Skip to main content

Man allegedly scams elderly woman by posing as Chase bank employee

Click here for updates on this story

    PALM BEACH COUNTY, Florida (WPBF) — The Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office arrested a man suspected of scamming an elderly woman by posing as a bank employee, with investigators linking him to other fraud cases.

According to investigators, the scam began with a phone call from someone pretending to be from Chase Bank. The caller claimed that a bank employee would visit the victim’s home, but deputies said it was part of the scheme.

Authorities identified the suspect as Alberto Stanley, who they said arrived at the victim’s home dressed in business attire and identified himself as a Chase employee.

Officials said Stanley told the woman that Chase Bank suspected fraud with her accounts and that a representative would come to collect her debit card. Deputies said the victim handed over her debit card, watched as Stanley cut it up, placed it in an envelope, and asked her to sign it.

The woman became suspicious and went to her local Chase branch, where she learned that nearly $2,400 had already been withdrawn from her accounts.

Detectives said the case matched other fraud investigations they were working on. Using surveillance footage, witness interviews, and the Flock camera system, they tracked Stanley’s vehicle later that day.

When deputies pulled him over, they said they found the signed envelope from the victim’s home along with thousands of dollars in cash. Authorities also said another victim has since come forward, reporting a similar scam.

Stanley is charged with grand theft and the fraudulent use of a victim’s personal identification.

“Whether it’s from the bank, the government, even a grandkid, like these scammers might even know the names of your family members. If it’s unsolicited, if it’s unexpected, that is a big red flag,” said Adam Klappholz, head of product for Zelle.

“The sense of urgency and the isolation is so that you don’t take a moment to contact your kid, to contact your grandkid, to contact a friend. But you need to sanity-check it with them. Don’t let them isolate you. Don’t fall victim to the sense of urgency. Reach out to someone else, get their perspective, and then only communicate with your financial institution through that authenticated channel.”

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Trump urges Supreme Court to overturn E. Jean Carroll’s $83M defamation verdict

(CNN) — President Donald Trump on Tuesday urged the Supreme Court to once again step into his messy legal brawl with magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll, appealing an $83.3 million jury verdict for defamation on the grounds that, as president, he is immune from the litigation.The appeal, which has not yet been docketed at the high court, relies heavily on the court’s 2024 decision granting the president wide immunity for actions taken in office.“This is the first case in our nation’s history in which a court has imposed damages liability on a president for his conduct in office,” Trump’s attorneys told the high court, according to a copy of the appeal reviewed by CNN. “Yet, in upholding the exorbitant $83.3 million defamation judgment here, the Second Circuit never even decided whether presidential immunity applies.”Trump told the justices that an appeals court decision in Carroll’s favor would “cause significant damage, not only to this president and future presidents” but also the nation.In addition to raising the prospect that Trump should be immune from the litigation, Trump is also asking the court to review whether the United States government should be the defendant rather than the president.“Here, the president of the United States has been ordered to pay nearly $100 million in damages…for issuing a press release and answering reporters’ questions, from the White House, defending against attacks on his fitness for office,” his attorneys told the court.The latest appeal comes days after the Supreme Court declined to take up a separate case from Trump in which the president is seeking to unwind a $5 million civil verdict that found he sexually abused and defamed Carroll at a Bergdorf Goodman department store in the 1990s.Trump has denied wrongdoing in both cases.The new appeal involves statements Trump made against Carroll in 2019, when he was president, that a jury found were defamatory and ordered him to pay $83 million in damages. A federal appeals court panel affirmed the damages award, finding it “reasonable in light of the extraordinary and egregious facts” and rejected several of Trump’s legal challenges. Among them, the appeals court found that Trump had previously waived any claim of presidential immunity and said the Supreme Court’s decision in 2024 involving presidential immunity did not alter their view.The full 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals declined to revisit that decision in late April.Both Trump and the Department of Justice signaled at that time that they would appeal to the Supreme Court. The president said he would raise claims of immunity from civil claims for “official acts” as president.The Justice Department said that it intends to intervene to effectively take over the case under the Westfall Act, which shields individual federal employees from tort suits for actions taken while they were engaged with their official duties. Normally, that might put federal taxpayers on the hook for an employee’s actions, though in this case it would almost certainly mean the end of Carroll’s defamation case.Carroll claims Trump defamed her when, in 2019, he denied the assault, said she wasn’t his type, and claimed she made it up to boost sales of a book.“There were no eyewitnesses, no video evidence, and no police report or investigation,” Trump told the Supreme Court in the appeal he filed last year in the case involving the $5 million verdict. “Instead, Carroll waited more than 20 years to falsely accuse Donald Trump, who she politically opposes, until after he became the 45th president, when she could maximize political injury to him and profit for herself.”Trump, meanwhile, is continuing to fight a separate, $5 million case involving Carroll. After sitting on Trump’s appeal in that matter for months, the court denied it during the final days of its term last month. Trump has made a long-shot request for the high court to reconsider that decision but a federal judge ordered the release of the money to Carroll.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story