Skip to main content

Trump bombed at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner — and proved its point

WSJ reporters awarded for article on Trump's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein

(CNN) — President Donald Trump bombed at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner Friday night. He knew he was bombing, too, and he even tried to meta-joke his way out of it.

But no. Even the president’s jokes about his bad jokes fell flat, and he was widely ridiculed for the comedy routine afterward.

Members of the media mocking a leader’s dismal performance on live TV and all across the internet? In some other countries, that’s a criminal offense. But in the US, it’s the norm, so maybe Trump’s speech unwittingly underscored the theme of the dinner: America’s robust First Amendment protections.

In a rambling hour-long speech, Trump insulted journalists by name, repurposed old nicknames for political opponents, made a strange number of fat jokes that weren’t funny at all, and sounded mad at his unnamed writers for giving him weak material to work with. “Does anyone understand this stuff?” he said at one point, and the answer was generally no.

Some of Trump’s remarks were “vicious,” as press secretary Karoline Leavitt promised. But more than anything, the speech was just… boring.

And boring is one thing Trump never, ever wants to be. He claimed to be singlehandedly keeping the news business afloat, commenting, “When I’m gone, you’re all going to be broke.”

“Nobody gives a damn about anybody else,” he said, and proceeded to count how many stories on The New York Times front page are about him.

Attendees were mostly silent while Trump delivered lines better suited to a MAGA rally than a black-tie dinner.

Trump’s low energy led more than one TV executive to muse that the president had stumbled upon a new technique against the media: Tank the ratings with a snoozefest.

Some attendees said they were surprised that Trump didn’t bring more original material, given how highly anticipated the dinner was, in part because his attendance ended his years-long boycott of the White House Correspondents’ Association’s annual fundraiser.

Friday’s dinner was a smaller-scale redo of the April 26 affair that was postponed after a gunman tried to rush into the ballroom of the Washington Hilton hotel.

The do-over dinner was held across town at the Waldorf Astoria, a building Trump once operated as his namesake DC hotel — and an unofficial clubhouse for his first administration.

“See those beautiful chandeliers? I can tell you everything about them,” he threatened.

Trump did strike some notes of unity, praising the Secret Service and denouncing political violence. “In this country, we believe in freedom of speech,” he said. “We settle our differences not with bullets, but with open and vigorous debate. And no deranged loser with a gun will ever change that.”

Then he joked about dinnergoers wearing bulletproof vests under their fancy outfits, “which many people didn’t want to wear because they’d rather die than look 20 pounds heavier.”

Trump covets control of media

Trump’s remarks showed how he understands the power of the press — and that he gets angry when he can’t control it. He singled out several CNN journalists by name.

In response, CNN CEO Mark Thompson said in a statement, “We stand by our journalists and the integrity and fairmindedness with which the CNN team reports the news. Honest, accurate journalism may sometimes irritate politicians, but our right to report and present that reporting to the public without government interference is fully protected by the US Constitution. CNN will continue to exercise this right.”

Trump also gave shoutouts to media executives whom he views as allies, namely Larry and David Ellison, who took control of Paramount last year and are now trying to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, CNN’s parent company. Paramount suffered a major setback earlier on Friday when it agreed to accept a months-long delay to the merger while legal challenges are resolved.

Invoking the fact that Paramount owns CBS News, Trump said David Ellison is “going to make, I think, fantastic changes and keep some of the great stuff going.”

Trump also made a convoluted joke about the controversial changes implemented by Ellison’s handpicked editor-in-chief of CBS News, Bari Weiss: “Under my administration, a once-feared and powerful regime that relentlessly attacked America has finally been toppled. Their former leaders have been removed, and they’re now being run by a gay dictator facing internal divisions. But I, for one, wish Bari Weiss all the best at CBS News. She’s a wonderful woman.”

Toward the end of the speech, the president donned a red “Trump 2028” hat. His choice of attire seemed like a deliberate troll, given the outrage that erupts every time he talks about a constitutionally barred third term.

He also said that he was only kidding about running again. Earlier in the evening, during a lengthy digression about his White House ballroom addition, he remarked that “I’m only going to be using it for about six months” before leaving office, a rare acknowledgment that his term has an expiration date.

Losing the room

The more resentful and recycled Trump’s speech got, the more attendees seemed to tune it out.

CNN’s Betsy Klein, who was in the room, said many people were on their phones or talking amongst themselves. Others were eating macarons from the dessert trays, using the bathroom or mingling in the lobby.

“The person at the table next to me has just poured himself a comically large glass of wine,” she observed nearly an hour in.

CNN’s Kristen Holmes said a Republican source of hers in the room said to her, “Whoever wrote this speech should be fired.”

But a few of the jabs will surely travel well on right-wing social media platforms, and Daniel Dale predicted that “the silence in the room will be portrayed by the president’s allies as evidence he roasted the ‘fake news’ so bad they were stunned into submission.”

One of the most intriguing parts of the evening involved the correspondents’ association’s annual journalism awards presentation. Trump sat through multiple prizes, including one for “courage and accountability” in reporting that went to a team of Wall Street Journal reporters for their investigative work on a lewd birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein bearing Trump’s name.

“Trump quickly filed a $20 billion lawsuit against the Journal, revealing reporter Khadeeja Safdar’s home address,” CNN’s Wolf Blitzer said while presenting the award.

Trump laughed and threw up his hands in an aw shucks-like gesture.

“Her family had to be relocated,” Blitzer continued. “The Journal was kicked off of Air Force One, but the reporters continued to file revelatory stories.”

Trump then stood up and shook hands with each reporter. He is currently suing the Journal’s parent company over the investigation, and legal experts say he will most likely lose the case.

The outgoing president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, Weijia Jiang, introduced Trump after discussing the importance of press freedom. Jiang drafted her remarks knowing the president would be sitting next to her and listening.

Jiang said there is “an existential difference between criticizing the press and trying to undermine it. One is healthy, and it makes all of us better. The other is exactly what the founders hoped to prevent.”

The CBS correspondent also addressed Trump directly: “When we ask questions, you push back. You give us answers, and we push back. You have always been a deal guy. Well, that’s the deal. And the First Amendment is a done deal. And that’s what we toast tonight.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Juez ordena suspender el impuesto a las segundas residencias de Mamdani tras la demanda de los propietarios

Un juez de Staten Island bloqueó temporalmente el lunes la controvertida implementación del impuesto a las segundas residencias del alcalde de Nueva York, Zohran Mamdani, suspendiendo así la aplicación de una de sus principales promesas de campaña: gravar a los ricos.La orden del juez suspende la aplicación del recargo a las segundas residencias de alto valor en la ciudad mientras avanza una demanda presentada por un grupo de propietarios. El grupo alega que la ciudad incluyó erróneamente sus residencias principales en la lista de contribuyentes sujetos al impuesto.Bajo la orden de restricción temporal, la ciudad debe eliminar el registro público de contribuyentes y tiene prohibido emitir notificaciones adicionales mientras la orden esté vigente. La próxima audiencia está programada para el 31 de agosto.El juez declaró que las notificaciones de impuestos enviadas a los propietarios causaron un daño irreparable, ya que no explicaban por qué se les había incluido en la lista de contribuyentes sujetos al recargo ni advertían que quienes no solicitaran una exención estarían sujetos al impuesto.El fallo se produjo horas después de que Mamdani, en una conferencia de prensa el lunes por la mañana, prometiera defender enérgicamente la postura de la ciudad ante los tribunales.El impuesto sobre segundas residencias aplica un recargo a las viviendas no principales en la ciudad de Nueva York valoradas en al menos 5 millones de dólares, así como a los condominios y cooperativas valorados en un millón de dólares o más. Este impuesto se promulgó como parte del presupuesto estatal y se convirtió en ley en mayo, con el objetivo de reducir el déficit presupuestario de la ciudad. La gobernadora Kathy Hochul anunció la propuesta junto con Mamdani en abril y la promulgó.La demanda, presentada el viernes ante el Tribunal Supremo del estado en el condado Richmond, fue interpuesta por tres propietarios —Simon Hedley, Rachel O’Brien y Carmine Morano— quienes alegan que la ciudad identificó erróneamente sus viviendas como potencialmente sujetas al recargo, a pesar de que son sus residencias principales, según un comunicado de prensa.La demanda no cuestiona la legalidad del impuesto en sí, sino que impugna la publicación por parte de la ciudad de un registro fiscal que incluía los nombres, direcciones y valores de más de 900.000 propiedades residenciales de la ciudad de Nueva York —incluidas aquellas no sujetas al impuesto—, así como las notificaciones enviadas a algunos residentes. Aproximadamente 17.000 propietarios recibieron cartas alertándoles de que podrían estar sujetos al recargo.“Estamos muy satisfechos con la decisión del juez, que ha reivindicado los derechos de millones de propietarios de viviendas en la ciudad de Nueva York que fueron sometidos a un proceso del que nunca debieron haber formado parte”, declaró Randy Mastro, abogado de los demandantes.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story