Skip to main content

Measles outbreak ‘slowing,’ but newborn’s family still can’t meet her

▶ Watch Video: Dr. Scott Gottlieb says measles outbreak may “get worse, unfortunately, before it resolves”

Kasey is seven weeks old tomorrow. Her parents keep a running list of the people she hasn’t met: great-grandparents in the Midwest, family in Arizona, relatives who are sick and running out of time to fly. Measles is the reason.

The official story in Utah is that the worst has passed. State guidance on the measles shot recently moved back to the usual 12 months, after a stretch of offering it early because spread had slowed. Utah’s own weekly case count has fallen sharply since its March peak. The national count hasn’t: it passed last year’s full-year total this week and is still climbing.

None of that changes the math in Abby Laskey and Liam Hammons’ apartment in Mill Creek, just outside Salt Lake City. Kasey is too young for the MMR vaccine. The earliest she can get a dose is six months, and with Utah back to standard guidance, more likely a year. Until then she depends on the one thing measles is built to erase: everyone else’s immunity.

So her parents have rearranged their lives around a virus that’s supposedly receding. No museums. No indoor public spaces. No flying. They’re both vaccinated, both careful, both doing everything the system asks of them. And they still can’t introduce their daughter to the people who most want to meet her. “There’s not a guarantee,” Abby told me, “that by the time she’s fully vaccinated they’ll be able to meet her at all.”

Then came the part I keep thinking about. To justify the caution to older relatives, they caught themselves borrowing authority from others. The pediatricians are really cautioning against travel, they’d say, reaching for the white coat to make the case. It made them uneasy. They were, said Liam, “offloading blame and caution onto systems that are already … on the ropes … in the public perception.” You can hear the grandparent’s reply coming: those pediatricians are overreacting; when I was a kid, we all got measles. They didn’t love making every pediatrician in Utah the reason a family stayed home.

Vaccination used to spread the cost. Now it doesn’t.

Vaccination used to spread the cost of protection across everyone. When enough people are immune, a 6-week-old who can’t be is covered anyway, for free, by the wall around her. That wall is what’s thinning: national kindergarten MMR coverage has slipped from 95.2% five years ago to 92.5% last year, under the threshold epidemiologists use for herd protection. And when it thins, the cost doesn’t disappear. It moves. It settles on the people with the least protection and the least to do with the problem: the immunocompromised, the newborns, and the parents now playing bouncer on their own maternity leave.

Abby kept circling something they couldn’t quite name: the scary stories, they said, of kids who “die of related things” years later. They’re describing immune amnesia. Measles doesn’t only make a child sick in the moment. It infects the immune cells that remember past infections and erases a chunk of that memory. In work led by the immunologist Dr. Michael Mina, the effect lined up with higher deaths from other infections for about 28 months afterward. A child can recover from measles and stay more vulnerable to everything else for two years. Dr. Paul Offit and New York Times writer David Wallace-Wells call the social version “cultural immune amnesia,” our forgetting of what these diseases actually did. Both kinds are running at once.

The official reports only tell part of the story

As of July 21, the U.S. had logged 2,295 confirmed measles cases in 2026, according to the Johns Hopkins University’s measles tracker, surpassing all of 2025’s total of 2,289 and marking the highest count in 35 years, with more than five months still left in the year. (CDC’s own weekly count, released separately on Fridays, stood at 2,260 as of July 16. Both trackers are counting the same outbreak. They just close their weeks at different times.)

Even short of that line, 2026 is running about 37% ahead of last year’s pace at the same point, and roughly 97% of cases are spreading within U.S. communities. Utah alone has counted 518, spread across 22 of its 29 counties, a share no other state has matched.

Genomic sequencing ties the numbers to one continuous chain: the mutations in Utah’s cases trace back to an outbreak that started in West Texas in January 2025, the same signature now confirmed in at least four other states.

The nation’s measles elimination status is now on the line

The United States’ measles elimination status, held since 2000, requires no continuous domestic transmission for a full year. The Pan American Health Organization is scheduled to make its formal assessment in November, but based on the data, the U.S. has already lost its measles elimination status.

“This didn’t have to be,” Abby said. They’re not that afraid of the virus itself, they told me; they’re angry it’s forcing the question at all. “If we’re losing the plot on this one,” Liam said, “what’s the next thing we lose the plot on?” He told me that “Trust is going to take a long time to build back up … a lot of unnecessary suffering and a lot of unnecessary deaths.”

Kasey’s parents will keep her home. They’ll see family at campgrounds and on beaches, outdoors, at a distance, and skip the flights. Her great-grandparents will keep waiting.

This article was originally published in Dr. Céline Gounder’s “Underlying Conditions” newsletter on Substack. Read more and subscribe here.

Trump will need China for his new economic war against Iran. Good luck getting Xi on side

Beijing (CNN) — When US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent unveiled “Operation Economic Outcast,” threatening damaging new sanctions on countries that refuse to stop doing business with Iran, he didn’t name the one country that could decide its success or failure: China.The world’s second largest economy has long been a critical economic lifeline for Tehran, buying up the vast majority of its oil exports – worth an estimated tens of billions in US dollars last year – in addition to other trade.Bringing it on board with the White House’s latest effort to subdue an Iranian leadership stubbornly defiant after almost six months of war, however, is an extremely tall order.Beijing flatly rejects what it calls “unilateral” US sanctions and has long defended its right to regular trade with partners like Iran and Russia. It also surmises that Washington would be wary of triggering a broader economic confrontation that would hurt both countries, right ahead of the US midterms.On Tuesday, following Bessent’s presser, China’s Foreign Ministry vowed to “take all necessary measures” to safeguard its “own legitimate rights and interests” in the face of US sanctions threats.“Economic warfare and maximum pressure will not help resolve the issue; they will only further intensify tensions and conflicts, create spillover risks, disrupt the global economic and financial order,” ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said.Bessent’s threat also comes ahead of a highly anticipated visit by Chinese leader Xi Jinping to the US next month, where the two sides could make progress on extending a critical trade truce set to expire later this fall.Trump earlier said that he did not ask Xi “for any favors” on Iran during a May meeting between the two – a statement, which, if correct, will likely smell to Beijing of American desperation to end the conflict.What’s left now is a careful calculus for both countries in how they navigate what Bessent has said will be a period of “quiet diplomacy” – or privately issuing ultimatums to Iran’s economic partners, which the Treasury chief did not specifically name during his press conference.Chinese analysts suggest limited space for Washington’s demands: “China is unlikely to accept a situation in which Washington determines what Chinese companies can legally trade with third countries,” said Zhao Long, director of the Institute for International Strategic and Security Studies at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies.“That would establish a precedent that US secondary sanctions can effectively determine China’s commercial relations with third countries,” he said.What Washington could doChina imports Iranian oil using a shadowy system that’s by design insulated from the US dollar system – and sanctions.Private, so-called teapot refineries, purchase and process US-sanctioned Iranian crude, relying on a network of ports, financial institutions and tankers that are often similarly firewalled from international exposure. China hasn’t recorded these purchases officially in years, since after the US re-imposed sanctions on Iran when the first Trump administration backed out of the Obama-era Iranian nuclear deal.But pressure points do exist, analysts say.“When you look at the upstream ownership of these entities, you’ll find many are directly or indirectly held by major Chinese state-owned entities that are heavily integrated into the US dollar system,” said Max Meizlish, a senior research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank in Washington.“By sanctioning their subsidiaries, the US can apply pressure on the parents to divest at risk of being deemed as providing direct or indirect support to sanctioned entities,” he said.Bessent earlier this year said Washington has sent warnings to two unnamed Chinese banks about their role in Iran-linked transactions. When asked on Monday during his press conference what measures the US would take against non-compliant Chinese banks and shipping firms, he said “no one is above” facing US sanctions.Despite the tough talk, Beijing has seen the US threaten – and then back off – sweeping sanctions before. And it also knows Washington is acutely aware of China’s significant economic leverage over the US, especially in the form of its grip on the global supply of strategically critical rare earths.“If Washington crossed that threshold (of sanctioning major Chinese banks), Beijing would almost certainly respond, and the political atmosphere for a summit (between Trump and Xi) would deteriorate sharply,” said Sun Chenghao, a senior fellow at Tsinghua University’s Center for International Security and Strategy in Beijing.Such a move might not automatically cancel their meeting, but it would “shift the summit from stabilization toward damage control,” he said.Summit considerationsBoth sides will be weighing up the impact of escalation to that summit, expected to be the first state visit by Xi to the US in 11 years.While Beijing will not want to be seen to be cooperating with a sanctions regime it opposes, there are careful maneuvers it could take – such as quietly reducing oil purchases or elevating its political messaging to Tehran and efforts to encourage restraint.Chinese purchases of Iranian oil have already declined sharply compared to last year as the US blockade has constrained Iranian crude exports.Chinese analysts have also in recent weeks suggested there are overlaps between the interests of Washington and Beijing, especially in terms of seeing trade flows restored in the Strait of Hormuz, which has been choked by the conflict, and restoring broader regional stability, also conductive to trade.And Beijing has in recent days re-upped its messaging urging restraint and normal operations around the Strait.In a joint statement following a meeting with Jordanian King Abdullah II in Beijing on Monday, Xi called for the restoration of “normal passage” through the Strait and a “comprehensive solution” to the conflict.Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Miao Deyu said last week while hosting Iranian officials in Beijing that China was “actively committed to promoting peace talks.”Even still, Beijing has shown itself wary of playing a direct mediator role in the conflict, preferring a position where it protects its own economic interests – and plays up its image as a stable power that supports regional peace, in contrast to Washington’s vacillations.Any cooperation with the US in restoring regional peace “should not be reduced to ‘doing Trump a favor,’” said Zhao in Shanghai.“Beijing is willing to contribute to ending the crisis, but it is not willing to become an instrument of Washington’s maximum-pressure strategy.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story