it could be ISIS, it could be Al Qaeda. But behind those actors is always a state sponsor — and Iran is by far the biggest state sponsor of terrorism and has been for the last four decades.”

A spokesperson for the Iranian Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

El Gobierno de Trump admite que canceló subvenciones de energía limpia en estados que votaron por Kamala Harris

Los legisladores demócratas acusaron al Gobierno de Trump de abusar de su poder después de que funcionarios admitieran en un documento ante un tribunal federal que recomendaron poner fin a varios miles de millones de dólares en subvenciones para proyectos de energía limpia con base “únicamente” en la “identidad política” de los estados y en si el presidente Donald Trump ganó las elecciones de 2024 en esos estados.En un documento presentado el 15 de julio, que forma parte de una demanda colectiva para revocar la decisión, los funcionarios dijeron que el Departamento de Energía envió a la Oficina de Administración y Presupuesto una lista de más de 600 subvenciones que recomendó cancelar a beneficiarios en estados donde la exvicepresidenta Kamala Harris ganó el voto, y que tienen dos senadores que se alinean con los demócratas. En última instancia, la Oficina de Administración y Presupuesto (OMB, por sus siglas en inglés) canceló 284 subvenciones en octubre de 2025.La medida está en línea con el impulso más amplio de Trump en su segundo mandato para tomar represalias contra una variedad de oponentes políticos, y con sus agresivos esfuerzos por frenar la financiación federal en estados gobernados por demócratas. A principios de este año, el Gobierno intentó congelar US$ 10.000 millones en financiación para servicios sociales de cinco estados demócratas, antes de desistir de la iniciativa.En febrero, la Agencia Federal para el Manejo de Emergencias (FEMA, por sus siglas en inglés) liberó más de US$ 5.000 millones en ayuda por desastres largamente retrasada para los estados, pero dejó fuera a varios estados liderados por demócratas donde Trump había tenido enfrentamientos con gobernadores. El Departamento de Seguridad Nacional negó que la política influyera en la decisión.Esos acontecimientos se produjeron durante el apogeo de un esfuerzo sin precedentes del director de la OMB, Russell Vought, por ejercer nueva autoridad y poder sobre el proceso de gasto federal, un impulso que se aceleró rápidamente tras amplias acusaciones de fraude en Minnesota a finales del año pasado.La revelación de la medida del Gobierno para recortar subvenciones en estados donde Harris ganó los votos electorales fue informada por primera vez por el New York Times. Los demandantes en el caso, un grupo de investigadores de la Universidad de California, argumentan que la gestión de Trump optó por la cancelación de subvenciones federales por motivos políticos.En la presentación del 15 de julio, el Departamento de Energía (DOE, por sus siglas en inglés) declaró que “acepta que la inclusión de subvenciones en el aviso de octubre se basó únicamente en la afiliación política del estado beneficiario, es decir, si la ubicación o el lugar de ejecución del proyecto se encontraba en un estado demócrata o no”.El líder de la minoría del Senado, Chuck Schumer, demócrata, calificó la admisión del DOE de “trumpismo sin precedentes y algo a lo que nunca deberíamos insensibilizarnos”.“Trump admite que les quita el sustento a familias trabajadoras para vengarse de los estadounidenses que no votaron por él. Es enfermizo y desquiciado”, escribió Schumer en X. “Su ego es tan frágil que castigará a familias que ya luchan por llegar a fin de mes solo por un poco de venganza”.El representante de Maryland, Jamie Raskin, afirmó que las acciones del Gobierno de Trump constituyen una “profunda traición a Estados Unidos”, y añadió que los fondos deben ser restituidos de inmediato a los estados demócratas.“Esta represalia partidista masiva es espantosa, indignante, peligrosa, ilegal, inconstitucional, antipatriótica y una grave ofensa contra la República”, escribió Raskin en X. “Trump sabía lo importantes que eran estas subvenciones de la era Biden para el pueblo estadounidense, por eso no las recortó a los estados republicanos, pero sí a los demócratas”.La representante de Ohio, Marcy Kaptur, y la senadora de Washington, Patty Murray, ambas demócratas que integran las comisiones de asignaciones en sus respectivas cámaras, declararon en un comunicado conjunto el viernes: “Esta es una admisión asombrosa de que el presidente y su equipo abusaron corruptamente de su poder para destruir empleos dignos y castigar a familias trabajadoras debido a sus opiniones políticas”.“Utilizar al Gobierno federal como arma de esta manera es completamente antiestadounidense”, añadieron las legisladoras.CNN contactó a la Casa Blanca, el Departamento de Energía, la Oficina de Administración y Presupuesto y el Departamento de Justicia para solicitar comentarios.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story