Skip to main content

Passenger who witnessed Houston ICE shooting says it’s left him traumatized and unable to sleep

(CNN) — A witness to the fatal shooting of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo by a federal immigration agent in Houston said Thursday he is traumatized and unable to sleep, especially since he says Salgado Araujo never posed a threat to officers and was going to surrender when his van was stopped.

ICE, in its initial statement early this month, said Salgado Araujo rammed into a law enforcement vehicle and refused to follow commands before an agent fired his weapon in self-defense.

“That’s a lie,” Jose Trinidad Rojas Pliego, 51, a passenger in the van who was released from ICE custody Wednesday, said in an exclusive interview with CNN airing on Erin Burnett OutFront.

A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson did not directly respond to Rojas Pliego’s claim, saying it is investigating the agent-involved shooting while the Houston FBI looks into the potential assault on a federal officer.

Rojas Pliego told CNN’s Ed Lavandera he was devastated by the agents’ tactics, noting the van’s three passengers were forcefully removed from the vehicle and Salgado Araujo was mortally wounded, pulled out of the vehicle, thrown to the ground and lifted up to be handcuffed.

The fatal shooting was the latest case to garner extreme scrutiny and skepticism over Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s tactics and apparent rush to defend those involved.

“We were only going to work,” Rojas Pliego said. “I only ask for justice for him, his family and the workers.”

Salgado Araujo was behind the wheel of the van the morning of July 7 when ICE said he was shot while attempting to evade arrest during a traffic stop.

Rojas Pliego said “at no moment” were there agents in front of or behind the van during the stop. “He was going to surrender,” the witness said of Salgado Araujo, adding he never attacked or threatened officers.

Rojas Pliego entered the US in 1998, according to court documents. The Mexican immigrant has no criminal record in the US and is common-law married to an American citizen, according to a habeas corpus petition filed by his attorney.

Rojas Pliego’s attorney, Hugo Balderas-Ibarra, told CNN his client has to wear an ankle monitor and report to ICE regularly after his release from detention. Rojas Pliego, who may qualify for a visa and work permit issued to crime victims, is in removal proceedings, according to the attorney.

“Things will never be the same with my family,” said Rojas Pliego, who referred to Salgado Araujo as “El Patron,” or The Boss. “I’m sad about … what I saw, since I was the one who witnessed it all.”

Though the agency described the incident as a “targeted enforcement operation,” it did not specify whether Salgado Araujo was the target. A source with preliminary details of the shooting said Salgado Araujo was not the target of the enforcement action.

Salgado Araujo’s family has disputed the government’s self-defense claim, saying they believe he would have stopped and complied with federal agents if he had known the cars following him belonged to ICE or other law enforcement. He had been seeking a work permit and had no criminal record, his family said.

The 52-year-old father of three encountered ICE agents as he picked up the last members of his construction crew in Houston’s East End area before heading north to finish construction on several houses, Salgado Araujo’s oldest son said. Because Salgado Araujo’s van and tools had been stolen in the past, he had been cautious about being followed, his son told CNN.

No video or photos of the traffic stop or the shooting have been released by federal officials. The officers involved had not been issued body-worn cameras, a DHS spokesperson told CNN.

The DHS’ Office of the Inspector General is now leading an investigation into the shooting, according to ICE. And the FBI’s Houston field office is investigating the alleged assault on a federal law enforcement officer.

Texas Democratic lawmakers, activists and Salgado Araujo’s family have called for an independent investigation into his death.

The case was the latest in which someone was severely injured or killed this year after being shot by a federal immigration enforcement agent — and raises questions again about who is targeted in a nationwide immigration crackdown the Trump administration says aims to remove dangerous criminals.

Shortly before the shooting, agents were investigating two Guatemalan men known to be driving a white van who had previously evaded arrest and were potentially subject to deportation, the US attorney for Texas’ southern district said.

While the agents searched for that van on the morning of July 7, officers received a report of a similar van in the area that then fled as the officers tried to pull it over, according to the US attorney, Aaron Reitz.

The three other men in the van, including Salgado Araujo’s brother, were detained.

A week after the shooting, the FBI filed a warrant application saying the agency had cause to believe that an investigator — after the shooting — saw illegal drugs in the vehicle longtime Texas resident Salgado Araujo had been driving.

The FBI’s suspicion about drugs became public after a court unsealed the warrant application. That drew pushback from Salgado Araujo’s family, whose lawyer said she believed the substance was salt, used to make a homemade electrolyte mix.

Testing later confirmed the substance not drugs, according to a spokesperson for the Harris County District Attorney’s Office.

The attorney for Salgado Araujo’s brother, who witnessed the shooting, said “an unproven claim was allowed to circulate before it was tested, and the way it was made public did real damage, diverting attention from what actually matters in this case.”

And even if it was drugs, District Attorney Sean Teare said, it should‘ve had no bearing on investigations into whether the killing of Salgado Araujo was justified, or whether the stop of the Mexican immigrant and his three passengers was warranted.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Hair sample found at Nancy Guthrie’s home inconclusive as search hits 6-month mark

▶ Watch Video: Pima County sheriff says he is optimistic about Nancy Guthrie's case "based on all the evidence" A hair sample that underwent forensic testing after being found at the Tucson, Arizona, home of Nancy Guthrie, the missing mother of "Today" show co-host Savannah Guthrie, came back inconclusive and did not point to a suspect, the sheriff overseeing the local investigation told CBS News on Thursday. "It came back with no results," Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos said. The sheriff's department said the results from the hair sample were verified in early June. Thursday was the first time they shared that information publicly. Nanos noted there was blood and other DNA found at the scene that is also still being analyzed, but has so far also yielded no results."I know that there was blood at the scene and so that was also part of the processing of the scene," Nanos said.CBS News previously reported in May that a DNA sample that was sent by sheriff's detectives to a private laboratory in Florida was then forwarded to the FBI's crime lab in Quantico, Virginia. Officials did not confirm, however, any details about that sample or whether it was the hair sample in question."We have a lot of DNA that is being looked at by credible scientists around the country who know and understand what they have in front of them and they understand the rules that they have to play by," Nanos said.Nancy Guthrie, 84, was last seen on the evening of Jan. 31 when she was dropped off after dining at the home of her daughter Annie. Security video from Nancy Guthrie's home showed a suspect at her front door in the early morning hours of Feb. 1.Investigators have said they believe Guthrie was likely abducted, and at least two ransom notes were sent in the days after she went missing."Even when a case goes cold, we don't give up on it," Nanos said. "We continue to work it. This one's far from being cold. God forbid this ever takes 50 years, but it could."Other than the surveillance video from Guthrie's home that was released earlier in the investigation, no new video has been recovered. And it appears the suspect or suspects evaded traffic cameras.Asked if he believes the suspects could be local to the Tucson area, Nanos said "absolutely.""Do I have evidence of it? No," Nanos said. "But let's look at crime across the country, around the world, who by far, 90%, 95% of your criminals are where? Right here locally."On Monday, Savannah Guthrie posted a video to social media directed at her mother's kidnappers."So I'm asking you, begging you to do the right thing now," she said in the clip. "Make the right choice. Help us find her. Tell us where to look for her. I truly believe it is never too late to do the right thing."The sheriff on Thursday also addressed the criticism that was previously levied against him by FBI Director Kash Patel, who claimed the sheriff's department was slow to involve the FBI in the case."I've never talked to him," Nanos said of Patel. "No, I have no reason to. If I needed him, I'm sure I could talk to him. What I need is to know that his team and my team are working close together and that absolutely they are and they have been for decades."Nanos said he is optimistic that the case will be resolved "based on all the evidence before me.""The bottom line here is this: We know more than you will ever know, because that's how investigations work," he said.
Read Next Story