Skip to main content

Lawyer for Ohio congressman’s ex-wife seeks restraining order against the lawmaker over alleged grabbing incident

(CNN) — A lawyer for Rep. Max Miller’s ex-wife has asked a judge to issue a restraining order against the congressman, alleging that Miller grabbed him and another attorney’s bag on Tuesday.

The filing alleges the incident, which it said occurred outside an Ohio courtroom where Miller and his ex-wife had attended in hearing in their long-run legal battle, was the second time the Congressman accosted his ex-wife’s attorneys after a court proceeding.

In May, the filing alleged, Miller made a crude comment about his ex-wife’s attorney’s fiancee.

CNN has reached out to Miller’s lawyer and spokesman for comment.

The request for a restraining order is the latest turn in a contentious and highly public custody battle between Miller and his ex-wife, Emily Moreno, daughter of Ohio’s Senior senator Bernie Moreno. Emily Moreno has accused her husband of abuse; Miller has denied the claims and countered that his ex-wife struggles with bipolar disorder, an allegation Moreno’s lawyer denied.

The latest filing, though, describes an encounter not between the two of them, but the congressman and his ex-wife’s attorneys, particularly lawyer Andrew Zashin. Miller sued Moreno and Zashin earlier this year for defamation.

According to the filing, during a conversation between the parties in the hallway, Miller “physically grabbed Attorney Zashin in an effort to get his attention while [Miller] simultaneously made reference to Zashin’s fiancée.” The filing also alleges that Miller “grabbed” another attorney’s bag to get his attention.

The encounter came after a court hearing in which, according to the filing, Miller interrupted, asking Zashin whether he wanted him to sign a copy of a book by former White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham. Miller sued Grisham for defamation in 2021 over her allegations of abuse in the book; he later voluntarily dismissed the case.

After the exchange, the filing alleges, Miller’s attorney Larry Zukerman looked across the table and said his client “just can’t control himself.”

Miller’s legal battle with his ex-wife and the allegations it has unearthed have roiled his reelection bid in what has long been considered a solidly Republican congressional seat. Trump won Ohio’s 7th district by 11 points in 2024. Earlier this summer, police video obtained by CNN detailed specific allegations of abuse, including Moreno telling investigators about an incident in which she says Miller held a gun to her.

Democratic legislators, including the Democratic Women’s Caucus, have called for a formal Ethics investigation into Miller. Rep. Sam Liccardo, the first to demand an inquiry, posted on X that “Congress must never serve as a safe harbor for abusers.” Miller told CNN last month there was no active ethics investigation into him.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Hair sample found at Nancy Guthrie’s home inconclusive as search hits 6-month mark

▶ Watch Video: Pima County sheriff says he is optimistic about Nancy Guthrie's case "based on all the evidence" A hair sample that underwent forensic testing after being found at the Tucson, Arizona, home of Nancy Guthrie, the missing mother of "Today" show co-host Savannah Guthrie, came back inconclusive and did not point to a suspect, the sheriff overseeing the local investigation told CBS News on Thursday. "It came back with no results," Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos said. The sheriff's department said the results from the hair sample were verified in early June. Thursday was the first time they shared that information publicly. Nanos noted there was blood and other DNA found at the scene that is also still being analyzed, but has so far also yielded no results."I know that there was blood at the scene and so that was also part of the processing of the scene," Nanos said.CBS News previously reported in May that a DNA sample that was sent by sheriff's detectives to a private laboratory in Florida was then forwarded to the FBI's crime lab in Quantico, Virginia. Officials did not confirm, however, any details about that sample or whether it was the hair sample in question."We have a lot of DNA that is being looked at by credible scientists around the country who know and understand what they have in front of them and they understand the rules that they have to play by," Nanos said.Nancy Guthrie, 84, was last seen on the evening of Jan. 31 when she was dropped off after dining at the home of her daughter Annie. Security video from Nancy Guthrie's home showed a suspect at her front door in the early morning hours of Feb. 1.Investigators have said they believe Guthrie was likely abducted, and at least two ransom notes were sent in the days after she went missing."Even when a case goes cold, we don't give up on it," Nanos said. "We continue to work it. This one's far from being cold. God forbid this ever takes 50 years, but it could."Other than the surveillance video from Guthrie's home that was released earlier in the investigation, no new video has been recovered. And it appears the suspect or suspects evaded traffic cameras.Asked if he believes the suspects could be local to the Tucson area, Nanos said "absolutely.""Do I have evidence of it? No," Nanos said. "But let's look at crime across the country, around the world, who by far, 90%, 95% of your criminals are where? Right here locally."On Monday, Savannah Guthrie posted a video to social media directed at her mother's kidnappers."So I'm asking you, begging you to do the right thing now," she said in the clip. "Make the right choice. Help us find her. Tell us where to look for her. I truly believe it is never too late to do the right thing."The sheriff on Thursday also addressed the criticism that was previously levied against him by FBI Director Kash Patel, who claimed the sheriff's department was slow to involve the FBI in the case."I've never talked to him," Nanos said of Patel. "No, I have no reason to. If I needed him, I'm sure I could talk to him. What I need is to know that his team and my team are working close together and that absolutely they are and they have been for decades."Nanos said he is optimistic that the case will be resolved "based on all the evidence before me.""The bottom line here is this: We know more than you will ever know, because that's how investigations work," he said.
Read Next Story