Skip to main content

Schiff launches inquiry into DOJ’s closure of baby formula probe

▶ Watch Video: FDA conducts largest-ever baby formula safety test: Here’s what the results say

Washington — California Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff is launching a congressional inquiry into why the Justice Department shuttered a long-running criminal investigation into Cronobacter bacterial contamination at an Abbott Laboratories plant that made baby formula.

In a July 8 letter to acting Attorney General Todd Blanche reviewed by CBS News, Schiff said he is seeking answers about why senior DOJ officials did not follow prosecutors’ advice to pursue felony charges against the company and several of its executives.

“Under your management, DOJ does not consider a case involving deadly risks to medically sensitive infants, after a recommendation of a felony charge, to be worthy of criminal prosecution,” Schiff wrote. 

“If prosecuting cases involving the risk of injuries or death to premature infants are not a priority enforcement matter, I have questions about what priorities the DOJ considers worthy of pursuing,” he added. 

A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed receiving the letter from Schiff’s office.

In 2022, Abbott Laboratories recalled several of its popular powdered formula brands, including Similac, after consumers complained about infant illness related to products from Abbott Nutrition, in Sturgis, Michigan. The FDA in March said five infants had to be hospitalized due to reported bacterial infections which it said “may have contributed to death in two patients.”

In a statement, the company told CBS News that “no unopened, distributed Abbott infant formulas have ever tested positive for Cronobacter sakazakii” and said the Food and Drug Administration also separately confirmed in March 2022 that “the unopened product from homes of the infants under investigation at the time of the 2022 recall tested negative for Cronobacter.”

Further, Abbott said that in four of the cases, open containers of formula were tested, and three of the four were negative for Cronobacter. It said the fourth was positive for two strains of Cronobacter sakazakii, one of which was the same strain that caused the infection in the infant. But neither of the two strains was found at the Sturgis plant.

Abbott also said that it learned a year later, in March 2023, that Cronobacter sakazakii was found on breast pump parts in the home of one of the four cases.

Federal prosecutors wanted to pursue felony charges in the case, and they had the support of Tysen Duva, the assistant attorney general of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, according to sources with knowledge of the matter. 

However, senior DOJ leadership ordered the case closed, the sources added. The Justice Department is working on a civil settlement with the company in a parallel False Claims Act case, according to a public May 12 docket entry, but no details have been made public.

A senior DOJ official told CBS News that the department believed that a civil False Claims Act resolution was “the best mechanism to achieve accountability, deterrence and protection of the public” in the matter. 

The official added that the agreement reached in principle with Abbott includes a “significant” monetary penalty, and said that Abbott’s plans to possibly build a new $1 billion facility in Ohio played no role in its decision to drop the criminal investigation.

The Wall Street Journal was the first to report on the closure of the case. Bloomberg Government previously reported on Duva’s efforts to keep the case alive, and how the case has sparked broader concerns about a retreat of corporate prosecutions involving public health and safety.

A federal law known as the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act prohibits the sale, distribution or manufacturing of counterfeit, adulterated or misbranded drugs and medical devices, as well as food, supplements and cosmetics. 

The law allows prosecutors to bring misdemeanor charges against companies and individuals under a strict liability standard, meaning they do not need to prove a defendant knowingly violated the law. But historically, the Justice Department has focused its efforts on investigating felony violations of the law.

In the public False Claims Act case, which was filed by numerous states and joined by the Justice Department, the company is accused of lying about the conditions under which the formula was manufactured to federal and state regulators.

“Abbott repeatedly lied to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (‘USDA’) and State agencies when it represented that it produced powder infant formula under conditions that complied with U.S. Food and Drug Administration … rules,” DOJ lawyers wrote in a February 2026 filing after the company asked a federal judge to dismiss the case.

“None of the misplaced arguments in Abbott’s motion can turn a years-long and widespread failure to manufacture compliant powder infant formula into a ‘regulatory disagreement’ or ‘record-keeping’ error.” 

Schiff, in his letter to the Justice Department, pointed to some of the language in those court filings and questioned the department’s decision not to pursue a criminal case.

“For such serious allegations, a DOJ dedicated to enforcing the law — regardless of the political affiliation of its Attorney General — would likely insist on criminal charges and a civil penalty, not simply a settlement that is a cost of business for a corporation,” Schiff wrote.

He also raised questions in his letter about the fact that the company is represented by the law firm Kirkland & Ellis, which was one of the firms that struck a deal with the administration to provide pro-bono legal services to pro-Trump causes last year.

An attorney at Kirkland & Ellis who represents the company did not respond to a request for comment.

In his letter, Schiff asked Blanche to respond to a series of questions about the case, including whether he had personally reviewed it.

Schiff, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, will have an opportunity to ask the acting attorney general about the Abbott Labs case in person on July 15 — that’s when Blanche is scheduled to appear before the panel for his confirmation hearing to be attorney general.

Record share of kindergartners missed required vaccines last year as Trump executive order takes aim at state mandates

(CNN) — A record share of kindergartners in the United States had an exemption for a required vaccination last school year, as the Trump administration continues to make moves to reduce the number of vaccinations recommended for children.An executive order signed by President Donald Trump last week aims to reshape the federal government’s approach to vaccines. The order offers recommendations to “give parents more information and options” — but the authority to set and enforce vaccine requirements still lies with states, and a growing share are utilizing existing policies that allow exemptions.The administration signaled that it will push states to rework their vaccine requirements to incorporate the new federal guidelines, effectively upending longstanding practices aimed at improving childhood immunization rates. It’s unclear exactly how officials plan to reinforce this, but the Department of Justice, the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services have been directed to tie compliance with federal funding.The new executive order emphasizes the administration’s aim to “maximize parental choices over vaccinations for their children,” specifically noting that states should “provide religious and medical exemptions” to vaccine requirements.All 50 states have their own laws requiring certain vaccines for students to attend school, and all allow students to be exempted from school vaccine requirements for medical reasons. The vast majority of states also allow vaccine exemptions for non-medical reasons, which may be categorized as religious or personal.Utilization of these exemptions is more common than it’s ever been. Data published Monday by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that 4.2% of kindergartners had an exemption for at least one required vaccine during the 2025-26 school year.This left about 157,000 new schoolchildren without full coverage for at least one state-mandated vaccine last school year, CDC data shows – nearly 20,000 more than the year before.The share of students with a vaccine exemption is the highest on record and twice as high as it was a decade ago. Last school year, only 0.2% of exemptions were for medical reasons, a share that has held steady for years.Exemptions increased in all but nine states, and nearly half of states report exemptions exceeding 5%, according to the CDC.According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, only four states do not allow exemptions that are not for medical reasons: California, Connecticut, Maine and New York.New York removed the option for religious exemptions for school vaccines in 2019 after measles outbreaks in the state grew to some of the largest the US had seen in decades.The new CDC data shows that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination rate among kindergartners fell only slightly last school year, from 92.5% to 92.4%, but that’s still well below the 95% coverage needed to provide herd immunity and prevent outbreaks.State authority to set vaccine policy has been challenged before but broadly upheld by the US Supreme Court.States are still reviewing the new executive order, but many – including those that follow federal guidance for vaccine policy and those that have broken from federal recommendations – say that it does not require any changes at the state level.“Federal recommendations do not change the requirements in Texas,” the state health department said in an email to CNN.Others responded to the president’s action with a commitment to science-based vaccine policy.“Vaccines are our most effective defense against vaccine-preventable illnesses,” Dr. Puthiery Va, director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention, said in a statement. “In Maine, vaccines remain available at no cost to eligible children through the Maine CDC’s Immunization Program. Maine’s school and child care immunization requirements remain unchanged by federal actions to date.”Changes to any state vaccine exemption laws would need to be passed by state legislatures, many of which will not meet again until January.But courts can get involved, too. Mississippi started allowing religious exemptions in 2023 after a federal court order, and a move to allow religious exemptions in West Virginia is facing legal challenges. Before these changes, both states were known to have exceptionally high childhood vaccination coverage under some of the strictest laws.Public health experts say that building trust in the safety and effectiveness of vaccines is key to reversing the decline in childhood immunization rates.“If more and more parents choose not to vaccinate their children for non-medical reasons, we will no doubt see a rise in disease outbreaks,” Dr. William Moss, an associate professor with Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, has said.Measles cases in the US have reached a 35-year-high this year, the vast majority of which are in people who have not been vaccinated with the MMR.But the new executive order advises that the MMR be separated into three individual shots — a dramatic change that goes against broad scientific consensus and a suggestion that could raise doubts.States have typically aligned their policies for vaccine requirements with recommendations from the CDC and its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). But ACIP has undergone sweeping changes under US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and actions by the federal agency and the advisory board to overhaul the childhood vaccine schedule — including a reduction in the number of diseases covered by routine vaccinations — have led many states to break from this longstanding practice.According to KFF, 28 states have announced that they will no longer follow federal vaccine recommendations. Most have indicated that they will instead follow recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics, an independent medical association. “For decades, the U.S. childhood immunization schedule was developed through a rigorous scientific process required by law that evaluates the safety and effectiveness of vaccines and how they should be given to patients. This transparent, expert-led process has helped prevent serious diseases, reduce hospitalizations, and save millions of lives,” the Governors Public Health Alliance said in a statement. The coalition includes more than a dozen governors who represent about a third of the US population.“President Trump’s Executive Order directing changes to longstanding federal vaccine recommendations circumvents that process and defies scientific consensus. It also risks causing confusion and endangering our children,” the alliance said.“Parents should know that vaccines currently available in the United States remain available and that the Executive Order does not change that. Governors and state public health leaders hold the power to continue working with healthcare providers, schools, and local health agencies to ensure that parents have access to trusted information and can make informed decisions regarding the health of their children.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story