Skip to main content

How four key Trump claims about the Iran war have fallen apart

(CNN) — Several of President Donald Trump’s key claims about the war with Iran have fallen apart.

Some of Trump’s claims were obviously untrue at the time he made them. Some were boasts that had a factual basis at the time but ceased to be true as the war continued. And others were assertions about what would supposedly happen in the near future but didn’t.

In congressional hearings Tuesday and Wednesday, Democrats pressed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and US Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz over some of the Trump administration’s previous declarations about the war. Here’s a look at four claims Trump has made:

Iran’s military

Trump’s claims: Trump repeatedly claimed this spring that Iran’s military capabilities had been entirely eradicated.

For example, he said in March, “Everything they have is gone, including their leadership.” He said in April, “They can’t fight back.” He said in May that Iran’s “military is totally gone” and that “we’ve totally destroyed their military.” He said in early July, “Look, they have no military left.”

How the claims fell apart: Even after Trump’s remarks, Iran was able to launch military attacks on US forces, US allies in the region and commercial ships – and kill and injure American servicemembers.

Even before these Iranian attacks, it was clear that Trump wasn’t telling the truth about the state of Iran’s military. CNN reported in the spring that US intelligence had found that Iran continued to have considerable military capabilities and was rapidly rebuilding various capabilities that had been weakened in the war. And Trump intermittently acknowledged on various occasions that Iran still had “some” missiles and drones, though he emphasized how much Iranian material had been destroyed.

The length of the war

Trump’s claims: Trump initially said the war would take mere weeks.

“It’s always been about a four-week process so – as strong as it is, it’s a big country, it’ll take four weeks – or less,” The Daily Mail quoted him as saying in an interview in early March. In a New York Times interview the same day, he said, “Well, we intended four to five weeks,” adding, “It won’t be difficult.” In late March, he said, “We estimated it would take approximately four to six weeks to achieve our mission” and that they were “really a lot ahead of schedule.”

Trump also made a series of vaguer claims that the war would end fast, saying in March that it would be over “pretty quickly” and in May that “we’re gonna end that war very quickly.”

How the claims fell apart: Like previous US wars, this one has proved much tougher to conclude than the president in power first suggested. Nearly five months after Trump launched the war, the fighting continues – and he threatened an escalation on Wednesday, vowing to destroy one Iranian bridge or power plant every time Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz.

The Strait of Hormuz

Trump’s claims: On July 13, Trump posted that “the Hormuz Strait is OPEN, and will remain OPEN, with or without Iran,” declaring that the US would be “from this point forward, known as ‘THE GUARDIAN OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT.’” He said in an interview the same day: “Well, we’re taking over the strait. They have nothing.” Then, on Sunday, Trump made an even stronger claim: “We control the strait. They [Iran] don’t control anything.”

How the claims fell apart: As was obvious when Trump made these claims, Iran retains significant control over the Strait of Hormuz even as the US Navy imposes a blockade against ships sailing to or from Iranian ports. Iran claimed responsibility for attacks on ships in the area of the strait on Monday and Tuesday; the Joint Maritime Information Center led by the US Navy reported Tuesday that commercial traffic in the strait “fell to a three-week low” during the last 48 hours, that Iranian “harassment activity” against merchant activity in the strait “persisted,” and that “recent attacks on tankers in Omani waters further influenced operator behaviour and contributed to significantly reduced traffic density.”

Oil prices

Trump’s claims: Trump has tried in recent weeks to promote a triumphant narrative about oil prices.

In the second half of June, amid the ceasefire with Iran in place at the time, he boasted that “oil prices are way down” and declared that “it’s soon going to be at the number that it was four months ago,” before he launched the war in late February. He then claimed on July 8, “You see the oil prices are lower than they were when I started” and that “the prices of oil are dropping like a rock”; he conceded that the resumption of violence that day would be sending prices “up a little bit,” but he added, “This will end very quickly.” And he asserted in a social media post Sunday that oil prices were among those “dropping FAST.”

How the claims fell apart: Oil prices were indeed down significantly in late June and the beginning of July from the wartime highs of March and April, and they did briefly fall below prewar levels. But then they spiked again after the ceasefire collapsed and the US and Iran resumed regularly attacking each other. Neither the violence nor the increase in oil prices ended quickly after July 8, the day Trump said he thought the ceasefire was over; oil prices were increasing, not “dropping FAST,” last week and early this week.

On Wednesday, the global oil benchmark Brent crude settled at $94.07 a barrel, up about 3.4% on the day; that was its highest settle level since June 8. The US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude settled at $86.83 a barrel, up about 3% on the day; that was its highest settle level since June 11. Both Brent and WTI crude were more expensive than they were when Trump started the war and when he returned to office in January 2025.

Trump vowed again during a Wednesday speech in Georgia that the price of oil is “going to be tumbling down” as it was three weeks ago. He urged Americans to “just give me a little time.”

CNN’s John Towfighi contributed to this article.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

In private call, Michigan Republican running for Senate sees himself in ‘good shape’ against one particular Democrat

(CNN) — As Michigan Democrats debate who is their best candidate for Senate, the presumptive Republican nominee, Mike Rogers, has a frank private assessment of the field.During a call with supporters last month, Rogers said his campaign was in “pretty good shape” overall – and feeling good if former public health official Abdul El-Sayed captures the Democratic nomination in the August 4 primary.“If he wins, I think we’re in good shape,” Rogers said while responding to a question about his campaign’s strategy for El-Sayed. “I mean, I think he’s so radical. I think he’s going to lose big parts of the west part of the state. We think we can do well in part of the southeast part of the state. I think we’ll do well if he in fact is the nominee.”Rogers’ comments fit into a fierce debate in the Democratic primary about who is best equipped to retain the seat held by the retiring Sen. Gary Peters: El-Sayed, who is running as an unabashed progressive with the support of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), or Rep. Haley Stevens, running as a more moderate candidate.A recording of the call was provided to CNN by a person who requested anonymity to share it.National Democrats almost certainly have to keep Michigan in their column if they want to capture a majority in the Senate. Stevens’ campaign has long argued El-Sayed is too progressive for the closely divided battleground state and suggested Republicans want him to win the primary.El-Sayed says he is best positioned to excite Democratic voters and bring back groups that have drifted away from the party.Rogers, a former House member, is running for Senate again after losing a tight 2024 race to now-Sen. Elissa Slotkin. He made the comments on a June 15 call with campaign supporters when a person asked him about his plan to counter the El-Sayed ads that they had been seeing. He assured the questioner that the El-Sayed ads are “targeting his Democrat base” in the primary and that Republicans would be ready to go once there is a Democratic nominee.Responding to Rogers’ comments, El-Sayed’s campaign said he has “built the strongest general election coalition: more than 10,000 volunteers, grassroots support in every corner of the state, and a campaign powered by people, not corporate PAC dollars.”“Mike Rogers won’t be in ‘good shape’ in November, but the people of Michigan will be,” the spokeswoman, Roxie Richner, said in a statement.In media appearances, Rogers has declined to say which Democrat he would prefer to face, criticizing both as wrong for Michigan and expressing confidence he could defeat either. His campaign reiterated that in response to a request for comment for this story.“We’re in good shape to beat both of them,” a Rogers campaign spokeswoman, Alyssa Brouillet, said in a statement. “They are completely out of touch with working families, and Mike will defeat whichever of them emerges broke, battered, and bruised from their train wreck primary.”A spokesman for the Stevens campaign, Arik Wolk, said in a statement about the June 15 call that Rogers “admitted what Republicans have said for weeks: They know they can beat Abdul El-Sayed, and that’s why they’re running ads to boost his campaign.”The Stevens campaign and its allies argue Republicans have been working to prop up El-Sayed because they believe he is a weaker candidate for the general election. The National Republican Senatorial Committee, which is the campaign arm of the Senate GOP, released a digital ad last month warning that El-Sayed is “too radical for Michigan.”Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, told Semafor last month that El-Sayed’s nomination would “make it even better for us there.”Rogers, who represented Michigan in the House from 2001-2015, ran for Senate in 2024 and lost to Slotkin by about 19,000 votes, even as President Donald Trump carried the state. Trump quickly got behind Rogers in his comeback campaign.“We’re going to win Michigan by turning out people who have already voted for us,” Rogers told supporters on the call. “We have enough votes in the bank to win this race. We have enough people who voted for Mike Rogers. If we just get them to turn out, we’re going to win.”That is a huge difference with Democrats, who have been stuck in a contentious, expensive nominating battle for months. Until recently, their primary also featured a third serious candidate, state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, who dropped out earlier this month.Stevens and El-Sayed have especially clashed over the US relationship with Israel, with a super PAC affiliated with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee spending tens of millions of dollars on Stevens’ behalf. El-Sayed has shown more strength with his campaign’s fundraising, outraising Stevens in the second quarter and announcing Wednesday he has already raised more than $3.3 million this month.Rogers and his campaign’s political director, Liam Putz, spoke repeatedly on last month’s call about the benefits of running unopposed in the GOP primary while Democrats duke it out.“What we’re trying to do is let them go at each other while we’re building this team up over the summer,” Rogers said.While Rogers made a passing reference to Stevens, he appeared more animated by El-Sayed. Rogers said El-Sayed is a democratic socialist – a label the Democrat has rejected – and “doesn’t believe in the free-enterprise system.”“I don’t think he likes America, candidly. He doesn’t demonstrate he does. He hung out with a guy who believed that we deserved 9/11 as Americans,” Rogers said, referring to El-Sayed’s campaigning with Hasan Piker, a popular far-left Twitch streamer who has said he regretted his comment about the September 11 attacks. Piker has also been criticized by both parties for remarks about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including saying that he believes Hamas is “1,000 times better than Israel.”Richner, El-Sayed’s spokeswoman, responded to Rogers’ charge by pointing to a recent campaign event where El-Sayed led chants of “USA!” after far-right provocateur Jake Lang disrupted the program.“Does this look like a candidate that hates America?” Richner asked.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story