Skip to main content

Vance Boelter gets 2 life terms and more in Minnesota lawmaker shootings

▶ Watch Video: Boelter sentenced to 2 life sentences plus 40 years for killing Hortmans, shooting Hoffmans

Vance Boelter, the man who admitted in court to shooting two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses, was sentenced to two life terms in prison followed by 40 years Thursday morning.

Judge John R. Tunheim said it was “the longest sentence I have imposed after hearing thousands of cases over the years, but it is well deserved.”

Boelter, who turns 59 Thursday, pleaded guilty to six federal charges against him in June. As part of his plea, he confessed to killing former House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark and wounding Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette in a shooting that also targeted their daughter Hope.

The U.S. Department of Justice announced in June it would not seek the death penalty for Boelter.

In a pre-sentencing filing on Tuesday, prosecutors said, “Justice requires that Boelter never be free again.” Thursday’s sentence carries no possibility of parole.

Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a statement following the sentencing, saying, “This murderer will spend the rest of his life behind bars for his heinous acts of violence against public servants and their families. … Our hearts remain with the victims’ families, loved ones, and all those whose lives were forever changed by these horrific attacks.”

The Hennepin County Attorney’s Office previously said it plans to move forward with state charges against Boelter: two counts of first-degree premeditated murder, four counts of attempted first-degree murder and one count each of felony cruelty to an animal and impersonating an officer.

The Hoffman family is suing Boelter civilly, accusing him of assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence and negligence per se, according to the complaint.

The June 14, 2025, shootings in the Twin Cities suburbs of Champlin and Brooklyn Park prompted a manhunt that lasted 43 hours and ended in rural Green Isle, Minnesota. Officials said the attacks were politically motivated.

In the most recent legislative session, Hortman’s colleagues approved a number of tributes to her, including a memorial garden for the State Office Building and the renaming of Highway 610 and Minnesota’s community solar garden program in her honor. Lawmakers also passed two measures championed by Hortman’s son Colin, which aim to ease the burdens on families following traumatic events.

Boelter speaks before sentencing

Boelter gave a brief statement to the court before being sentenced.

“To every person I have caused loss, pain, heartache, confusion, shame or loneliness, I am truly sorry,” he said.

Hortman children say they still think of parents’ murders daily

Sophie and Colin Hortman, children to Melissa and Mark, told the court the pain they experienced after Boelter killed their parents is unforgettable.

“What I cared about in my entire life had been shattered in 30 seconds,” Sophie Hortman said. “My parents were dead. The dog had been shot multiple times. My brother was wrecked.”

Colin Hortman said he lives with post-traumatic stress disorder.

“The blood that was spilled is the last thing I see before I fall asleep and the first thing I see as I wake,” he said, adding that when he pictures his parents, he sees “bullet holes.”

Both admitted no penalty would be fully satisfactory, but Colin Hortman asked for the maximum sentence with no possibility of release.

“Justice can never be served for those who lost,” Sophie Hortman said. “I miss my mom. I miss my dad. I miss my best friends. I miss believing in the goodness of humanity.”

Mark Hortman’s family expressed feeling robbed of seeing Boelter executed

In court, Mark Hortman’s father J. Carroll Hortman and brother Lee Hortman expressed the feeling of being robbed of seeing Boelter executed. J. Hortman called out Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche by name. 

“He [Boelter] only killed Democrats, so Todd [Blanche] didn’t care,” J. Hortman said. 

A spokesperson from Blanche’s office responded with a statement, inferring for the first time that prosecutors may not have been able to achieve the death penalty. 

“Deciding whether to seek the death penalty is among the Attorney General’s most important and consequential responsibilities. Every case presents unique facts, circumstances, and legal considerations, and the views of victims’ families are always an important part of that assessment. But even when capital punishment may appear to be the just sentence, significant legal or evidentiary obstacles may leave no legally sustainable basis to seek it,” the spokesperson said. 

On June 11, the day of Boelter’s plea hearing, U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota Daniel Rosen did not discuss any legal obstacles when it came to the death penalty. 

“This case as charged was certainly death penalty eligible and we would have prevailed in that ultimately in the courts. The truth is when you have a defendant who is prepared to plead guilty, take consecutive life terms plus, to ensure that he never sees freedom again in his entire life, that is an opportunity that we just could not pass up,” Rosen said that day. He was not in the courtroom for Boelter’s sentencing on Thursday. 

Leaving the courthouse, Lee Hortman said he would have liked to see Boelter hanged.   

Hoffmans recount horror of shooting, difficulty of aftermath

John Hoffman said he “returned to the Minnesota Senate because I refuse to allow violence to become the author of my future.”

Still, he said, his family lives “with a heightened awareness that enters every room before we do.”

“Our home no longer feels like the sanctuary it once was,” he said. “We installed solid steel doors and reinforced security. Your honor, those aren’t home improvements. They are daily reminders that violence followed us home.”

Yvette Hoffman said she “genuinely believed” she was dying after being shot.

“I’ll never forget looking down and watching my blood stream down that white washing machine as I felt myself sinking to the floor and fading,” she said.

“I came face to face with evil,” she later added. “I survived it. I will carry the memory of that day with me for the rest of my life.”

Hope Hoffman, whose father said her actions “helped save our lives and many others,” said she lives not only with the trauma caused by the attack, but that of the “bias and sensationalism” she endured from the media in the aftermath.

“In all reality, I’d like to just be a victim of gun violence who called 911. I really shouldn’t have to be advocating for that, but here we are,” she said.

Both Hope and Yvette Hoffman shared ill wishes for their attacker.

“Not only is he a criminal and a loser, he’s also the worst kind of father he could possibly be,” Hope Hoffman said. “I hope one day he miserably dies with that thought.” 

“If I had a wish, it is when the defendant’s life ends, his body is carried out of federal prison in one of those body bags he intended for my family,” Yvette Hoffman said.

Fellow lawmakers say attacks shook, changed them

Before the sentencing, Rep. Kristin Bahner, who said Boelter also visited her home the night he shot the Hortmans and Hoffmans, gave an emotional victim impact statement.

“Nothing could prepare me for an assassin at my door,” Bahner said. “I never dreamt that doing the job that I love would put my family in harm’s way, forever shattering their innocence.”

Bahner told the judge, “I only want one thing. That neither courts nor you can give me, Mr. Boelter. I want Melissa back.”

Rep. Zack Stephenson, who took over as House DFL leader after Hortman’s killing, said Boelter’s actions “sent a message of terror to everyone who serves in public life,” but that “our caucus is stronger, more unified and even more dedicated to the values that Melissa and Mark lived their life by.”

“Melissa consistently acted the way every Minnesotan, every American, would hope their representative would act,” Stephenson said. “There has never been another Melissa Hortman and I doubt there ever will be.” 

South Carolina to hold first 2028 Democratic presidential primary

▶ Watch Video: Democrats expected to approve South Carolina as first primary in 2028, but other states pushing back Democrats on Saturday approved a new presidential nominating calendar for 2028, cementing South Carolina's place as the first official Democratic primary state, as the party looks to elevate states that better reflect its diverse coalition of voters.The vote came during the Democratic National Committee's summer meeting in Austin, where members signed off on a schedule that begins with South Carolina on Jan. 22, followed by Nevada on Feb. 1. New Hampshire, New Mexico, Michigan and Virginia round out the early-state lineup throughout February, all voting before Super Tuesday."This is much bigger than a lineup of dates on a calendar," said DNC Chair Ken Martin. "This is about our approach to winning back the presidency. It's about the kind of Democratic Party and the kind of country we aspire to be."The new calendar goes into effect amid a tug-of-war within the progressive and establishment wings of the party. It also continues a shift away from a tradition that for half a century gave states that are predominantly composed of White voters — Iowa and New Hampshire — outsized influence at the start of the nominating process. Strategists say the new calendar gives greater influence to Black and Latino voters, who make up key parts of the Democratic coalition. "If you're not strong with Latino voters or if you're not strong with Black voters, you know you can only get so far in this calendar," CBS News contributor and Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha said, adding that the schedule shows Black voters "the respect that they're due."Not everyone in the party is on board. Democratic leaders in Iowa and New Hampshire — previously the first and second states to hold primary contests, respectively — excoriated the new map as soon as the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee recommended it, arguing that it diminishes the role of states that have long taken on the responsibility of shaping the presidential nomination battlefield. "New Hampshire's First in the Nation primary is a tested proving ground in a closely contested swing state that forges better candidates and better presidents — and despite what DNC insiders say, that hasn't changed," New Hampshire's U.S. congressional delegation said in a statement. "As a state with highly engaged voters, we put candidates through their paces and thoroughly vet them. And our small size means that actually meeting and talking to voters takes precedence over super PACs or mega-donor-fueled campaigns."Iowa Democratic Chair Rita Hart said on Saturday the new calendar "fundamentally misses the mark," saying the job of the DNC calendar is to "ensure that the strongest possible nominee emerges" to become the Democratic candidate for president."It's a product of broken promises, and it excludes huge swaths of the country and the voters that Democrats need to win, the kind of majorities it takes to restore Democratic principles and reject this misguided and corrupt Trump administration," she said.Momentum for South Carolina's ascension in the calendar traces back to 2020, when a victory there shifted momentum in the presidential primary that year to Joe Biden after he performed poorly in Iowa, New Hampshire and, to a lesser extent, Nevada. Under pressure from Biden and his allies, the DNC moved South Carolina's primary to first for the 2024 calendar. That cycle, New Hampshire defied the DNC's revised schedule and held its primary before South Carolina, citing a state law that mandates it hold the first primary. In response, the party stripped the contest of its sanctioned status. DNC Chair Ken Martin has signaled that if New Hampshire jumps ahead again in 2028, punishment will be more severe. "This is a calendar this party is actually going to protect," Martin told reporters after the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee met last month to propose a new schedule. The new calendar could impact the ideological battle within the Democratic Party between establishment moderates and more progressive candidates, including far-left democratic socialists. With no obvious 2028 front-runner, the newly approved schedule gives South Carolina, Nevada and the other four early states disproportionate influence over which faction can build early momentum in the 2028 presidential primaries. Among the states granted early slots, only Nevada and New Mexico offer clear advantages to progressives. Michigan has shown openness this cycle to progressives, with the primary victory of Abdul El-Sayed in the Senate race, but historically has elected more moderate candidates. New Hampshire voters have over time shown an openness to outsiders, but they typically have a more independent streak rather than a steep ideological lean. Progressives face an uphill battle in South Carolina, which has fewer of the White voters with college degrees who tend to support further-left candidates, and Virginia, which has long favored more moderate candidates. The decision to elevate states with large Black and Hispanic populations also comes as Democrats fight to stop the GOP from gaining ground with those two groups in general elections. President Trump won 48% of the Hispanic vote in 2024, up 12 points from four years earlier, and he won 15% of Black voters, almost double his share in 2020, according to the Pew Research Center. His share of non-Hispanic White voters remained stable, at 55%.
Read Next Story