Skip to main content

Tate brothers vow to fight UK extradition on rape and sex trafficking charges

UK to seek extradition of Tate Brothers

MIAMI (CNN) — Social media influencers Andrew and Tristan Tate appeared handcuffed and shackled in federal court Monday as their attorneys vowed to fight an extradition request from the United Kingdom on sex-crime charges, including rape and sex trafficking.

The brothers, who were arrested by US Marshals Saturday on their way to a bare-knuckle boxing event in Miami, remain in custody after the hearing.

The brothers were already facing rape and human trafficking charges in the UK over allegations from 2012 to 2015. New charges were brought Sunday after Bedfordshire Police investigated reports made by four additional victims, UK authorities said.

Attorneys for the brothers, who are dual US and UK citizens, asked for their release pending the outcome of the case.

One of those attorneys, Joseph McBride, has said they are innocent and has publicly pleaded with the Trump administration to intervene.

A friend of the Tates who witnessed the arrests in Miami told CNN, “I was with them when it happened. We were walking over to the fight and just ‘boom’ — they were everywhere.”

The brothers waived their attendance for the next hearing, which has been scheduled for next Monday, during their appearance in court. Both Andrew and Tristan Tate remained in custody as of Monday afternoon. McBride said they have spent multiple days in solitary confinement.

During the brief hearing, the judge emphasized the full extradition process has not been formally completed and Monday’s hearing was not a criminal proceeding.

Before the hearing, McBride referenced the Trump administration, specifically Secretary of State Marco Rubio — who has the final say on extradition requests — framing the case as a prosecution against free speech.

But as of Monday, Rubio — who retains discretion to deny extradition had not spoken to the Tate brothers or their lawyers, and the State Department had “no plans to act” on their effort to fight the UK’s extradition request, a senior State Department official told CNN. President Donald Trump is also not expected to get involved in the extradition case, two sources familiar with the matter told CNN.

Here’s what we know:

Who are the Tate brothers?

After getting their start on reality TV in the UK, the Tate brothers have gained notoriety over the years by promoting increasingly misogynistic content online, racking up followers — and criminal charges.

Andrew Tate, a self-proclaimed misogynist, has earned masses of online supporters — many of them young men and boys — with content promoting male dominance, female submission and a reverence for wealth and power.

He once argued women should “bear responsibility” for being sexually assaulted. The comments got him banned from almost every social media platform, but when Elon Musk took over Twitter in 2022, he reinstated Tate’s account.

Tristan Tate has built a following by creating and promoting a similar take on modern masculinity.

The brothers are pillars of the so-called manosphere, a digital space traditionally associated with the alt-right and hate, and populated by overtly misogynist podcasters and influencers. The term gained prominence in 2024 after Trump was said to have successfully leveraged the male-oriented podcast space to help him win the election. “Manosphere” has since been used to broadly encapsulate more mainstream male-oriented podcasters like Joe Rogan.

What charges are they facing?

Andrew Tate faces 42 charges, including rape, human trafficking, indecent images of a child and assault, according to the UK Crown Prosecution Service and Bedfordshire Police. Tristan Tate faces 17 charges, including sexual assault, rape and trafficking, according to officials, bringing the total to 59 charges between them.

The extradition request followed an investigation by the UK Crown Prosecution Service, which said the alleged offenses were reported by seven women and took place in the East of England, north of London, between 2010 and 2017.

Andrew Tate also faces a civil suit in the UK from four women who have accused him of rape and coercive control.

In Romania, the brothers face charges of human trafficking and forming an organized criminal group to sexually exploit women.

The state of Florida is also conducting an active criminal investigation into the brothers. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier acknowledged the Tates’ arrest on X.

The brothers have denied all the allegations against them.

“We are thankful to the United States and United Kingdom authorities for courageously pursuing justice with the arrest and extradition of accused sex traffickers Andrew and Tristan Tate,” said Dani Pinter, chief legal officer and director of the Law Center at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, which represents a client it says was coerced into a sex trafficking operation in Romania by the brothers.

“Most importantly, our client Jane Doe and her family, who have been victims of a campaign of harassment and witness intimidation at the hands of the Tate brothers, are safer,” Pinter said.

How does extradition work?

After their 2022 arrest in Romania, the Tate brothers were prohibited from leaving the country. But after Romanian authorities lifted the travel restrictions on the pair last year, they flew to Florida on a private jet.

They were arrested by US Marshals in Miami following the UK’s extradition request. The US and the UK are part of an extradition treaty, meaning each country has agreed to surrender individuals wanted by the other for prosecution.

A strengthened US-UK extradition treaty took effect in 2007, and the State Department has since granted nearly every British extradition request.

The extradition process requires a hearing before a US judge to determine whether the treaty’s requirements are met, but the final decision rests with Rubio. The brothers have the option to mount legal challenges.

The extradition process can take months, depending on what challenges are brought, legal experts said.

The Justice Department confirmed the arrests “were made in accordance with the treaties and law enforcement agreements governing Justice Department extraditions.” The arrests were approved by the leaders of the department’s criminal division, a source told CNN.

McBride argued that the UK’s extradition request interferes with the brothers’ legal cases in Florida and Romania. The brothers remain on modified release from Romania and have continued to travel there for their court appearances every month, the attorney said.

“There is a long-standing agreement between the UK and Romanian governments that the UK would not seek extradition while the Romanian proceedings are pending,” McBride said. “Those proceedings are ongoing right now. That agreement exists because no nation gets to trample the judicial sovereignty of another for political convenience.”

Romanian courts ruled in 2024 the brothers should be extradited to the UK once their Romanian case concludes, British prosecutors previously said.

Any agreement or understanding between British and Romanian authorities would not legally bind the United States, which was not a party to it.

Politics at play

The Tates are ardent Trump supporters, and allies of the brothers have been reaching out to people in Trump’s orbit in hopes of building a campaign in support of them, a source familiar with the matter told CNN.

Despite reports the Trump administration pressed Romanian authorities to ease restrictions on the brothers last year, White House officials said the US government had no direct role in bringing them to Florida, and Romania’s foreign minister said he did not face pressure to lift the restrictions.

McBride appears to be nodding to a “political offense” exception in the US-UK extradition treaty, framing the UK’s sex-offense charges as a politically motivated prosecution.

“Yes, it’s politically motivated. There’s no question about it. These guys went to DC to exercise their First Amendment rights. They met with members of Congress as private citizens. They met with friends in Washington, DC. They walked the grounds of the Capitol, and three days later, they’re in the jumpsuit,” McBride told reporters Monday morning. “You do the math.”

McBride said he believes Trump administration officials “are not fans of communism” and wouldn’t want to see the brothers jailed for “free speech.”

“I would just think, as a matter of principle, based on the reasons why they were elected, that they would not want to see two free citizens go to a country where they’re going to be thrown in jail for political reasons,” McBride said.

McBride also referenced his own involvement representing defendants charged in connection with the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol.

CNN has reached out to the White House for comment, and the Florida attorney general’s office for information about where and how the brothers are being held.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

El Gobierno de Trump admite que canceló subvenciones de energía limpia en estados que votaron por Kamala Harris

Los legisladores demócratas acusaron al Gobierno de Trump de abusar de su poder después de que funcionarios admitieran en un documento ante un tribunal federal que recomendaron poner fin a varios miles de millones de dólares en subvenciones para proyectos de energía limpia con base “únicamente” en la “identidad política” de los estados y en si el presidente Donald Trump ganó las elecciones de 2024 en esos estados.En un documento presentado el 15 de julio, que forma parte de una demanda colectiva para revocar la decisión, los funcionarios dijeron que el Departamento de Energía envió a la Oficina de Administración y Presupuesto una lista de más de 600 subvenciones que recomendó cancelar a beneficiarios en estados donde la exvicepresidenta Kamala Harris ganó el voto, y que tienen dos senadores que se alinean con los demócratas. En última instancia, la Oficina de Administración y Presupuesto (OMB, por sus siglas en inglés) canceló 284 subvenciones en octubre de 2025.La medida está en línea con el impulso más amplio de Trump en su segundo mandato para tomar represalias contra una variedad de oponentes políticos, y con sus agresivos esfuerzos por frenar la financiación federal en estados gobernados por demócratas. A principios de este año, el Gobierno intentó congelar US$ 10.000 millones en financiación para servicios sociales de cinco estados demócratas, antes de desistir de la iniciativa.En febrero, la Agencia Federal para el Manejo de Emergencias (FEMA, por sus siglas en inglés) liberó más de US$ 5.000 millones en ayuda por desastres largamente retrasada para los estados, pero dejó fuera a varios estados liderados por demócratas donde Trump había tenido enfrentamientos con gobernadores. El Departamento de Seguridad Nacional negó que la política influyera en la decisión.Esos acontecimientos se produjeron durante el apogeo de un esfuerzo sin precedentes del director de la OMB, Russell Vought, por ejercer nueva autoridad y poder sobre el proceso de gasto federal, un impulso que se aceleró rápidamente tras amplias acusaciones de fraude en Minnesota a finales del año pasado.La revelación de la medida del Gobierno para recortar subvenciones en estados donde Harris ganó los votos electorales fue informada por primera vez por el New York Times. Los demandantes en el caso, un grupo de investigadores de la Universidad de California, argumentan que la gestión de Trump optó por la cancelación de subvenciones federales por motivos políticos.En la presentación del 15 de julio, el Departamento de Energía (DOE, por sus siglas en inglés) declaró que “acepta que la inclusión de subvenciones en el aviso de octubre se basó únicamente en la afiliación política del estado beneficiario, es decir, si la ubicación o el lugar de ejecución del proyecto se encontraba en un estado demócrata o no”.El líder de la minoría del Senado, Chuck Schumer, demócrata, calificó la admisión del DOE de “trumpismo sin precedentes y algo a lo que nunca deberíamos insensibilizarnos”.“Trump admite que les quita el sustento a familias trabajadoras para vengarse de los estadounidenses que no votaron por él. Es enfermizo y desquiciado”, escribió Schumer en X. “Su ego es tan frágil que castigará a familias que ya luchan por llegar a fin de mes solo por un poco de venganza”.El representante de Maryland, Jamie Raskin, afirmó que las acciones del Gobierno de Trump constituyen una “profunda traición a Estados Unidos”, y añadió que los fondos deben ser restituidos de inmediato a los estados demócratas.“Esta represalia partidista masiva es espantosa, indignante, peligrosa, ilegal, inconstitucional, antipatriótica y una grave ofensa contra la República”, escribió Raskin en X. “Trump sabía lo importantes que eran estas subvenciones de la era Biden para el pueblo estadounidense, por eso no las recortó a los estados republicanos, pero sí a los demócratas”.La representante de Ohio, Marcy Kaptur, y la senadora de Washington, Patty Murray, ambas demócratas que integran las comisiones de asignaciones en sus respectivas cámaras, declararon en un comunicado conjunto el viernes: “Esta es una admisión asombrosa de que el presidente y su equipo abusaron corruptamente de su poder para destruir empleos dignos y castigar a familias trabajadoras debido a sus opiniones políticas”.“Utilizar al Gobierno federal como arma de esta manera es completamente antiestadounidense”, añadieron las legisladoras.CNN contactó a la Casa Blanca, el Departamento de Energía, la Oficina de Administración y Presupuesto y el Departamento de Justicia para solicitar comentarios.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story