Skip to main content

Homan says ‘I think body cameras are the way to go’ after ICE shootings

▶ Watch Video: Trump border czar says “I think body cameras are the way to go” after deadly ICE shootings

White House border czar Tom Homan said on Sunday, “I think body cameras are the way to go,” after fatal shootings by federal officers in Texas and Maine earlier this month.

“I think body cameras let the American people know what that officer sees when he takes that action,” Homan said on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.”

On July 7, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and killed a Mexican national in Houston who had lived in the U.S. for decades. Days later, an ICE officer shot and killed a Colombian man in Biddeford, Maine. In both cases, the immigration personnel involved in the shootings were not wearing body cameras.

Homan said Sunday that “you can have a cellphone camera from a witness on the side, you can have, you know, city cameras or whatever. But I want the American people to see what that officer sees when he makes the decision and takes an action.”

“I think the American people need to see what that officer sees and hears,” Homan added. “I think it’s important.”

Homan has previously advocated for body cameras. And last week, the Department of Homeland Security announced that every Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrest team will have at least one officer equipped with a camera going forward. DHS said shortly after the Houston shooting that body cameras had been deployed to more than half of ICE’s field offices, with the remaining offices set to receive them within 60 days.

The body cameras issue was part of negotiations between Senate Democrats and Republicans during a shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security earlier this year. At the time, Democrats refused to fund the department as they sought reforms to the administration’s immigration enforcement operation following two deadly shootings by federal agents in Minneapolis in January. 

During the negotiations over immigration enforcement, the Trump administration signaled openness to expanding the use of body cameras. But negotiations ultimately fell apart. Democrats eventually opted to approve funding for the rest of the department in April, which included $20 million for body cameras, while Republicans later approved a roughly $70 billion package unilaterally to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol through the end of the Trump administration.

Homan on Sunday pointed to the DHS shutdown, claiming, “Everybody in ICE would have a camera now if the government wasn’t shut down by Democratic members of Congress.”

“There was money in that bill that they held up,” he said. “But because the government shut down, we’re behind on that.”

Democratic lawmakers have criticized DHS’s slow rollout of body cameras, given the funding approved in April, along with the “big, beautiful bill” passed last year. But Homan said the $20 million the department received earlier this year “wasn’t enough.”

“It didn’t fund everything, but now we have the funding after reconciliation,” Homan said, referring to the $70 billion package passed in June. “The cameras have been purchased, right now they’re training the trainer in deploying the cameras nationwide.”

The shootings in Texas and Maine have drawn renewed scrutiny on ICE’s practices. Homan said “we got to let the investigations play out,” but he noted that DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin “took some action in concern of the safety of the agents and how we do operations” with a pause on vehicle stops. President Trump overturned that suspension on Wednesday. Both men were shot during attempted vehicle stops, and DHS has acknowledged that they were not the intended targets of the immigration operations.

Homan said more broadly, he’s concerned about rhetoric, pointing to statements, including from members of Congress, encouraging people to resist Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He said “I actually think that emboldens some people to say, ‘I’m not going to comply with ICE.'”

“And I think no matter what people think of ICE, no matter what you think of immigration law, you should always comply with law enforcement,” Homan said. 

Homan said even unmarked law enforcement vehicles are equipped with emergency lights and sirens, along with an insignia worn by officers, that he argued would make clear that they’re law enforcement. In the Maine and Texas cases, Homan said he didn’t know whether those lights were used. 

“I’m saying our vehicles are equipped with emergency lights,” Homan said. “If they didn’t activate the lights, then there’s an issue there.”

La batalla global por los derechos de ciudadanía italiana recibe un posible respiro

Italia causó gran conmoción en su diáspora global en marzo de 2025 al promulgar una nueva ley que imponía un estricto límite de dos generaciones para la ciudadanía por descendencia.De la noche a la mañana, millones de descendientes en todo el mundo —muchos de los cuales ya habían gastado miles de dólares en investigación genealógica y honorarios legales— vieron bloqueado su camino hacia un pasaporte europeo.Pero tras un aparente giro judicial esta semana, la crucial batalla para revocar la controvertida legislación se reanudó oficialmente.Inicialmente, el Tribunal Constitucional de Italia confirmó la estricta ley, conocida como L74/2025 y dejó devastados a los solicitantes al desestimar cientos de demandas que impugnaban la prohibición.Sin embargo, tras volver a examinar la legislación, el tribunal dio un giro radical.Ahora suspendió las últimas impugnaciones a la ley presentadas por jueces regionales italianos y remitió oficialmente el caso al Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea para determinar si Italia infringió las normas jurídicas europeas.“Es un giro de 180 grados”, declaró a CNN Marco Mellone, uno de los cuatro abogados que impugnaron la ley en la última audiencia de junio. “Es una confesión de que cometieron un error en marzo”.“No me lo esperaba porque solicitamos una remisión en la audiencia anterior pero el tribunal la denegó”, dijo Corrado Caruso, profesor de Derecho en la Universidad de Bolonia, quien también alegó ante el tribunal. “Así que es un paso positivo porque significa que el tribunal tiene algunas dudas. Creo que hubo un cambio de opinión”.La abogada Monica Restanio, quien también defendió el caso, lo calificó como “la mejor noticia que podíamos recibir, y mucho mejor de lo que esperaba… volvieron a poner todo en juego”.Aunque el tribunal italiano afirma que todavía cree que la ley cumple las normas de la UE, Mellone interpreta esta medida como una admisión discreta de un error pasado. Fallos europeos anteriores han establecido firmemente que la ciudadanía no puede ser retirada sin previo aviso, de manera desproporcionada o de golpe.“Tuvieron la oportunidad de remitir el caso hace tres meses y no lo hicieron; es evidente que cambiaron de opinión”, afirmó. “Han sido valientes. La ley contradecía por completo 30 años de jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea”.Restanio señaló que la jurisprudencia europea suele favorecer a los descendientes, “establece la necesidad de una notificación adecuada y una evaluación individual” antes de restringir la ciudadanía por descendencia. En cambio, Italia aprobó la Ley 74/2025 sin previo aviso, lo que dejó fuera a miles de personas que estaban a mitad del proceso de solicitud.Desde entonces, cientos de descendientes de italianos han perdido sus batallas legales impugnando la nueva ley, que prohíbe a los ciudadanos con doble nacionalidad en el extranjero transmitir su nacionalidad y aplica el límite de dos generaciones.La impugnación depende de si los demandantes nacieron italianos con una ciudadanía no reconocida, tal como había dictaminado la jurisprudencia previa.Si el Tribunal de Justicia de la UE falla en contra de la ley, esta quedará completamente anulada y obligará al Gobierno italiano a redactar una nueva legislación que cumpla con las normas de la UE.Caruso no pudo explicar por completo el giro repentino del tribunal. “Tal vez el tribunal fue demasiado rápido al desestimar nuestra solicitud en marzo; tal vez reflexionaron un poco más a fondo”, dijo y añadió que sentencias recientes no relacionados han sido notablemente “favorables a la UE”.Este no es el único desafío que se está tramitando en el sistema judicial. En abril, el Tribunal Supremo italiano examinó la denominada “cuestión menor”, una medida de 2024 que restringe la ciudadanía por descendencia. Restanio dijo que espera la sentencia definitiva “con gran serenidad”.Mientras tanto, Mellone calificó la remisión del Tribunal Constitucional como un momento histórico: la primera vez que un tribunal italiano admite que la nueva ley podría tener algún fallo.“Esto es una buena señal”, dijo. “Estábamos prácticamente derrotados. Ahora retomamos la lucha”.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story