Skip to main content

Meet the World Cup referee paving the way for women

(CNN) — When Tori Penso walked onto the field, her three daughters were with her – their names inscribed on her cleats as a reminder of what the occasion meant beyond the whistle.

Weeks before her 40th birthday, Penso became the first American woman – and the second woman ever – to referee a men’s World Cup match. She also led the first all-American, all-female officiating crew in the tournament’s history to oversee two group-stage games in June.

The milestone follows a string of firsts. She took charge of a senior World Cup final at the 2023 Women’s World Cup, another first for an American referee, and she is also Major League Soccer’s first full-time female referee.

Yet only six (or 3.5%) of the 170 officials picked this summer were women, highlighting how rare such breakthroughs remain. And for the Florida native, her trailblazing achievement was about far more than getting split-second decisions right in the face of online misogyny.

“This moment is for them so that they have a bigger stage when they get there,” she recently told CNN Sports in New York. “Women belong in sport, in boardrooms, and places where maybe they haven’t historically had a seat. And when we show up and we do it right and we perform well, it moves the needle.”

Every call counts

In the two games between South Africa and the Czech Republic, as well as Ecuador and Germany, Penso occupied one of soccer’s most unforgiving roles: the referee at the center of every consequential decision.

Her “rather harsh” handball call to award Bafana Bafana a penalty delivered the squad a much-needed equalizer. Opting not to punish a German midfielder for a high boot moments before their goal infuriated Ecuadorian supporters.

As tempers flared, players grew testy too. But she didn’t hesitate to assert her control throughout and booked seven players in total across the fixtures, including Ecuadorian international and Arsenal star Piero Hincapié.

“Authority and respect (are) critical for us as match officials,” she said. “A lot of times we hope we’re not seen and the game just flows naturally. That’s the best games, but the game will demand that we show up in certain moments.”

Understanding not only the tactics but also the emotions of a match is a fundamental aspect of elite refereeing. “I recognize that they were frustrated,” Penso said, adding that she often sought to defuse tensions by talking players down and explaining her perspectives.

Those exchanges haven’t gone unnoticed.

An Instagram reel of her calmly speaking to a Czech player and motioning for him to return as he attempted to walk away went viral. The clip racked up more than 26 million views and 2 million likes. Its on-screen caption read: “there’s nothing buzzier than watching a woman ref tell off these man babies.”

Breaking down the incident, Penso said two players made contact during a corner kick in the tail end of the game. Seeing no foul play, she waved play on, a decision that upset one of the players.

And talking worked.

“Online people were saying it was a mom moment, but for me it was a moment of respect,” she said. “You cannot walk away from a match official and think that that’s going to be tolerated.”

She emphasized the importance of “drawing a line in the sand” before the next play spirals out of control, adding that the confidence to engage with players and call out poor conduct requires decades of experience to develop.

And referees work just as hard off the pitch, too. During the match cycle, officials gathered daily to review footage and debate the decisions.

“The objective is consistency, and that’s what we hope to achieve,” she said.

Pride of USA

On a personal level for Penso, who began refereeing when she was 14, it was a dream come true.

“Walking out into the tunnel, the energy, the buzz, the stadium, the players, the pressure, you can feel it in the air,” she said of her exhilaration leading the teams out for the first time in front of over 67,000 spectators at a packed Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta.

Yet the accomplishment is not hers alone; it belongs to the 135,000 soccer officials across the United States, particularly the women who account for 22% of the country’s refereeing ranks, she said. Worldwide, that figure drops to 9%.

“We need to celebrate the moment because it matters,” she said. The fact that half of the six female officials called up were American, she added, is a testament to the growing opportunities in the country for women to excel in the profession.

“I’m really proud of what we’ve done,” Penso said. “At the same time, I look forward to the day when it’s not a talking point – we have officials on the field because they are capable, because they’ve earned the spot based on their performances, and it’s not about what gender they are.”

Showing what’s possible

The journey from local fields to soccer’s showpiece demands years of sacrifice. Beneath the glamor lies a personal toll that has cost some officials dearly, including their marriages.

Asked what drives her through trying times, Penso points to her three daughters, the eldest of whom is 12.

“They are my why,” she puts it simply.

Her motivation stretches beyond them, though, to creating a space for the countless young girls around the world watching from living rooms. Research shows that one in two girls who quit sports has been criticized for their body type, and Penso wishes her presence on the pitch can challenge those perceptions.

“To see a female strong, confident at the top of her game on the global stage sends such a message, and I hope that image resonates with girls,” she said.

Whenever they feel small or inferior, they will see her and find the confidence to believe in themselves and champion whatever they set their minds to, Penso hopes.

And she has already seen the impact at home. One of her daughters recently stepped outside her comfort zone to give the opening remarks at a band concert.

“When I talked to her afterwards I realized that she’s seen her mom do that,” Penso said. “So for her it was very natural to take up space and do it confidently, and I was so proud.”

Microcosm of society

Being a World Cup referee entails operating under relentless scrutiny from hundreds of millions of people. Perhaps some criticism is fair. Some, however, descends into misogyny.

“Put a woman ref (in charge) … that’s what you get,” one Facebook user wrote after Penso rescinded a penalty following a VAR review.

“The first woman to admit she is wrong,” another mocked.

A third questioned the officials’ appearance: “Where are they from? The truth is they don’t look like women.”

Such comments are far from uncommon, but Penso remains unfazed.

“When you know you step on the field and you represent something like we do, which is challenging the status quo, people feel threatened by that,” she said. Some lash out from behind a keyboard, she added, writing things they would never say to someone’s face.

But what matters most to Penso are the kids in the stands whose faces light up when they see her. And while the misogyny hardly merits her attention, Penso sees it as emblematic of a larger problem.

“It’s worth doing because we need to change the paradigm,” Penso said.

And despite their best efforts, referees are human too, capable of mistakes just as players miss shots and penalties. Dealing with the inevitable backlash is not her favorite part of the job, but she has learned to find humor in some of it while staying focused on the opinions that matter.

“There are mean tweets back in the day when you read it out loud and just kind of joke,” she said. “It’s not something I take to heart because I know that the criticism I take to heart is my mentors, is my coaches, is the people who’ve been on that field in that capacity.”

Expanding access

So, how can soccer broaden access and opportunity for female referees?

Penso argues that strengthening the pipeline starts at the grassroots level: Bring more women into the game, create more chances for them to thrive, discard assumptions, and more will ultimately rise to the top.

“I hope that we’ve inspired administrators to think differently about what is possible for female officials,” she said.

FIFA president Gianni Infantino recently floated expanding the 2030 World Cup – to be co-hosted by Morocco, Portugal and Spain – to 64 teams. It is another step up from the record 48 competing this year, which boasted the largest refereeing contingent in World Cup history with 170 officials from 50 countries.

The proposal has already proven controversial among pundits and fans, but Penso welcomes the idea.

“Some of those countries never had a World Cup official before, so we need to celebrate that too,” she said. “We need to celebrate the women, but we need to celebrate all of these wins because they are wins and they represent something.”

In her view, expansion is another way of broadening pathways. A larger tournament would mean more slots for teams, players and officials, and she hopes it could pave the way for more women to officiate on the global stage.

Straddling two worlds

After spending the past two years focused on the men’s game, Penso said women’s soccer is starkly different, from physiology to the ways fouls are committed.

“You get surrounded in the men’s game. There’s a lot more pressure in the moments,” she said. “The women’s game doesn’t have so much of that. It’s coming in the game, but not as much.”

The differences do not make one game easier to officiate than the other, though.

Rather, they require officials to manage matches and interact with players in different ways. That presents a unique set of challenges for Penso, who is bracing for the World Cup next year in Brazil.

But match officials like her are already gearing up.

“We’ll watch more women’s football,” she said. “We’ll understand the players and the mindsets and prepare for what that means for next summer.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Why Karoline Leavitt might be impossible for Trump to replace

(CNN) — Donald Trump hardly needs anyone else to serve as his mouthpiece.The most clamorous president in modern history always gets his message out — in a daily riot of online posts, interviews and rancor with reporters.The departure of a press secretary therefore might seem like a trifle to the messenger in chief. But the exit of Karoline Leavitt, announced Wednesday, represents a significant personal and political loss. The vacuum she’ll leave will emphasize her role as a vital member of the president’s brain trust.But she is far more than a spokesperson. Leavitt understands the Trump id. She’s been a leader in his second-term assault on Washington institutions of accountability — in this case, the Beltway press. Just like the boss, she broke the mold of her position. And with relentless trolling of reporters, she’s exposed the fractures of traditional journalism in the social media age.Leavitt said on social media on Wednesday that since the birth of her second child, a daughter, on May 1, she’d realized she couldn’t be the mom her kids deserve while devoting the “constant time, energy, and attention,” her job requires. Trump, perhaps softening the blow to himself of the departure of a 28-year-old he praised as one of his “most trusted aides” announced that Leavitt will continue to serve as an outside adviser.A Herculean assignmentBeing Trump’s press secretary is no easy ride. The term “message discipline” is an oxymoron in this administration. No one, including himself, knows what the president will say from one minute to the next. He changes policy on a dime, contradicting his top officials and himself.And Trump is a master media manipulator. He’s demonized, flattered and played reporters for decades. He relished the role of 1980s New York tabloid villain as he built his brand as a real estate tycoon and celebrity. He intuits the media’s craving for constantly evolving headlines and uses it as a tool of distraction.Trump’s zeal for conflict, disdain for etiquette and willingness to say outrageous things forged alchemy when his political ascent coincided with the explosion of social media. He used the new technology to inject his volcanic personality into the nation’s political bloodstream, bypassing the traditional media used as a conduit by his predecessors.So maybe he doesn’t even need another press secretary.He’ll struggle to replace Leavitt’s combination of skills. She speaks MAGA more fluently on camera than anyone but the president. Her briefings are less attempts to explain policy or to deliver coded messages to foreign leaders than demonstrations of Trumpian defiance.The president’s supporters dearly love Leavitt. Her blasts at famous reporters recall the rebel yells of Trump’s first campaign. She rarely answers a question straight — preferring to attack the motives or mindsets of reporters thrust into the role of extras in the Trump show.Last month, Leavitt sat by the president’s side at the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner that was rescheduled after a gunman tried to rush into the annual event in April. That evening, which Trump spent insulting journalists in vicious and personal terms, will now serve as a valedictory metaphor for her tenure.It’s also somehow fitting that Leavitt announced her resignation in the middle of a storm over whether the White House used reporters on Air Force One as a decoy during the president’s secret flight from Turkey during a security scare last month.Grave questions about press freedomsLeavitt’s tenure will be remembered as devastating to the quaint notion that the press has a vital role in holding presidents to account.Her operation took over control of the pool system long administered by the independent correspondents’ association. She decided who got into presidential events and flew on Air Force One. She added streaming services, local conservative radio hosts, and podcasters and MAGA personalities to the permanent press corps.Critics saw an attempt to introduce propagandists who’d go soft on Trump. His supporters cheered what they saw as an overdue dilution of what they regard as the liberal elite media.In one enormous controversy epitomizing the administration’s contempt for regular media, Leavitt — under Trump’s direction — banned the Associated Press from certain White House press events, and an agency reporter was excluded from Air Force One. AP, which has thousands of clients in the US and worldwide, had declined to change its style guide to mirror Trump’s executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America.”Leavitt’s briefings soon made the “alternative facts” pioneered by Trump’s first-term media team appear tame by comparison. She opened briefings with highly torqued monologues hyperbolically lauding Trump’s achievements. The performances were reminiscent of prime time shows on conservative TV — a world in which she’d surely find a lucrative future once her kids grow up.Tensions develop between every administration and the media. Relations between President George W. Bush’s team and reporters were often brittle. Acrimony between reporters and President Barack Obama’s aides belied conservative notions that journalists were in the tank. And President Joe Biden’s press shop was especially prickly. But Trump has threatened the constitutional role of the press in the republic as never before.Democratic Rep. James Walkinshaw said on CNN’s “The Arena” on Wednesday that he didn’t doubt Leavitt’s sincerity in citing family reasons for her departure. But he added: “It’s a tough job. It’s a job where, to be Donald Trump’s spokesman, you have to willfully deny reality on a daily basis.” The Virginia lawmaker added: “I think her legacy will be one of further degrading the relationship between the White House and the press.”While Leavitt’s briefings are made-for-TV showdowns, she’s often more collegial with media members away from the cameras. She’s usually available to reporters, and her bond of trust with Trump means she’s in the room with the commander in chief at pivotal moments. This privilege is important to journalists and builds credibility for top spokespeople. And there are fears that with Leavitt gone, they will find it even more difficult to report on the decision-making of an erratic and nearly unchecked president.Unless the president picks a replacement who is already deep in his inner circle, Leavitt’s successor may lack the authenticity that made her an authoritative voice for the administration. Most White Houses groom one or more deputy press secretaries for the top job, which typically grinds down incumbents within a few years. The lack of a visible succession plan for Leavitt will fuel speculation that Trump may just take on the entire task himself.Leavitt will always be a heroine to Trump’s base. And her influence may outlast the second Trump administration, since West Wing teams often build on the techniques of those who came before. A future president, Democratic or Republican, might balk at voluntarily handing back power to the press.In his second term, Trump often looks like he’s wielding power to ensure nothing can ever be the same again.He had a loyal and effective partner in Leavitt.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story