Skip to main content

Trump says he’ll remove Syria as state sponsor of terrorism for the first time since 1979

By WTOP Staff
U.S. President Donald Trump (R) meets with Ahmed al-Sharaa, President of Syria (L) for bilateral talks at Beştepe Presidential Compound during the NATO Summit on July 08, 2026 in Ankara, Turkey. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — President Donald Trump, sitting next to Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa at the NATO summit in Turkey, said Wednesday that he will remove Syria from the State Department’s State Sponsors of Terrorism list. 

“He’s done a great job. Maybe he would have brought that up. That’s a good question. Yeah, any problems with that? I think we should. Yeah, I will,” Trump said of al-Sharaa when asked about removing Syria from the list.

Trump offered high praise for al-Sharaa during their meeting on the sidelines of the NATO summit, a remarkable turnaround for the man who once led an al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria.

Al-Sharaa at one point had a $10 million bounty on his head and served time in the infamous Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

He then then led a coalition of Islamist rebel factions in late 2024 to topple former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

“He’s done a really fantastic job as president. He’s unified the country in a very short period of time,” Trump said Wednesday, describing the Syrian leader as a “strong person” who is “respected by everybody.”

“We’re proud of the job he’s doing,” Trump said. 

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Trump had alerted Congress Wednesday of the administration’s intent to rescind Syria’s designation following a 45-day period — the amount of time required for congressional review. 

In his statement, Rubio referenced an executive order issued by the president last year ordering a review of Syria’s designation and remarks on the “positive changes and counterterrorism actions taken by the Syrian government under President Ahmed al-Sharaa, and formal assurances provided by President al-Sharaa that Syria will not support acts of international terrorism in the future,” two requirements for delisting. 

Congress could attempt to block the delisting but the move is not expected to face significant opposition. 

What it means for Syria

Trump’s commitment to potentially remove Syria from the State Sponsors of Terrorism list would mark one of the final obstacles blocking the country from fully rejoining the international financial system.

The U.S. designated Syria a state sponsor of terrorism in 1979 — the longest such designation for any country on the list. The other countries on the list are Cuba, Iran and North Korea. Syria was designated as such because of the former al-Assad regime’s historical support for designated terrorist groups.

But U.S. officials have said there are a number of steps needed ahead before the designation can be removed.

U.S. lawmakers are cautiously optimistic.

A bipartisan trio of lawmakers wrote to Trump earlier this month lobbying for Syria’s removal from the list. But they argued al-Sharaa’s government has more work to do to follow through on equal representation for women and minority constituents in Syria and ensuring security in the region. 

The new US-Syria relationship 

In May 2025, Trump announced he would lift sanctions on Syria to create a new relationship between the two countries.

Last November, the United Nations Security Council formally adopted a U.S.-led resolution that lifted sanctions on al-Sharaa so he could travel to the U.S. to meet with Trump in the Oval office, the first offical visit by a Syrian president. 

Congress also approved repealing comprehensive sanctions under the Caesar Syrian Civilian Protection Act. Trump signed it into law in December.

The repeal provided a way for Syria to begin transacting with regional and U.S. businesses, but the state sponsor of terrorism designation blocks it from accessing significant U.S. foreign assistance.

Lifting this designation on Syria could facilitate a whole range of investments in the country, including in oil, banking, technology, and real estate — which could lead to an economic sea change for the country and more overall stability. 

ABC News’ Shannon K. Kingston contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

‘There is freedom’: Why Asian women are leaving their husbands in their 50s and 60s

(CNN) — Eiko Toyama had waited 32 years to leave her husband.Throughout their marriage, she said, she did all the housework and childcare in their Japan home, as well as supporting the family financially. Her husband “wanted to control everything,” from her social life to professional ambitions, leaving her feeling trapped and miserable. Still, she stuck it out for their two children.That finally changed when she turned 60. Her adult sons no longer needed her, and her husband was healthy – not yet so old that he needed a caretaker. It was a precious window of opportunity, and she took it.“I was nothing but happy (after the divorce). That was my only emotion,” she said. “I was so happy I wanted to run around all over the place.”Stories like hers are increasingly common around the world as the number of “gray divorces” – splits among couples aged 50 and older – rises each year. The trend has been seen in countries like the United States and elsewhere, but takes on particular significance in Asia, where people generally live longer.Many places like South Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan and mainland China are battling demographic crises as birth rates fall and elderly populations swell.The surge in gray divorces is also often driven by women – who have long faced restrictive gender norms in conservative Asian societies, as well as legal, financial, and social barriers to seeking divorce. That’s now changing; in Japan, for instance, among couples splitting after decades of marriage, twice as many women as men filed for divorce in 2024.This could reshape what Asia’s elderly population looks like in the coming decade: more people living alone and requiring more welfare support, as experts have predicted — but also perhaps more empowered to step out on their own.For women like Toyama, growing up in the 1960s and ‘70s, divorce was uncommon – and often met with judgment and shame.Back then, if you were a woman, “getting divorced was kind of like the end of life,” said Sangyoub Park, an associate professor of sociology at Washburn University in Kansas, who wrote a 2023 paper on late-life divorces in South Korea.That began changing in the second half of the 20th century as more women joined the workforce and pursued higher education. Gray divorces have risen steadily – particularly as Gen X began entering its 50s in the past decade, Park said.That’s an important demographic: born between 1965 and 1980, Gen X was the first generation to grow up in a globalizing Asia, watching American TV and movies. Through pop culture, they also absorbed American values such as prioritizing “personal choices rather than family obligation,” which – alongside those broader economic factors – helped gradually shift attitudes toward divorce, Park said.That’s reflected in data around the region. In South Korea last year, the number of divorces among couples who had been married at least 30 years surpassed divorces among younger couples who were married less than five years – for the first time ever.Taiwan has also seen divorces increase among long-married couples, according to government data. In Hong Kong, multiple law firms have described a surge in gray divorces, and in mainland China, the number of elderly divorces has doubled in the past 30 years.Part of this may be demographic: an aging society has a bigger pool of older people, so it’ll have more older divorces too. Young people are getting married less these days, so their divorces are also fewer.But legal reforms have also made a huge difference, creating safety nets for women who previously had to depend on their husbands’ livelihoods.For instance, South Korea ruled in 2014 that future pensions and severance pay could be included in the division of assets. That means if a housewife handled all the housework and childcare during their marriage, thus allowing her husband to work, she’s entitled to part of his elderly pension after getting divorced. Japan introduced a similar reform in 2007.These measures are especially critical given the high rate of elderly poverty in Asia. Among OECD nations, South Korea has the highest poverty rate for people over 65; Hong Kong (not an OECD member) is similarly high. While Japan ranks slightly lower, it’s still above the global average.And deep gender inequality still persists, despite these reforms.“For women in particular, the main reason they can’t get a divorce is the inability to be financially independent,” said Toyama, pointing to lower wages for women in Japan. “Once a woman becomes a full-time homemaker, it’s very hard to leave her husband and become independent.”“My two children are boys, but if I had a daughter, I would constantly tell her, ‘No matter what happens, never quit your job,’” she added.The biggest common factor across Asia is longevity, Park said – and how people are thinking differently about the final part of their lives.“Having an extra 20, 30 years creates new expectations,” with people more “willing to walk away from an unhappy, unfulfilled marriage,” he said. Divorce “is not a failure anymore – rather, it’s something new. It’s the beginning of a new chapter.”Iman Lau, 50, experienced this rebirth firsthand. Growing up in Hong Kong, her expectations for marriage were less than inspiring: spouses eat together, do activities together, and share blandly peaceful lives, she thought. “This is just how marriage is.”That mentality stayed even through years of infidelity by her husband. She would wonder: had she done something wrong, was she not good enough? He was ultimately the one to initiate the divorce despite her pleas to stay together; he even compared her to a bird who refused to fly out of an open cage.“I’m a pretty traditional woman,” she said. “In my whole life, I never thought I would get divorced.”It was a shock, as if she’d lost a limb or an organ. But it also made her realize that somewhere in that 14-year marriage, she’d lost her sense of self, neglecting her friends and interests to simply “orbit around him,” she said.She vowed to change that this year after finalizing the divorce, and threw herself into the world with determined vigor. She joined online meetup groups and made new friends. She discovered a love for the outdoors, going hiking, swimming, kayaking and snorkeling. She’s learning to play the piano and loves jazz.After traveling across Europe, she printed and hung up holiday photos in her apartment; it’s her “happy wall,” to remind her of the joy she found trekking across Sicily and camping in Georgia.“I didn’t know that life by yourself could be so spectacular,” she said.Toyama has embarked on a similar journey, describing herself as “full of life” at 63.She began livestreaming on TikTok, and created an account on a messaging app to dole out advice to people who call and text each week. She’s working to launch new business ventures including a marriage agency and a live events company.“For 32 years, I couldn’t do anything, but now I’m finally in my third year of being able to do whatever I want,” she said. The process wasn’t easy, but any challenges now are still “much better than the anxiety of being with my ex-husband,” she said. “Above all, there is freedom.”Both women described noticing an evolution in people’s attitudes when they shared news of their divorce. For Toyama, the reactions were overwhelmingly positive, with some even expressing envy. For Lau, they were more split – and in revealing ways.“Friends around my age treat it like a taboo, like you’ve had a death in the family – they don’t dare to ask about it, they’ll just say, ‘I’m so sorry,’” she said. “But with young Gen Z people, everybody congratulates me.”The increase in gray divorces might start to plateau when millennials – who got married under very different circumstances and social attitudes than their predecessors – start aging into retirement, said Park. But that’s not for another decade or so, and separations will likely continue rising until then.For those future divorcees, Lau has some encouragement from the other side. “Actually, this world is extraordinary,” she said.“Asians in particular often think divorce is like a stain or taboo in your life, like a label of failure. But that’s not true,” she added. “Just think of it as giving yourself the chance to see that you can have an even more vibrant life – as long as you’re willing to take that step.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story

Related Stories

Latest News
La batalla global por los derechos de ciudadanía italiana recibe un posible respiro
44 minutes ago

La batalla global por los derechos de ciudadanía italiana recibe un posible respiro

Family's battle for justice has impacted victims' rights

El humor escatológico sobre la pérdida de peso inducida por diarrea demuestra que la gordofobia sigue vigente

Inside a family's fight to keep teen daughter's killers in prison

This week on 'Sunday Morning' (July 26)