Skip to main content

France becomes the first EU country to ban social media for children

Paris (CNN) — French lawmakers voted Tuesday to ban social media use for children under the age of 15, making it the first country in the European Union to introduce such an age limit.

Australia made history late last year when it implemented the first ban on social media for under-16s. The British government announced similar restrictions last month, expected to come into effect next year. Spain, Greece and Denmark are also planning to impose minimum age limits for social media use.

French lawmakers overwhelmingly voted in favor of the bill, which was strongly backed by France’s President Emmanuel Macron. He will now sign it into law.

“Social media will be banned for children under 15 starting this school year,” he posted on X after the vote as he thanked lawmakers for passing the bill.

“The brains of our children and our teenagers are not for sale,” he had said in a video message in January. “The emotions of our children and our teenagers are not for sale or to be manipulated, neither by American platforms nor by Chinese algorithms.”

Macron had ordered the French government to expedite the bill’s passage through parliament, with the aim of having legislation in place for the beginning of the new next school year in September.

It is not yet clear how the social media sites will verify users’ ages. Australia requires companies to “take reasonable steps” to prevent underage children from opening or keeping accounts, and the French government has promised to implement age controls to back up the law.

Earlier versions of the legislation also included proposals for a ban on advertising promoting social media to children, including by influencers, and to require advertisements for social media platforms to carry the warning: “Dangerous products for children under 15.” However, these plans did not make it into the final bill.

The new law will be enforced by Arcom, France’s audiovisual and digital communications regulator. It is expected to apply to all the major platforms.

According to Arcom, children aged 12 to 17 in France spend an average of 1 hour and 21 minutes a day on TikTok. The regulator says the platform’s recommendation algorithm tends to promote the most “extreme” content, exposing teenagers to a continuous stream of anxiety-inducing or otherwise harmful videos.

Social media companies say they already take steps to protect children from some kinds of content.

‘Real change of atmosphere’

The proposal for a ban was welcomed by many French parents earlier this year.

“I think it’s great,” mother-of-six Geraldine Delacroix told CNN in March. “Now I’m waiting to see how it’s workable, but in any case, it’s better than nothing,” she added, noting that children could often get around existing parental controls. “Even if we block, they find ways to get around it,” she said.

In her work as a pediatrician, Delacroix has seen a growing distrust of smartphones and social media over the past decade among her patients’ families. “People are tense (about smartphones),” she said. “There’s been a real change of atmosphere.”

Her daughter Ariane said she saw little downside to the ban, but wished it had come in sooner, telling CNN it was “a bit too late for the young people of my generation who are 13 to 14.”

“We have a tendency to say, ‘OK, I’m just going to look at my phone for five or 10 minutes’ and then, as it’s super-addictive, we spend an hour, two hours on the phone,” she said.

Ariane, who is on all the major social networks, said that while they provided “fast, easy entertainment, without effort,” she saw almost no upside for children of her own age.

Her older sister, Gabrielle, who said she’d had access to Instagram and TikTok since before her 10th birthday – well before the age limit of 13 for most social networks – blamed Covid-19-era lockdowns for sowing bad habits of excessive smartphone use among her generation.

“Once you’re, like, used to it, you just keep on using it,” she said.

Gabrielle added that she had no doubt that children would find ways around the restrictions and suggested the platforms should instead do more to filter out dangerous content.

‘Not a toy’

For the countries looking into age restrictions, ensuring effective age verification is a major challenge.

“Bans alone won’t be enough,” French Education Minister Édouard Geffray told lawmakers in January. “We can’t just restrict, we have to educate and propose different ways of socializing.”

Katia Roux, of Amnesty International France, sounded a similar note on Tuesday. “The debate over banning social media for those under 15 is legitimate,” she told CNN. “However, this measure is not enough to make digital platforms safe. Only a shift in the business model of social media companies will truly protect all users. To begin with, the platforms’ addictive and manipulative features must be banned.”

Across OECD countries in 2022, at least half of 15-year-olds in most countries spent 30 hours or more per week on digital devices, including learning activities in or out of school.

Last week, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said warned that “social media is not a toy,” in a statement calling for “age-appropriate restrictions.”

“In Europe, whoever develops a product is responsible for its safety. Car manufacturers must make their vehicles safe. We do not expect children to design their own seatbelts. We do not expect parents to fit airbags at home,” she wrote. “This is not about whether children can access social media. It is about whether and when social media can access our children.”

In France, some opposition lawmakers opposed the bill at an earlier stage over concerns about free speech and access to informative online content. Some senators had proposed a blacklist of certain social media platforms.

Teenager Nelya Ouali, whose mother does not permit her to have her own smartphone, said the law could impact her access to educational videos.

“We won’t be able to get more information as a result, because we don’t watch much television anymore,” she said, as she and her friends favor influencers’ videos. “But it’s still important for communication. Social networks are still important; they allow us to talk with our friends,” she said. “They allow us to be entertained, to take our minds off things.”

This is not the first time France has restricted access to online material. A ban on access to online pornography for minors overcame legal challenges to finally come into effect in 2025. It requires users to provide proof of age.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

DOJ asking secretive court to remove Afghan woman allegedly tied to terror plot

The Justice Department is seeking to convince a federal judge to deport a Texas-based Afghan woman who prosecutors allege is an "alien terrorist," it revealed Wednesday, in the first-ever test case before a secretive court that has never convened since it was created three decades ago.Nazira Haji Zada, 47, of Fort Worth, Texas, will appear Thursday morning in the Alien Terrorist Removal Court in Washington, D.C., where a judge will hear evidence from the Justice Department over whether she should be removed from the United States, according to the Justice Department and court filings. The government is accusing her of links to a foiled Islamic State-inspired terrorist plot to carry out a mass shooting on Election Day in 2024."The allegations in this case show the matriarch of an ISIS-sympathizing family aiding in a plot to launch a mass casualty attack on American voters on Election Day," Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement.Zada has never been publicly charged by the government with any crimes of terrorism, and has no known criminal history, according to the government.Last year, her son Abdullah Haji Zada and son-in-law Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi each pleaded guilty in a federal court in Oklahoma to purchasing two AK-47 style rifles and 500 rounds of ammunition from an undercover FBI agent as part of an alleged plot targeting the 2024 election in support of the Islamic State.At the time of his arrest in 2024, Zada's son was only 17. He was charged as an adult and pleaded guilty to gun crimes when he was 18. Tawhedi pleaded guilty to terrorism and gun offenses.In an unclassified FBI summary filed in the Alien Terrorist Removal Court, the government alleged that Zada "supported" her son and son-in-law's conspiracy. The FBI also alleged she "pledged loyalty to ISIS" and "worked to indoctrinate her children with ISIS ideology," citing information from a "reliable source.""Nazira worked with Tawhedi to radicalize the family and to conceal their pro-ISIS teaching and planned family relocation to ISIS-controlled territory from her unsuspecting husband," the FBI wrote.The Alien Terrorist Removal Court was created by Congress in 1996 and signed into law by President Bill Clinton. It was set up to deport noncitizens who could not be removed by the traditional legal process because the information about their cases was classified and could not be made public for national security reasons.The targets of noncitizen terrorist removal proceedings — including legal permanent residents — are not permitted to review the classified evidence against them, and unlike in criminal proceedings, they are barred from legally challenging how the evidence was collected by the government.Applications for removal must be certified by the attorney general and are reviewed by the court ex parte and in camera — meaning the target of the deportation proceeding is not a party to the hearing.If the application is accepted, it moves to the removal stage and a public hearing is conducted. As part of that, the Justice Department also releases an unclassified summary of the case, as it did in a newly created website for the court that was only launched on July 17.Until July 15, when the Justice Department first filed its removal application against Zada, the Alien Terrorist Removal Court had been a "zombie" court that existed only on paper. It had never been used before, and prior efforts by the Justice Department earlier on after its creation to find a test case failed.The court is structured similarly to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, another secret court that reviews sensitive requests for surveillance warrants. All five of its judges also sit on the FISC and are appointed by the chief justice of the Supreme Court.U.S. District Judge Joan Ericksen, who sits on the federal bench in Minnesota, is the chief judge of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court, and will preside over Zada's public removal hearing at the federal courthouse in Washington, D.C., at 11 a.m. ET Thursday.Zada has a green card, according to publicly unsealed court records. Under the rules of the court, lawful permanent residents are afforded the right to government-appointed counsel  — though that attorney may not share classified evidence with the defendant.According to court filings, her spouse was employed at the Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan from 2009 to 2016, and was granted a green card under a program for Afghans who assisted U.S. forces during the war in Afghanistan.CBS News could not immediately determine who may represent Zada at her removal hearing on Thursday. CBS News has reached out to the defense attorney who represented her son in his criminal case in the Western District of Oklahoma, where the original case was brought.Tawhedi and Abdullah Haji Zada were arrested on Oct. 7, 2024, after purchasing the firearms and ammunition from the undercover agent.Abdullah Haji Zada, who was also a green card-holder like his mother, was sentenced to 15 years in prison. In his plea deal, he consented to being deported to Afghanistan after serving his sentence and acknowledged his lawful permanent resident status would be revoked.Tawhedi, 28, pleaded guilty on June 13, 2025, to conspiring and attempting to provide material support and resources to the Islamic State.Both were accused of conspiring to relocate their female and juvenile male family members, including Nazira Zada, to Islamic State-controlled territory in Afghanistan while their alleged Election Day plot was carried out. 
Read Next Story