Skip to main content

How Democrats could pick a new Maine Senate nominee to replace Graham Platner

▶ Watch Video: Graham Platner drops out of Senate race amid new sexual assault allegation

Washington — Democrats are facing a rapidly closing window to replace Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner, who dropped out of the race Wednesday following a sexual assault allegation.

At stake is one of the most closely watched and heavily contested Senate races of the year, as national Democrats seek to deny Republican Sen. Susan Collins a sixth term.

Platner’s insurgent campaign collapsed just days after a Maine woman he previously dated, Jenny Racicot, told Politico and CNN that Platner raped her in 2021 — an allegation he denied. Almost immediately, he faced calls to step aside from the Maine Democratic Party and top national Democrats, including figures who supported him through prior scandals

Even before Platner dropped out, several high-profile Maine Democrats hinted that they’re interested in replacing him on the ballot, and some former Platner allies began making the case that he should be replaced with a fellow progressive. The Maine Democratic Party accused Platner’s campaign of trying to “manipulate” the succession process.

The party will now have less than three weeks to pick a new candidate to go up against Collins. The exact process is not clear, but state Democratic officials have promised “transparency” — and say Platner himself will not be involved.

How could Platner be replaced?

Under state law, Platner had until Monday afternoon to withdraw from the race and remove his name from the general election ballot. Since he met that deadline, the Maine Democratic Party can replace him, but it must make a decision by July 27 at 5 p.m.

“If a political party makes a replacement nomination for the general election by the deadline,” the law says, “the Secretary of State shall produce new general election ballots or amend or supplement general election ballots already printed.” 

State law does not delineate how the party should choose a replacement. The Maine Democratic Party announced Wednesday it would hold a nominating convention to select a nominee, but it did not lay out a timeline or information on how the convention will work, saying it would announce more details “soon.” 

“We will keep the public informed throughout the process — transparency is of the utmost importance,” it said in a statement.

Candidates must file paperwork declaring their intent to seek the nomination by July 15, the party said late Thursday. The requirements include written statements from the candidate and at least 500 signatures from Democratic voters, with at least 50 signatures apiece from eight of Maine’s 16 counties.

In Maine politics, the sudden need to replace a nominee for statewide office appears to be unprecedented, Dan Shea, a political science professor at Colby College in Waterville, Maine, told CBS News. But national Democrats struggled with a similar dilemma two years ago, when former President Joe Biden dropped his reelection bid and was replaced by then-Vice President Kamala Harris.

“I think Maine Democrats are keeping in mind some of the controversy surrounding the … very narrow process leading to Kamala Harris’s nomination — the very quick, truncated process,” Shea said.

Who will replace Platner?

It’s unclear who the party will choose to replace Platner, who won last month’s primary with 72% of the vote. His top rival for the Democratic Senate nomination was outgoing Gov. Janet Mills, but she suspended her campaign before the primary election, and it’s not certain that the 78-year-old governor is interested in reentering the fray or would be viewed as a top contender.

The Democratic primary for governor was far more crowded, and some watchers of Maine politics told CBS News a few of the candidates who came up short in that race could be near the top of the list to replace Platner as Senate nominee. 

Three of those former gubernatorial candidates have already expressed interest: Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, former state Senate President Troy Jackson and former Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention Director Nirav Shah.

Jackson — a former Platner ally whose gubernatorial bid was backed by independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont — announced “I’m in” less than an hour after Platner dropped out. In a post on X, Jackson said “Maine deserves a Senator that will fight for working families.”

Bellows, who previously ran against Collins in 2014, announced her candidacy Thursday. 

“The people of Maine have been building a movement that deserves to continue all the way to November when we beat Susan Collins,” she said in a statement. 

Shah announced Thursday morning that he is throwing his hat in the ring. Shah told “CBS Mornings” on Thursday that Democrats are “feeling 1,000 emotions at once,” but “the one that is overriding is the eagerness and the commitment to defeating Susan Collins in the fall.” 

On Tuesday, Shah posted on social media that his team has “received hundreds of encouraging messages” in a statement that laid out his platform. Shah argued a new nominee should be chosen through a “transparent and open” process with at least one televised debate.

Another name that has circulated is state Rep. Valli Geiger, a former Platner supporter. Geiger told local TV station WMTW on Wednesday that Platner called her two days earlier and said he wanted to throw his support behind her. Platner has not publicly backed Geiger or any other potential replacement candidate.

Some former Senate candidates have also publicly entertained the idea of jumping in.

Maine Beer Company cofounder Dan Kleban, who launched a Senate campaign last year before abandoning it, announced Wednesday that he’s “in to replace Platner.” He wrote in a statement before Platner dropped out: “I’ve been overwhelmed by the countless calls from Mainers encouraging me to consider this race.”

Former U.S. House staffer Jordan Wood, a Lewiston native, announced on Thursday that he is seeking the nomination. Wood briefly ran for Senate last year before dropping out to run to replace Democratic Rep. Jared Golden in the House, a race he lost to State Auditor Matt Dunlap. (Golden’s team has told several news outlets he’s not interested in replacing Platner.)

Former House candidate Paige Loud and former Senate candidate David Costello have also signaled they plan to run.

Actor Patrick Dempsey, another Lewiston native who founded the Dempsey Center for cancer care, said Wednesday that he will not be seeking the nomination. In an op-ed in the Portland Press Herald, he called the speculation “flattering” but wrote that ultimately he is opting not to run. 

“Not because public service isn’t honorable — it absolutely is,” Dempsey wrote. “But because I believe I can contribute more effectively through the life I’ve already built.”

Will Platner have a say in his successor?

The Maine Democratic Party says no.

Shortly after the party called for Platner to drop out of the race, Executive Director Devon Murphy-Anderson wrote in a statement: “In no scenario is there a legal possibility for a nominee to be selected by an individual campaign.”

Murphy-Anderson was more forceful late Tuesday, saying in a video that Platner’s team “has repeatedly reached out to us in an attempt to put their thumb on the scale of what this process looks like.”

“We have repeatedly reiterated to Graham Platner’s team that they have no role in determining our next Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate, nor in determining what this process looks like,” she said.

A Platner campaign spokesperson quickly fired back, denying that the campaign had tried to put its “finger on the scale” but arguing that Platner “would want to make sure the voters and volunteers make this decision — not the political establishment.”

In a mass text to supporters Wednesday, the campaign accused the party of trying to prevent their “movement” from having any say in who the candidate will be.

In a video Wednesday announcing the end of his campaign, Platner called for an “open, transparent and democratic” process that isn’t controlled by “party apparatchiks.”

Some of the national progressive groups that supported Platner before the sexual assault accusation came to light have argued the next nominee should broadly share Platner’s politics and outsider image.

“To the Democratic establishment: this is not your opening,” Our Revolution Executive Director Joseph Geevarghese wrote Monday evening. The group, which has its roots in Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign, specifically warned against picking a “status-quo candidate” like Mills.

The Progressive Change Campaign Committee said in a statement shortly after Platner dropped out that the party “should immediately make clear that they will honor the record turnout in June’s primary — and the appetite for a candidate with a bold economic vision for working Americans — by running an open process that all Maine Democrats can participate in.”

One high-profile former Platner supporter — Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California — was more explicit, arguing Jackson should get the nomination because he “has spent his life standing up for … progressive values.”

But state Sen. Joe Baldacci argued on social media the new Democratic candidate “has to be someone who is independent minded from Platner, otherwise they will be viewed by voters as a protege.” Baldacci, who previously ran for the Democratic nomination to replace Golden, has said he isn’t personally interested in replacing Platner.

Do Democrats still have a chance of beating Susan Collins?

The Democratic nominee will face Collins, a moderate Republican who has long vexed her opponents in the blue-leaning state. 

In 2020, Collins defeated Democratic nominee Sara Gideon by an 8.6-point margin even as Biden won statewide in Maine by nine points, and six years earlier, Collins defeated Bellows by more than 30 points. Collins sits on the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee, and her campaigns usually zero in on the federal funding that she has secured for Maine.

Ronald Schmidt, a political science professor at the University of Southern Maine, said he thinks Collins will be “very difficult to beat” regardless of the eventual Democratic nominee.

“Sen. Collins is very, very good at running for reelection,” said Schmidt. “She’s got a group of people who, although they aren’t necessarily in her party or … aren’t necessarily huge fans of hers, think she can do the job, and so they vote for her again and again and again.”

Schmidt believes Democrats could still mount a competitive challenge to Collins even after swapping out Platner at the last minute, though he said it’s still an open question whether the party can “summon up the energy they need to get the big turnout that it would take to dislodge Susan Collins.”

Shea said he thinks an exit by Platner could make defeating Collins more likely. He argued that many Maine voters were “interested in making a change” from Collins and agreed with Platner’s political views, but “worried a lot about Graham Platner’s character.”

“My sense is that it may be a blessing in disguise,” he said.

Psicólogo duda de la declaración de Lindsay Clancy sobre alucinaciones mientras el juez rechaza el pedido de anular el juicio

Un psicólogo testificó que Lindsay Clancy mató a sus hijos en enero de 2023 porque planeaba suicidarse y “quería que sus hijos estuvieran ‘con’ ella para que no fueran separados (y) no tuvieran que sufrir después de que ella se fuera”.Kirk Heilbrun examinó a Clancy durante tres días en abril y realizó pruebas psiquiátricas mientras intentaba comprender su motivación para los asesinatos.Dijo que había algunos indicios de que ella padeció una psicosis aguda, principalmente su propia afirmación de que oyó una voz masculina que le decía que se matara y matara a sus hijos. Pero no informó haber oído esa voz en ningún momento antes de los asesinatos o después.“Por decirlo suavemente, ese sería un patrón o una manifestación muy, muy inusual de cómo ocurren este tipo de cosas”, dijo.Aseguró que “siempre es muy cuidadoso” cuando alguien afirma haber experimentado un síntoma únicamente cuando comete un delito.“Ofrece una manera conveniente de reducir la propia culpabilidad. Siempre es posible, pero, como dije, me parece muy, muy poco frecuente”, afirmó.El testimonio del psicólogo se produjo este lunes durante la presentación de pruebas de refutación de la fiscalía, cuando el juicio por triple asesinato se acerca a su conclusión. Su testimonio terminó abruptamente por ese día después de que mencionara la religión católica de Clancy, lo que provocó duras palabras del juez y una petición de la defensa para anular el juicio.Es probable que los últimos testigos de la fiscalía terminen este martes y se espera que los alegatos finales tengan lugar el miércoles, dijo el juez. Advirtió que el calendario está sujeto a cambios.Clancy, de 36 años, se ha declarado inocente por razón de demencia de tres cargos de asesinato por las muertes de sus hijos Cora, de cinco años; Dawson, de tres; y Callan, de ocho meses.Los fiscales argumentaron que Clancy “actuó de forma intencionada, racional y rápida” cuando estranguló a sus tres hijos e intentó suicidarse en su casa de Duxbury, Massachusetts, el 24 de enero de 2023. Han reconocido que ella tenía problemas de salud mental, pero afirman que aun así sabía distinguir entre el bien y el mal cuando mató a sus hijos.Sin embargo, su abogado defensor ha argumentado que ella no es “penalmente responsable” porque se encontraba en medio de un episodio psicótico derivado de una enfermedad mental posparto. Un experto en psiquiatría testificó la semana pasada a favor de la defensa que Clancy no comprendía que sus acciones eran incorrectas en ese momento.En el testimonio del lunes, Heilbrun dijo que los relatos de Clancy sobre una voz masculina fueron inconsistentes a lo largo del tiempo. Afirmó que la voz era más congruente con un pensamiento intrusivo no deseado, algo que ella había estado experimentando durante meses, que con una alucinación imperativa.Después de su intento de suicidio, por ejemplo, lo primero que Clancy le dijo a quien entonces era su esposo, Patrick Clancy, fue que había intentado suicidarse.“Si realmente hubiera experimentado esta alucinación imperativa, podría haber dicho algo como ‘hice lo que tenía que hacer’ o ‘hice lo que dijo la voz’”, testificó Heilbrun.En cambio, el psicólogo describió los asesinatos como “filicidio altruista”, es decir, el acto de matar a los propios hijos por amor. A Clancy no le gustaba alejarse de sus hijos, ya fuera por trabajo, por la escuela o para salir en pareja, testificó.“Cuando decidió en algún momento que iba a poner fin a (su vida), tuvo que responder a la pregunta de qué hacer con los niños, y no quería dejarlos, y estaba convencida de que sufrirían sin ella”, testificó Heilbrun.El testimonio de Heilbrun se interrumpió abruptamente el lunes por la tarde después de que aludiera a la religión católica romana de Clancy.Clancy dijo “Vayan con Dios” mientras estrangulaba a sus hijos, según le contó a un psiquiatra, de acuerdo con el testimonio de la semana pasada, y Heilbrun mencionó esa frase al explicar su estado mental. “Fue criada como católica, y esto, según entiendo las consideraciones católicas, no es necesariamente lo que sucede, pero cuando le pregunté al respecto: ‘¿No es el suicidio un pecado mortal?’”Las partes se acercaron inmediatamente al estrado para hablar en privado. Después, el abogado defensor Kevin Reddington solicitó la anulación del juicio, alegando “conducta indebida intencional por parte de la fiscalía” al “introducir la fe católica romana en este juicio”.Los fiscales se opusieron a la anulación del juicio y dijeron que el comentario de Heilbrun no fue intencional. Los fiscales no le habían preguntado sobre religión y, por lo tanto, argumentaron que no hubo conducta indebida intencional de su parte.Finalmente, el juez Sullivan rechazó la solicitud de anulación del juicio, pero indicó a los miembros del jurado que ignoraran el testimonio de Heilbrun sobre la fe de Clancy y la teología católica.“La religión en la que fue criada la acusada es, sin duda, un ámbito de testimonio inapropiado”, dijo Sullivan. “Debe eliminarse del acta. No debe tomarse en consideración”.Varios miembros del jurado asentían mientras Sullivan les daba las instrucciones.Esta es la segunda vez durante este juicio que se aborda la idea de un “pecado mortal”.La semana pasada, la fiscalía preguntó a la exsuegra de Clancy, Susan Clancy, si “sabía que el asesinato se considera un pecado mortal”. El juez convocó inmediatamente una conversación privada junto al estrado e indicó al jurado que no tomara en consideración esa pregunta.Con información de Nicki Brown, de CNN, desde Plymouth, Massachusetts, mientras que Eric Levenson informó y escribió este artículo en Nueva York.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story