Skip to main content

“Ask the Archivist” Opens a New Door to Obama-Era History

Click here for updates on this story

    July 23, 2026 (Houston Style Magazine) — History is usually introduced with a velvet rope, a glass display case and a respectful reminder not to touch anything. At Chicago’s newly opened Obama Presidential Center, however, history is being invited to pull up a chair and answer questions.

The Obama Foundation and the National Archives and Records Administration have launched “Ask the Archivist,” a public-access program that places a National Archives archivist on-site at the Obama Presidential Center Branch of the Chicago Public Library. Every Thursday from July 23 through October 8, 2026, visitors may stop by between 10 a.m. and 6 p.m. Central Time to learn how presidential records are preserved, researched and made available to the public.

That may sound like a niche opportunity reserved for scholars wearing elbow patches. It is not. The program welcomes curious visitors, students, teachers, journalists, family historians and everyday citizens who want to better understand how the decisions of an administration become part of the nation’s permanent record.

“The National Archives have been a tremendous partner to us as we work to illuminate the work of the Obama Administration at the Obama Presidential Center,” said Obama Foundation CEO Valerie Jarrett. She added that “Ask the Archivist” represents another way to make President Barack Obama’s work “accessible and transparent to the public.”

That word—accessible—is especially important. The Barack Obama Presidential Library is the nation’s first fully digital presidential library. An estimated 95 percent of the administration’s records were created digitally, including emails, photographs, videos, documents, social-media posts and other electronic files. NARA also received millions of pages of paper records that must be preserved, reviewed and digitized before broader public release.

Dr. Kenvi Phillips, director of the Barack Obama Presidential Library, said the partnership allows Center visitors to do more than admire artifacts. They can also speak directly with archivists about the digital holdings and learn how to search for materials connected to the Obama years.

That is a meaningful upgrade from simply reading a museum label. Archivists are the patient detectives of democracy. They organize enormous collections, protect fragile materials, review records for public access and help researchers locate the historical needle inside a digital haystack.

The partnership also reflects the unusual structure of the Obama legacy institutions. The Obama Foundation operates the privately funded Presidential Center and Museum, while NARA retains custody of the official presidential records and manages the digital Barack Obama Presidential Library. NARA-owned artifacts and records may be loaned to the Center for public exhibition, connecting the physical museum experience with the federally maintained archive.

For Houston-area educators, students, civic organizations and journalists, the significance reaches well beyond Chicago. Released Obama Administration records can be explored online, making the collection a national classroom available from a school library, newsroom or living-room laptop. The archive offers opportunities to study policy, leadership, communications, civil rights, public service and the workings of American democracy.

“Ask the Archivist” reminds us that preserving history is not about locking the past away. It is about giving people the tools to examine it, question it and carry its lessons forward.

photo

Visit Obama.org for information about the Obama Foundation and Presidential Center. Explore released presidential records and digital resources at ObamaLibrary.gov. Branch details, hours and directions are available through the Chicago Public Library.

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Kierra Lee
KIELEESTYLE@GMAIL.COM
4096658446

What is China’s Kimi K3 and why is the US so rattled by it?

Hong Kong (CNN) — Remember DeepSeek? The Chinese artificial intelligence startup that rattled the US tech industry with its model that nearly matched leading rivals, trained at a fraction of the cost.China may have done it again.The latest Chinese AI model making waves was developed by a lesser-known startup called Moonshot AI. In just two days after launch, Moonshot suspended new subscriptions after demand overwhelmed its computing capacity.The unexpected enthusiasm for Moonshot’s Kimi K3 model stems from its ability to match – and in some cases outperform – its most advanced US competitors, such as the latest iterations of OpenAI’s GPT and Anthropic’s Claude, for free.Now its rise is intensifying an already contentious race between the US and China to dominate cutting-edge AI. Washington has ramped up export restrictions against China in recent years to slow the country’s development of AI and chips that could power its military.After Kimi K3 was released, US officials and Anthropic have again accused Moonshot of distilling American models, a technique in which one AI model is trained using outputs from another. Moonshot has denied the allegations.Still, the fears spreading among US companies and government officials underscore the stakes of the AI rivalry, and its far-reaching implications for economy, defense and national security.More broadly, Kimi K3’s capabilities are renewing questions about the effectiveness of Washington’s tech export curbs. The new model also challenges an industry belief that leading-edge AI requires heavy spending on data centers and the advanced chips that the US has restricted access to.Unlike most American proprietary models, Kimi K3 was released as an open-weight model. That allows developers to download it, modify it, and run it on their own servers for free, positioning it for easier adoption and a wider market globally.Constrained by limited access to AI hardware and investment compared with American firms, China has embraced so-called “open” models, in contrast to US rivals that mostly sit behind paid subscriptions.“Many organisations value the ability to self-host open models, allowing them to retain the weight and control over sensitive data instead of relying solely on closed-model providers,” said Chelsey Tam, senior equity analyst at financial services firm Morningstar.Who is behind China’s latest AI breakthrough?Moonshot AI was founded three years ago by Yang Zhilin, a promising software engineer in his early 30s from China’s Southeastern city of Shantou.He demonstrated potential early on when studying at Tsinghua University, China’s most elite engineering school, under Tang Jie, a professor who would go on to found another prominent AI startup Z.ai in 2019.“He is the most talented and exceptional student I’ve encountered in recent years,” Tang said while recommending Yang for a scholarship in 2014.Yang went to Carnegie Mellon University for his PhD in computer science at under Ruslan Salakhutdinov, a former AI executive at Meta and Apple. By the end of his studies, Salakhutdinov recalled, Yang turned down a job offer by a senior Apple executive who reported directly to Tim Cook.“I remember him telling me that if he didn’t at least try starting his own company, he would regret it for the rest of his life. I respect that, and he was right,” Salakhutdinov said in a post on X.Yang later said the decision came down to two things. “First was the environment. We saw tremendous opportunities, from government and venture-capital support to the advances China had made in education over the past few decades, all of which created favorable conditions for AI startups,” he told state-run media in 2024. “Second, we believed AI represented a massive opportunity.”Yang stood out in China’s AI industry not only for founding Moonshot at the age of 32, making him one of the country’s youngest AI entrepreneurs, but also for choosing to return to China to launch his venture.From the start, Yang had grand ambitions. He told a podcast in 2024 that the startup’s name was a nod to his favorite album by British rock band Pink Floyd, “Dark Side of the Moon,” in the hope that it would “accomplish something that would create enormous value but would also be extremely difficult — much like landing on the moon.”Moonshot quickly reached national fame after releasing its first Kimi model – named after Yang’s English name – in 2023. That same year, Moonshot secured nearly $300 million in its first two funding rounds, according to a 2024 interview with Chinese media.Is it another ‘DeepSeek moment’?The international attention that Kimi K3’s has garnered echoes the rise of DeepSeek in early 2025, when its R1 reasoning model sent shockwaves through the global AI community.This time, K3 delivered performance approaching frontier systems such as OpenAI’s GPT 5.6 Sol and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 on various benchmarks, further narrowing the gap between Chinese and American AI models.But analysts say Moonshot’s achievement should be viewed through a different lens.DeepSeek challenged the conventional wisdom that developing an advanced AI model requires massive financial investment and vast computing power, and offered competitive pricing.But K3’s discount to frontier models is much smaller than R1’s was at launch, suggesting its cost advantage may be less significant than DeepSeek’s, according to Ivan Su, director at Morningstar.What K3 demonstrates is that Chinese companies are continuing to build on the success of DeepSeek, and close the gap between Chinese and US AI models, said Poe Zhao, analyst and founder of the newsletter Hello China Tech.“Its broader significance is that DeepSeek increasingly looks like the beginning of a pattern,” he said. “DeepSeek was a surprise. K3 is evidence that China’s progress is becoming more repeatable.”Since DeepSeek, Chinese AI firms like Moonshot, Alibaba and Z.ai are getting more attention for each new model, with the pace of the rollouts speeding up.With K3, Wei Sun, principal AI analyst at market analysis firm Counterpoint Research, said the general gap between Chinese and American models has narrowed to three to six months, though it varies significantly by task.Still, other analysts have expressed reservations toward K3’s true capabilities.“While K3 constitutes progress, we’d hesitate to ascribe it near-parity with American frontier models, such as Fable 5, in real-world tasks,” said Malik Ahmed Khan, senior equity analyst at Morningstar in a research note last Friday. Many open model developers have optimized software performance around benchmarks for better results in the past, he explained.Is it a threat to the US?For American tech companies, free and comparable Chinese models like K3 threaten to undermine their own products.Leading US AI firms Anthropic and OpenAI have long accused Chinese labs, including Moonshot, DeepSeek and Alibaba, of extracting capabilities from their models. Those claims have intensified with the arrival of K3.Huang Zhenxin, Moonshot AI’s head of enterprise business, denied the accusations of distillation in an interview with state-run media on Monday.But that has not stopped new allegations from Washington.“We have information that Moonshot AI distilled Anthropic’s Fable for the development of its K3 model,” said Michael Kratsios, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, in a Wednesday post on X. “Large-scale, covert industrial distillation aimed at stealing proprietary U.S. technology and undermining American research is unacceptable.”Sarah Heck, Anthropic’s policy head, echoed Kratsios in an X post that accused Moonshot of engaging in “IP theft and industrial espionage,” calling it a “national challenge that creates serious national security risks.”CNN has reached out to Moonshot for comment.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also reiterated Wednesday that the US could sanction Chinese firms over such IP theft, without mentioning Moonshot or others by name.“When PRC firms conduct covert, industrial-scale distillation attacks that cross the line into IP theft, sanctions and Entity List designations will be on the table,” he said on X, referring to the country’s formal name People’s Republic of China.Most analysts, however, found the distillation accusation against Moonshot unlikely.Sun of Counterpoint said Moonshot would not have had enough time to train its AI model with its rivals’ latest models, which had limited availability before K3’s launch. And distillation alone would not account for Kimi K3’s outperformance, she added.“The timeline is unconvincing,” she said.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story

Related Stories

Latest News
EE.UU. advierte que operativos rusos atacan los correos electrónicos de científicos nucleares y contratistas de defensa
6 minutes ago

EE.UU. advierte que operativos rusos atacan los correos electrónicos de científicos nucleares y contratistas de defensa

Javier Bardem aclara sus dichos sobre Argentina: "Nunca diría que es un país xenófobo"

Member of Vance's Secret Service detail under investigation for leaking

Rapid pace of interceptor and precision-guided weapons use worries Trump admin.

Trump fires U.S. attorney in Washington on heels of court appointment