Skip to main content

Senate fails to advance latest attempt to limit Trump’s Iran war powers

▶ Watch Video: House passes resolution to limit Trump’s war powers after 4 Republicans join Democrats on vote

Washington — The Senate rejected the latest attempt to rein in President Trump’s war powers in Iran on Thursday, soon after the House adopted a separate measure rebuking the president amid escalations in the conflict in recent days. 

In a 47 to 49 vote, one Republican — Susan Collins of Maine — joined Democrats in voting to advance the measure. Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania was the sole Democrat to oppose. Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Rand Paul of Kentucky, who have previously supported similar war powers efforts, did not vote. 

The resolution, led by Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, would direct the president to “remove the United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Iran, unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or a specific authorization for use of military force.”

Earlier Thursday, the House voted 214 to 208 to adopt another war powers resolution introduced by Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington. Four Republicans — Reps. Tom Barrett of Michigan, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky — split from their party to vote in favor of that resolution. 

Other efforts to rein in Mr. Trump on Iran have seen mixed results in the Senate in recent months. In May, four Republicans joined Democrats to move forward with a similar measure led by Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia. Then, in June, the same four Republicans joined Democrats to adopt a separate, House-passed resolution aimed at limiting the president’s powers. That measure was a concurrent resolution, meaning it didn’t require the president’s signature. But the symbolic rebuke of the president appeared to strike a chord. A day later, after a contentious meeting with the president and pressure from GOP leaders, key Republicans shifted their votes, and an effort to advance Kaine’s resolution further fell short. 

Since the conflict began in February, Democrats have forced a series of votes to bring attention to the administration’s handling of the war and put pressure on their GOP colleagues. Thursday’s vote marked the first time the Senate has weighed in since the shaky ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran collapsed earlier this month.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer urged Republicans to join Democrats ahead of the vote Thursday to “end this war, get our troops out of harm’s way, and force Trump to face the reality of this catastrophe.”

“Will our Republican colleagues join us?” the New York Democrat asked. “Or are they just going to keep their heads in the sand? They know how bad this is, they’re hearing it from one end of the country to the other. But they’re so afraid of speaking truth to power.”

Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the president is required to report to Congress within 48 hours of deploying forces if Congress hasn’t declared war, and any unauthorized engagement is capped at 60 days, with an optional 30-day extension. But as the 60-day deadline approached earlier this year, the administration said it did not apply, arguing the clock stopped with the ceasefire reached on April 7. The president said in a letter to congressional leaders on May 1 that “hostilities” with Iran had “terminated.” Mr. Trump formally notified Congress earlier this month that “military action” against Iran restarted on July 7.

Since then, the conflict has escalated, with the U.S. launching a 12th consecutive night of strikes on Iranian military infrastructure Wednesday. And the death toll rose to 18 after three U.S. soldiers were killed in an Iranian attack in Jordan last week, while another service member died in Iraq during a controlled explosion to destroy an Iranian drone.

GOP Sen. Tim Sheehy of Montana, a former Navy SEAL, delivered an impassioned defense of the conflict with Iran on the Senate floor ahead of the vote. Before Mr. Trump, he said, “there’s never been a single president who has stood up to Iran and hit back.”

“For 47 years, our troops and our families have been absorbing attack after attack after attack,” Sheehy said. “It’s a global, radical ideology, and we’ve been fighting it for half a century. We didn’t start this war, we did not. But we will finish it.”

Sheehy urged his colleagues to “think about the people who are deployed right now, standing on that wall with a loaded weapon, who have volunteered to defend our country and our way of life.” 

“They are there defending us in a just war, because we did not start a war with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, they started it with us 47 years ago, and their attacks have gone unanswered for half a century,” Sheehy said. “It’s time to fix this problem and make sure another generation of Americans does not have to fight this murderous, savage adversary.”

Schumer said Democrats will continue with their efforts to limit Mr. Trump’s war powers, vowing to “keep the pressure on our Republican colleagues.”

“That’s what we’re supposed to be doing here, because it’s Congress that has the power to bring war,” Schumer said. “And so it’s perfectly appropriate and right and part of our obligation as the opposition party to force our Republican colleagues to vote again and again and again until they see the light.”

Darline Graham ganará la segunda vuelta por el escaño en el Senado de su difunto hermano en Carolina del Sur, proyecta CNN

La senadora Darline Graham ganará la segunda vuelta republicana de la elección especial al Senado en Carolina del Sur, proyecta CNN. Graham reemplazará a su difunto hermano, el senador Lindsey Graham, en la papeleta de las elecciones generales.Darline Graham, recién llegada a la política, fue designada por el gobernador Henry McMaster para completar el mandato de su hermano después de que este muriera repentinamente en julio.Graham contó con el apoyo del presidente Donald Trump, quien la respaldó para cumplir un mandato completo en el Senado antes de que ella siquiera anunciara su intención de postularse. Trump también hizo campaña junto a ella antes de la segunda vuelta. Graham quedó en primer lugar en unas primarias especiales celebradas a principios de este mes, pero obtuvo apenas cerca de un tercio de los votos, por lo que tuvo que disputar una segunda vuelta contra el representante Ralph Norman.Algunos republicanos han expresado malestar ante la impresión de que se estaba allanando el camino para que Graham heredara el escaño por encima de candidatos con más experiencia. En noviembre, será la favorita frente a Annie Andrews, médica y candidata demócrata al Senado, en un estado sólidamente republicano.Tras una “segunda vuelta de primarias muy reñida”, el Partido Republicano de Carolina del Sur felicitó a la senadora Darline Graham.“Como hemos dicho a lo largo de este proceso, este fue un momento histórico para Carolina del Sur, y los votantes de nuestras primarias republicanas se lo tomaron en serio y estuvieron a la altura del desafío”, dijo en un comunicado el presidente estatal del partido, Drew McKissick.McKissick pidió al partido cerrar filas en torno a Graham y centrar su atención en noviembre.La victoria de la senadora Graham supone otro triunfo para Invest in Tomorrow Coalition —Coalición para Invertir en el Futuro—, un comité independiente de campaña centrado en las energías limpias.El grupo destinó US$ 1 millón a hacer campaña contra su rival, el representante Ralph Norman, por considerar que se opone a la industria de las energías renovables. El comité independiente de campaña ayudó anteriormente a derrotar al representante Andy Ogles, republicano de Tennessee, en sus primarias y también gastó dinero contra el representante Chip Roy, republicano de Texas, durante su fallida campaña para fiscal general de Texas.“Nos gustaría dar una cálida bienvenida a Ralph Norman, quien se une a sus colegas Chip Roy y Andy Ogles en el club de congresistas que sacrificaron sus carreras por lanzar unos cuantos golpes bajos contra la industria energética nacional de Estados Unidos”, afirmó en un comunicado Tom Mattzie, presidente del comité independiente de campaña.Annie Andrews, la candidata demócrata al Senado de Estados Unidos por Carolina del Sur, desafió a la senadora Darline Graham a participar en al menos tres debates televisados después de que Graham ganara este martes por la noche la candidatura republicana.Andrews, pediatra, enfrenta un panorama difícil en un estado que no elige a un demócrata para un cargo de elección estatal desde 2006. Sin embargo, dijo que los votantes merecen conocer mejor las posiciones de Graham, una recién llegada a la política que tuvo tropiezos durante el debate de la segunda vuelta de las primarias frente al representante Ralph Norman.“Ningún nombramiento, respaldo o vínculo familiar le da a nadie el derecho de ocupar durante seis años un escaño en el Senado de Estados Unidos”, dijo Andrews en un comunicado. “Este escaño pertenece al pueblo de Carolina del Sur”.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story