Skip to main content

Trump says U.S. reinstating Iran blockade in Strait of Hormuz

▶ Watch Video: Iran and U.S. both claim control over Strait of Hormuz, trade more strikes

President Trump said Monday that the U.S. will be “the guardian” of the Strait of Hormuz and suggested that other countries will pay the U.S. for securing it. 

“The U.S.A. will be, from this point forward, known as ‘THE GUARDIAN OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT,’ but as such, and as a matter of FAIRNESS, will be reimbursed, at the rate of 20% on all cargo shipped, for any and all costs necessary to do the job of providing safety and security to this very volatile section of the World,” he said on Truth Social. “The process and formation will begin immediately.” 

He also said the U.S. is reinstating its blockade on Iranian ports and vessels, adding the blockade is “so named because it is only stopping Iran’s ships or customers from entering or leaving.”

“All other countries will have fair and open use of the Strait,” he said, adding that it will stay open “with or without Iran.”

The president told Fox News earlier Monday that the U.S. was “going to keep the strait, and we’ll probably run it. We’ll become the guardian of the strait. Maybe we’ll call it the ‘Guardian Angel of the Strait.’ And we should be reimbursed for that.” 

hormuz.jpg

CBS News

He did not name any countries he expected would pay under such an arrangement, but implied that Persian Gulf energy producers should.

“When we do that, we’re going to be reimbursed, because the other nations are very wealthy; they’re on our side, and we can’t be expected to do that for nothing,” he said.

He also said the U.S. had “guarded the strait for 50 years, more, and we never got paid for it,” saying other nations “made all the money.”

“We guarded it for nothing, and now we’re going to guard it,” he said. “We’re going to get paid for guarding it, a lot of money.”

The strait was open to all vessels before the U.S. and Israel launched their joint war on Iran on Feb. 28. Maritime traffic through the strait has been significantly reduced since then, and the U.S.-Iran dispute over control of the crucial waterway has derailed attempts to reach a lasting peace deal in the conflict.

Iran has argued that the vaguely worded memorandum of understanding signed by the U.S. and Iran in mid-June gave it the right to control shipping through the strait, and it balked at the U.S. government and military’s calls for ships to use the southern route close to Oman, which President Trump has insisted is open.

Iran’s embassy in the U.K., in a statement Monday, accused the U.S. of having “done nothing but violate” the agreement “since day one,” specifically by “pushing vessels toward a dangerous southern parallel route” through the strait, close to Oman’s coast. It called that “not only legally questionable but also unsafe, unreliable, and prone to accidents.”

Iran attacked several ships attempting to use that southern route last week, and on Saturday it also struck a container vessel near the western entrance to the strait, prompting the U.S. to launch multiple rounds of airstrikes on Iranian targets. 

Later Monday, Iran’s Persian Gulf Strait Authority declared in a social media post that, “due to recent hostile actions by the US forces, passage through the Strait of Hormuz is currently unfeasible.” 

“As soon as stability and calm are restored, all applications will be reviewed in accordance with the scheduled timeline, and the permitting process will resume,” the PGSA added, reminding vessels that in Iran’s view, “the sole means of obtaining a passage permit” to transit the strait is through its website.

Mr. Trump’s suggestion on Monday that the U.S. should “get paid for guarding” the strait came after weeks of condemnation from Washington over suggestions by Tehran that it would in the future charge commercial ships “fees” for passage. 

“Purpose Over Pleasure”: Harris County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth Turns Down $305,000 Salary and Delivers a WOW Lesson in Leadership

Click here for updates on this story    August 24, 2026 (Houston Style Magazine) -- HOUSTON — Jonathan Traylor captured it in three unforgettable words: “Purpose over Pleasure.” And every so often, a public official makes a decision that gives those words real-world meaning—so refreshingly unexpected that taxpayers collectively lean closer and say, “WOW.” Harris County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth has created one of those moments, choosing employees, fiscal stewardship and the mission of serving Harris County over personal financial gain after announcing that she would not accept her newly authorized $305,000 salary if the increase had to be absorbed within her office’s existing budget.Harris County Clerk Teneshia Hudspeth has created one of those moments.photo After Harris County Commissioners Court approved salary increases placing several countywide elected officials at $305,000 annually, Hudspeth announced she would not accept her newly authorized salary because the additional compensation came without additional funding for her office. Recent county budget proceedings confirm the $305,000 salary level approved for most affected elected officials.Why?Because accepting more for herself could mean having less available for the people helping her office serve Harris County. Somebody cue Jonathan Traylor.“Purpose over Pleasure.” That simple phrase from Traylor’s song could practically serve as the soundtrack to Hudspeth’s decision.Hudspeth could have taken the money, smiled for the cameras and kept moving. Instead, she thanked Commissioners Court for recognizing the responsibilities and demands of her position while explaining that the increase would have to be absorbed within the County Clerk’s existing budget.Her priority, she said, remains filling positions requested during the budget process and maintaining staffing necessary to serve Harris County residents.In other words: recognition appreciated; mission first.Making History—Then Giving Leadership Meaning
Read Next Story