Skip to main content

Transcript: Border czar Tom Homan on ‘Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,’ July 19, 2026

▶ Watch Video: Trump border czar says “I think body cameras are the way to go” after deadly ICE shootings

The following is the transcript of an interview with Tom Homan, Trump administration border czar, that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on July 19, 2026.


MARGARET BRENNAN: And we’re back with President Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan. Welcome back to Face the Nation.

TOM HOMAN: Thanks for having me.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Mr. Homan, we saw that two immigrants were shot in the span of a week. There was that one in Maine that was fatal just days after another one in Houston. We also saw that man fleeing agents in Florida who then was struck and killed by a tractor trailer. I know you’ve been trying to keep the department out of the headlines ever since that streak in Minnesota that was deadly. How do you respond to those who say what’s happening now looks like very little has changed?

TOM HOMAN: Well, you know, first of all, we’ll wait and see what the investigations- how they play out, right? Because, you know, I don’t want to get ahead of investigations on who’s at fault, what exactly happened. Because we all know when the investigations happen, there’s going to be cell phone video, there may be city cameras, and of course, then you got witness statements and affidavits from the officer, and- and witnesses. So, we got to let the investigations play out. So, I don’t want to really comment on investigation themselves, but you know, I think, you know, Markwayne Mullin, you know, took some action, and in concern of the safety of the agents and- and how we do operations, and- and that’s why he did that, you know, that- that- that pause on- on enforcement on vehicle stops. But you know, I- my concern is I’ve never- I’ve done this since 1984. My concern is I think a lot of the rhetoric that you see every day, especially in sanctuary cities, and at these protests that- resist, members of Congress saying ICE isn’t a real law enforcement agency. I think that- I actually think that emboldens some people to say, “I’m not going to comply with ICE.” And I think no matter what people think of ICE, no matter what you think of immigration law, you should always comply with law enforcement.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes. Yes, but in the shootings in both Houston and Maine, the people who were killed were not the intended targets. Have you caught the people you’re actually looking for?

TOM HOMAN: One of them, I believe, we did, but you know that happens in law enforcement all the time. I mean, we’re working, you know, we get leads on individuals, and you say, okay, well, this subject lives at this house, he drives this car, and when that subject leaves that house, you know, 6:00 in the morning, and someone gets in that car from that house, you know, they assume, ‘okay this is our guy, and they’ll do a vehicle stop. And depending on when they make that stop and and that person complies, either they’re going to be arrested or released. That’s the way it’s supposed to be. So you know, law enforcement deals with misidentity every day across the country, not just ICE, every law enforcement agency. I was a cop, I know- I know that happens.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah, but these were fatal shootings, of course, in Houston and in Maine. And in Houston, it was an unmarked car. So, when you’re saying, “don’t resist,” these individuals who were chasing the man who died, they didn’t have markings on that vehicle that would allow for him to know that they were ICE. It just looked like a car coming after them in the videos.

TOM HOMAN: Well, I got to disagree with that. No, they have emergency lights. Officers have insignia, so when they get out of that car and approach the car, you can clearly see the law enforcement officers. Again this is, these people–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, in the video that has been public, the- it’s not a marked car.

TOM HOMAN: –these- these people. I’m not saying it’s a marked car, but they have emergency lights and sirens. So when they pull someone over, they want to activate the emergency lights. A lot of- lot of police departments- I’m in New York City right now, a lot of NYPD officers are driving unmarked vehicles, and- and that helps them find people that don’t want to be found. Right, so you know, but bottom line is, we’ll see when the investigation plays out, but they would be alive today if they simply complied with- with a vehicle stop by federal law enforcement. Just comply. You can- if you don’t think you’ve been treated right and and they had no reason to stop you, then there’s there’s avenues to take them to court to sue–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, the- the family of the man–

[CROSSTALK]

TOM HOMAN:–and- and argue in court.

MARGARET BRENNAN: –in Houston said that he thought he was being robbed because it was an unmarked vehicle. Not that it was law enforcement at all.

TOM HOMAN: They- they had emergency lights. They activate emergency lights, blue and light- you know- you know- in- in my vehicle, I drive where I’m with my security detail–

[CROSSTALK]

MARGARET BRENNAN: You’ve seen that on video? Because we haven’t.

TOM HOMAN: Seen what on video, ma’am?

MARGARET BRENNAN: That there were lights. Because in the videos that we’ve seen there aren’t, and because there weren’t body cameras, it is hard to substantiate some of what–

TOM HOMAN: Okay–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –you are saying.

TOM HOMAN: Okay, well, I have not seen the videos, but I’m saying–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay.

TOM HOMAN: –our vehicles are equipped with emergency lights. Now, if they didn’t activate the lights, again, I haven’t seen that video. If they didn’t activate the lights, then it- then there’s an issue there, right?

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay.

TOM HOMAN: But I’m saying they- they are equipped with lights- lights, so let me just caveat that. They should have been equipped with lights and sirens, but I do not know specifically if they activated those lights.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay.

TOM HOMAN: As far as the cameras, Margaret, you know everybody in ICE would have a camera now if- if the government wasn’t shut down by Democratic members of Congress. There was money in that bill that they held up.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

TOM HOMAN: I think it was $120 million to equip all ICE officers with cameras, but because the government shut down, we’re behind on that.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But they got 20 million in April.

[CROSSTALK]

TOM HOMAN: But the cameras have been purchased. That wasn’t enough, $20 million may have bought some cameras, but it doesn’t buy the- the storage. It doesn’t buy the- the resources we need for the thousands of FOIA requests we’re going to get there. There has to be storage capability to hold these videos for a long time.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

TOM HOMAN: So it didn’t fund everything, but now we have the funding after reconciliation. The cameras have been purchased right now. They’re training the trainer in deploying the cameras nationwide.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Do you think it was a mistake for the Trump administration to have proposed the bodycam expansion at the beginning of the term? Because I know you have advocated for body cameras, and now you’re playing catch up, right?

TOM HOMAN: I think body- yeah, I think body cameras are the way to go. I think body cameras lets the American people know what that officer sees when he takes that action–

MARGARET BRENNAN: When will everyone get one?

TOM HOMAN: You know, you can have a cell phone camera from a witness on the side. You can have, you know, city cameras or whatever, but I want the American people to see what that officer sees when he makes- when he- when he takes- when he makes the decision and takes the action.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

TOM HOMAN: I think the American people need to see what that officer sees and hears. I think it’s important–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

TOM HOMAN: –and if you look at the data, body cameras actually exonerate agents more than they, you know, provide evidence of wrongdoing.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, yeah, and it would certainly help with reporting and public knowledge. Let me ask you about something else. The DHS secretary has said they went through public records and identified 250,000 non-citizens in four states: California, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Nevada. I know those states don’t share their voter rolls, so it looks like they’re just pulling this from public information. For those states, are you planning operations before November? And you do acknowledge that it would be illegal to have federal agents at- at election locations.

TOM HOMAN: You know that’s a question of DHS. I’m not in the loop on that. I’m not familiar with the- the information that DHS just released.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay.

TOM HOMAN: I’m not in the loop on that. I’m at the White House border czar, so that’d be a question for Markwayne Mullin. I’m not in the loop on that.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay. All right, Mr. Homan. Thank you for your time this morning. We’ll leave it there.

TOM HOMAN: Good seeing you, Margaret.

MARGARET BRENNAN: We’ll be back in a moment.

Julián Álvarez fue silbado y se fue sin saludar a la afición: ¿qué sigue en la novela del argentino?

No fue un domingo cualquiera para Julián Álvarez. En realidad, no lo ha sido ningún día desde aquella frase que pronunció durante la Copa del Mundo: “lo mejor para todos es una transferencia”, cuando se hablaba de un fuerte interés del FC Barcelona por contratarlo. El fichaje no se hizo —porque el Atlético de Madrid no quiso negociar— y aquellas siete palabras, pronunciadas a un océano de distancia de España, le ganaron la enemistad de toda la afición del Atlético de Madrid, el club que pagó por él más de US$ 87 millones hace dos temporadas.La afición le hizo pagar esas palabras este domingo, en la primera vez que el delantero argentino pisó el estadio Metropolitano, cuando ingresó en el segundo tiempo de un partido que el Colchonero empataba 1-1. Pero ni la urgencia del resultado ni la necesidad por los goles de Álvarez —acaso su mejor centroatacante— para revertirlo le hicieron olvidar a las gradas rojiblancas las palabras del número 9, que recibió una silbatina generalizada al momento de ingresar al campo (ya había sido reprobado por el estadio durante el calentamiento).Álvarez no tuvo un buen ingreso y, aunque su equipo acabó rescatando un empate con 10 jugadores cerca del final, el goleador argentino se llevó la imagen final, sin participar del tradicional saludo que hace el Atlético, dando la vuelta al campo para agradecer a la afición. El delantero se fue a los vestuarios en soledad. Un gesto que, como dice el dicho, vale más que mil palabras.“Me comentaba la gente del club, que el club decidió que él no se acerque a saludar con sus compañeros a la gente. La decisión no fue de Julián Alvarez, fue del club, que tomó la decisión de alejarlo y separarlo para que se vaya hacia el vestuario”, dijo su director técnico, Diego Simeone, tras el juego.Queda exactamente una semana del mercado de fichajes en Europa, por lo que la presencia de Julián Álvarez en el Atlético de Madrid sigue estando en el aire para el resto de la temporada. El problema es que la reacción de la afición este domingo parece mostrar un punto de no retorno en la relación con el futbolista, que tampoco ha salido a expresar una disculpa o una explicación a sus dichos durante el Mundial.Un problema aún mayor es que, pese al deseo de ser transferido que tiene el jugador, el club no tiene ninguna intención de desprenderse de él y, conforme van pasando los días, el mercado se va achicando, porque al conocer las altas demandas de la directiva del Colchonero, los interesados salen a buscar alternativas, apurados por la fecha límite del 1 de septiembre.Por supuesto, el Atleti, a medida que pasan las horas, tiene cada vez menos deseos de abrirle la puerta de salida, porque se quedaría con muy poco tiempo para salir a buscarle un reemplazo al futbolista estrella que tiene la plantilla. Hallar un sustituto para el jugador que marcó 49 goles y dio 17 asistencias en 107 partidos con el club supondría muchos millones arriba de la mesa, posiblemente teniendo que pagar un valor más alto que de lo que dicta el mercado.Los destinos para Julián Álvarez son muy pocos. El Atleti ya dejó claro que no va a negociar con clubes españoles, porque no quiere reforzar a la competencia. Fuera de España, solo se conoció el interés del Arsenal y uno más pequeño del PSG. Ninguno prosperó, en parte por el deseo del jugador de vestirse de blaugrana.Los Gunners, campeones de la Premier League y subcampeones de la Champions League, podrían hacer el intento, a pesar de que en el ataque ya tienen muchas alternativas. Por eso se había barajado la idea de que los londinenses pusieran dinero y algún futbolista —como Viktor Gyökeres, por ejemplo— en la mesa de negociación, algo que le cerraría a la directiva española, ya que el jugador se iría a otra liga y tendría garantizado un nombre de reemplazo. Sin embargo, si la idea no prosperó es porque o no hubo acuerdo por el monto de dinero, o porque el futbolista no tiene grandes deseos de volver a una liga de la cual ya se fue —jugó en el Manchester City de 2022 a 2024—.La posibilidad de los parisinos se mencionó mucho al comienzo del mercado de fichajes, pero fue perdiendo fuerza con el correr de los días. Mucho más desde que los bicampeones de Europa se hicieron con los servicios de Ferran Torres, el héroe de la final del Mundial 2026, que ya empezó a pagar la confianza de Luis Enrique con goles, marcando un doblete en su presentación, también este domingo.Entonces, el futuro de Julián Álvarez parece estar entre tres destinos: quedarse en el Atlético, ya sea para revertir la situación o para esperar la ventana de transferencias de enero; reflotar la idea de volver a la Premier League, pero con la camiseta del Arsenal —un equipo que quizás tampoco seduce tanto por el estilo de juego que tienen los dirigidos por Arteta—; o que el FC Barcelona finalmente abra la chequera y ponga muchísimos millones arriba de la mesa, 500 millones de euros, para ser exactos, que es su cláusula de recisión. Una cifra jamás pagada por un futbolista, y por mucha diferencia.“Primero, juntos siempre somos más fuertes. Eso siempre nos caracterizó siendo el Atlético de Madrid distinto al resto. Julián es un jugador nuestro”, dijo Giuliano Simeone —autor del empate 2-2— a la prensa tras el partido.“Tenemos que estar todos juntos tirando para el mismo lado, porque, si no, nos vamos a dividir y eso no es bueno. Julián es jugador nuestro y vamos a apoyarlo siempre”, agregó el mediocampista.Su padre, el entrenador del equipo, también defendió a Julián Álvarez, pero con un poco más de cautela.“No estoy para dar consejos. Tengo que centrarme en mi trabajo, que es deportivamente hacer lo mejor para el Atlético de Madrid. Si el Atlético de Madrid quiere ganar algún título necesitamos estar juntos, tener delanteros importantes y para eso necesitamos trabajar en consecuencia todos de lo que necesitamos”, dijo en la rueda de prensa.“Creo que fui bastante claro. Necesitamos estar juntos. Cuando estuvimos juntos siempre hemos podido hacer cosas importantes”.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story