Skip to main content

La Cámara de Representantes de EE.UU. aprueba un proyecto de ley para hacer permanente el horario de verano

La Cámara de Representantes de Estados Unidos votó el martes a favor de una medida para instaurar el horario de verano durante todo el año en todo el país, impulsando así al Congreso a abordar un tema que durante mucho tiempo ha desconcertado a los legisladores y ha provocado apasionadas súplicas de padres, agricultores y otros con puntos de vista muy divergentes.

La iniciativa ahora pasará al Senado para su aprobación antes de ser enviada al presidente para su firma, aunque sus posibilidades de ser aprobada en la cámara alta siguen siendo inciertas.

Sus defensores argumentan que evitaría que los estadounidenses tuvieran que cambiar la hora, lo que alteraría los horarios de sueño de los niños pequeños y, posiblemente, agravaría la depresión estacional.

Sin embargo, sus detractores afirman que podría tener consecuencias económicas, especialmente para los agricultores, quienes tendrían que lidiar con amaneceres más tardíos. La votación en la Cámara de Representantes fue de 308 a 117.

El presidente Donald Trump lleva mucho tiempo criticando el ritual semestral de los estadounidenses por el que cambian la hora, aunque su postura sobre si el país debería adoptar por defecto el horario estándar o el horario de verano ha evolucionado.

Trump celebró el proyecto de ley del martes, la Ley de Protección de la Luz Solar, cuando fue aprobada por la Comisión de Energía y Comercio de la Cámara de Representantes en mayo. “Cientos de millones de dólares se gastan cada año por personas, ciudades y estados que se ven obligados a cambiar la hora”, escribió en una publicación de Truth Social.

“Ya es hora de que la gente deje de preocuparse por el ‘Reloj’, por no hablar de todo el trabajo y el dinero que se gasta en esta ridícula producción que se realiza dos veces al año. Además, será una gran victoria para el Partido Republicano. ¡Aprovéchenla!”, decía la publicación.

Muchos estados están listos para adoptar el cambio. Según la Conferencia Nacional de Legislaturas Estatales, 19 estados han promulgado leyes para adoptar el horario de verano permanente si el Congreso lo autoriza.

Sin embargo, el proyecto de ley también permite que los estados opten por no participar si actúan antes de que entre en vigor, lo que podría afectar a los residentes de Hawai, gran parte de Arizona y varios territorios estadounidenses que observan el horario estándar.

Al igual que Trump, los legisladores del Congreso llevan tiempo interesados ​​en aprobar leyes para eliminar el cambio de hora y hacer permanente el horario de verano.

El tema ha generado una intensa actividad de cabildeo y una fuerte defensa por parte de grupos de interés, como la industria del golf, los cineastas, los agricultores y los educadores. El apoyo y la oposición no se dividen claramente según las líneas partidistas.

Los defensores de la medida del martes argumentan que eliminar el cambio de hora traería consigo numerosos beneficios, como evitar que los estadounidenses pierdan una hora de sueño en primavera y otros inconvenientes.

Sostienen que más horas de trabajo con luz solar significan menos depresión estacional, más actividad recreativa y económica, y menos delincuencia por las noches.

“Hay mucha evidencia científica al respecto, y la verdadera pregunta es: ¿por qué seguimos cambiando la hora? Es una pregunta que muchos nos hacemos cada vez que tenemos que hacerlo, y cada vez es más difícil justificarla”, comentó el representante demócrata Frank Pallone en una audiencia de la Comisión de la Cámara de Representantes el lunes.

Pero los detractores del cambio esgrimen los mismos argumentos: los beneficios económicos y la salud de los estadounidenses.

Legisladores provenientes de distritos agrícolas advierten que los agricultores podrían verse gravemente afectados por las largas mañanas de invierno en las que amanece más tarde, especialmente en distritos donde algunos no verán la luz del sol hasta después de las 9 de la mañana.

Y algunos defensores argumentan que podría poner en peligro la vida de los estudiantes que se desplazarían a la escuela en la oscuridad.

Y hay algunos legisladores que pueden estar a favor de abandonar el cambio de hora, pero dicen que adoptar el horario estándar permanente tiene más sentido que el horario de verano durante todo el año.

“Si vamos a realizar un cambio permanente que afecte a todos los estadounidenses, debemos basarnos en la ciencia y priorizar la salud de los estadounidenses, en particular la de los niños”, declaró la representante Mary Gay Scanlon, al hablar a favor de la adopción del horario estándar permanente en una audiencia de la comisión el lunes.

Los sentimientos encontrados de los legisladores sobre el tema reflejan en gran medida los del público estadounidense.

Las encuestas han demostrado que a la ciudadanía no le gusta cambiar la hora, pero no logran ponerse de acuerdo sobre una solución.

“Estoy un poco indeciso sobre qué postura adoptar respecto a este proyecto de ley, pero hemos escuchado alto y claro que la gente no quiere cambiar la hora”, manifestó el representante republicano Nick Langworthy, quien representa a partes de Buffalo, Nueva York, en la audiencia de la comisión del lunes.

El Congreso ya había intentado anteriormente adoptar el horario de verano permanente, aprobando una medida en 1974 cuando Estados Unidos atravesaba una crisis energética.

Sin embargo, los legisladores rápidamente dieron marcha atrás debido a la gran impopularidad de la medida, un hecho que los opositores al proyecto de ley del martes mencionan con frecuencia.

Este episodio no ha disuadido a los legisladores de volver a considerar la idea.

En 2022, el Senado aprobó una versión de un proyecto de ley sobre el horario de verano, pero no llegó a votarse en la Cámara de Representantes.

En 2025, un grupo bipartidista de senadores buscó el consentimiento unánime para aprobar una medida similar, pero el senador republicano Tom Cotton de Arkansas lo impidió.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

‘There is freedom’: Why Asian women are leaving their husbands in their 50s and 60s

(CNN) — Eiko Toyama had waited 32 years to leave her husband.Throughout their marriage, she said, she did all the housework and childcare in their Japan home, as well as supporting the family financially. Her husband “wanted to control everything,” from her social life to professional ambitions, leaving her feeling trapped and miserable. Still, she stuck it out for their two children.That finally changed when she turned 60. Her adult sons no longer needed her, and her husband was healthy – not yet so old that he needed a caretaker. It was a precious window of opportunity, and she took it.“I was nothing but happy (after the divorce). That was my only emotion,” she said. “I was so happy I wanted to run around all over the place.”Stories like hers are increasingly common around the world as the number of “gray divorces” – splits among couples aged 50 and older – rises each year. The trend has been seen in countries like the United States and elsewhere, but takes on particular significance in Asia, where people generally live longer.Many places like South Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan and mainland China are battling demographic crises as birth rates fall and elderly populations swell.The surge in gray divorces is also often driven by women – who have long faced restrictive gender norms in conservative Asian societies, as well as legal, financial, and social barriers to seeking divorce. That’s now changing; in Japan, for instance, among couples splitting after decades of marriage, twice as many women as men filed for divorce in 2024.This could reshape what Asia’s elderly population looks like in the coming decade: more people living alone and requiring more welfare support, as experts have predicted — but also perhaps more empowered to step out on their own.For women like Toyama, growing up in the 1960s and ‘70s, divorce was uncommon – and often met with judgment and shame.Back then, if you were a woman, “getting divorced was kind of like the end of life,” said Sangyoub Park, an associate professor of sociology at Washburn University in Kansas, who wrote a 2023 paper on late-life divorces in South Korea.That began changing in the second half of the 20th century as more women joined the workforce and pursued higher education. Gray divorces have risen steadily – particularly as Gen X began entering its 50s in the past decade, Park said.That’s an important demographic: born between 1965 and 1980, Gen X was the first generation to grow up in a globalizing Asia, watching American TV and movies. Through pop culture, they also absorbed American values such as prioritizing “personal choices rather than family obligation,” which – alongside those broader economic factors – helped gradually shift attitudes toward divorce, Park said.That’s reflected in data around the region. In South Korea last year, the number of divorces among couples who had been married at least 30 years surpassed divorces among younger couples who were married less than five years – for the first time ever.Taiwan has also seen divorces increase among long-married couples, according to government data. In Hong Kong, multiple law firms have described a surge in gray divorces, and in mainland China, the number of elderly divorces has doubled in the past 30 years.Part of this may be demographic: an aging society has a bigger pool of older people, so it’ll have more older divorces too. Young people are getting married less these days, so their divorces are also fewer.But legal reforms have also made a huge difference, creating safety nets for women who previously had to depend on their husbands’ livelihoods.For instance, South Korea ruled in 2014 that future pensions and severance pay could be included in the division of assets. That means if a housewife handled all the housework and childcare during their marriage, thus allowing her husband to work, she’s entitled to part of his elderly pension after getting divorced. Japan introduced a similar reform in 2007.These measures are especially critical given the high rate of elderly poverty in Asia. Among OECD nations, South Korea has the highest poverty rate for people over 65; Hong Kong (not an OECD member) is similarly high. While Japan ranks slightly lower, it’s still above the global average.And deep gender inequality still persists, despite these reforms.“For women in particular, the main reason they can’t get a divorce is the inability to be financially independent,” said Toyama, pointing to lower wages for women in Japan. “Once a woman becomes a full-time homemaker, it’s very hard to leave her husband and become independent.”“My two children are boys, but if I had a daughter, I would constantly tell her, ‘No matter what happens, never quit your job,’” she added.The biggest common factor across Asia is longevity, Park said – and how people are thinking differently about the final part of their lives.“Having an extra 20, 30 years creates new expectations,” with people more “willing to walk away from an unhappy, unfulfilled marriage,” he said. Divorce “is not a failure anymore – rather, it’s something new. It’s the beginning of a new chapter.”Iman Lau, 50, experienced this rebirth firsthand. Growing up in Hong Kong, her expectations for marriage were less than inspiring: spouses eat together, do activities together, and share blandly peaceful lives, she thought. “This is just how marriage is.”That mentality stayed even through years of infidelity by her husband. She would wonder: had she done something wrong, was she not good enough? He was ultimately the one to initiate the divorce despite her pleas to stay together; he even compared her to a bird who refused to fly out of an open cage.“I’m a pretty traditional woman,” she said. “In my whole life, I never thought I would get divorced.”It was a shock, as if she’d lost a limb or an organ. But it also made her realize that somewhere in that 14-year marriage, she’d lost her sense of self, neglecting her friends and interests to simply “orbit around him,” she said.She vowed to change that this year after finalizing the divorce, and threw herself into the world with determined vigor. She joined online meetup groups and made new friends. She discovered a love for the outdoors, going hiking, swimming, kayaking and snorkeling. She’s learning to play the piano and loves jazz.After traveling across Europe, she printed and hung up holiday photos in her apartment; it’s her “happy wall,” to remind her of the joy she found trekking across Sicily and camping in Georgia.“I didn’t know that life by yourself could be so spectacular,” she said.Toyama has embarked on a similar journey, describing herself as “full of life” at 63.She began livestreaming on TikTok, and created an account on a messaging app to dole out advice to people who call and text each week. She’s working to launch new business ventures including a marriage agency and a live events company.“For 32 years, I couldn’t do anything, but now I’m finally in my third year of being able to do whatever I want,” she said. The process wasn’t easy, but any challenges now are still “much better than the anxiety of being with my ex-husband,” she said. “Above all, there is freedom.”Both women described noticing an evolution in people’s attitudes when they shared news of their divorce. For Toyama, the reactions were overwhelmingly positive, with some even expressing envy. For Lau, they were more split – and in revealing ways.“Friends around my age treat it like a taboo, like you’ve had a death in the family – they don’t dare to ask about it, they’ll just say, ‘I’m so sorry,’” she said. “But with young Gen Z people, everybody congratulates me.”The increase in gray divorces might start to plateau when millennials – who got married under very different circumstances and social attitudes than their predecessors – start aging into retirement, said Park. But that’s not for another decade or so, and separations will likely continue rising until then.For those future divorcees, Lau has some encouragement from the other side. “Actually, this world is extraordinary,” she said.“Asians in particular often think divorce is like a stain or taboo in your life, like a label of failure. But that’s not true,” she added. “Just think of it as giving yourself the chance to see that you can have an even more vibrant life – as long as you’re willing to take that step.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story